Blast Furnace Burden Distribution Patents: Leaders & Filing Trends 2026
Blast Furnace Burden Distribution Patents: Who Holds the Claim Space
42.5% concentration. The top five assignees alone account for 1,793 of the 4,222 records in scope — filing is concentrated at the top of an otherwise long tail. Annual filings climbed from 124 in 2017 to a peak of 211 in 2021, then fell to 101 by 2024 — a 52% decline over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures (down to 24 for the partial latest year) are still filling in and should not be read as a continuation of the decline.
- 1JFE STEEL CORP12.4%
- 2NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION12.1%
- 3KAWASAKI STEEL CORP6.7%
- 4SIKA TECH AG6.5%
- 5UNITED STATES GYPSUM CO4.7%
See the full blast furnace burden distribution analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about this landscape
Who holds the most patents in blast furnace burden distribution?
The assignee ranking is led by a single company with 524 records, well ahead of fifth place at 199 and tenth place at 63. The top five assignees together hold 1,793 records, 42.5% of the 4,222 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 57.7%. This is a leader-plus-long-tail structure: one dominant filer, a handful of strong followers, and then many companies with only a few filings each.
Is patent filing in this field growing or slowing down?
Filings rose from 124 in 2017 to a peak of 211 in 2021, then fell to 101 by 2024, a 52% decline over that three-year window. Figures for 2025 and 2026 are lower still, but publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, so those recent years are undercounted and should not be read as proof the field is dying. The safest complete read is the 2021-to-2024 decline; anything drawn from 2025-2026 needs revisiting once more filings publish.
What technology areas overlap with burden distribution patents?
Beyond core iron-production claims (C21B, 44.1% of records), the dataset shows meaningful overlap with refractories and cement (C04B, 16.2%), metal extraction and refining (C22B, 13.3%), and furnace hardware (F27B and F27D). Smaller but notable shares appear in layered products (B32B), material testing (G01N) and building structures (E04B), reflecting how furnace lining, sensor instrumentation and structural design all intersect with charging and layering technology. A single filing often carries several of these classes at once.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Blast Furnace Burden Distribution covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.