Book a demo

Boom Sprayer Design Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Boom Sprayer Design Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/boom-sprayer-design-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Crop Protection Machinery · Patent Landscape
Boom sprayer design patents: mapping who holds the ground and where it is still open
  • 31.5% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees account for 274 of 869 records in scope — a market with a defined head, not a flat field of single filers.
  • Filing peaked in 2020 at 84 records. The 2021-to-2024 span shows a 43% decline in filings (70 to 40), though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
  • B05B spraying claims sit under A01M pest-control claims. 241 records carry B05B (27.7%) against 349 in A01M (40.2%), showing mechanical spraying hardware is claimed less densely than the pest-control umbrella it sits inside.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
869
Published Records
32%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-43%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (70 records) with 2024 (40) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 869 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the boom sprayer design patent record actually shows

Boom sprayer design sits at the intersection of mechanical spray hardware and agrochemical application control. The 869 records in scope span nozzle spacing, pressure regulation, boom stability, boom height control, drift reduction and tank cleaning — a search built to capture the mechanical boom as much as the chemistry it delivers. Filing activity is not evenly spread: a small group of assignees holds a disproportionate share of the record, while a long tail files once or twice and does not return.

Reading the technology composition tells a second story. Pest and vermin control (A01M) and biocide/agrochemical classes (A01N) dominate by record count, but spraying and atomising hardware (B05B) trails both — meaning the physical boom, nozzle and pressure-regulation mechanisms are claimed less exhaustively than the chemical and pest-control framing around them. That gap is where mechanical design freedom tends to survive longest.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC65
  2. 2BAYER AG65
  3. 3CAPSTAN INC64
  4. 4DEERE & CO47
  5. 5AGCO INT GMBH33
  6. 6EXEL INDUSTRIES29
  7. 7MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC29
  8. 8AGROVISTA UK26
  9. 9CRODA INC25
  10. 10IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD25
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Boom Sprayer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Every figure below is drawn directly from the 869 records in scope. Publication lag means the final one to two years of any trend line will always look lighter than filing activity actually was.

Filings rose to a 2020 peak, then eased

Annual filings climbed from 25 in 2017 to a peak of 84 in 2020, then declined; the 2021-to-2024 window alone shows a 43% drop, from 70 to 40 records. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as a continued fall.

Filings rose to a 2020 peak, then eased0255075100252017201820198420202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Mechanical spraying hardware trails the pest-control umbrella

A01M (pest & vermin control) appears on 40.2% of records and A01N (biocides/agrochemicals) on 35.2%, while B05B (spraying & atomising) — the class closest to boom mechanics themselves — sits at 27.7%. A01P (pesticide activity) reaches 19.7%, and A01C (planting & sowing) 13.0%, with A01B, A01G and G01N each under 6%. Since records can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the 869 records.

Mechanical spraying hardware trails the pest-control umbrellaA01M · Pest & vermin control34940.2%A01N · Biocides / agrochemicals30635.2%B05B · Spraying & atomising24127.7%A01P · Pesticide activity17119.7%A01C · Planting & sowing11313.0%A01B · Soil working in agriculture495.6%A01G · Horticulture & forestry485.5%G01N · Material analysis & testing364.1%Other41247.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 869 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Boom Sprayer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Boom Sprayer Design with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about boom sprayer design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The records shaping this field

Representative recent filing
US20260026489A12026-01-29

Boom sprayer nozzle spacing adapter (US20260026489A1)

PENTAIR FLOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC.

A boom sprayer assembly including a boom, a plurality of fluid connectors fluidly coupled to the boom, and one or more nozzle spacing adapters respectively fluidly coupled to one or more of the plurality of fluid connectors. The connectors sit at a fixed first spacing interval; each adapter defines an outlet at an offset spacing interval different from that first interval, letting a single boom accommodate more than one nozzle spacing pattern.Filed by Pentair Flow Technologies and published 2026-01-29, this record illustrates how spacing flexibility is now being claimed as a discrete adapter component rather than as a fixed boom geometry.

