Book a demo

BIPV Patents: Top Companies, Trends & White Space 2026

BIPV Patents: Top Companies, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/building-integrated-photovoltaics-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Solar Energy · Patent Landscape
Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patents: Who Leads and Where the Filing Gaps Sit
  • 23.8% concentration at the top. The five leading assignees together hold 392 of the 1,646 records in scope — a real lead, not a runaway monopoly, leaving most of the field to a long tail of single- and few-filing entrants.
  • Filing has plateaued, not slowed. Annual filings held flat from 70 in 2021 to 70 in 2024 — a 0% three-year change — while 2025-2026 figures are still filling in under normal publication lag.
  • Semiconductor claims dominate the class mix. H01L covers 57.1% of all 1,646 records and H02S covers 28.6%, meaning most protected ground sits in cell and module electronics rather than in building-envelope integration itself.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
1,646
Published Records
24%
Top-5 Share of All Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (70 records) with 2024 (70) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 1,646 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What counts as a Building-Integrated Photovoltaics patent here

This landscape covers 1,646 published records matching claims and disclosures around building-integrated photovoltaics, solar building facades, and the underlying performance metrics — solar irradiance, cell efficiency, module temperature, and power output — that examiners and drafters use to distinguish one BIPV claim from another. The scope spans filings from 2015 through the current data cut-off, with the most recent one to two years still incomplete due to normal publication lag.

Because BIPV sits at the intersection of building materials, semiconductor devices, and grid-facing power electronics, a single filing routinely touches several IPC subclasses — a roofing patent that also claims a specific cell architecture, for instance. That overlap is real signal, not noise, and it is why the technology composition figures below sum to more than the record total.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC133
  2. 23M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO109
  3. 3ZINNIATEK68
  4. 4TESLA INC49
  5. 5GAF ENERGY LLC33
  6. 6COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES31
  7. 7NANOFLEX POWER CORP29
  8. 8SAULE SA27
  9. 9ARCHITECTURAL GLASS & ALUMINUM CORP26
  10. 10ARBELL ENERGY LTD23
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 1,646-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend: growth without acceleration

Filings peaked at 105 in 2019, held near 89 in 2017, and settled into a flat plateau of 70 filings in both 2021 and 2024 — a 0% change across that span. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as understated rather than declining; publication lag of roughly 18 months means the most recent years always look thinner than they will once records catch up.

Filing trend: growth without acceleration030609012089201720181052019202020212022202320242025102026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: semiconductor claims dominate

H01L (semiconductor devices) touches 57.1% of the 1,646 records and H02S (photovoltaic power generation) touches 28.6% — the two largest classes by a wide margin. Roofing (E04D, 8.5%) and solar heat collectors (F24S, 8.9%) trail well behind, which suggests most competitive pressure sits in the cell and module layer rather than in the building-envelope integration layer where BIPV's actual differentiation lives.

Technology composition: semiconductor claims dominateH01L · Semiconductor devices94057.1%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…47128.6%F24S · Solar heat collectors1478.9%E04D · Roofing & roof coverings1408.5%H02J · Power supply & grid systems1267.7%H10K · Organic semiconductors (OLED e…1257.6%G02B · Optical elements & systems986.0%F24J865.2%Other1,16871.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 1,646 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about building-integrated photovoltaics patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this field

Representative Filing
US20220122781A12022-04-21

Photovoltaic devices comprising luminescent solar concentrators and perovskite-based photovoltaic cells

ENI S.P.A.

A photovoltaic device combining a luminescent solar concentrator with a perovskite-based photovoltaic cell mounted on its external side, the perovskite selected from organometal trihalides. The filing names building-integrated photovoltaic systems and photovoltaic windows among its target applications.Filed by ENI S.p.A., published 2022-04-21 as US20220122781A1.

US20220122781A1 — patent drawing 1US20220122781A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6750391B2Alternating current photovoltaic building block433
2US7592537B1Method and apparatus for mounting photovoltaic modules380
3US20090014057A1Photovoltaic modules with integrated devices363
4US20080302030A1Structures for Low Cost, Reliable Solar Roofing343
5US20090014058A1Rooftop photovoltaic systems323
6US20030111103A1Alternating current photovoltaic building block311
7US20170027168A1Methods, products, and systems relating to making, providing, and using nanocrystalline (NC) products compris…304
8US20070283997A1Photovoltaic module with integrated current collection and interconnection246
9US20070283996A1Photovoltaic module with insulating interconnect carrier236
10US20140330538A1Building integrated photovoltaic devices as smart sensors for intelligent building energy management systems191

Citation counts inside this corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and citation data mean for filing strategy

Three figures worth sitting with before deciding where to file next.

