Book a demo

Built-Environment Digital Twins Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026

Built-Environment Digital Twins Patents: Who Leads, Where Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/built-environment-digital-twins-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape Briefing
Built-Environment Digital Twin Patents: Filing Trends and Leading Assignees
  • Filing growth of +400% between 2021 and 2024, the last year that can be read as complete before publication lag sets in.
  • One leader, then a long tail the top-ranked assignee holds 9 records while fifth place holds just 2 and tenth place holds 1.
  • Control systems dominate the claim space G05B covers 62.1% of the 29 records in scope, far ahead of every other IPC subclass.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
29
Published Records
+400%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
10
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (5) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this dataset covers

Built-environment digital twins sit at the intersection of building automation and simulation software: systems that model a building, campus or district as a live graph of sensors, assets and relationships, then use that model to predict, calibrate or recommend action. The search scope combines building or urban digital twin terms with district energy, municipal data platform, environmental sensor and related built-system language, which keeps the corpus tight at 29 published records rather than pulling in generic smart-building filings that never mention a twin or simulation layer.

That tight scope means the dataset is a lens on a specific, still-forming claim space rather than the whole of smart-building IP. Readers should treat family-level counts as the fairer comparison unit, and should discount the very latest filing years, since publication typically lags filing by around 18 months.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP9
  2. 2Mitsubishi Electric Corporation7
  3. 3Tyco Fire & Security GmbH4
  4. 4PassiveLogic, Inc.3
  5. 5Rutgers University2
  6. 6Shenzhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd.2
  7. 7Johnson Controls Technology Company1
  8. 8Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.1
  9. 9GRAPHIC ERA DEEMED TO BE UNIV1
  10. 10DHRUV AMITBHAI SHAH1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 29-record corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

From zero to a 2022 peak

Annual filings moved from 0 in 2017 to a peak of 14 in 2022, then continued at a lower but active pace; the documented +400% growth from 2021 (1 record) to 2024 (5 records) is the clearest trend signal here, since 2025 and 2026 are still filling in under publication lag.

From zero to a 2022 peak048111502017201820192020202114202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Control and data processing lead by a wide margin

G05B control and regulating systems appear in 62.1% of records and G06F data processing in 44.8%, together framing this as a controls-and-software field first. Business/admin data processing, healthcare informatics and digital transmission each sit at 10.3%, with AI-model computing at 6.9% and air-conditioning-specific and non-electric control classes each at 3.4% — thin enough to flag as still-open branches rather than settled ground.

Control and data processing lead by a wide marginG05B · Control & regulating systems1862.1%G06F · Electric digital data processi…1344.8%G06Q · Business, commerce & admin dat…310.3%G16H · Healthcare informatics310.3%H04L · Digital information transmissi…310.3%G06N · Computing based on AI models26.9%F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation13.4%G05D · Control of non-electric variab…13.4%Other26.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 29 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about built-environment digital twins patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The representative filing and the most-cited prior art

Representative Filing
US20240394281A12024-11-28

Artificial intelligence generated correlators for building digital twin

TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH

A building system can include one or more storage devices storing instructions thereon, that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to generate a building graph, the building graph including nodes representing entities of a building and edges between the nodes, the edges representing relationships between the entities. The building system can execute an artificial intelligence service, the artificial intelligence service to receive at least one of data describing the entities, at least one node of the nodes, or at least one edge of the edges as an input and output a correlator type that identifies that a first entity type of a first entity of the entities.Filed by Tyco Fire & Security GmbH, published 2024-11-28 as US20240394281A1.

US20240394281A1 — patent drawing 1US20240394281A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20200234220A1Smart building automation system with employee productivity features38
2US20230106530A1Calibration System and Method for Calibrating an Industrial System Model using Simulation Failure17
3US20230169223A1Building data platform with digital twin based predictive recommendation visualization13
4US20230360802A1Medical and healthcare service platforms and uses thereof10
5US20250139313A1Method and systems for live digital twin visualization9
6US20230169224A1Building data platform with digital twin based virtual indicators8
7US20240394281A1Artificial intelligence generated correlators for building digital twin7
8US20230168640A1Building data platform with digital twin based historical scenario generation6
9US20230168638A1Building data platform with digital twin based situational experimentation3
10US20240295336A1Building digital twin system for building health2

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to be cited; read them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs of the dataset that matter more for strategy than the raw counts alone.

