Book a demo

Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026

Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Patents: Leaders & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/bidirectional-dc-dc-converter-wide-bandgap-device-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Power Electronics · Patent Landscape
Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device Patents
  • Filing activity has already peaked. 2022 recorded the most filings in the set at 15, and counts have fallen off since — this is a maturing claim space, not a growing one.
  • H02M dominates the classification mix. Every record in this dataset sits under power-conversion IPC H02M, with EV propulsion (B60L) and grid-tied power supply (H02J) as the only sizeable adjacent branches.
  • No single assignee is pulling ahead right now. Every organisation tracked for recent-year momentum — from Siemens to Fraunhofer to university and startup filers — shows zero filings in the latest year.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
39
Published Records
62%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+25%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (4 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 39 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families at the intersection of bidirectional DC-DC power conversion and wide-bandgap switching devices — silicon carbide MOSFETs and gallium nitride switches used in place of silicon in converters that move power in both directions. The search combines converter-architecture terms in the title/abstract with wide-bandgap device terms in the claims, restricted to the core power-conversion and semiconductor-device IPC classes (H02M3/335, H01L29/16, H01L29/20). That combination is deliberately narrow: it captures converters where the wide-bandgap device is claimed as part of the invention, not simply mentioned as a possible component choice.

The dataset spans filings from 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, with 39 published records forming 39 distinct patent families — meaning there is essentially no continuation or multi-jurisdiction duplication to correct for here. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent one or two years in any trend chart will understate real filing activity.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1SIEMENS AG16
  2. 2KONERU LAKSHMAIAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION2
  3. 3FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG EV2
  4. 4ZUBIETA LUIS2
  5. 5LEHN PETER WALDEMAR2
  6. 6FROST DAMIEN2
  7. 7THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO2
  8. 8ZUNIK ENERGIES PTE LTD2
  9. 9NORTHEASTERN UNIV CHINA1
  10. 10DELTA ELECTRONICS (SHANGHAI) CO LTD1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 39 families: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the claims actually sit in.

Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined

From a single filing recorded in 2017, activity built steadily to a peak of 15 in 2022 — the midpoint year of the trend — before falling back. A flat-to-declining trend after a mid-period peak usually signals that the core architecture claims have already been staked out and later entrants are filing narrower, defensive variations rather than new ground.

Filings rose to a 2022 peak, then declined048111512017201820192020202115202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H02M is the whole story; B60L and H02J are the spillover

All 39 records classify under H02M (power conversion), confirming the search is on-target. Seven records also touch H02J (power supply and grid systems) and five touch B60L (electric vehicle propulsion), pointing to vehicle-charging and grid-storage interfaces as the main application contexts pulling this technology outward. H03K and H05K appear only incidentally.

H02M is the whole story; B60L and H02J are the spilloverH02M · Power conversion (AC/DC etc.)39100.0%H02J · Power supply & grid systems717.9%B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion512.8%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…25.1%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies12.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 39 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bidirectional dc-dc converter wide-bandgap device and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative filing
US20190222133A12019-07-18

US20190222133A1 — Apparatus having a DC-DC converter

FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNG DER ANGEWANDTEN FORSCHUNG E.V.

Filed by Fraunhofer, this application claims a DC-DC converter whose commutation resonant circuit is built partly from the converter's own parasitic characteristics, with a driving unit that switches the semiconductor device faster than one resonant-frequency cycle and times the switching instant against the current supplied by the source.Published 2019-07-18. Full abstract available in the source record.