Concentration
23.8%
top 5 of 1,646 records

Leadership exists but is not dominant

The leading assignee holds 133 records against a fifth-place figure of 33 and a tenth-place figure of 23 — a real gap at the very top, but nowhere near a lock on the field. Most of the 1,646 records sit with the remaining ranked entities, a pattern typical of a technology still being defined at the claim level rather than one already settled by a handful of dominant players.

Based on the full 100-company assignee ranking
Trend
0%
2021 to 2024 change

A plateau, not a slowdown signal

Filing volume moved from 70 in 2021 to 70 in 2024, flat across three years after peaking at 105 in 2019. That flatness is worth reading as market settling into steady-state filing rather than retreat — especially since 2025-2026 counts are still incomplete under normal publication lag and should not be read as decline.

Peak year: 2019 at 105 filings
Citation influence
433 citations
top-cited record

Foundational mounting and module patents still anchor the field

The most-cited record in scope, on alternating-current photovoltaic building blocks, carries 433 citations — well ahead of the next records on mounting structures and rooftop systems. These older filings shaped how later applicants frame module-level and mounting claims, even where the underlying cell technology has since moved on.

Citation counts favour older, more-cited filings
Filing geography
558 filings
United States receiving office

US and EPO carry the bulk of formal filings

The United States receiving office accounts for 558 filings, ahead of the EPO at 296 and WIPO PCT filings at 242, with China, India, and Australia trailing further behind. That distribution points to where enforceable rights are actually being sought, distinct from where R&D activity or manufacturing is concentrated.

Receiving office counts, not jurisdiction of origin
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to building-integrated photovoltaics patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The assignee ranking spans 100 companies from established materials and semiconductor firms to specialist BIPV entrants — read the gate chips below as the sub-areas that ranking leaves comparatively unclaimed.

Leader
133 records
top-ranked assignee

A materials and semiconductor incumbent sets the pace

The top-ranked assignee's 133 records give it a clear lead over the field, built on a base in industrial materials and semiconductor devices that predates the current BIPV wave. Its position reflects breadth of filing across adjacent IPC classes rather than a single dominant claim.

Leader vs. fifth place: 133 vs. 33 records
Fast movers
1 filing
latest-year activity, several entrants

Recent momentum sits with newer, smaller filers

Latest-year activity is thin and spread across newer names rather than concentrated in the historical leaders — several established assignees show zero filings in the latest year, while smaller and more recent entrants each register a single filing. That pattern is consistent with a maturing filing pipeline shifting toward newer specialists.

Latest-year counts are partial under publication lag
Collaboration
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Co-filing is limited and mostly internal

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, and the strongest of them link a corporate assignee to named individual inventors rather than to another company. Cross-company joint filing is rare in this field so far, suggesting most competitive advantage is still built in-house.

Strongest pair: 10 shared filings
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a first-mover claim
These sub-areas sit well below the density seen in H01L and H02S, based on the IPC composition figures in scope.
Perovskite-glass laminate facadesLuminescent solar concentrator windowsThermal-electric hybrid roof modulesGrid-interactive BIPV invertersOptically transparent PV glazing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Tesla Inc1
NANOFLEX POWER CORP1-67%
SAULE SA1
Dow Global Technologies LLC0
3M Innovative Properties Co0
Zinniatek0
GAF Energy LLC0-100%
Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this next

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, whitespace filing, or monitoring.

Map freedom-to-operate around the top-cited records

The most-cited records in this set, particularly the mounting and module-level filings, define the prior art that later claims have had to draft around. Any new filing in module mounting or rooftop integration should be checked against these first.

Explore citation network in Eureka

Test claim language in the under-claimed branches

Perovskite-glass laminates and luminescent solar concentrator windows show far lower filing density than core semiconductor classes. A first, carefully drafted claim there has more room to stand without colliding with existing coverage.

Draft claims in Eureka

Track the fast-moving newer entrants

Latest-year filing activity has shifted toward newer, smaller assignees rather than the historical leaders. Watching this group closely now is cheaper than reacting after they scale their portfolios.

Set up assignee monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about the BIPV patent landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole building-integrated photovoltaics patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.