Book a demo

CDI Charge-Discharge Control Patent Landscape 2026

CDI Charge-Discharge Control Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
CDI Charge-Discharge Control Patent Landscape in 2026

The CDI charge-discharge control field is moderately concentrated, with Samsung Electronics and Stockholm Water Tech AB jointly leading, and activity dominated by water-treatment applications under C02F. Annual filing volume has plateaued near its 2018 peak, while several adjacent branches — notably electrolytic compound production and advanced electrode materials — remain comparatively sparse.

50
Patent families in scope
34%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+6%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung and Stockholm Water Tech lead a fragmented but concentrated top tier

Samsung Electronics and Stockholm Water Tech AB share the top ranking, each with 8 patent records, followed by Jilin University, Foshan Shunde Midea Water Dispenser Manufacturing, and Midea Group, each with 4 patent records. The top five filers collectively account for 34% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total, signalling a moderately concentrated field.

Below the two co-leaders, the ranking disperses quickly across universities and smaller industrial players, most holding two or three patent records. This broad mid-tier, with no clear second-place challenger substantially closing the gap on the leaders, points to an open competitive field rather than a two-firm duopoly.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.8
2Stockholm Water Tech AB8
3Jilin University4
4Foshan Shunde Midea Water Dispenser Manufacturing Co., Ltd.4
5Midea Group Co., Ltd.4
6Shenyang Institute of Chemical Technology3
7Nanyang Technological University3
8WUHAN UNIV OF SCI & TECH3
9Voltea3
10KOREA INST OF CIVIL ENG & BUILDING TECH3
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11École de Technologie Supérieure2
12Jiangsu Maymuse Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.2
13Jacon2
14Korea Institute of Energy Research2
15Changzhou University2
16KOREA ADVANCED INST OF SCI & TECH2
17Hyundae Steel Co., Ltd.2
18KOREA UNIV RES & BUSINESS FOUND2
19National Taiwan University2
20DOOSAN HEAVY IND & CONSTR CO LTD2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions reflect deep expertise in core capacitive deionization water-treatment processes (C02F), giving them a prior-art foundation that late entrants must design around, particularly in electrode cycling and ion-exchange membrane control methods.

The most recent 18–24 months of filings are subject to publication lag and are therefore likely under-counted; trend readings near the current date should be interpreted with that in mind. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing activity has plateaued since a 2018 peak; water treatment dominates the technology mix

The annual filing trend and technology-composition charts together reveal a maturing field anchored in water-treatment chemistry, with limited but notable satellite activity in separation and electrolytic processes.

Annual filing trend

Filings peaked in 2018 with 10 records, then settled into a 4–6 record annual range through 2023. A visible uptick appears in 2024 (9 records), though this figure should be read cautiously given publication lag — the 2025 and 2026 counts are almost certainly incomplete. The multi-year window still shows modest positive growth of 6%, consistent with a plateau rather than a decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 10 in 2018.020171020186201962020520214202252023920245202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C02F (water and wastewater treatment) commands 74 records, far ahead of all other classes, confirming that charge-discharge control is overwhelmingly applied to desalination and ion-removal contexts. B01D (separation processes) is the next largest branch at 12 records, followed by C25B (electrolytic production) at 7. All remaining IPC classes each hold 3 or fewer records, underscoring the narrow application focus of the current corpus.

Technology compositionC02F · Water & wastewater treatment leads with 74; B01D · Separation processes (filtration etc.) 12.C02F · Water & wastewate…74B01D · Separation proces…12C25B · Electrolytic prod…7C01B · Non-metallic elem…3C08B · Polysaccharides &…3C08L · Polymer compositi…3G01N · Material analysis…3H01M · Batteries, cells …3↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2025095515A1Published 2025-05-08

Capacitive deionization water purification system …

Korea Institute Of Civil Engineering And Building Technology

Provided are a capacitive deionization (CDI) water purification system using citric circulation water in a circulation tank for a desorption process, and a control method therefor, the CDI water purification system being implemented to separately include a circulation tank capable of supplying circulation water used only for ion desorption in a desorption… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Capacitive deionization water purification system … — patent drawingCapacitive deionization water purification system … — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Method and apparatus for capacitive deionization a…368
2Capacitive deionization device30
3Method and apparatus for capacitive deionization, …22
4Electrode containing a hybrid nanomaterial of grap…18
5Control method of capacitive deionization device16
6Capacitive deionization device and method of contr…13
7一种纳米钛渗碳电极电容去离子装置12
8一种履带状回转式电极电容去离子装置与方法11

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of a plateauing filing rate, a concentrated top tier, and a narrow technology focus in C02F creates both risks and openings for teams entering or expanding in this space.

Maturity

Field has plateaued near its 2018 peak

Annual filings have plateaued near their 2018 high and have not returned to that peak level on a sustained basis, placing the field in a mature stage. On a multi-year basis, the 6% recent growth figure suggests the field is not contracting, but the era of rapid accumulation of foundational filings appears to have passed. Teams entering now face an established prior-art landscape and must differentiate through novel control algorithms, electrode geometries, or application domains.

Mature / Plateau
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a broad mid-tier

The top five filers hold 34% of the hundred largest filers’ combined total — a moderate concentration level. The co-leaders Samsung Electronics and Stockholm Water Tech AB hold equal positions at 8 patent records each, with no single dominant player. The wide mid-tier of universities and smaller industrials means that targeted filing in a sub-niche can establish a defensible position without confronting a single monolithic blocker.