US20190222133A1 — patent drawing 1US20190222133A1 — patent drawing 2
View full patent record
Highest-cited patents in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20130121033A1DC-DC converter circuit using LLC circuit in the region of voltage gain above unity50
2US9059636B2DC-DC converter circuit using LLC circuit in the region of voltage gain above unity13
3CN107070287A电能路由器和电能路由器子模块11
4US20190222133A1Apparatus having a DC-DC converter7
5WO2022157350A1Bi-directional power converter4
6US20240097574A1Bi-directional power converter3
7CN112968612A一种模块化高变比隔离型直流-直流变换器3
8EP3790155A1On-board charging and discharging system3
9US20240120848A1Bi-directional power converter2
10US20240313661A1Bi-directional power converter2

Citation counts accumulate over time within this searched corpus, so older LLC-converter filings from the early 2010s lead the table by volume of citations rather than by current relevance — treat this as a map of historical influence, not of what matters today.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, classification and citation data that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Filing momentum
15 in 2022, declining since
peak year filings

The rush has already happened

A single 2022 peak followed by decline, on a base of only 39 families total, means this is a small, largely-settled claim space rather than an emerging one. New entrants should expect to design around existing architecture claims rather than stake out fresh ground.

Based on 2017–2026 filing counts
Classification concentration
39 of 39 records in H02M
core IPC coverage

Everything sits in one power-conversion class

Total concentration in H02M, with only partial spillover into H02J and B60L, shows the inventive activity is happening in the converter topology itself, not in adjacent system-level integration. That leaves EV-propulsion and grid-interface framing comparatively open.

IPC subclass distribution, this dataset
Citation pattern
50 citations on the top record
leading citation count

Influence is concentrated in older LLC-topology filings

The two most-cited records both describe an LLC circuit operated in the voltage-gain-above-unity region, filed years before the wide-bandgap device terms in this search became common. That is a citation-recency effect, not evidence those architectures are still the best filing target.

Most-cited records in the corpus
Assignee activity
0 latest-year filings across tracked assignees
recent-year momentum

No one is currently pulling ahead

Every organisation tracked for recent-year momentum, from established players to university and startup filers, shows zero filings in the latest year. Combined with the small co-assignee network of only four pairs, this reads as a fragmented field without a clear technology leader at present.

Recent-year filings by assignee
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bidirectional dc-dc converter wide-bandgap device, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

With 39 families spread across corporate, academic and individual-inventor filers and no assignee showing recent-year momentum, this field has no dominant incumbent to route around — but that also means claim coverage is thin in places rather than deep.

Corporate R&D
Fraunhofer, Siemens
represented assignees

Research institutes hold some of the most-cited ground

Fraunhofer's converter-switching filing is among the most-cited records here, and Siemens also appears in the assignee set, but neither shows any filings in the latest tracked year. Their claims are worth checking before drafting around resonant-switching timing.

Assignee and citation data
Academic filers
The Board of Governors of Colorado State University
university assignee

Universities are active but not accelerating

University assignees sit alongside corporate filers in this dataset, reflecting continued academic interest in converter topology, but the same zero-momentum pattern applies to them as to industry filers.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Co-filing networks
4 co-assignee pairs
collaboration density

Collaboration is sparse and mostly individual-led

Only four co-assignee pairs exist in the whole corpus, several of them pairing named individual inventors (Zubieta, Lehn, Frost) rather than corporate labs. That is a low-density network — there is no dominant joint-filing cluster to negotiate around.

Co-assignee pair analysis
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
Branches with filing activity but no concentrated ownership in this dataset:
Bidirectional converter control for V2G interfacesSiC-based commutation resonant-circuit timingGaN switch integration in grid-tied power supply (H02J)Multi-port bidirectional converter topologies
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Siemens AG0
The Board of Governors of Colorado State University0
Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.0
ZUNIK ENERGIES PTE LTD0
ZUBIETA LUIS0
LEHN PETER WALDEMAR0
KONERU LAKSHMAIAH EDUCATION FOUNDATION0
KADAM ABHIJIT0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a settled but fragmented field. The next steps depend on whether you are clearing a design or scouting for a filing gap.

Check freedom-to-operate against the most-cited claims

Before committing to a resonant-switching or LLC-based topology, review the claim scope of the highest-cited records in this set — their age does not remove their enforceability.

Explore claims in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches to your architecture

V2G control, grid-tied GaN integration and multi-port topologies show filing activity but no concentrated ownership — worth a deeper claim-chart pass if your design touches them.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Bidirectional DC-DC Converter Wide-Bandgap Device in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole bidirectional dc-dc converter wide-bandgap device corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.