Book a demo

Bipolar Battery Fast Charging Patent Landscape 2026

Bipolar Battery Fast Charging Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Bipolar Battery Fast Charging Patent Landscape in 2026

Nissan Motor dominates a highly concentrated field, holding the largest block of patent records among the top hundred filers, with the top five collectively accounting for 76% of that group’s total. The field is still expanding on a multi-year basis — recent three-year filings running 140% above the prior window — though annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak, and Japan remains the primary filing jurisdiction.

21
Patent families in scope
76%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+140%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Japan
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Nissan leads a tightly concentrated field with limited challengers

Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. holds the top position in the Nilar International AB follows in second place with 13 patent records, and Toyota Jidosha KK ranks third with 5 patent records.

The top five filers collectively account for 76% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signaling a highly concentrated competitive structure with a steep drop-off after the leading pair. Applicants ranked fourth and below each hold just two or one patent records, confirming a wide tier gap.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.38
2Nilar International AB13
3Toyota Motor Corporation5
4Advanced Battery Concepts LLC2
5APB Corp2
6GMCC Electronics Technology (Wuxi) Co., Ltd.2
7Gridtential Energy Inc.2
8Hangzhou Huayu New Energy Research Institute Co., Ltd.2
9Subaru Corporation2
10Guangzhou Yangxin Technology Research Co., Ltd.1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Nilar Europe AB1
12Chongqing Qinxiong Motorcycle Sales Co., Ltd.1
13Sanyo Chemical Industries, Ltd.1
14Quzhou Power Battery and Energy Storage Research Institute1
15Denso Corporation1
16GM Global Technology Operations LLC1
17Hangzhou Zhanhong Technology Co., Ltd.1
18Firefly International Energy Co.1
19University of Chicago1
20Chaowei Power Group Co., Ltd.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Nissan’s position, reinforced by named-inventor collaborations across multiple filings, suggests deep institutional commitment to bipolar fast-charging architecture rather than exploratory patenting. Nilar International AB’s focus on H01M 10 and H01M 50 subclasses indicates a complementary but narrower structural emphasis.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and are likely under-represented; absolute counts for 20242026 should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity surged from 2021, peaked in 2022, and technology is anchored in core battery chemistry

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that activated rapidly after 2020 and is defined overwhelmingly by cell-level battery chemistry, with secondary presence in charging infrastructure and vehicle integration.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible through 2020, then jumped sharply in 2021 and peaked in 2022 with 7 patent records. Volume moderated in 2023 and the years from 2024 onward are understated by publication lag, so the apparent softening should not be read as a real decline. On a multi-year basis the recent window sits 140% above the prior equivalent window, confirming the field is still expanding.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 7 in 2022.12017120180201902020520217202232023220241202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01M — covering batteries, cells, and fuel cells — dominates the technology mix with 77 patent records, reflecting that most innovation targets cell architecture and electrochemistry directly. H02J (power supply and grid systems) is the second branch with 28 patent records, capturing charging-protocol and power-management work. B60L (electric vehicle propulsion), G01R (measurement), G01K (temperature), and H02H (protective circuits) are each sparsely populated, indicating that system-integration and safety aspects remain underdeveloped relative to the core chemistry.

Technology compositionH01M · Batteries, cells & fuel cells leads with 77; H02J · Power supply & grid systems 28.H01M · Batteries, cells …77H02J · Power supply & gr…28B60L · Electric vehicle …6G01R · Electric & magnet…4G01K · Temperature measu…2H02H · Protective circui…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US9236746B2Published 2016-01-12

Bipolar battery control device for adjusting a vol…

Nissan Motor CO., LTD.

A battery control device is provided that uses a discharge to adjust the capacitance of cells that form a bipolar battery and calculates the voltage increase value of the remaining cells that do not discharge to adjust capacitance if one or more cells, among all of the cells that form the bipolar battery, are discharged to adjust capacitance in a battery… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Bipolar battery control device for adjusting a vol… — patent drawingBipolar battery control device for adjusting a vol… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Bipolar battery and its control method184
2Bipolar battery71
3Bipolar battery, battery pack with multiple bipola…48
4A bipolar battery and a biplate assembly47
5双极电池和双极板组件44
6Bipolar battery and a biplate assembly42
7High power bipolar battery/cells with enhanced ove…36
8Bipolar battery, battery packs and a vehicle insta…31

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of high concentration, a clear lifecycle stage, inventor-level collaboration patterns, and geographic skew toward. Japan and. China shapes both the risk and opportunity profile for new entrants and incumbents alike.

Growth

Growth stage with annual volume easing from 2022 peak

The field is classified at the Growth lifecycle stage: recent three-year filings are 140% above the prior three-year window, confirming multi-year expansion. Annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak, and the most recent years are further understated by publication lag. Entrants still have a window to establish positions before the field matures, but the core H01M chemistry space is becoming more crowded.

Growth · post-peak annual
Concentration

Two-tier structure: Nissan dominant, all others distant

The top five filers hold 76% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, and Nissan alone accounts for 38 patent records versus Nilar’s 13. Every other ranked applicant holds five or fewer patent records. This steep gradient means challengers lack the defensive portfolio depth to contest Nissan on its core claims, but also that many adjacent technical routes remain thinly covered.

