Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape tracks 276 patent families published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off that combine CdTe solar cell claims with absorber-layer, deposition or grain-growth process language. The corpus spans device architecture claims filed under H01L alongside deposition and coating process claims filed under C23C and C25D, giving a view across both the finished device and the process used to build its absorber layer.
Filing activity is concentrated in the United States, with the WIPO PCT route and European filings forming the next largest blocks, followed by smaller volumes in Australia, India and Canada. The most heavily cited records in the set predate the 2015 window, meaning the claim scope that current filers must design around was largely established before this dataset begins.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing activity in this dataset runs from 2015 through the partial-year 2026 cut-off, with technology coverage spread across semiconductor device claims and the deposition and coating processes that produce the CdTe absorber layer itself.
Filings rose to 20 in 2018, the peak year in this dataset, then fell back toward a single filing at the 2022 midpoint. That flat-to-declining pattern after the peak suggests the core absorber-formation claim space filled up early in the period rather than continuing to expand.
H01L (semiconductor devices) accounts for 252 of the records, dwarfing every other subclass. C23C (coating and surface deposition, 39) and C25D (electroplating and electroforming, 20) show that deposition-process claims are a real but secondary share of the filing activity, with C03C (glass and enamel, 11) and smaller subclasses trailing further behind.
Shares are the percentage of the 276 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cdte thin-film solar cell absorber layer and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe method forms a Cd-deficient, Te-rich surface region on a CdTe containing compound film, exposes that region to an electron-reflector forming material, forms the electron reflector, and lays down a contact layer over it. The resulting cell has a Cd/Te molar ratio within the treated region that decreases from 1, producing an electron-reflector layer and ohmic contact on the surface of the CdTe absorber.Filed by EncoreSolar, Inc.; published 2012-08-02.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6137048A | Process for fabricating polycrystalline semiconductor thin-film solar cells, and cells produced thereby | 241 |
| 2 | US6423565B1 | Apparatus and processes for the massproduction of photovotaic modules | 237 |
| 3 | US20030129810A1 | Apparatus and processes for the mass production of photovoltaic modules | 219 |
| 4 | US6537845B1 | Chemical surface deposition of ultra-thin semiconductors | 165 |
| 5 | US5304499A | Methods of making pn CdTe/CdS thin film solar cells | 140 |
| 6 | US5922142A | Photovoltaic devices comprising cadmium stannate transparent conducting films and method for making | 129 |
| 7 | US7220321B2 | Apparatus and processes for the mass production of photovoltaic modules | 103 |
| 8 | US20090242029A1 | Junctions in substrate solar cells | 95 |
| 9 | US20090235986A1 | Back contact for thin film solar cells | 88 |
| 10 | US20030011047A1 | Photovoltaic device | 83 |
Ranked by citation count within the searched corpus; older filings accumulate more citations and should be read as influence markers, not as current commercial signals.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals stand out once the raw counts are read against each other: where the claim density sits, how filing momentum has moved, and which records still carry the most citation weight.
Semiconductor device claims under H01L outnumber every other subclass combined, with coating (C23C, 39) and electroplating (C25D, 20) trailing well behind. Occupied claim space here is in device architecture and contact structure, not in the deposition chemistry itself.
The peak year of 20 filings in 2018 gives way to a single filing by 2022, and recent-year momentum across every leading assignee tracked shows zero filings in the latest year. Publication lag means the newest year is always underreported, but the multi-year decline predates that effect.
US6137048A, filed well before this dataset's window opens, remains the single most-cited record at 241 citations, ahead of two other pre-2015 apparatus and fabrication patents. High citation counts here mark foundational influence rather than current filing activity.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cdte thin-film solar cell absorber layer, with the prior art for and against each one.
Filing here shows a small set of assignees with sustained activity through the peak years, several joint-development pairs, and a broad tail of single-filing entrants — but no leading assignee shows any filings in the latest year tracked.
