Book a demo

Building Energy Management Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Building Energy Management Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/building-energy-management-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Building Energy Management
Building Energy Management Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Headed
  • 35.6% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees together account for 3,585 of the 10,070 records in scope — a field with a clear head and a long tail below it.
  • Filing cooled from its 2019 peak. Volume ran from 961 records in 2019 down to 552 in 2024, a -35% swing across 2021-2024, though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publication catches up.
  • Control software outweighs mechanical HVAC hardware. G05B control and regulating systems touch 36.3% of records versus 22.6% for F24F air conditioning and ventilation — the fight is increasingly in the software layer.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
10.1K
Published Records
36%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-35%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (849 records) with 2024 (552) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 10,070 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What building energy management patents actually cover

Building energy management sits at the intersection of controls engineering, HVAC hardware and, increasingly, data processing. The dataset behind this page spans 10,070 records filed or published between 2015 and 2026, captured through claim and title language tied to building management systems, HVAC control, occupancy scheduling and thermal storage. Because the search terms bridge both mechanical building equipment and the software that governs it, the record set mixes actuator and refrigerant-cycle patents with dashboards, analytics and grid-interaction claims.

The result is a field where a single filing often touches several IPC subclasses at once — a smart thermostat claim can sit in control systems, air conditioning and digital data processing simultaneously. That overlap is the reason the technology composition below adds up to more than 100% of records, and it is also why competitive mapping here needs more than one classification lens.

Filing volume and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH1,728
  2. 2JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY CO715
  3. 3VIEW INC481
  4. 4VIEW OPERATING CORP340
  5. 5HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC321
  6. 6JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HLDG LLP296
  7. 7SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA INC237
  8. 8SIGNIFY HOLDING BV237
  9. 9SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC158
  10. 10STRONG FORCE VCN PORTFOLIO 2019 LLC136
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 10,070-record dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which technical classes carry the claim density.

Filing volume: a 2019 peak, then a pull-back

Annual filings ran from 686 records in 2017 up to a peak of 961 in 2019, then eased to 552 by 2024 — a -35% move across the 2021-2024 window. 2025 and 2026 numbers will keep revising upward as publication catches up with filing, roughly an 18-month lag, so treat the tail of the chart as a floor rather than a ceiling.

Filing volume: a 2019 peak, then a pull-back02505007501,0006862017201896120192020202120222023202420251022026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition by IPC subclass

Control and regulating systems (G05B) touch 36.3% of the 10,070 records, ahead of air conditioning and ventilation hardware (F24F) at 22.6%. Business and administrative data processing (G06Q) and general digital data processing (G06F) each sit near 18%, and AI-based computing (G06N) already reaches 6.5% — a share worth watching given how recent that class is as a mainstream filing target.

Technology composition by IPC subclassG05B · Control & regulating systems3,65336.3%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation2,27422.6%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…1,81418.0%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1,79317.8%H02J · Power supply & grid systems1,40213.9%H04L · Digital information transmissi…1,18011.7%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…7047.0%G06N · Computing based on AI models6566.5%Other8,22881.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 10,070 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Building Energy Management Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about building energy management patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

A representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US20190302157A12019-10-03

Building energy management system with virtual audit metrics (US20190302157A1)

TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH

The filing describes collecting building-equipment data samples across two time periods, computing energy audit metrics from each period, comparing the resulting values, and displaying the comparison — effectively a virtual, continuous energy audit rather than a periodic manual one.Filed by Tyco Fire & Security GmbH, published 2019-10-03.

US20190302157A1 — patent drawing 1US20190302157A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing →
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100332373A1System and method for participation in energy-related markets1,024
2US20100327766A1Wireless emergency lighting system996
3US6785592B1System and method for energy management982
4US9641122B2HVAC actuator with automatic end stop recalibration957
5US20100324962A1Smart building manager954
6US20110133655A1Autonomous grid shifting lighting device934
7US20100141153A1Wireless lighting devices and applications911
8US10034344B2Control interface facility management system836
9US20100217550A1System and method for electric grid utilization and optimization775
10US20120080944A1Grid Shifting System for a Lighting Circuit754

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate them — read this table as a map of influential prior art, not of current filing activity.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data means for filing strategy

Three findings that shape where a new filing is likely to face dense prior art, and where the claim space is comparatively open.

