Catalyst Manufacturing Scale-Up Patent Landscape 2026
Catalyst manufacturing scale-up is a moderately concentrated field, with Huntsman Petrochemical and Johnson Matthey holding the top positions and the United States as the dominant filing jurisdiction. Annual volume has eased from its 2020 peak, signaling a field past its rapid-growth phase where technical differentiation and adjacency moves carry higher strategic weight.
Huntsman leads a field where the top five filers hold over a third of the largest filers’ combined activity
Huntsman Petrochemical LLC leads the applicant ranking with 30 patent records, ahead of Johnson Matthey PLC at 24 and Lummus Technology Inc at 18. Babcock Hitachi KK ranks fourth at 17 patent records, forming a distinct top tier.
The top five filers account for 38% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, indicating moderate but not extreme concentration. A clear tier gap exists between the top four players and the remainder of the ranking, where no single applicant reaches double digits above rank five.
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Huntsman Petrochemical LLC | 30 | |
| 2 | Johnson Matthey PLC | 24 | |
| 3 | Lummus Technology Inc | 18 | |
| 4 | Babcock Hitachi KK | 17 | |
| 5 | Thrunnel Ltd Oy | 9 | |
| 6 | Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences | 8 | |
| 7 | Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Ltd | 7 | |
| 8 | University of Connecticut | 7 | |
| 9 | SABIC Global Technologies BV | 6 | |
| 10 | Covestro Deutschland AG | 6 |
| # | Applicant | Patent records | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | United States of America as represented by the Administrator (US Government) | 6 | |
| 12 | LG Chem Ltd | 5 | |
| 13 | Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology | 5 | |
| 14 | Khaled A H Abo-Hashema (individual) | 5 | |
| 15 | Nippon Seisen Co Ltd | 4 | |
| 16 | Khaled A H Abo-Hashema (individual) | 4 | |
| 17 | Ichikawa (individual) | 4 | |
| 18 | Huntsman Specialty Chemicals Corp | 4 | |
| 19 | UNIV OF SCI & TECH BEIJING | 3 | |
| 20 | BASF Catalysts LLC | 3 |
The leaders’ positions reflect long-standing industrial chemistry and refining expertise; Huntsman and Johnson Matthey in particular span both commercial catalyst supply and proprietary process scale-up, giving them broad portfolio coverage that challengers would need to circumvent rather than replicate directly.
Recent filing years (approximately 2024–2026) are subject to publication lag and likely undercount true activity; the apparent drop in those years should not be read as a further structural decline. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.
Activity peaked in 2020 and has eased; B01J catalysis dominates the technology mix with several adjacent branches underserved
The filing trend chart reveals a field that surged to a 2020 peak of 23 annual records then pulled back, while the technology composition chart shows heavy concentration in core catalysis classes alongside a long tail of adjacent branches with sparse coverage.
Annual filing trend
Filings climbed from 7 records in 2017 to a peak of 23 in 2020, then eased to single digits by 2021–2023, with a partial recovery to 13 in 2024. The 2025–2026 data points (4 and 1 records respectively) reflect publication lag rather than confirmed activity levels and should be treated as provisional.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaTechnology composition
B01J (Chemical/physical processes and catalysis) dominates the IPC distribution with 258 records, followed by C07C (Acyclic and carbocyclic compounds) at 113. B01D (Separation processes), F01N (Exhaust treatment), C25B (Electrolytic production), B22F (Powder metallurgy), and C07D (Heterocyclic compounds) each appear with counts in the teens-to-low-forties range, representing adjacent branches where scale-up know-how is sparser relative to the core.
↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask EurekaHighly cited patent families surfaced by the query
Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.
Cored round trilobe shaped catalyst for producing …
The present disclosure provides an improved shaped catalyst containing catalytic material comprised of mixed oxides of vanadium and phosphorus and using such shaped catalysts for the production of maleic anhydride. (excerpt from the patent abstract)
| # | Patent | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Catalyst for producing carbon nanotubes by means o… | 178 |
| 2 | Shaped oxidation catalyst structures for the produ… | 158 |
| 3 | Catalyst manufacturing method | 98 |
| 4 | Heterogeneous gaseous chemical reactor catalyst | 82 |
| 5 | Process for preparing acrylic acid from methanol a… | 75 |
| 6 | Catalyst for producing carbon nanotubes by means o… | 66 |
| 7 | Molding catalyst for heterogenous system catalyst … | 50 |
| 8 | Catalytic distillation | 47 |
Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.
What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions
Four dimensions — lifecycle stage, concentration, collaboration ecosystem, and geography — collectively shape where new entrants and incumbents should direct effort in catalyst scale-up.
Field is in decline from its 2020 peak
The lifecycle evidence classifies this field as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2020 peak of 23 records. For R&D teams, this typically signals that broad foundational claims are already held and incremental improvement patents face a crowded prior-art base. Differentiation through adjacent processes or novel catalyst form factors is more likely to yield protectable space than core composition filings.
Lifecycle: DeclineTop tier is entrenched but not monopolistic
The top five filers account for 38% of the hundred largest filers’ combined records, with Huntsman Petrochemical (30 records) and Johnson Matthey PLC (24 records) holding the clearest advantages. The mid-tier — Lummus Technology, Babcock Hitachi, and Thrunnel — each hold between 9 and 18 records, leaving meaningful room for challengers to build differentiated sub-domain positions without directly competing with the leaders across all routes.
