Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
- Filing activity has already peaked. 2022 recorded the most filings in the set at 15, and counts have fallen off since — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
- H02M dominates the classification mix. Every record in this dataset sits under power-conversion IPC H02M, with EV propulsion (B60L) and grid-tied power supply (H02J) as the only sizeable adjacent branches.
- No single assignee is pulling ahead right now. Every organisation tracked for recent-year momentum — from Siemens to Fraunhofer to university and startup filers — shows zero filings in the latest year.
Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 39 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of bidirectional DC-DC power conversion and wide-bandgap switching devices — silicon carbide MOSFETs and gallium nitride switches used in place of silicon in converters that move power in both directions. The search combines converter-architecture terms in the title/abstract with wide-bandgap device terms in the claims, restricted to the core power-conversion and semiconductor-device IPC classes (H02M3/335, H01L29/16, H01L29/20). That combination is deliberately narrow: it captures converters where the wide-bandgap device is claimed as part of the invention, not simply mentioned as a possible component choice.
The dataset spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with 39 published records forming 39 distinct patent families — meaning there is essentially no continuation or multi-jurisdiction duplication to correct for here. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 39 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.
Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined
From a single filing recorded in 2017, activity built steadily to a peak of 15 in 2022 — the midpoint year of the trend — before falling back. A flat-to-declining trend after a mid-period peak usually signals that the core architecture claims have already been staked out and later entrants are filing narrower, defensive variations rather than new ground.
H02M is the whole story; B60L and H02J are the spillover
All 39 records classify under H02M (power conversion), confirming the search is on-target. Seven records also touch H02J (power supply and grid systems) and five touch B60L (electric vehicle propulsion), pointing to vehicle-charging and grid-storage interfaces as the main application contexts pulling this technology outward. H03K and H05K appear only incidentally.
Shares are the percentage of the 39 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bidirectional dc-dc converter wide-bandgap device and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records and a representative filing
US20190222133A1 — Apparatus having a DC-DC converter
Filed by Fraunhofer, this application claims a DC-DC converter whose commutation resonant circuit is built partly from the converter's own parasitic characteristics, with a driving unit that switches the semiconductor device faster than one resonant-frequency cycle and times the switching instant against the current supplied by the source.Published 2019-07-18. Full abstract available in the source record.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20130121033A1 | DC-DC converter circuit using LLC circuit in the region of voltage gain above unity | 50 |
| 2 | US9059636B2 | DC-DC converter circuit using LLC circuit in the region of voltage gain above unity | 13 |
| 3 | CN107070287A | 电能路由器和电能路由器子模块 | 11 |
| 4 | US20190222133A1 | Apparatus having a DC-DC converter | 7 |
| 5 | WO2022157350A1 | Bi-directional power converter | 4 |
| 6 | US20240097574A1 | Bi-directional power converter | 3 |
| 7 | CN112968612A | 一种模块化高变比隔离型直流-直流变换器 | 3 |
| 8 | EP3790155A1 | On-board charging and discharging system | 3 |
| 9 | US20240120848A1 | Bi-directional power converter | 2 |
| 10 | US20240313661A1 | Bi-directional power converter | 2 |
Citation counts accumulate over time within this searched corpus, so older LLC-converter filings from the early 2010s lead the table by volume of citations rather than by current relevance — treat this as a map of historical influence, not of what matters today.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the trend, classification and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.
The rush has already happened
A single 2022 peak followed by decline, on a base of only 39 families total, means this is a small, largely-settled claim space rather than an emerging one. New entrants should expect to design around existing architecture claims rather than stake out fresh ground.
Everything sits in one power-conversion class
Total concentration in H02M, with only partial spillover into H02J and B60L, shows the inventive activity is happening in the converter topology itself, not in adjacent system-level integration. That leaves EV-propulsion and grid-interface framing comparatively open.
Influence is concentrated in older LLC-topology filings
The two most-cited records both describe an LLC circuit operated in the voltage-gain-above-unity region, filed years before the wide-bandgap device terms in this search became common. That is a citation-recency effect, not evidence those architectures are still the best filing target.
