Book a demo

Carbon Capture (CCUS) Patent Landscape 2026

Carbon Capture (CCUS) Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Carbon Capture (CCUS) Patent Landscape in 2026

The CCUS patent corpus spans 11,749 families and is in a Growth stage, with three-year filing volume roughly doubling versus the prior window — though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak and the most recent years remain under-counted due to publication lag. General Electric Tech GmbH leads a moderately concentrated field, holding the top position among the hundred largest filers, with separation-process chemistry dominant across virtually every major applicant.

11,749
Patent families in scope
19%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+109%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··8 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

GE Tech leads a moderately concentrated, rapidly expanding field

General Electric Tech GmbH sits at the top of the applicant ranking with 754 patent families, ahead of ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Co at 512 and Air Products & Chemicals at 372. The top five filers together account for 19% of the combined total of the hundred largest filers — a moderate concentration level that signals meaningful room for challengers.

A clear tier gap separates the leader (754 families) from the second-ranked applicant (512 families), and a second gap falls between the top-five incumbents and the broader mid-tier cohort, which includes national laboratories, universities, and specialist start-ups. This tiered structure suggests the field rewards both scale investment and focused niche strategy.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1General Electric Tech GmbH754
2EXXONMOBIL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING CO512
3AIR PROD & CHEM INC372
4LAIR LIQUIDE SA POUR LETUDE & LEXPLOITATION DES PR…353
5Saudi Arabian Oil Co331
6COMMONWEALTH SCI & IND RES ORG307
7Toshiba Corporation307
8Huaneng Clean Energy Research Institute300
9Alstom Technology Ltd278
10Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij BV238
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11The Regents of the University of California234
12Climeworks AG227
13IFP Energies Nouvelles208
14General Electric Co201
15Research Triangle Institute190
16Massachusetts Institute of Technology177
17KING ABDULLAH UNIV OF SCI & TECH172
18Korea Institute of Energy Research164
19Fluor Technologies Corp154
20Siemens AG150
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions are grounded in separation-process chemistry (IPC B01D), which recurs as the primary technical anchor for every top applicant reviewed. Incumbents with large, mature B01D portfolios benefit from citation leverage and freedom-to-operate depth, raising the bar for new entrants targeting mainstream post-combustion capture.

Applicant rankings and the corpus total of 11,749 are measured in patent families. Branch, jurisdiction, and route-matrix figures are at the patent-record level — a single family can carry multiple IPC classes or be filed across several offices, so those counts independently exceed the family total and are not directly comparable to it. The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are systematically under-counted due to publication lag and should not be interpreted as a slowdown.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top 20 applicants by patent families filed in the CCUS domain. Applicant family counts can overlap where a family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth driven by separation chemistry, with emerging electrolytic and utilisation branches

The annual filing trend and IPC composition charts together show where investment has concentrated and where it is beginning to diversify. Separation processes remain structurally dominant, but adjacent classes covering electrolytic production, gas liquefaction, and biological conversion are accumulating records at a meaningful, if smaller, scale.

Annual filing trend

Filings climbed steadily from 2017 through a 2023 peak before easing in 2024; the 2025 and 2026 bars are heavily under-counted due to publication lag and must not be read as a real decline. The three-year recent window sits approximately 109% above the prior three-year window, confirming the field’s Growth classification on a multi-year basis.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2,237 in 2023.63520176712018774201989220201,29520211,97620222,23720231,98420241,2002025852026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B01D (separation processes) dominates at the record level by a wide margin, reflecting the centrality of absorption, adsorption, and membrane separation across CCUS workflows. C01B (inorganic compounds) and B01J (catalysis and chemical processes) form a secondary tier, while C25B (electrolytic production), F25J (gas liquefaction), and C02F (water treatment) represent lower-share but technically adjacent branches.

Technology compositionB01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) leads with 17,369; C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds 7,076.B01D · Separation proces…17,369C01B · Non-metallic elem…7,076B01J · Chemical/physical…5,496C25B · Electrolytic prod…972C07C · Acyclic & carbocy…911C01F · Alkaline-earth, A…805F25J · Gas liquefaction …724C02F · Water & wastewate…693↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. IPC counts are at the patent-record level; one family may contribute to multiple classes.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Foundational and most-cited patents

The most-cited families that anchor this space. Hover a row and click to open it in Eureka.

