Book a demo

Bio-based Chemicals Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Bio-based Chemicals Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/bio-based-chemicals-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Bio-based Chemicals
Bio-based Chemicals Patents: Mapping Who Files, What They Claim, and Where Room Remains
  • Concentrated at the top. The top 5 assignees hold 50.8% of all 563 records in scope, and the top 10 hold 65.7% — a small group has occupied most of the core claim space.
  • Filing has cooled from its peak. Activity peaked in 2021 at 55 records and fell to 26 by 2024, a 53% drop over that span — though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publications lag filing.
  • Fermentation routes dominate the claims. C12P (fermentation & enzymatic synthesis) and C12N (microorganisms & genetic engineering) each cover roughly a third of all records, far ahead of downstream refining and lubricant classes.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
563
Published Records
51%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-53%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (55 records) with 2024 (26) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 563 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset draws on 563 published records matching bio-based chemicals process language — reaction medium, product selectivity, synthesis route — combined with renewable or biomass-derived chemistry terms. The scope runs from 2015 through the 2026-08-31 data cut-off, capturing both upstream fermentation and genetic-engineering claims and downstream refining, fuel and lubricant applications built on the same feedstocks.

Coverage spans receiving offices in the United States, WIPO's PCT system, Europe, Canada, India and Australia, giving a reasonably global view of where applicants are seeking protection rather than just where the underlying research originates.

Records by filing year and IPC subclass
  1. 1DUKE UNIV96
  2. 2GENOMATICA INC58
  3. 3NESTE OYJ57
  4. 4SWEDISH BIOFUELS AB40
  5. 5GEVO INC35
  6. 6RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA22
  7. 7SOLARCLEAN FUELS LLC17
  8. 8BASF SE17
  9. 9THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE UNIV OF TORONTO14
  10. 10AVELLO BIOENERGY14
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 563 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.

Filing activity: rise, peak, and pullback

Annual filings climbed from 5 in 2017 to a peak of 55 in 2021, then declined to 26 by 2024 — a 53% fall over that three-year window. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts shown here are still incomplete and should not be read as a continuing decline.

Filing activity: rise, peak, and pullback01530456052017201820192020552021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Where the claims sit

Fermentation and enzymatic synthesis (C12P) and microorganism/genetic-engineering claims (C12N) each appear in roughly a third of all 563 records, making biological routes the dominant claim territory. Acyclic and carbocyclic compound chemistry (C07C) and hydrocarbon refining (C10G) follow at meaningfully lower shares, with lubricants (C10M) and fatty oil/wax production (C11B) the thinnest-claimed categories in this set.

Where the claims sitC12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…20636.6%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…18633.0%C07C · Acyclic & carbocyclic compounds13524.0%C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining10117.9%C10L · Fuels & firelighters5910.5%B01J · Chemical/physical processes & …468.2%C10M · Lubricants285.0%C11B · Fatty oils & waxes production244.3%Other36965.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 563 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about bio-based chemicals patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in this landscape

Representative Filing
US20190308922A12019-10-10

Upgrading fusel oil mixtures over heterogeneous catalysts to higher value renewable chemicals

GEVO, INC.

This present disclosure relates to catalytic processes for upgrading crude and/or refined fusel oil mixtures to higher value renewable chemicals, via mixed metal oxide or zeolite catalysts. Disclosed herein are processes passing a vaporized stream of crude and/or refined fusel oils over various mixed metal oxide catalysts, metal doped zeolites, or non-metal doped zeolites and/or metal oxides providing options to valorize fusel oil mixtures to higher value products. Renewable chemicals formed, via these upgrading catalyst platforms, are comprised of, but not limited to, methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), di-isobutyl ketone (DIBK), isoamylene, and isoprene.Filed by Gevo, Inc. — published 2019-10-10 as US20190308922A1.

View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080193989A1Energy Efficient Methods to Produce Products370
2WO2009094485A1Methods and organisms for utilizing synthesis gas or other gaseous carbon sources and methanol182
3US20110258914A1Methods for integrated fast pyrolysis processing of biomass153
4WO2011085223A1Integrated methods of preparing renewable chemicals108
5US20090191593A1Methods and organisms for utilizing synthesis gas or other gaseous carbon sources and methanol102
6US20110201089A1Methods for increasing product yields100
7US20110172475A1Integrated methods of preparing renewable chemicals83
8US8425633B2Methods for integrated fast pyrolysis processing of biomass80
9US20120329113A1Microorganisms for Producing 1,3-Butanediol and Methods Related Thereto77
10US20110288352A1Renewable jet fuel blendstock from isobutanol76

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a signal of historical impact rather than current commercial weight.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Reading the concentration, the technology mix and the citation pattern together points to where claim space is occupied and where it is thinner.

