Book a demo

Carbon Fiber Composites Patent Landscape 2026

Carbon Fiber Composites Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Carbon Fiber Composites Patent Landscape in 2026

Carbon fiber composites IP is concentrated among a small tier of Japanese manufacturers and global aerospace OEMs, with Toray Industries holding the single largest position in a corpus of 10,080 patent families. The field reached its filing peak in 2018 and has eased since, making existing portfolio positions and adjacent under-served branches the primary strategic levers today.

10,080
Patent families in scope
41%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-36%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Japan
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Toray and Boeing anchor a highly concentrated leader tier

Toray Industries leads all applicants with 1,838 patent families, followed by The Boeing Company at 1,550 — together accounting for the largest share of the hundred top filers. The top five applicants collectively hold 41% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, confirming a steep concentration gradient.

A clear two-tier structure exists: Toray and Boeing sit far above the next cluster — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (588 families), Mitsubishi Chemical (552), and Subaru (408) — which in turn leads a broader mid-tier of aerospace, automotive, and materials specialists. The gap between tier one and tier two is substantial and suggests high barriers to displacing the leaders through volume alone.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Toray Industries, Inc.1,838
2The Boeing Company1,550
3Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.588
4Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation552
5Subaru Corporation408
6Teijin Limited387
7Toyota Motor Corporation375
8Airbus Operations GmbH371
9Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.258
10Vestas Wind Systems A/S235
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11Rolls-Royce plc206
12Airbus Operations S.L.192
13Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc.181
14Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd.168
15NIPPON STEEL CHEM & MATERIAL CO LTD156
16Hitachi Astemo, Ltd.132
17General Electric Company129
18Nippon Steel Corporation126
19Airbus Operations Ltd.109
20DIC Corporation109
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Toray’s focus on polymer processing and Boeing’s emphasis on plastics shaping and aircraft structures reflect complementary supply-chain roles: material science versus system integration. Both positions would be difficult to challenge without deep application-domain expertise and long customer-qualification cycles.

Filing counts for 20242026 are significantly under-counted due to patent publication lag, so the apparent sharp decline in those years overstates any real slowdown; the 2023 figure of 900 families is the most reliable recent data point.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Post-peak volumes and a shaping-dominated technology mix

The filing trend reveals a field that expanded sharply to a 2018 peak and has eased since, while the IPC composition shows that composite shaping and polymer processing collectively dwarf all end-use application branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings rose steeply from 1,212 families in 2017 to a peak of 1,597 in 2018, then declined to 1,027 in 2022 and 900 in 2023. Data for 2024–2026 are incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as continued decline. The 2018 peak likely reflects intensifying aerospace and automotive lightweighting programmes converging simultaneously.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,597 in 2018.1,21220171,59720181,48720191,29520201,25120211,0272022900202367120245752025652026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B29C (shaping of plastics) and C08J (polymer processing and solutions) are the two dominant branches, reflecting the field’s core focus on manufacturing process IP rather than end-product design. Downstream application branches — B64C (aeroplanes), F03D (wind turbines), and F17C (pressure vessels) — are present but much smaller, indicating that most innovation is captured upstream in process and material IP.

Technology compositionB29C · Shaping of plastics leads with 13,004; C08J · Polymer processing & solutions 7,554.B29C · Shaping of plastics13,004C08J · Polymer processin…7,554B32B · Layered products …3,499C08L · Polymer compositi…3,228B29K · Plastics moulding…3,021B29L · Plastic products …2,690C08K · Use of additives …2,640C08G · Condensation poly…2,032↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Foundational and most-cited patents

The most-cited families that anchor this space. Hover a row and click to open it in Eureka.

Featured patent
US20150298402A1Published 2015-10-22

Carbon fiber composite material boom, production m…

Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science And Technology CO., LTD.

The present invention discloses a carbon fiber composite material boom, a production method thereof, and a truck-mounted concrete pump comprising the carbon fiber composite material boom. The production method of the carbon fiber composite material boom comprises: a flexible airbag is inflated to form an airbag in a first state and a carbon fiber prepreg is… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Carbon fiber composite material boom, production m… — patent drawingCarbon fiber composite material boom, production m… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Curable resin sols and fiber-reinforced composites…402
2Method for manufacturing windmill blades319
3Methods of manufacturing separable structures264
4Liquid composition, and method for manufacturing f…208
5Prepreg, preform and molded product201
6Method of molding shaped article of plastic compos…174
7Carbon fiber composite material and method for pro…173
8Implantable biomimetic prosthetic bone163

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Most-cited patent families for this query, ranked by total forward citations.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment

The combination of a post-peak trend, high concentration, active cross-sector collaboration, and Japan-led geography shapes a specific set of strategic considerations for new and existing participants.

Decline

Field is in a post-peak phase after a 2018 high

The lifecycle stage is assessed as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2018 peak of 1,597 families. The multi-year window still contains a large body of active IP, but the rate of new filing has reduced materially. For R&D teams, this means differentiation increasingly comes from depth in under-served sub-branches rather than broad volume strategies.

Post-peak · 2018 high
Concentration

Two leaders, then a meaningful tier gap

The top five filers hold 41% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, and the leader pair (Toray at 1,838 families, Boeing at 1,550) sit well above the next tier. Challengers in the 400–600 family range — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Mitsubishi Chemical, Subaru — occupy defensible but clearly secondary positions. New entrants face a high volume threshold to achieve comparable breadth.