High concentration
Collaboration

Inventor co-filing at Nissan signals internal programme depth

The most active co-filing pairs both link named inventors to Nissan Motor: MIYAZAKI YASUHITO and Nissan (2 joint filings) and ABE TAKAAKI and Nissan (2 joint filings), with additional single-filing pairs involving SHIMOIDA YOSHIO and KATO YUKINARI. No cross-company co-applicant relationships are evident in the evidence, suggesting the field has not yet developed the open-innovation consortium structures seen in more mature battery segments.

Inventor-level co-filing
Geography

Japan and China are the primary protection markets

Japan leads with 18 patent records, followed by China with 15 and the United States with 11. Europe (EPO) accounts for 8 records, South Korea for 5, and PCT filings for 4. The spread across Malaysia, Taiwan, Sweden, Germany, and Mexico indicates that key filers are pursuing broad multi-jurisdictional protection, but Japan’s lead reflects both Nissan’s and Toyota’s home-market anchoring.

Japan-led, China rising
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
MIYAZAKI YASUHITO日产自动车株式会社2
ABE TAKAAKI日产自动车株式会社2
SHIMOIDA YOSHIO日产自动车株式会社1
KATO YUKINARI日产自动车株式会社1

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence from the Eureka corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Nissan anchors core battery chemistry; Nilar focuses on structural cell design

The two clear leaders differ in both portfolio depth and technical emphasis: Nissan commands the charging-protocol and cell-architecture space, while Nilar International AB concentrates on cell structural components.

Leader · Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.

Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.

Nissan holds 38 patent records, the largest position in the ranking by a substantial margin. Its technology emphasis spans H01M 10 (36 records), H01M 2 (21 records), and H02J 7 — power supply and charging systems (13 records) — indicating that Nissan integrates cell chemistry, structural design, and charging-protocol claims within a single coordinated programme. Inventor-level co-filings with named researchers reinforce the institutional depth of this portfolio. No momentum data specific to the most recent period is available for Nissan beyond its established dominant position.

patent records: 38
Challenger · Nilar International AB

Nilar International AB

Nilar International AB holds 13 patent records and focuses its filings on H01M 10 (6 records), H01M 50 — cell structural elements (5 records), and H01M 2 (1 record). The emphasis on H01M 50 differentiates Nilar from Nissan, pointing to a competitive strategy built around bipolar plate and assembly architecture rather than charging protocols. Toyota Jidosha KK, ranked third with 5 patent records, is flagged as a new entrant in the most recent momentum window, suggesting it is building a position rather than defending an established one.

patent records: 13
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings for all 20 filers including Advanced Battery Concepts, APB Corp, Gridtential Energy, and others.
Advanced Battery Concepts LLCAPB Corp+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Toyota Motor Corporation2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards draw on applicant ranking, technology focus subclasses, and applicant momentum data from the Eureka corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

EV integration, measurement, and protection circuits are under-served adjacent branches

Four IPC branches outside the dominant H01M and H02J classes have sparse coverage relative to the core chemistry work, representing areas where filing activity has not kept pace with the underlying technical need in a bipolar fast-charging context.

B60L · Electric vehicle propulsion integration

B60L carries only 6 patent records, representing 5% of the branch distribution. Given that bipolar batteries are explicitly targeted at automotive applications — as indicated by the applicant mix dominated by Nissan, Toyota, and Subaru — the paucity of EV-integration claims is notable. Technical value is high: fast-charging protocols must be co-optimized with drivetrain thermal management and regenerative braking. An entrant with systems-integration competency could file around bipolar-specific BMS-to-drivetrain interfaces without directly contesting Nissan’s H01M core.

Search this in Eureka →

G01R · Electrical measurement and state estimation

G01R holds only 4 patent records, or 3% of the branch distribution. Accurate real-time state-of-charge and state-of-health estimation is a prerequisite for safe fast charging in bipolar architectures, where the stacked-cell topology can create voltage imbalances. The sparse coverage in this branch suggests that measurement and diagnostics methods tailored to bipolar cell stacks have not been systematically claimed. Entrants with sensor-fusion or impedance-spectroscopy expertise could address this gap with relatively low risk of blocking claims from incumbents.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See analysis of all four sparse branches including G01K temperature measurement and H02H protective circuit arrangements.
G01K · Temperature measurement for fast-charge thermal managementH02H · Protective circuit arrangements for bipolar stacks+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent-branch candidates are drawn from IPC classes with the lowest patent-record counts relative to the dominant H01M branch.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading filers differ across technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01M 10 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 2 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH02J 7 · Power supply & grid systemsH01M 50 · Batteries, cells & fuel cellsH01M 4 · Batteries, cells & fuel cells
日产自动车株式会社Strong · 36Strong · 21Moderate · 13Emerging · 7Moderate · 8
Nilar International ABStrong · 6Emerging · 1AbsentStrong · 5Absent
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 5Moderate · 2Strong · 3AbsentEmerging · 1
Nilar Europe ABStrong · 4Strong · 3AbsentStrong · 3Absent
Nilar International ABStrong · 3Strong · 2AbsentStrong · 3Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own bipolar battery fast charging landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.