US20260026489A1 — patent drawing 1US20260026489A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5704546APosition-responsive control system and method for sprayer293
2US5653389AIndependent flow rate and droplet size control system and method for sprayer279
3US4580721AFluid container217
4US5260875ANetworked agricultural monitoring and control system185
5US20100032492A1Method and System to Control Flow From Individual Nozzles While Controlling Overall System Flow And Pressure162
6US5348226ASpray boom system with automatic boom end height control160
7US20060273189A1Electrically actuated variable pressure control system156
8US7311004B2Flow control and operation monitoring system for individual spray nozzles156
9US4629164AContainer with memory146
10US20060265106A1Networked diagnostic and control system for dispensing apparatus139

Citation counts favour older, foundational records inside this searched corpus — treat them as a measure of influence on later filings, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Boom Sprayer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three patterns stand out once the record is read as a whole: concentration at the top, a technology mix weighted toward chemistry over hardware, and a peak that has since eased without yet showing a confirmed downturn.

Concentration
31.5%
of 869 records held by top 5

A defined head, not a flat field

The five leading assignees together hold 274 of the 869 records in scope (31.5%), and the top ten extend that to 408 records (47.0%). Below that line the ranking thins quickly into single- and double-filing entrants, which is where freedom-to-operate work should concentrate.

Based on the 100-company assignee ranking returned for this dataset.
Momentum
84 in 2020
peak year filings

A peak behind us, not yet a confirmed decline

Filings rose from 25 in 2017 to a 2020 peak of 84, then eased to 40 by 2024 — a 43% drop over that three-year span. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete and should not be read as continued decline until later data fills in.

2021-2024 growth figure taken directly from the filing trend.
Composition
27.7% vs 40.2%
B05B share vs A01M share

Hardware claims trail the chemistry framing

Spraying and atomising hardware (B05B) appears on 27.7% of the 869 records, well below pest-control framing (A01M, 40.2%) and biocide/agrochemical claims (A01N, 35.2%). Mechanical boom, nozzle and pressure-regulation design is claimed comparatively thinly relative to the surrounding chemical and pest-control art.

IPC shares sum above 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Collaboration
9 pairs
co-assignee pairings recorded

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only nine co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, and the strongest links cluster around a small set of corporate affiliates rather than cross-company joint filings. Most assignees in this field file independently.

Strongest pairing observed at 16 shared records.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to boom sprayer design, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Boom Sprayer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the door is still open

The ranked leaders span agrochemical majors, farm equipment manufacturers and specialist sprayer makers. Momentum among the named leaders has cooled in the latest year across the board, which reads as a data-lag artefact more than a genuine pullback.

Leader
65 records
top-ranked assignee

A single assignee well ahead of the field

The leading assignee holds 65 records, well clear of the fifth-place holder at 33 and the tenth-place holder at 25. That gap suggests a sustained, multi-year filing programme rather than a single burst of activity.

Counted across the 869-record assignee ranking.
Mid-field
33 to 25
records, 5th to 10th place

A competitive second tier

Between fifth and tenth place, record counts narrow from 33 to 25 — close enough that a handful of new filings could reshuffle mid-table rankings within a single publication cycle.

Based on positions five through ten in the ranking.
Receiving offices
US 220 · EPO 148
leading jurisdictions

Filing strategy is US- and Europe-first

The United States (220 records) and the European Patent Office (148) lead receiving offices, ahead of Australia (100), WIPO/PCT (94), Canada (68) and the United Kingdom (40). A filer entering this space without US or EPO coverage is missing the two largest gates.

Counts reflect receiving office, not country of applicant.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches show lower filing density relative to the core boom-and-nozzle art, based on the technology composition and representative filings in scope.
Nozzle spacing adaptersBoom height auto-levelling sensorsIn-line pressure regulation valvesTank residue / cleaning cyclesDrift-reduction shrouding
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum among named leaders
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Dow AgroSciences LLC0
Bayer AG0
CAPSTAN INC0
Deere & Co0
AGCO International GmbH0
Exel Industries0-100%
Monsanto Technology LLC0
AGROVISTA UK0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Boom Sprayer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, white-space filing, or tracking a named competitor.

Run a freedom-to-operate check on the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 65 records against a fifth-place figure of 33, any new boom hardware filing should be checked against that leader's claim scope before drafting.

Search assignee portfolios in Eureka

Map the B05B-versus-A01M claim gap in detail

The 12.5-point gap between A01M (40.2%) and B05B (27.7%) coverage suggests mechanical spraying hardware has room that chemical and pest-control framing has not fully occupied.

Explore IPC-level claim maps in Eureka

Watch 2025-2026 publications as they land

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the true trajectory after the 2024 figure of 40 will only become clear as later filings publish.

Set a filing alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Boom Sprayer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on boom sprayer design patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Boom Sprayer Design covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Boom Sprayer Design in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole boom sprayer design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.