Book a demo

Carbon-Neutral Building Patent Landscape 2026

Carbon-Neutral Building Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Carbon-Neutral Building Patent Landscape in 2026

The carbon-neutral building patent space is an early-stage, fragmented field where no single applicant holds a commanding position, with Laken & Associates Inc leading on just 3 patent records out of 9 families in scope. Activity surged from 2022 onward, and the field is still expanding on a multi-year basis, though annual volume has eased from its 2022 peak and recent years are further understated by publication lag.

9
Patent families in scope
64%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+250%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Laken & Associates Inc leads a highly fragmented field

Laken & Associates Inc ranks first with 3 patent records, followed by Harmon David L and McGill University each with 2 patent records — a structure that signals opportunity for new entrants rather than a locked-in incumbent advantage.

The top five filers collectively account for 64% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, a moderate concentration figure that, in a corpus this small, still leaves significant room for challengers to establish meaningful positions quickly.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1LAKEN & ASSOC INC3
2Harmon David L2
3McGill University2
4Rusher Karl David1
5CABN Co Ltd1
6B Anil Kumar1
7Meesala Tripura Sai Lakshmayya1
8I S Anvesh Reddy1
9Manoj Kumar Pakki1
10Arelac Inc1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions suggest that no applicant has yet achieved the breadth or depth needed to define the field’s standards, making differentiated technology routes — particularly in building envelope materials and HVAC integration — potentially high-value entry points.

The most recent filing years are understated due to standard patent publication lag of 18–24 months; apparent inactivity in 20242026 should not be interpreted as a slowdown. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 2022 filing surge anchors multi-year growth; building structures and HVAC dominate the technology mix

The filing trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that has grown substantially from a near-zero base, concentrated in two core IPC classes, with a long tail of adjacent branches that remain sparsely covered.

Annual filing trend

Filings were absent through 2018, with initial activity appearing in 2019, before a clear surge to 5 records in 2022. The three-year recent window sits 250% above the prior three-year window. Years from 2023 onward should be read as understated due to publication lag rather than as a plateau.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2022.02017020182201902020020215202222023020240202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

E04B (Building structures & elements) and F24F (Air conditioning & ventilation) are the two dominant IPC classes, reflecting a field centered on low-carbon structural systems and climate-controlled enclosures. Twelve other IPC classes each appear only once, indicating that many technically adjacent areas — from solar collectors to separation processes — are sparsely patented relative to the core.

Technology compositionE04B · Building structures & elements leads with 6; F24F · Air conditioning & ventilation 5.E04B · Building structur…6F24F · Air conditioning …5E04F · Building finishing2A01G · Horticulture & fo…1B01D · Separation proces…1B32B · Layered products …1C01B · Non-metallic elem…1E02D · Foundations & ear…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
CA3170763A1Published 2024-02-19

Building construction components and methods

Cabn CO LTD.

A method for constructing a pre-fabricated component of a building, including: configuring a pre-fabricated component of a building based on energy infomied modelling; wherein the pre- fabricated component is able to be assembled with at least one other pre- fabricated component into the building at a final site for the building. A method for constructing a… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Co2-sequestering formed building materials117
2Predictive building air flow management for indoor…2
3Architectural Construction Technique2
4Building construction components and methods1
5Multi-sheet cladding1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The field’s early-growth stage, thin concentration, and absence of formal collaboration create an unusually open window for targeted IP positioning. The cards below translate each structural dimension into an actionable read.

Growth

Growth stage — expanding on a multi-year basis from a small base

The lifecycle is classified as Growth, with three-year recent filings running 250% above the prior three-year window. Annual volume peaked in 2022 and has since eased, though publication lag makes the post-2022 picture incomplete. This stage offers first-mover advantage in defining claim architectures before the field consolidates.

Growth · post-2022 peak
Concentration

Moderate top-5 share masks an extremely shallow absolute depth

The top five filers hold 64% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, but the corpus itself spans only 9 patent families. This means a single well-scoped filing program — covering structural systems, HVAC integration, and materials — could move an entrant to a leadership position within two to three years.