Top-5 share: 41%
Collaboration

Subaru–JX Nippon and Toray–Mitsubishi Heavy are the most active co-filer pairs

The most frequent co-filing relationship is Subaru Corporation with JX Nippon Oil & Energy (105 joint families), reflecting integrated automotive-materials development. Toray Industries and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries filed 38 joint families, linking the leading material supplier to a major aerospace integrator. Toyota Motor and Toyota Industries collaborated on 20 joint families, signalling intra-group automotive composites programmes. These pairings define the dominant collaboration topology: material-supplier + end-system integrator.

Subaru–JX Nippon: 105 co-filings
Geography

Japan anchors the field; China and the US are the key secondary markets

Japan leads all jurisdictions in patent records, followed by China, the United States, and Europe (EPO). Germany appears as a significant standalone national office, reflecting Airbus and automotive-sector activity. PCT (WIPO) filings indicate applicants pursuing broad international protection. South Korea, India, and Australia represent growing but secondary protection targets. Entrants should prioritise Japan and China prosecution to compete in both supply-chain and end-market jurisdictions.

Japan-led · China rising
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Subaru CorporationJX Nippon Oil & Energy Corporation105
Toray Industries, Inc.Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.38
Toyota Motor CorporationToyota Industries Corporation20
Toyota Motor CorporationAisin Takaoka Co., Ltd.13
Toray Industries, Inc.KU Leuven (Catholic University of Leuven)10
Subaru CorporationFukui Prefecture10
Airbus Operations GmbHAirbus SAS (France)10
Teijin LimitedTeijin Carbon Europe10
Subaru CorporationTsudakoma Corp.9
Toyota Motor CorporationToyota Motor Corporation9

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration pairs and jurisdiction data are drawn from co-applicant and filing-office records in the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Toray leads on material science; Boeing dominates process and airframe IP

The two clear leaders occupy complementary technology positions — one upstream in polymer processing, one downstream in aerospace shaping — and both show meaningful recent filing reductions consistent with the field’s post-peak trajectory.

Leader · Toray Industries

Toray Industries

Toray holds 1,838 patent families, the largest position in the corpus. Its technology emphasis is concentrated in C08J (polymer processing and solutions), B29C (shaping of plastics), and B29K (plastics moulding materials) — reflecting a materials-science-first strategy spanning precursor chemistry through composite manufacture. Recent filings show a trend of ▼ –63% versus the prior three-year period, consistent with a maturing core portfolio rather than strategic retreat.

families: 1,838
Challenger · The Boeing Company

The Boeing Company

Boeing holds 1,550 patent families, focused heavily on B29C (shaping of plastics), B64C (aeroplanes and helicopters), and B29L (plastic products) — an application-integration posture that locks composite IP to specific airframe structures. Recent filings show a trend of ▼ –80% versus the prior period, the steepest reduction among top applicants, which may reflect portfolio rationalisation or a shift toward fewer, broader filings. Boeing’s collaboration with no external co-filer at significant scale suggests a largely proprietary development model.

families: 1,550
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Explore all ranked applicants, their technology profiles, and filing momentum in the full landscape report.
Mitsubishi Heavy IndustriesVestas Wind Systems+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Toray Industries, Inc.104▼ -63%
The Boeing Company120▼ -80%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.39▼ -63%
Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation100▬ 0%
Subaru Corporation46▼ -49%
Toyota Motor Corporation38▼ -48%
Airbus Operations GmbH18▼ -42%
Teijin Limited47▼ -53%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Family counts are from the applicant ranking; momentum figures compare the most recent three-year window to the prior three-year window.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant shaping core

The whitespace analysis identifies IPC branches that sit adjacent to the dominant shaping and polymer-processing core but carry relatively lower shares of the filing activity, suggesting areas where competitive density is lower and differentiated IP may be more achievable.

B32B · Layered products and laminates

B32B accounts for 6% of the branch-level records — meaningful in absolute terms but sparse relative to the shaping-dominated core. Laminate architecture IP bridges raw composite manufacture and structural end-product design, and is directly relevant to lightweighting in automotive body panels and wind blade skins. For a materials or process specialist already active in B29C, extending into B32B laminate-stack design could yield defensible adjacent claims without requiring new application-domain expertise.

Search this in Eureka →

C08K · Use of additives in polymers

C08K holds a 5% share of branch records, covering additive formulations that modify composite matrix performance — including fire retardancy, conductivity, and toughness modifiers. As end-use sectors tighten performance requirements (e.g., pressure vessels for hydrogen storage, battery enclosures), additive-driven performance differentiation becomes technically valuable. The branch is adjacent to the heavily contested C08J and C08L polymer chemistry space, so entry would require clearly novel additive systems to avoid crowded prior art.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access all identified adjacent branches, filing density heatmaps, and competitor overlap analysis.
C08L · Polymer compositionsB29L · Plastic products+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures reflect each IPC class’s proportion of patent records among the top whitespace candidates identified by the analysis.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leaders differ across key technology routes

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerB29C 70 · Shaping of plasticsC08J 5 · Polymer processing & solutionsB29K 105 · Plastics moulding materials (index)C08K 7 · Use of additives in polymersB32B 5 · Layered products & laminates
Toray Industries, Inc.Strong · 709Strong · 1,165Moderate · 333Emerging · 177Emerging · 229
The Boeing CompanyStrong · 1,431Emerging · 120Emerging · 124AbsentEmerging · 156
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Strong · 503AbsentModerate · 157AbsentModerate · 101
Subaru CorporationStrong · 307Moderate · 120Moderate · 93AbsentEmerging · 56
Toyota Motor CorporationStrong · 334AbsentModerate · 143AbsentEmerging · 37
Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd.AbsentStrong · 253Moderate · 72Emerging · 24Moderate · 63
Mitsubishi Chemical CorporationAbsentStrong · 264Moderate · 83Emerging · 40Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own carbon fiber composites patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.