Every assignee with the highest historical filing counts in this dataset — spanning module manufacturers and materials suppliers — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year, consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend since the 2018 peak.
Of 10 co-assignee pairs identified in this dataset, the strongest pairing accounts for 16 jointly filed records, well ahead of the next pairs at 7 and 5. That concentration suggests joint absorber-process development has been the exception rather than the norm.
United States filings account for the largest single share of receiving-office activity, with the WIPO PCT route and the European Patent Office forming a meaningful second tier ahead of Australia, India and Canada.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| First Solar, Inc. | 0 | — |
| General Electric Company | 0 | — |
| SOLEXANT CORP | 0 | — |
| Ulillae Solar Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| EncoreSolar, Inc. | 0 | — |
| CTF Solar GmbH | 0 | — |
| China Triumph International Engineering Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Reel Solar, Inc. | 0 | — |
The filing pattern here points to a claim space that filled early and has cooled since — the open questions now are about where the remaining gaps sit and how durable the oldest claims still are.
Before committing to a specific absorber-formation or contact-treatment method, check it against the pre-2015 apparatus and fabrication claims that still carry the most citation weight in this corpus.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaH01B and H10D remain comparatively unclaimed relative to core device and deposition subclasses; monitoring new entrants there can flag a shift before it shows up in the aggregate trend.
Set up subclass monitoring in EurekaRecent-year filings sit at zero across every leading assignee tracked, but publication lag means 2025-2026 activity is understated; revisit the trend once later filings publish.
Explore the full trend data in EurekaThe most-cited records in this dataset cover polycrystalline thin-film fabrication and mass-production apparatus for photovoltaic modules, with citation counts in the hundreds that mark them as foundational reference points for later filers. These records date from the earlier part of the period tracked and set process and apparatus scope that subsequent absorber-layer and contact-treatment patents had to build around. Because citation counts accumulate over time, the highest-cited records are not necessarily the most commercially active today, but they remain the claims most often referenced when assessing freedom to operate.
No. Filing activity peaked at 20 records in 2018 and had fallen to a single filing by the 2022 midpoint of the dataset, and recent-year momentum across the leading assignees tracked here shows zero filings in the latest year. That pattern points to a flat-to-declining filing trend rather than continued expansion, though the most recent year or two is always understated because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months. A practitioner should treat the apparent decline as a lower bound rather than a confirmed drop-off.
Close-space sublimation and related vapor-based deposition methods sit largely under H01L and C23C in this dataset, which together account for a large majority of the 276 records tracked, reflecting their status as the dominant commercial route to CdTe absorber formation. Electrodeposition claims are tracked separately under C25D, with 20 records, making it a smaller but still active alternative filing route. The two routes are claimed differently: vapor deposition patents tend to specify temperature and vapor-transport parameters, while electrodeposition patents specify bath composition and current conditions.
US20120192948A1, assigned to EncoreSolar, claims a method of forming a Cd-deficient, Te-rich surface region on a CdTe absorber and converting it into an electron-reflector layer beneath an ohmic contact, with a specified Cd/Te molar ratio gradient. It blocks approaches that rely on that specific compositional gradient as the basis for the electron-reflector step, but it does not cover absorber deposition itself or alternative reflector mechanisms that do not use a Cd-deficient surface gradient. Anyone designing a back-contact stack should check whether their surface-conditioning step produces a comparable stoichiometric profile before assuming clearance.
The thinnest subclasses in this dataset are H01B (cables, conductors and insulators, 6 records) and H10D (general semiconductor devices, 4 records), both far behind the 252 records concentrated in core H01L device claims. That gap suggests interconnect and interlayer conductor treatment specific to CdTe absorbers is comparatively open relative to the well-claimed absorber-deposition and device-architecture space. Zero recent-year filings across the leading assignees tracked here reinforces that this white space looks unclaimed rather than recently vacated by a retreating competitor.
Go past this page: query the whole cdte thin-film solar cell absorber layer corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.