Featured patent
US20260001034A1Published 2026-01-01

High-efficiency carbon dioxide (CO2) capture ceram…

PENG, HSU-LING

The present invention relates to a high-efficiency carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) capture ceramic filtration system and its application method. The system includes a carbon capture exhaust pipe configured to store a CO<sub>2 </sub>capture material. The key materials of the CO<sub>2 </sub>capture material are dolomite powder, coral powder, shell powder… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

High-efficiency carbon dioxide (CO2) capture ceram… — patent drawingHigh-efficiency carbon dioxide (CO2) capture ceram… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Most-cited patents
#PatentCitations
1New and improved system for processing various che…852
2Removal of carbon dioxide from air270
3Carbon Dioxide Capture and Mitigation of Carbon Di…268
4Sequestration of carbon dioxide266
5Amine enriched solid sorbents for carbon dioxide c…255
6Biochar244
7Carbonation of metal silicates for long-term CO2 s…241
8Zero/low emission and co-production energy supply …240

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts accrue over time, so this list favours older, broadly-cited patents and may include general-purpose work beyond the specific topic; treat it as foundational context rather than a current-activity ranking.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Most-cited patent families for this query, ranked by total forward citations.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the CCUS patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of strong multi-year growth, moderate top-tier concentration, active cross-sector collaboration, and US-led jurisdiction filings creates a specific risk-reward profile for new entrants and incumbents alike. The four cards below translate the structural evidence into actionable strategic reads.

Growth

Growth stage — expanding but past its 2023 annual peak

The field is classified as Growth: the recent three-year filing window sits 109% above the prior window, confirming sustained capital deployment. Annual volume peaked in 2023 and has eased since, though the most recent years are partially obscured by publication lag. For R&D planners, this stage means the technology frontier is still being defined and early movers can establish durable citation-anchor positions.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a visible leader gap

The top five filers account for 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — moderate enough that no single player has locked up the field. The gap between the top-ranked GE Tech (754 families) and the next cluster creates a structural window for well-resourced challengers. Mid-tier applicants including national research bodies and universities fill a meaningful share of the ranking, suggesting the field rewards specialised technical depth as well as scale.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Corporate-to-university and intra-group co-filing are the dominant partnership patterns

The most active co-filing pair is Toshiba Corporation with Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions, sharing 82 co-filed families — a sign of intra-group IP coordination as business units restructure. Saudi Arabian Oil Co and Aramco Services Co co-file on 56 families, reflecting a similar integrated-company dynamic. ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Co is the most outward-facing incumbent, co-filing with the University of California (33 families), Georgia Tech Research Corp (25 families), and TDA Research (25 families), signalling a deliberate academic-sourcing strategy for sorbent and process innovation.

Active collaboration
Geography

US-centric filing with strong PCT and EPO coverage

At the patent-record level, the United States leads all jurisdictions by a substantial margin, followed by WIPO PCT filings and the European Patent Office — patterns consistent with applicants seeking broad transatlantic protection for commercially scalable processes. Canada and Australia rank fourth and fifth respectively, reflecting both resource-sector interest and active domestic CCUS policy environments. China’s record count is notably lower than its overall patent activity in adjacent energy domains, pointing to a gap that could reflect strategic underfiling or differing prosecution timelines.

US-led, global reach
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Toshiba CorporationToshiba Energy Systems & Solutions Corp82
Saudi Arabian Oil CoAramco Services Co56
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering CoThe Regents of the University of California33
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering CoGeorgia Tech Research Corp25
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering CoTDA Research Inc25
Alstom Technology LtdGeneral Electric Tech GmbH20
Saudi Arabian Oil CoKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology19
Alstom Technology LtdDow Global Technologies LLC18
General Electric Tech GmbHGE Vernova Infrastructure Technology LLC18
Air Products & Chemicals IncGeneral Electric Co14

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction figures are at the patent-record level and reflect prosecution choices, not unique invention counts.Explore insights →
Leaders

GE Tech and ExxonMobil lead on volume; Saudi Aramco and Toshiba show the strongest recent momentum

The top applicants all converge on separation-process chemistry (B01D 53) as their primary technical anchor, but they diverge in secondary emphasis — ExxonMobil and CSIRO lean more heavily on adsorption and catalyst development (B01J 20), while Air Liquide and Air Products weight inorganic compound synthesis (C01B). Momentum trends reveal a field where some incumbents are accelerating while others have plateaued.