Moderate Concentration
Collaboration

Two active co-filing pairs identified

Midea Group and Foshan Shunde Midea Water Dispenser Manufacturing co-filed 4 records together, reflecting an integrated corporate-subsidiary R&D relationship. Shenyang Institute of Chemical Technology and Wuhan University of Science and Technology co-filed 3 records, representing an academic cross-institutional pairing. No large-scale industry–academia consortia are evident, leaving that collaboration model as an under-exploited structural option.

Limited Collaboration
Geography

China and South Korea lead filing activity; US and EPO form a secondary tier

China leads with 18 patent records, closely followed by South Korea with 17, reflecting the concentration of both industrial and academic filers in those jurisdictions. The United States ranks third at 12 records, with Europe (EPO) and WIPO (PCT) each at 7. The Netherlands, Singapore, Taiwan, and several other jurisdictions each hold small counts. Teams seeking broad commercial protection should prioritize a China–Korea–US–EPO filing strategy.

Asia-Led Geography
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Midea Group Co., Ltd.Foshan Shunde Midea Water Dispenser Manufacturing Co., Ltd.4
Shenyang Institute of Chemical TechnologyWuhan University of Science and Technology3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insight cards are derived from lifecycle, collaboration, jurisdiction, and applicant-ranking evidence in the CDI corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung Electronics and Stockholm Water Tech AB lead; Midea and Jilin University are new entrants with momentum

The top two filers are tied on volume but differ in geographic focus and institutional type: one is a global electronics conglomerate, the other a specialized water-technology company. Below them, several organizations entered recently with notable momentum.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics holds 8 patent records, all concentrated in C02F 1 (water and wastewater treatment), with satellite coverage in B01D 61 (separation processes) and C25B 15 (electrolytic production). Its breadth across core and adjacent classes suggests a platform-level CDI strategy rather than narrow point solutions. Momentum data places Samsung in the established tier without a flagged recent surge, consistent with a mature portfolio being selectively maintained.

patent records: 8
Challenger · Stockholm Water Tech AB

Stockholm Water Tech AB

Stockholm Water Tech AB also holds 8 patent records, focused exclusively on C02F 1 and B01D separation classes — a tighter, more application-specific profile than Samsung’s. Its equal rank despite a narrower IPC spread indicates depth in core CDI water-treatment process control. Midea Group and Jilin University each entered as new entrants in the recent window with 4 patent records, representing the most active new momentum in the current period.

patent records: 8
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 identified applicants, including university filers and emerging industrial entrants.
VolteaNanyang Technological University+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Midea Group Co., Ltd.4▲ new entrant
Jilin University4▲ new entrant
Foshan Shunde Midea Water Dispenser Manufacturing Co., Ltd.4▲ new entrant
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology2▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player cards are based on applicant patent-record counts, technology focus (applicantTech), and filing momentum evidence.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Electrolytic compound production and advanced electrode materials are under-served adjacent branches

Several IPC classes adjacent to the dominant C02F core hold only a handful of records each, and may represent areas where differentiated CDI charge-discharge control research could find less crowded prior art.

C25B · Electrolytic production of compounds

C25B holds 7 records — the largest of the sparse branches — representing electrolytic compound production. CDI charge-discharge control overlaps naturally with electrolytic processes when electrode reactions produce or consume ions beyond simple adsorption cycles. The relatively low filing count relative to C02F suggests that control methods specifically optimized for electrolytic CDI variants (e.g., chlorine generation, hydrogen evolution suppression) remain under-developed. Teams with electrochemistry expertise in Samsung’s C25B 15 sub-class have a potential first-mover angle in this sub-domain.

Search this in Eureka →

C01B / C08B / C08L · Inorganic compounds and polymer electrode materials

C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds), C08B (polysaccharides and derivatives), and C08L (polymer compositions) each hold only 3 records. Nanyang Technological University is notably the only filer with C01B 32 and C08B 37 coverage, reflecting graphene-based and biopolymer electrode material research. Charge-discharge control strategies that co-optimize electrode material chemistry — such as capacitance-aware cycling for novel carbon architectures or ion-selective polymer membranes — are sparsely covered and represent an observation of relative sparsity with plausible technical value for materials-oriented R&D teams.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all identified sparse IPC branches and their overlap with active applicant portfolios to prioritize R&D investment.
G01N · Material analysis & testingH01G · Capacitors+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Adjacent branches are IPC classes with low record counts relative to the dominant C02F class; sparsity is an observation, not a validated commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerC02F 1 · Water & wastewater treatmentB01D 61 · Separation processes (filtration etc.)C02F 103 · Water & wastewater treatmentC25B 15 · Electrolytic production of compoundsC02F 101 · Water & wastewater treatment
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 8Emerging · 1AbsentEmerging · 1Absent
Stockholm Water Tech ABStrong · 8Emerging · 1Emerging · 1AbsentAbsent
Jilin UniversityStrong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsentModerate · 2
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building TechnologyStrong · 3Strong · 2Moderate · 1AbsentAbsent
Foshan Shunde Midea Water Dispenser Manufacturing Co., Ltd.Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Midea Group Co., Ltd.Strong · 4AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Nanyang Technological UniversityStrong · 3AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own CDI charge-discharge control landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.