Biolubricants & Synthetic Base Oil Patents: Leaders, Trends 2026
- Filing peaked in 2019 at 25 families and has since flattened, with the 2022 midpoint at 12 — this is a mature claim space, not a growing one.
- China receives the largest share of filings (100 of 305), well ahead of Europe (59) and the United States (38), reshaping where freedom-to-operate checks matter most.
- None of the six most active named assignees filed in the latest tracked year, a momentum gap that suggests either a filing lag or a genuine pause among incumbents.
What this patent set covers
This landscape covers 305 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 that claim synthetic base oils, biolubricants or polyalphaolefin base oils with technical limitations on viscosity index, biodegradability, oxidative stability, ester base stock chemistry or seal compatibility. The IPC scope is anchored in C10M lubricant compositions and C10N property/use indexing, so the corpus is deliberately narrow: it captures formulation and performance claims rather than every document that merely mentions a lubricant.
Because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart are undercounts and should not be read as a real drop-off yet. The more reliable signal is the plateau running from 2019 onward, well before the most recent two years enter the picture.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 305-family set: filings by year, and how those families distribute across IPC subclasses beyond the core C10M/C10N scope.
A flat-to-declining trend since 2019
Filings rose to a peak of 25 in 2019, sat at 12 by the 2022 midpoint, and have not recovered since. Read the final one to two years as incomplete rather than as a genuine collapse, given publication lag.
Concentrated in lubricant chemistry, with small overflow into fatty acids and polymers
Nearly all families sit in C10M and C10N. The secondary subclasses are thin — C07C acyclic compounds (24), C10L fuels (8), C11C fatty acids (8), C08F addition polymers (6) — indicating that most inventive activity stays inside base-oil and additive formulation rather than spilling into adjacent feedstock or polymer chemistry.
Shares are the percentage of the 305 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Biolubricants and Synthetic Base Oils with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about biolubricants and synthetic base oils and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative and most-cited filings
US11492567B2 — Method for producing biolubricant from vegetable oil, and biolubricant
Discloses a three-step route to a biolubricant from vegetable oil: esterification of hydrolysed vegetable oil with a branched aliphatic alcohol, epoxidation of the resulting esters, and nucleophilic substitution of the epoxidated esters with a second branched aliphatic alcohol. The specific product example is built from a ricinoleic fatty acid backbone.Filed by Universidade Federal do Ceara (UFC), granted 2022-11-08.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EP0471071A1 | High temperature functional fluids | 306 |
| 2 | CN101982534A | 一种节能型长寿命汽油机油 | 47 |
| 3 | JP2000109876A | Hydraulic oil composition for buffer | 41 |
| 4 | US20040176260A1 | Lubricating oil composition for internal combustion engine | 40 |
| 5 | EP0471071B1 | High temperature functional fluids | 40 |
| 6 | US5366648A | Functional fluids useful at high temperatures | 40 |
| 7 | CN102776056A | 一种开式齿轮润滑油组合物及其制备方法 | 35 |
| 8 | CN106497654A | 一种含石墨烯润滑油及其制备方法 | 32 |
| 9 | WO2011106186A1 | Estolide derivatives useful as biolubricants | 30 |
| 10 | US6610637B2 | Synthetic diesel engine lubricants containing dispersant-viscosity modifier and functionalized phenol deterge… | 30 |
Citation counts reward older documents that have had more time to accumulate references; treat them as a measure of historical influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say
Reading the filing trend, geography and citation pattern together points to a field where the core chemistry is well-staked and the interesting questions have moved to jurisdiction and niche formulation.
Growth has stalled, not accelerated
The peak of 25 families in 2019 has not been matched since; by 2022 annual filings had halved to 12. Combined with publication lag, the honest read is a technology area where the main formulation routes are already claimed rather than one still being actively opened up.
China is the largest single filing destination
China accounts for roughly a third of all families, ahead of the EPO (59) and the United States (38). Freedom-to-operate work that only checks US and EU registers will miss the largest share of active rights in this space.
Incumbents show no filings in the latest year
None of the six most active named assignees — spanning US, Japanese and Chinese majors — recorded a filing in the most recent tracked year. That is consistent with either a genuine pause after a mature filing programme or simply the reporting lag catching up with newer applications.