Concentration
35.6%
of 10,070 records held by the top 5 assignees

The field has a clear head, then a long tail

3,585 of the 10,070 records in scope belong to the five leading assignees, and the top 10 combined reach 46.2% (4,649 records). That leaves more than half of the dataset spread across a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants — a pattern typical of a field where large controls and building-systems incumbents set the baseline and smaller players file around specific features.

Ranking covers 100 companies, the full set the data endpoint returns.
Momentum
-35%
filing change, 2021 to 2024

Volume has pulled back from its 2019 peak

Filings peaked at 961 records in 2019 and have since eased, with 2021's 849 records falling to 552 by 2024. That is a real three-year decline, not an artefact of publication lag, since 2024 is the last year in the dataset old enough to be treated as complete.

2025-2026 figures will revise upward as publication catches up.
Composition
36.3%
of records classed under G05B control systems

Software claims now outweigh mechanical HVAC claims

G05B (control and regulating systems) covers 36.3% of the 10,070 records, ahead of F24F air conditioning and ventilation hardware at 22.6%. Combined with G06Q, G06F and H02J each in the mid-to-high teens, this points to a field where the contested ground is increasingly the control and data layer sitting on top of otherwise settled HVAC hardware.

A record can carry several IPC classes, so shares are not mutually exclusive.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to building energy management patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Leading assignees and where their filing has slowed

The ranked leaders span building-controls incumbents, HVAC OEMs and, more recently, software and grid-services entrants. Momentum in the most recent tracked year has cooled sharply across almost every one of them, consistent with the field-wide pull-back from its 2019 peak.

Leader
1,728
records

A single assignee holds a commanding share

The leading assignee's 1,728 records dwarf the fifth-place holder's 321, meaning the top of this ranking is far more concentrated than the top 5-to-10 gap suggests. That gap has practical consequences for freedom-to-operate work: clearing the leader's portfolio matters more than clearing any other single competitor.

Fifth place: 321 records. Tenth place: 136 records.
Momentum
-79% YoY
for the most active recent filer

Even active filers are pulling back

The assignee with the most recent-year filings, at 13, is still down 79% year-on-year, and most other tracked assignees show similarly steep drops or flat, near-zero activity. This is field-wide cooling, not one company retreating while others advance.

Recent-year counts are the most exposed to publication lag.
Collaboration
10
co-assignee pairs identified

Co-filing is rare and mostly intra-group

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest pair links two entities under the same corporate umbrella rather than independent co-development. Cross-company joint filing is not yet a meaningful pattern in this space.

Strongest pair: 28 shared records.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core control and HVAC classes.
Occupancy-schedule prediction from sparse sensor dataThermal storage dispatch optimisationWorking-fluid selection for low-GWP thermal loopsCross-building load aggregation for grid servicesAI-model-based fault detection in HVAC control loops
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Tyco Fire & Security GmbH13-79%
Johnson Controls Technology Company1-50%
Signify Holding B.V.10%
Siemens Industry, Inc.1-67%
View Operating Corporation0-100%
Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP0
Honeywell International Inc.0-100%
Schneider Electric USA, Inc.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a field consolidating at the top while cooling overall — the next steps depend on whether you are clearing a filing, tracking a competitor or scoping new claim territory.

Run freedom-to-operate against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 1,728 of 10,070 records, a targeted clearance search against that single portfolio will resolve more risk than a broad sweep of the long tail.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka →

Map claim language in the under-claimed branches

Thermal storage dispatch and AI-based fault detection show thinner filing density than the core control classes — worth a closer claim-mapping pass before committing to a filing direction.

Map white space in Eureka →

Watch for the 2025-2026 filing correction

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent drop-off in the most recent years will partly revise upward — re-run the trend view in a few quarters rather than treating today's tail as final.

Track filing trends in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about building energy management patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Building Energy Management Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole building energy management patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.