Leader · General Electric Tech GmbH

General Electric Tech GmbH

With 754 patent families, GE Tech holds the largest CCUS portfolio among the top hundred filers. Its technical emphasis centres on B01D 53 separation processes (203 records), supported by B01J 20 catalysis and C01B 32 inorganic compounds. Its recent-window momentum is classified as a new entrant trend in the applicant-momentum data, which in context reflects portfolio consolidation and re-registration under the current entity name rather than a genuinely new market participant — the underlying technology lineage traces to the legacy Alstom Tech Ltd position (278 families), with which GE Tech co-filed 20 families.

families: 754
Challenger · Saudi Arabian Oil Co

Saudi Arabian Oil Co

Saudi Arabian Oil Co ranks fifth overall with 331 patent families and shows the strongest momentum among major incumbents at +74% recent versus prior three-year period (125 recent families). Its technical focus mirrors the field’s dominant B01D 53 separation-process axis (233 records), with secondary weight on C01B 32 inorganic compounds (57 records) and B01J 20 catalysis (55 records). Its active co-filing with Aramco Services Co (56 families) and King Abdullah University of Science & Technology (19 families) suggests a deliberate strategy of pairing operational scale with university-sourced materials research.

families: 331
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles, momentum scores, and technology emphasis for all top-100 CCUS filers.
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering CoAir Products & Chemicals Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering Co77▬ -4%
Saudi Arabian Oil Co125▲ +74%
Toshiba Corporation56▲ +47%
Air Liquide SA52▲ +18%
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)54▬ +4%
Air Products & Chemicals Inc70▲ new entrant
General Electric Co8▲ new entrant
General Electric Tech GmbH91▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player family counts are from the applicant ranking; momentum trends compare the most recent three-year window to the prior three-year window.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the CCUS core

The IPC classes below each account for roughly 2% of total patent records in scope — sparse relative to the dominant B01D separation branch. They are adjacent to established CCUS workflows and carry plausible technical value, but sparsity alone does not confirm a commercial gap; entry-path feasibility should be validated independently.

C25B · Electrolytic production of compounds

With approximately 972 records at roughly 2% share of the technology composition, C25B covers electrochemical routes to converting captured CO2 into value-added products such as formate, methanol, or syngas. Electrochemical CO2 reduction is technically adjacent to carbon utilisation (the ‘U’ in CCUS) and complements renewable-electricity integration strategies. The current sparsity relative to thermal separation routes may reflect early technology-readiness levels; applicants with electrochemistry competencies from fuel-cell or electrolysis portfolios would have a plausible cross-domain entry path.

Search this in Eureka →

F25J · Gas liquefaction & separation

F25J covers cryogenic and low-temperature gas separation processes, which are relevant to CO2 purification from flue gas, transport-ready liquefaction, and integration with LNG infrastructure. At approximately 724 records and roughly 2% share, this branch is under-represented relative to its role in full CCUS chain economics. Applicants with cryogenic engineering capability — particularly those already active in LNG or industrial gas — would find a technically coherent entry point, especially for offshore or ship-based capture systems where footprint constraints favour cryogenic over amine scrubbing.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level gap analysis covering all adjacent IPC classes in the CCUS landscape.
C02F · Water & wastewater treatment in CCUS mineralisationC01F · Alkaline-earth compounds for mineral carbonation+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch record counts are at the patent-record level; share figures reflect proportion of total IPC records, not patent families.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading CCUS applicants differ by technical route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerB01D 53 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)C01B 32 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsB01J 20 · Chemical/physical processes & catalysisC01B 3 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compoundsC01B 31 · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds
Alstom Technology LtdStrong · 488Moderate · 167AbsentAbsentEmerging · 26
ExxonMobil Technology & Engineering CoStrong · 367Moderate · 101Strong · 185AbsentAbsent
Air Products & Chemicals IncStrong · 206Strong · 149AbsentModerate · 45Moderate · 42
Air Liquide SAStrong · 208Strong · 121AbsentModerate · 71Emerging · 34
Toshiba CorporationStrong · 246Strong · 133AbsentAbsentAbsent
General Electric CoStrong · 204Strong · 120AbsentAbsentEmerging · 22
Saudi Arabian Oil CoStrong · 233AbsentModerate · 55Moderate · 50Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Route matrix counts are at the patent-record level; applicant names reflect the standard English entities mapped from the original source.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own CCUS patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.