Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (39 records) with 2024 (51) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,364 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
Casting simulation and die design sits at the intersection of computational modelling and tooling engineering: filling pattern prediction, air entrapment control, thermal balance across the die, vacuum assistance, die life estimation and warpage prediction are the recurring technical threads tying the corpus together. 3,364 records fall within scope for the period tracked, spanning applicants from tooling specialists to university labs and materials suppliers. The assignee ranking returned by the data endpoint covers 100 companies — a wide field, not a short list of dominant players.
Filing concentration is low relative to many mature manufacturing technologies: the top 10 ranked assignees together hold 11.0% of all records, leaving the majority of filings distributed across a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants. That pattern usually signals a technology still being worked out in the open, where claim scope has not yet consolidated around a handful of dominant architectures.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 3,364-record dataset: filings over time, and how those records distribute across IPC subclasses. Because a single record can carry more than one classification, the subclass shares below sum to more than 100%.
Filings peaked at 94 in 2017 and have moved unevenly since; the last fully comparable window shows growth from 39 records in 2021 to 51 in 2024, a 31% rise. Counts for 2025 and 2026 are understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months — treat the most recent bars as still filling in, not as a decline.
Medicinal preparations (A61K) and microorganism/genetic engineering claims (C12N) each touch over a quarter of all records, with therapeutic-activity classifications (A61P) and peptide/protein chemistry (C07K) close behind. Material analysis and testing (G01N) and enzymatic/DNA measurement (C12Q) sit lower but still cross 15% of the corpus, marking where simulation and testing methodology overlaps with the core casting-and-die claims.
Shares are the percentage of the 3,364 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about casting simulation and die design and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by Anhui University of Science and Technology, this record describes a physical test-bench approach to validating gravity casting simulation, pairing a modelled filling and solidification prediction with an instrumented rig for measured comparison.Filed 2019-09-18. Included here as a representative record from the dataset, not necessarily the most-cited.
View full record in Eureka| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5207666A | Passive shuttle metering device for implantable drug delivery system | 336 |
| 2 | WO2020125839A1 | Electronic element and electrically controlled display element | 324 |
| 3 | WO2003002711A2 | A novel group of dollar g(a)-amylases and a method for identification and production of novel dollar g(a)-amy… | 251 |
| 4 | WO2004067561A1 | Amyloid- dollar g(b)(1-42) oligomers, derivatives thereof, antibodies for the same, method for production and… | 221 |
| 5 | WO2005044836A2 | Macromolecular nucleotide compounds and methods for using the same | 210 |
| 6 | US6046641A | Parallel HV MOSFET high power stable amplifier | 179 |
| 7 | WO2018065360A1 | Cyclic dinucleotides containing benzimidazole, method for the production of same, and use of same to activate… | 169 |
| 8 | EP1230354A2 | Permanent amniocyte cell line, the production thereof and its use for producing gene transfer vectors | 167 |
| 9 | US7024342B1 | Thermal flow simulation for casting/molding processes | 161 |
| 10 | WO2002086126A2 | Enzymatic method for the enantioselective reduction of keto compounds | 116 |
Citation counts accumulate over time, so older records are structurally favoured — read this table as a map of influence within the searched corpus, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings stand out once the concentration figures, filing trend and receiving-office split are read together.
With the leader at 56 records and the top 5 combined at just 6.5% of all 3,364 records in scope, casting simulation and die design has not consolidated around a small number of dominant filers. That leaves room for a well-drafted claim to stake out defensible ground rather than design around an entrenched leader.
The field's high-water mark of 94 filings in 2017 was not sustained, but the most recent complete comparison shows renewed growth: 39 records in 2021 rising to 51 in 2024. Read 2025-2026 figures as understated given typical publication lag, not as a downturn.
Germany accounts for 1,572 records, well ahead of the EPO (447) and WIPO/PCT (320). Any freedom-to-operate search in this space should treat the German register as the primary prior-art pool, with EPO and PCT filings as the secondary check.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to casting simulation and die design, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked list spans 100 companies with no dominant leader, which makes the pattern of who is active — and who has gone quiet — as informative as the raw counts.
At 56 records, the leading assignee sits well ahead of fifth place (38) and tenth place (26), but the drop-off is gradual rather than a cliff — consistent with a field where no single architecture has become the default.
The ranking the data endpoint returns covers 100 companies rather than a short leaderboard, and the top 10 combined still account for only 11.0% of all 3,364 records. Most filers in scope appear with a handful of records or fewer.
A number of the higher-ranked assignees show zero filings in the latest tracked year, including one recording a -100% year-on-year change. Given publication lag, this may reflect filings still in the pipeline rather than a genuine exit — worth confirming before reading too much into it.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Genentech, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Agilent Technologies, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
| Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Foerderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | 0 | — |
| Clondiag GmbH | 0 | — |
| BASF SE | 0 | — |
| Merck Patent GmbH | 0 | — |
| University of Zurich | 0 | — |
| KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up work depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, portfolio strategy, or identifying a first-filing opportunity.
With concentration this low, a targeted FTO search against the ranked leaders and their strongest co-assignee pairings will cover more ground than chasing the full long tail.
Explore assignee claims in EurekaVacuum-assisted filling, warpage prediction and thermal-cycling die-life claims show thinner density — worth checking against any technology already in development.
Search white space in EurekaThe ranked list covers 100 companies, and no single filer dominates: the top-ranked assignee holds 56 records, with fifth place at 38 and tenth place at 26. The top 5 assignees combined account for only 6.5% of all 3,364 records in scope, and the top 10 combined reach 11.0%. That means most of the field's activity sits with filers outside the ranked leaders, so a competitive review needs to look past the obvious names.
Filing activity peaked at 94 records in 2017 and did not sustain that level afterward, but the most recent complete comparison shows growth, not decline: 39 records in 2021 rose to 51 in 2024, a 31% increase. Figures for 2025 and 2026 look lower, but that reflects normal publication lag of roughly 18 months rather than a real slowdown. Any conclusion about the field cooling off should wait until those later years finish publishing.
Germany is by far the dominant receiving office in this dataset with 1,572 records, ahead of the EPO at 447 and WIPO/PCT filings at 320. The United States (138) and Australia (123) trail well behind. This distribution suggests German patent examiners have built the deepest body of prior art in this specific technology, which matters both for drafting strategy and for where a search should start.
GB201911055D0, filed by Anhui University of Science and Technology on 2019-09-18, describes a gravity casting simulation test bench that pairs a modelled filling and solidification prediction with a physical instrumented rig for validation. It is included here as a representative record of the corpus rather than the most-cited filing in the field. Whether it blocks a specific new filing depends on how closely a proposed claim tracks its particular test-bench and validation-loop architecture, which requires a direct claim-by-claim comparison rather than a landscape-level read.
Filing density is visibly thinner around vacuum-assisted die filling controls, warpage prediction algorithms, die-life estimation under thermal cycling, thermal balance sensing in multi-cavity dies, and air-entrapment detection methods, relative to the core simulation and gating-system claims that dominate the corpus. Thin filing density signals open claim space rather than a technology gap in demand, since these are established engineering problems without heavy patent coverage yet. A first mover drafting claims here has more room to define the architecture than in the more heavily filed gating and filling-pattern space.
Go past this page: query the whole casting simulation and die design corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.