Moderate concentrationNo co-filing partnerships identified in this corpus
The collaboration evidence shows no co-applicant filings within this dataset. The absence of visible joint filings suggests that scale-up know-how is treated as proprietary by the dominant players, and that university-industry or cross-company consortia have not yet emerged as a structuring force in this space. New entrants seeking ecosystem leverage may find open collaboration channels as a genuine differentiator.
No co-filers detectedUS-centric filing with meaningful EPO and China coverage
The United States leads jurisdiction coverage at 58 records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 45 and China at 26. WIPO PCT filings at 21 and India at 15 suggest applicants are pursuing multi-region protection for higher-value inventions. South Korea, Japan, and Australia each appear at 10–13 records, rounding out a genuinely global (if US-anchored) filing geography. Teams seeking freedom-to-operate in emerging manufacturing hubs should pay particular attention to the China and India profiles.
US-led, global scopeGo beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.
Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.
Huntsman leads on volume; Johnson Matthey brings the broadest process-to-form-factor coverage
The two leading applicants differ in emphasis: Huntsman Petrochemical concentrates on core catalysis and heterocyclic compound routes, while Johnson Matthey spans catalysis preparation, powder metallurgy, and shaped-catalyst structures. Momentum signals vary sharply across the top cohort.
Huntsman Petrochemical LLC
Huntsman Petrochemical holds 30 patent records, the largest position in the corpus. Its technology focus clusters on B01J 27 and B01J 35 (catalysis preparation and shaped catalysts) alongside C07D 307 (heterocyclic compounds), indicating a specialization in both catalyst form and targeted organic synthesis applications. Momentum data for Huntsman Petrochemical specifically is not broken out in the evidence; the broader Huntsman entity appears as a historically dominant filer rather than a recent surge.
patent records: 30Johnson Matthey PLC
Johnson Matthey PLC holds 24 patent records and shows the broadest multi-domain coverage among the leaders, with top IPC codes spanning B01J 35 (shaped catalysts), B01J 37 (catalyst preparation methods), and B22F 3 (powder metallurgy compaction and forming). This combination of catalysis and powder-forming expertise maps directly to industrial-scale catalyst pellet and monolith manufacture. Applicant momentum data indicates Johnson Matthey registered as a new entrant in the most recent period, suggesting renewed but nascent recent activity from a small recent base.
patent records: 24| Applicant | Recent (3 yrs) | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson Matthey PLC | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Lummus Technology Inc | 2 | ▼ -83% |
| BASF SE | 1 | ▲ new entrant |
| Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Ltd | 5 | ▲ new entrant |
Under-served branches adjacent to core catalysis scale-up
Several IPC classes appear in the corpus at low relative share despite plausible technical connections to catalyst scale-up; these represent observations of sparsity rather than validated commercial gaps, and their relevance should be verified against specific R&D objectives before acting.
C25B · Electrolytic production of compounds
C25B carries 21 records and a 3% share of IPC assignments in this corpus — sparse relative to the dominant B01J class. Electrolytic catalyst scale-up is directly relevant to green hydrogen and electrochemical synthesis pathways, where electrode and membrane catalyst deposition at scale is an active engineering challenge. The technical overlap with B01J preparation methods and B22F powder forming creates a plausible entry path for teams with electrochemical or PEM expertise seeking to extend into manufacturing scale-up claims.
Search this in Eureka →B22F · Powder metallurgy
B22F holds 19 records and a 3% share, appearing primarily in Johnson Matthey’s portfolio, which suggests that powder-based catalyst forming (compaction, sintering, pelletization) is addressed by only a narrow set of filers. Given that powder metallurgy underpins shaped-catalyst manufacturing for fixed-bed and monolith reactors, its low coverage across the broader applicant base may signal an under-claimed area. Teams with materials-forming or additive-manufacturing backgrounds could find adjacent opportunities here, though the Johnson Matthey position warrants a careful freedom-to-operate review.
Search this in Eureka →Frequently asked questions
The corpus covers 92 patent families in scope. Applicant rankings within the analysis are based on patent records, which can exceed the family count because a single family may be filed across multiple offices.
Huntsman Petrochemical LLC leads with 30 patent records, ahead of Johnson Matthey PLC at 24 and Lummus Technology Inc at 18. These three applicants form a distinct top tier separated from the rest of the ranking.
Evidence classifies the field as Decline. Annual filings peaked at 23 records in 2020 and have eased since. The most recent years (2025–2026) show very low counts that reflect publication lag rather than confirmed activity, but the multi-year trend from 2020 onward is downward.
The United States leads with 58 patent records, followed by Europe (EPO) at 45 and China at 26. WIPO PCT filings stand at 21 and India at 15, indicating that leading applicants pursue multi-region protection for higher-value inventions.
Five adjacent branches show notably lower coverage: B01D (Separation processes, 45 records), F01N (Exhaust treatment, 22), C25B (Electrolytic production, 21), B22F (Powder metallurgy, 19), and C07D (Heterocyclic compounds, 19). All carry a 3–7% share of IPC assignments compared with B01J’s dominant position.
No co-applicant filings are identified in the collaboration evidence for this corpus. Scale-up know-how appears to be held and filed unilaterally by the major players, and no visible university-industry or cross-company consortia have yet emerged as a structuring force.
Built on Patsnap Open Platform
This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.