Filing Momentum
+400%
2021 to 2024

Growth is real but from a small base

Annual filings rose from 1 record in 2021 to 5 in 2024, and the corpus peaked at 14 filings in 2022. That is meaningful growth for a 29-record field, but the base is small enough that a handful of new filers can shift the picture quickly.

2025-2026 figures are still incomplete under publication lag.
Claim Density
62.1%
of records carry G05B

Control logic is the crowded layer

Control and regulating systems (G05B) and digital data processing (G06F) between them cover most of the corpus. New filings that sit purely in these two classes are entering the densest part of the claim space.

Based on the 29 records in scope; classes overlap so shares exceed 100%.
Geographic Filing
20 of 32
receiving-office filings are US

Filing activity is US-centric with a secondary India cluster

Of the receiving offices recorded, the United States accounts for 20 filings, with India carrying 4 and Europe, WIPO and national European offices splitting the remainder. A digital twin filer weighing jurisdiction should read the US concentration as the default competitive venue.

Counts are by receiving office, not by unique family.
Citation Signal
38 citations
on the top-cited record

Older automation filings still anchor the field

The most-cited record in the set, on smart building automation with employee productivity features, carries 38 citations — well ahead of the next entries. That gap reflects age and searched-corpus visibility as much as present-day relevance.

Citation counts favour older filings within any searched corpus.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to built-environment digital twins patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the field is still open

The ranking returned by the dataset covers 10 companies; it is not a top-50 or top-100 list, and the tail is long even within that count.

Leader
9 records
top-ranked assignee

One clear leader ahead of a thin field

The top-ranked assignee holds 9 of the ranked records, well ahead of fifth place at 2 and tenth place at 1. That gap suggests one organisation has built a genuine filing programme around building digital twins while most others hold a handful of filings each.

Ranking is by patent family count, not raw document count.
Recent Momentum
1 filing
latest-year leaders

Momentum has shifted to newer, smaller filers

In the most recent year, momentum sits with assignees filing just 1 record each rather than with the historical leader, which shows 0 in the latest year. That is a useful signal that the incumbent's filing pace has slowed even as new entrants appear.

Latest-year counts are subject to publication lag and will rise as later filings publish.
Collaboration
1 pair
co-assignee link

Collaboration is rare in this corpus

Only one co-assignee pairing recurs in the dataset, linking a university and a healthcare technology company, and it appears twice. Most records in this field are filed by a single assignee rather than through joint ventures or research partnerships.

Based on co-assignee pairs recorded across the 29 records.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a first-mover look
Sub-areas with thin IPC coverage in this corpus, where a well-drafted first claim faces less prior art to design around.
Air-conditioning-specific twin control (F24F)Non-electric variable control integration (G05D)AI-model-driven correlator generationDistrict-scale energy network twinsMunicipal data platform interoperability
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Tyco Fire & Security GmbH1
DHRUV AMITBHAI SHAH1
Johnson Controls Tyco IP Holdings LLP0
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation0
PassiveLogic, Inc.0
Rutgers University0
Shenzhou Medical Technology Co., Ltd.0
Johnson Controls Technology Company0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a controls-heavy field with a thin but growing set of filers. Two directions make sense from here.

Stress-test a filing position against the leader's claims

Run the top-ranked assignee's family through a freedom-to-operate read against the specific control and correlator claims flagged in this dataset before drafting adjacent claims.

Explore claims in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches as they fill in

F24F and G05D coverage is thin today; set an alert on new filings in those subclasses so a white-space window does not close unnoticed.

Set up monitoring in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on built-environment digital twin patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Built-Environment Digital Twins Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole built-environment digital twins patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.