No one is currently pulling ahead
Every organisation tracked for recent-year momentum, from established players to university and startup filers, shows zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the small co-assignee network of only four pairs, this reads as a fragmented field without a clear technology leader at present.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bidirectional dc-dc converter wide-bandgap device, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the gaps sit
With 39 families spread across corporate, academic and individual-inventor filers and no assignee showing recent-year momentum, this field has no dominant incumbent to route around — but that also means claim coverage is thin in places rather than deep.
Research institutes hold some of the most-cited ground
Fraunhofer's converter-switching filing is among the most-cited records here, and Siemens also appears in the assignee set, but neither shows any filings in the latest tracked year. Their claims are worth checking before drafting around resonant-switching timing.
Universities are active but not accelerating
University assignees sit alongside corporate filers in this dataset, reflecting continued academic interest in converter topology, but the same zero-momentum pattern applies to them as to industry filers.
Collaboration is sparse and mostly individual-led
Only four co-assignee pairs exist in the whole corpus, several of them pairing named individual inventors (Zubieta, Lehn, Frost) rather than corporate labs. That is a low-density network — there is no dominant joint-filing cluster to negotiate around.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Siemens AG | 0 | — |
| The Board of Governors of Colorado State University | 0 | — |
| Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | 0 | — |
| ZUNIK ENERGIES PTE LTD | 0 | — |
| ZUBIETA LUIS | 0 | — |
| LEHN PETER WALDEMAR | 0 | — |
| KONERU LAKSHMAIAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION | 0 | — |
| KADAM ABHIJIT | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a settled but fragmented field. The next steps depend on whether you are clearing a design or scouting for a filing gap.
Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited claims
Before committing to a resonant-switching or LLC-based topology, review the claim scope of the highest-cited records in this set — their age does not remove their enforceability.
Explore claims in EurekaMap the under-claimed branches to your architecture
V2G control, grid-tied GaN integration and multi-port topologies show filing activity but no concentrated ownership — worth a deeper claim-chart pass if your design touches them.
Run a white-space search in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
In this landscape, a wide-bandgap device means a silicon carbide (SiC) MOSFET or gallium nitride (GaN) switch claimed as part of the converter's switching stage, rather than merely mentioned as an implementation option. The search specifically requires these device terms to appear in the claims or description alongside converter-architecture language, which filters out generic power-electronics filings that happen to reference SiC or GaN in passing. This distinction matters because a patent that only lists wide-bandgap devices as an alternative to silicon is much weaker prior art than one that claims specific switching behaviour enabled by the device's properties.
The dataset shows filings building from a single record in 2017 to a peak of 15 in 2022, then falling off. This pattern typically means the core architectural claims — converter topology, basic switching schemes, resonant-circuit design — were staked out early, and later filers are left patenting narrower variations or specific applications. It does not necessarily mean interest in the technology is declining; it more often means the field's headline claim space is already occupied. Bear in mind that publication lag of roughly 18 months means the last one to two years in any such trend will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.
No single assignee shows a clear, sustained lead in this dataset. Organisations including Siemens, Fraunhofer, a Colorado university and several startup and individual-inventor filers all appear in the assignee set, but every one of them recorded zero filings in the latest tracked year. This is a fragmented ownership picture rather than a concentrated one, and the most-cited individual patents belong to older LLC-converter filings rather than to any currently active leader.
Start with the highest-cited records in the corpus, since citation count within a searched patent corpus is a reasonable proxy for how often examiners and applicants have already treated a filing as foundational. The two leading records here both describe an LLC circuit operated in the voltage-gain-above-unity region, and the Fraunhofer filing on commutation resonant-circuit switching timing is also heavily referenced. Because citation counts favour older filings, also run a fresh claim search on recent years rather than relying on the citation ranking alone.
The classification data shows every record concentrated in core power-conversion IPC class H02M, with only partial spillover into grid-interface (H02J) and EV-propulsion (B60L) classes. That leaves system-level integration — such as vehicle-to-grid control logic, GaN switch integration specifically within grid-tied power supplies, and multi-port bidirectional topologies — comparatively under-claimed relative to the converter topology itself. These branches show some filing activity but no concentrated ownership in this dataset, which is generally a better signal for a first-mover filing than a completely empty branch would be.
Research Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole bidirectional dc-dc converter wide-bandgap device corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.