Influence concentrates in a handful of older filings
The most-cited record, on high-temperature functional fluids, carries far more citations than the rest of the table combined. That gap reflects age and searched-corpus effects more than present-day importance — newer, more specific formulation claims have had less time to accumulate citations.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to biolubricants and synthetic base oils, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who holds the claim space
Filing activity is led by a mix of established lubricant majors and refiners, with co-filing pairs and academic entrants such as Universidade Federal do Ceara filling in around the edges.
A broad base with no single dominant filer
The 305 families spread across a wide assignee list rather than clustering around one or two houses, with major oil and lubricant companies each holding a modest share rather than an outright lead.
Co-assignment is rare and mostly small
Only ten co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, the strongest linking a major chemicals group with a named inventor across three families. Collaboration filing is the exception here, not the norm.
Leading filers have gone quiet in the most recent year
Every one of the six assignees with the strongest historical filing records shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, a pattern worth checking against publication lag before reading it as a real exit from the space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Lubrizol Corporation | 0 | — |
| ENEOS Corporation | 0 | — |
| Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | 0 | — |
| JX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation | 0 | — |
| Agip Petroli S.p.A. | 0 | — |
| Fujian Heishi Lubricant Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) | 0 | — |
Where to take this
The dataset points to a mature core and a thinner set of adjacent branches. The next steps depend on whether you are filing, clearing, or scouting for a partner.
Check freedom-to-operate against China filings first
With 100 of 305 families receiving a China filing, a clearance search limited to US and EPO registers will miss the largest single bloc of active rights in this space.
Explore assignee filings in EurekaProbe the under-claimed branches before drafting
Ester base stock seal compatibility and bio-based polyalphaolefin blends carry thin representation relative to the core lubricant composition claims — worth a targeted prior-art check before committing claim language.
Run a white space search in EurekaRe-verify momentum once the lag closes
Zero latest-year filings across the leading assignees may reflect an eighteen-month publication lag rather than an actual pause; revisit this once 2025-2026 filings have had time to publish.
Track assignee activity in EurekaCommon questions
In this corpus, a biolubricant claim typically covers a lubricant base stock or finished formulation derived from a renewable feedstock such as vegetable oil, combined with a technical limitation like biodegradability, oxidative stability or a defined viscosity index. It is not enough for a filing to mention a plant-derived ingredient in passing; the claims need to tie that ingredient to a measurable lubricant performance property. This is why the search scope here combines composition terms with property terms like oxidative stability and seal compatibility rather than searching on biolubricant alone.
The filing trend shows a peak of 25 families in 2019 followed by a drop to 12 by 2022, and it has not recovered since. This pattern is consistent with a field where the main formulation routes — ester base stocks, polyalphaolefin blends, common additive packages — were already well claimed by the late 2010s, leaving less open ground for new filings. Bear in mind that the final one to two years of any patent trend are always undercounted because of publication lag, so the true 2025-2026 picture will only become clear over the next year or so.
China leads with 100 of the 305 families in this dataset, followed by the European Patent Office at 59 and the United States at 38, with Japan, WIPO/PCT and Australia further behind. That distribution means a clearance or landscape exercise focused only on US and European registers would miss the single largest filing destination. Anyone assessing freedom to operate in this space should treat Chinese filings as a first-order check, not an afterthought.
US11492567B2 claims a specific three-step process for producing a biolubricant from vegetable oil: esterification with a branched aliphatic alcohol, epoxidation of the resulting esters, and a nucleophilic substitution step using a second branched aliphatic alcohol, with a worked example built on a ricinoleic fatty acid backbone. It blocks that particular reaction sequence and the resulting product class, not every route to a vegetable-oil-derived biolubricant. A process that skips the epoxidation step, or that uses a different substitution chemistry entirely, sits outside what this claim covers.
The IPC composition shows filing activity concentrated almost entirely in C10M and C10N, with only thin coverage in adjacent areas like C07C acyclic compounds, C11C fatty acids and C08F addition polymers. That imbalance suggests under-claimed ground in areas such as ester base stock seal-compatibility formulations, bio-based polyalphaolefin blends, and low-temperature oxidative stability additives derived from fatty acid chemistry. None of these are guaranteed open — they simply carry fewer families relative to the core claim space and warrant a targeted prior-art check before drafting.
Research Biolubricants and Synthetic Base Oils in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole biolubricants and synthetic base oils corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.