Book a demo

Building Energy Management Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Building Energy Management Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/building-energy-management-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · HVAC & Building Controls
Building Energy Management System Patents: Who Leads and Where Filings Are Slowing
  • Filings peaked in 2018 at 21 and have not returned to that level since, with the 2022 midpoint sitting at 11 — the claim space opened faster than it is now being filled.
  • G05B control logic dominates appearing in 116 of 133 families, more than double F24F air-conditioning-specific filings, showing claims cluster on control strategy rather than mechanical HVAC hardware.
  • The United States receives 95 filings versus 15 at the EPO and single digits elsewhere, so most enforceable rights in this dataset sit in one jurisdiction.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
133
Published Records
84%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+50%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Building energy management systems sit at the intersection of control theory and facilities operation: software and control logic that predicts occupancy, runs model predictive control loops, schedules demand response events, and flags equipment faults before they waste energy. This dataset pulls 133 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine building-automation search terms with occupancy prediction, MPC, demand response, fault detection and energy-baseline claim language, scoped to the F24F11, G05B15 and G05D23 IPC subclasses.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart are undercounts of actual filing activity, not a real drop-off. The more reliable signal is the shape from 2018 to 2022: a clear peak followed by a plateau, not sustained growth.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY CO44
  2. 2TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH36
  3. 3SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC14
  4. 4SIEMENS CORP11
  5. 5ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG7
  6. 6JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HLDG LLP6
  7. 7TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LTD5
  8. 8PARSONS CORPROATION3
  9. 9SIEMENS AG3
  10. 10RES FOUND THE CITY UNIV OF NEW YORK2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

133 patent families, filed mostly through the USPTO, concentrated in control-systems classifications rather than mechanical HVAC design.

A 2018 peak that has not been repeated

Filings rose to 21 in 2018, the high point of the covered period, then eased toward the 2022 midpoint of 11. That pattern reads as a claim space that filled quickly around a first wave of fault-detection and demand-response patents, then slowed as the obvious control-logic claims were staked out. The 2025-2026 figures are partial due to publication lag and should not be read as a collapse.

A 2018 peak that has not been repeated0613192562017212018201920202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Control logic outweighs air-conditioning hardware

G05B (control and regulating systems) appears in 116 of 133 families, far ahead of F24F (air conditioning and ventilation) at 46. G06F (data processing) and H04L (data transmission) filings, at 38 and 21 respectively, point to a software and connectivity layer wrapped around the control claims, while G06Q business-process claims (13) and G06T image processing (15) mark smaller adjacent branches tied to analytics dashboards and occupancy-sensing imagery.

Control logic outweighs air-conditioning hardwareG05B · Control & regulating systems11687.2%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation4634.6%G06F · Electric digital data processi…3828.6%H04L · Digital information transmissi…2115.8%H02J · Power supply & grid systems1612.0%G06T · Image data processing & genera…1511.3%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…139.8%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…96.8%Other3224.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 133 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Building Energy Management Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about building energy management systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this corpus

Representative filing
US9310786B22016-04-12

US9310786B2 — Automated demand response scheduling to reduce electrical loads

SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC.

A system and method for reducing an electrical load in a facility with a building automation system: on receiving a new demand response event, the system determines which devices of the building automation system to control, prepares a schedule of control actions for those devices, and sends control messages to execute the schedule during the demand response event.Filed by Siemens Industry Inc., granted 2016.

US9310786B2 — patent drawing 1US9310786B2 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation families
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20120022700A1Automated fault detection and diagnostics in a building management system408
2US8731724B2Automated fault detection and diagnostics in a building management system287
3US20170212482A1Building energy management system with energy analytics243
4US10055114B2Building energy management system with ad hoc dashboard186
5US10921972B2Building system with data model including bidirectional relationships171
6US11073976B2Building system with a building graph171
7US10534326B2Building automation system with integrated building information model157
8US20230030077A1Building system with a building graph54
9US9639413B2Automated fault detection and diagnostics in a building management system46
10US20180238575A1Building automation system with microservices architecture45

Citation counts favour older filings in any searched corpus; treat the ranking as a signal of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once families, jurisdictions and IPC codes are laid side by side.

