Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (451 records) with 2024 (243) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 7,397 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks 7,397 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine lyophilization or freeze-drying language with cake-quality signals — collapse, shrinkage, reconstitution time, residual moisture, potency and visual inspection — against IPC classes covering drying equipment, pharmaceutical preparations and microorganism handling. It is a formulation-and-process view of a single freeze-dried vial's physical and biological integrity, not a general biologics-manufacturing search.
Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in any trend line are still filling in and should not be read as a real slowdown. The dataset instead lets a reader separate two different things assignees compete on: broad formulation coverage under A61K, and the much narrower set of records that actually claim the drying process or equipment under F26B.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 7,397 records: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filings ran at 431 in 2017 and reached a peak of 498 in 2019. The 2021-to-2024 window, the most recent span complete enough to compare, shows a -46% move from 451 to 243 records — a real pullback, not a publication-lag artefact, though 2025-2026 figures will still revise upward.
A61K (medicinal preparations) touches 88.5% of the 7,397 records, far ahead of A61P (33.7%) and C07K peptide/protein claims (18.4%). F26B, the drying-equipment and process class, appears on only 14.5% of records — a signal that most competitive activity is fought over formulation stabilisers and excipients rather than the freeze-dryer cycle itself.
Shares are the percentage of the 7,397 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about biologic lyophilization cake quality and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMethods and compositions are provided for lyophilization of bacteria or Listeria strains, such as Listeria monocytogenes. Provided are methods for producing a lyophilized composition comprising a bacteria or Listeria strain, formulations for lyophilization comprising a bacteria or Listeria strain, lyophilized bacteria or Listeria strains, and methods of preparing frozen bacteria or Listeria strains for lyophilization.Filed by Advaxis, Inc., published 2023-09-29.
View full record| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5336616A | Method for processing and preserving collagen-based tissues for transplantation | 978 |
| 2 | US6933326B1 | Particulate acellular tissue matrix | 356 |
| 3 | US20040049150A1 | Vaccines | 343 |
| 4 | US20030113316A1 | Stable lyophilized pharmaceutical formulation of IgG antibodies | 309 |
| 5 | US20030035843A1 | Method for processing and preserving collagen-based tissues for transplantation | 270 |
| 6 | US6284282B1 | Method of spray freeze drying proteins for pharmaceutical administration | 251 |
| 7 | US5364756A | Method of cryopreserving a suspension of biological material | 251 |
| 8 | WO2003009817A2 | Stable lyophilized pharmaceutical formulation of igg antibodies | 239 |
| 9 | US20040191243A1 | System and method for stabilizing antibodies with histidine | 221 |
| 10 | US5955448A | Method for stabilization of biological substances during drying and subsequent storage and compositions there… | 214 |
Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns worth acting on before drafting new claims in this space.
The leader holds 156 records and fifth place holds 123 — a real gap, but nowhere near dominant given 7,397 records in scope. The top 10 combined reach only 16.5% of all records, meaning the bulk of this landscape sits with assignees below the ranked leaders.
The move from 451 records in 2021 to 243 in 2024 is large enough to be a real pullback rather than noise, even accounting for the fact that 2025-2026 counts will still revise upward as publications catch up.
Most protection in this landscape sits on the biologic's formulation chemistry rather than on the freeze-dryer cycle or equipment. Drying-specific claims under F26B touch under a sixth of records, leaving process-engineering routes comparatively less staked out.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to biologic lyophilization cake quality, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year momentum figures show several established filers pulling back sharply, which is consistent with the broader 2021-to-2024 decline in the full dataset.
Regeneron and Genentech both show a -100% year-over-year move to zero filings in the latest year, and Shire Human Genetic Therapies and Merck Sharp & Dohme show none either. Amgen and Pfizer each show only a single filing in the latest year.
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in this dataset, and the strongest pair shares 50 records — evidence of a small number of deliberate joint-filing relationships rather than a broadly collaborative field.
With the ranked ten holding only 16.5% of all 7,397 records, the majority of activity sits outside the named leaders — smaller biologics developers, CDMOs and academic-affiliated filers each contributing a handful of records apiece.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Amgen Inc. | 1 | -75% |
| Pfizer Inc. | 1 | — |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | 0 | — |
| Genentech, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG | 0 | — |
| Baxter International Inc. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate or new claim drafting.
With only 14.5% of records touching drying-process claims, a process-engineering approach to cake quality may face a thinner prior-art field than a formulation approach would.
Explore drying-process claims in Eureka →The 10 identified co-assignee pairs show where joint development and licensing arrangements already exist in this space, useful context before proposing a new one.
Review assignee relationships in Eureka →Because 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete, confirming whether the -46% three-year decline persists requires revisiting the trend once later years finish publishing.
Set a filing-trend alert in Eureka →The leading assignee in this dataset holds 156 of the 7,397 records in scope, with the fifth-ranked assignee at 123 and the tenth at 85. Together the top 5 hold 9.7% of all records and the top 10 hold 16.5%, which means no single company dominates the field the way a leader might in a narrower niche. The remaining records are spread across a long tail of smaller filers, including academic and CDMO-affiliated entities not in the ranked leaders.
Filings peaked at 498 records in 2019 and have declined since, with the most recent complete comparison showing a -46% drop from 451 records in 2021 to 243 in 2024. The 2025 and 2026 figures in the raw trend look lower still, but that is expected: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so those final years will revise upward as more applications publish. The 2021-to-2024 window is the most reliable recent signal, and it does point to a genuine cooling.
Formulation claims, largely filed under A61K, cover the biologic's stabilizers, excipients and buffer chemistry and touch 88.5% of the 7,397 records in this landscape. Drying-process and equipment claims, filed under F26B, cover the freeze-dryer cycle itself — shelf temperature ramps, primary and secondary drying parameters, chamber pressure control — and appear on only 14.5% of records. That gap suggests process-engineering routes to cake-quality improvements carry comparatively less prior art than formulation routes.
NZ803099A, assigned to Advaxis, Inc. and published 2023-09-29, claims methods and compositions for lyophilizing bacteria or Listeria strains, including Listeria monocytogenes, along with formulations for that lyophilization and methods of preparing the frozen bacteria beforehand. It is a live-bacterial-strain lyophilization claim rather than a general antibody or protein formulation claim, so its blocking effect is narrow to that class of biologic. Anyone developing freeze-dried live bacterial therapeutics, rather than freeze-dried proteins or antibodies, is the audience most likely to need to check around it.
Relative to the dense formulation-claim crowd under A61K, sub-areas like non-invasive residual moisture sensing, reconstitution-time claims tied to specific excipient ratios, and container-closure interactions during freeze-drying show thinner coverage. F26B drying-process claims overall sit at just 14.5% of the 7,397 records, well below formulation's 88.5%, which is the clearest quantitative signal that process-side claim space remains comparatively open. Confirming true freedom-to-operate in any specific sub-area still requires a targeted search beyond this landscape's scope.
Go past this page: query the whole biologic lyophilization cake quality corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.