Fragmented · high-entry opportunity
Collaboration

No co-applicant relationships detected in available data

Evidence pending — no formal co-filing or joint-applicant relationships are recorded in the current corpus. The absence of consortia or cross-institutional filings suggests the field has not yet attracted the standards-body or industry-alliance activity common in more mature green-building domains. Early movers who form research partnerships may gain both technical breadth and citation leverage.

No consortia detected
Geography

US-centric with early signals from Canada and India

The United States accounts for 6 patent records, Canada for 3, and India and WIPO (PCT) each for 1. The PCT filing signals at least one applicant is pursuing international protection, but the absence of European, Chinese, or Japanese filings in this corpus indicates that major construction markets outside North America remain uncontested at this stage.

US · Canada · India · PCT
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Cards are grounded in applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence from the corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Laken & Associates Inc on HVAC integration; McGill University on air quality and horticulture

The two leading entities approach carbon-neutral building from distinct technical angles — one through active climate-control systems, the other through air purification and biophilic integration — leaving structural and materials routes comparatively open.

Leader · Laken & Associates Inc

Laken & Associates Inc

The corpus leader with 3 patent records, all filed as a new entrant in the recent window. Technology focus is tightly concentrated in F24F 11 and F24F 5 (air conditioning and ventilation control) alongside F24D 11 (domestic heating systems), indicating a systems-integration approach to building energy management rather than a structural-materials play.

patent records: 3
Challenger · McGill University

McGill University

Tied for second with 2 patent records, also entering as a new entrant in the recent period. Coverage spans F24F 8 (air filtration and ventilation), A01G 9 (horticulture and forestry), and B01D 53 (gas separation and filtration), suggesting a research program linking indoor air quality, green infrastructure, and carbon capture — a broader but less commercially developed route than Laken’s HVAC focus.

patent records: 2
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 10 filers, including technology focus maps and momentum signals for each.
Harmon David LCABN Co Ltd+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
LAKEN & ASSOC INC3▲ new entrant
McGill University2▲ new entrant
Meesala Tripura Sai Lakshmayya1▲ new entrant
Manoj Kumar Pakki1▲ new entrant
I S Anvesh Reddy1▲ new entrant
CABN Co Ltd1▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards draw on applicant ranking, technology focus, and momentum data from the corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant structural and HVAC core

Several IPC classes appear at the periphery of the current corpus with only one or two records each; these observations are not validated commercial opportunities but indicate areas where technical coverage is currently thin relative to the core.

B01D · Separation processes (filtration and gas capture)

Only 1 patent record covers B01D (separation processes including gas filtration) in the current corpus, representing a 4% share. Carbon capture at the building level — using membrane or sorbent technologies integrated into HVAC exhaust streams — is technically adjacent to the dominant F24F claims and could extend existing system-level patents. The McGill University filing that touches B01D 53 suggests an academic research pathway that has not yet translated into broad industrial coverage.

Search this in Eureka →

A01G · Horticulture and green infrastructure integration

A01G (horticulture and forestry) has 1 patent record in the corpus, a 4% share. Green roofs, living walls, and biophilic building skins are increasingly cited in net-zero building standards as passive carbon-offset and thermal-regulation mechanisms. Coverage here is sparse and concentrated in a single academic filer, leaving the intersection of structural engineering and horticultural integration essentially uncontested for industrial applicants with construction-scale expertise.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all 14 IPC branches mapped against applicant coverage, including B32B layered products and C01B inorganic carbon-sequestering materials.
B32B · Layered products & laminatesC01B · Non-metallic elements & inorganic compounds+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are ranked by patent-record count within the corpus; lower-count branches indicate relative sparsity, not confirmed commercial gaps.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerE04B 1 · Building structures & elementsF24F 11 · Air conditioning & ventilationF24F 5 · Air conditioning & ventilationE04B 5 · Building structures & elementsE04F 15 · Building finishing
Harmon David LStrong · 2AbsentAbsentStrong · 2Strong · 2
Laken & Associates IncAbsentStrong · 3Strong · 3AbsentAbsent
CABN Co LtdStrong · 1AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
B Anil KumarAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own carbon-neutral building patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.