Filing momentum
21 in 2018 vs. 11 at 2022 midpoint
peak vs. midpoint filings

The early land grab is over

Filing activity peaked in 2018 and has not returned to that level. A midpoint of 11 in 2022 shows the field settling into a lower, steadier rate rather than continuing to accelerate — later entrants are filing into a claim space that is already partially occupied.

Based on the 2017-2026 filing trend
Jurisdiction concentration
95 of 133 filings at USPTO
US receiving-office share

Enforcement leverage is US-centric

The United States accounts for the large majority of filings, with Europe a distant second at 15 and China, India and Canada each in single digits. A freedom-to-operate review that only checks US prior art will miss most of what little coverage exists elsewhere.

Based on receiving-office counts
Claim layering
116 G05B vs. 46 F24F families
control vs. HVAC-hardware families

Control software, not ductwork, is contested

G05B control-and-regulation claims appear in more than double the families that F24F air-conditioning-specific claims do. Applicants are largely patenting how a building's systems are decided and scheduled, not the mechanical equipment itself.

Based on IPC subclass composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to building energy management systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing patterns
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Siemens Industry, Inc.SIEMENS CORP9
SONG ZHENJI KUN3
Siemens Industry, Inc.Siemens Corporation2
SONG ZHENWEI DONG2
SONG ZHENLU YAN2
Siemens Industry, Inc.SONGKAKUL PORNSAK1
Siemens Industry, Inc.RULE THOMAS1
Siemens Industry, Inc.MARCHI MICHAEL J1

Co-assignee pairs are rare in this dataset — only 10 identified — and the strongest pairing links two related Siemens entities, suggesting most patenting here happens inside a single corporate group rather than through joint ventures.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Filing activity concentrates around a small group of building-controls incumbents, with recent-year momentum flat across the board — every assignee tracked shows zero filings in the latest year, consistent with the publication-lag effect rather than a real pullback.

Incumbent
0 filings in latest tracked year
recent-year momentum

Siemens Industry and related entities

Siemens Industry Inc. and its affiliated Siemens entities appear repeatedly, including the strongest co-assignee pairing in the dataset. The representative demand-response scheduling patent in this landscape is a Siemens Industry filing.

Cross-referenced against co-assignee pairs
Incumbent
Flat recent-year filings
momentum signal

Johnson Controls group

Multiple related Johnson Controls entities, including a Tyco IP holding partnership, appear in the assignee set, reflecting a corporate structure that spreads filings across several related legal entities rather than one.

Based on assignee-momentum tracking
Diversified player
0 in latest year
momentum signal

ABB (Switzerland)

ABB's Swiss entity shows up among the tracked assignees with no filings in the most recent tracked year, matching the broader plateau in the filing trend rather than signalling a company-specific slowdown.

Based on assignee-momentum tracking
Services entrant
0 in latest year
momentum signal

Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services appears as a tracked assignee, indicating IT-services-side interest in building energy analytics alongside the traditional controls manufacturers.

Based on assignee-momentum tracking
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas sit below the dense G05B and F24F clusters and show comparatively thin claim coverage in this dataset.
Occupancy prediction via image sensing (G06T overlap)Demand-response tariff/business-rule integration (G06Q overlap)Fault-diagnostics on distributed energy resources (H02J overlap)Cross-protocol building network securityBaseline re-calibration after retrofit
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Johnson Controls Technology Company0
Siemens Industry, Inc.0-100%
Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP0
SIEMENS CORP0
ABB (Switzerland) Ltd.0
Tata Consultancy Services Limited0
Siemens Corporation0
Key Technologies Internet Protocol Corporation0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, US-heavy control-software claim space with a few specific gaps still open.

Check freedom-to-operate against G05B control claims

Given how densely control-and-regulation claims are filed, any new occupancy-prediction or MPC feature should be checked against the highest-cited fault-detection and energy-analytics families before development starts.

Explore FTO workflows in Eureka

Map the under-claimed branches before filing

The chip list above marks sub-areas — image-based occupancy sensing, tariff-integrated demand response, DER fault diagnostics — that show thinner coverage than the core control claims and may be worth a first-mover filing.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Watch jurisdiction gaps outside the US

With 95 of 133 filings at the USPTO and single-digit counts in China, India and Canada, companies expanding building-automation products into those markets should verify local coverage separately rather than assume US filings translate.

Compare jurisdictions in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building Energy Management Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Building Energy Management Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole building energy management systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.