Concentration
50.8%
of 563 records held by top 5

A small group holds half the field

Five assignees account for 50.8% of all 563 records, and the top 10 push that to 65.7%. That leaves a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants competing for the remaining share, which suggests new entrants should expect to work around, not through, the leaders' core claims.

Assignee ranking, 100 companies
Momentum
-53%
2021 to 2024 filing change

Peak filing has passed, for now

Filings rose steadily to a 2021 peak of 55, then fell to 26 by 2024. Because publication lags filing by about 18 months, the most recent years in the trend are undercounted and should not be read as the technology losing relevance.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology mix
36.6%
of records in C12P

Biological routes lead the claim map

Fermentation and enzymatic synthesis (C12P, 36.6% of records) and microorganism engineering (C12N, 33.0%) outweigh conventional refining chemistry, indicating that biological conversion routes are where most active claiming is happening rather than downstream separation or catalysis steps.

IPC composition, 8 subclasses shown
Collaboration
12
co-filings, strongest pairs

Co-assignee links stay narrow

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, with the strongest pairings each showing 12 shared filings — a sign that most work here is filed by single organisations rather than joint ventures or research consortia.

Co-assignee pairs, strongest linked at 12
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to bio-based chemicals patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Named-inventor collaboration
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
BURGARD ANTHONY PSUN JUN12
BURGARD ANTHONY PPHARKYA PRITI12
BURGARD ANTHONY POSTERHOUT ROBIN E12
Genomatica, Inc.SUN JUN8
Genomatica, Inc.PHARKYA PRITI8
Genomatica, Inc.OSTERHOUT ROBIN E8
Genomatica, Inc.BURGARD ANTHONY P8
BURGARD ANTHONY PBURK MARK J6

The densest inventor pairings in this dataset cluster around a small number of individuals credited across the leading assignee's fermentation and metabolic-engineering filings.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is thinning

The ranked leaders hold the bulk of the volume, but recent-year momentum shows even top filers slowing, which is where openings tend to appear.

Leader
96
records, top-ranked assignee

One filer sits well ahead of the field

The top-ranked assignee in this dataset holds 96 records, well clear of fifth place at 35 and tenth place at 14 — a steep drop-off that marks this as a leader-and-long-tail field rather than an evenly split one.

Assignee ranking, leader vs. 5th and 10th
Momentum
-75% YoY
leading recent-year change

Even active filers are pulling back

Several of the most established assignees in this dataset show flat or declining recent-year filing, including drops of -75% and -100% year over year among named leaders — consistent with the broader post-2021 pullback in the trend data.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Co-filing
3 pairs at 12
strongest co-assignee links

Collaboration is concentrated, not broad

The strongest co-assignee relationships in this dataset each reach 12 shared filings, all tied to inventors within the same leading organisation rather than spread across separate companies, pointing to internally coordinated R&D rather than cross-company joint filing.

10 co-assignee pairs identified
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches where filing density is lower relative to the core fermentation and refining classes, based on the IPC composition breakdown.
Lubricant-grade bio-based esters (C10M)Fatty oil and wax valorisation (C11B)Catalytic upgrading of fusel oil streamsMixed-feedstock synthesis gas utilisationHeterogeneous catalyst selectivity control
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
BASF SE1-75%
Duke University0
Neste Oyj0-100%
Genomatica, Inc.0
Swedish Biofuels AB0
Gevo, Inc.0
The Regents of the University of California0-100%
SolarClean Fuels LLC0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field with occupied core claims and a thinner periphery. The next steps depend on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate or looking for filing openings.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leaders

With 65.7% of records held by the top 10 assignees, a new filing in fermentation or genetic-engineering routes should be checked against the leading filers' claim scope before drafting.

Explore assignee claims in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed branches

Lubricant-grade esters, fatty oil valorisation and fusel-oil upgrading carry lower record counts than the core fermentation classes, which may leave room for narrower, defensible claims.

Run a white-space search in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on bio-based chemicals patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Bio-based Chemicals Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole bio-based chemicals patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.