Book a demo

Cell-Free Glycosylation Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026

Cell-Free Glycosylation Patents: Leaders, Trends & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/cell-free-biomanufacturing-cell-free-glycosylation-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Synthetic Biology & Biomanufacturing
Cell-Free Glycosylation Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Has Gone Quiet

A patent landscape review of cell-free glycosylation biomanufacturing: filing trends since 2017, the assignee ranking led by Northwestern and Cornell, technology composition across IPC classes, and the most-cited cell-fr

52
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
13
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth = 2021 (2 records) → 2024 (0); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the cell-free glycosylation patent record shows

Cell-free glycosylation replaces a living cell with a lysate or reconstituted enzyme system to attach sugar chains to proteins outside a cell wall. That matters commercially because glycosylation is often the rate-limiting, hardest-to-control step in producing glycoproteins and glycoconjugate vaccines, and doing it acellularly removes constraints tied to host-cell viability and secretion pathways. The 52 records in scope span academic assignees, individual inventors and a small number of corporate filers, with Cornell University and Northwestern University repeatedly appearing together on the same families.

The filing history runs from 2017 through a 2020 peak, then thins out sharply — the evidence shows a -100% swing in filings between 2021 and 2024, the last year that can be treated as a complete filing cohort given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication. Reading the drop-off as a technology in retreat would be premature; it is equally consistent with the core inventive territory already being claimed by the handful of repeat filers who dominate the ranking.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017–2026
  1. 1NORTHWESTERN UNIV24
  2. 2CORNELL UNIVERSITY22
  3. 3CELGENE CORP19
  4. 4FLETCHER JULIA2
  5. 5KATZEN FEDERICO2
  6. 6KUDLICKI WIESLAW2
  7. 7INVITROGEN CORPORATION2
  8. 8STAFFORD RYAN1
  9. 9YANG JUNHAO1
  10. 10DELISA MATTHEW1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Cell Free Glycosylation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 52-record dataset: annual filing volume, and the IPC subclasses those records fall under. Because a single record can carry several IPC codes, the subclass shares below are read against the full record count, not against each other.

A sharp 2020 peak followed by a fast decline

Filings rose to a peak of 16 records in 2020, then the documented trajectory shows -100% between 2021 (2 records) and 2024 (0 records) — the most recent year with a complete filing cohort. Treat 2025 and 2026 figures as provisional; publication lag means they will keep rising as later filings surface.

A sharp 2020 peak followed by a fast decline0510152062017201820191620202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Manufacturing and therapeutic classes dominate

C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) covers 80.8% of the 52 records, and A61K (medicinal preparations) covers 69.2% — the two together frame this almost entirely as a manufacturing route toward a therapeutic or vaccine output rather than a general biochemistry claim. C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering, 63.5%) and C07K (peptides and proteins, 53.8%) sit underneath as the enabling machinery; C12R (microorganism indexing, 9.6%) is a minor tag by comparison.

Manufacturing and therapeutic classes dominateC12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…4280.8%A61K · Medicinal preparations3669.2%C12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…3363.5%C07K · Peptides & proteins2853.8%C12R · Microorganisms (index)59.6%

Shares are the percentage of the 52 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Cell Free Glycosylation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Cell Free Glycosylation Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cell-free biomanufacturing: cell free glycosylation patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited and most representative filings

Representative Filing
US12404533B22025-09-02

US12404533B2 — Bioconjugate vaccines' synthesis in prokaryotic cell lysates

CORNELL UNIVERSITY

Disclosed are methods, systems, components, and compositions for cell-free synthesis of glycosylated proteins, which may be utilized in vaccines, including anti-bacterial vaccines. The glycosylated proteins may include a bacterial polysaccharide conjugated to a carrier, which may be utilized to generate an immune response in an immunized host against the polysaccharide conjugated to the carrier. Suitable carriers may include but are not limited to Haemophilus influenzae protein D (PD), Neisseria meningitidis porin protein (PorA), Corynebacterium diphtheriae toxin (CRM 197), Clostridium tetani toxin (TT), and Escherichia coli maltose binding protein, among others.Assigned to Cornell University, granted 2025-09-02 — one of the most recent grants in the dataset and a direct descendant of the earlier prokaryote-based cell-free glycoprotein synthesis work also tied to Cornell and Northwestern.

US12404533B2 — patent drawing 1US12404533B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2016109415A1Anti-CD47 antibodies and uses thereof196
2US20060211083A1Products and processes for in vitro synthesis of biomolecules88
3WO2013067523A1A prokaryote-based cell-free system for the synthesis of glycoproteins31
4US20180016612A1Method for rapid in vitro synthesis of bioconjugate vaccines via recombinant production of n-glycosylated pro…29
5US20170369572A1Anti-CD47 antibodies and uses thereof24
6US20180298416A1Cell-free glycoprotein synthesis (CFGPS) in prokaryotic cell lysates enriched with components for glycosylati…22
7WO2017117539A1Cell-free glycoprotein synthesis (CFGPS) in prokaryotic cell lysates enriched with components for glycosylati…22
8US20190284600A1Compositions and methods for rapid in vitro synthesis of bioconjugate vaccines in vitro via production and n-…15
9US20140255987A1Prokaryote-based cell-free system for the synthesis of glycoproteins15
10WO2020146814A1Bioconjugate vaccines' synthesis in prokaryotic cell lysates13

Citation counts reward older filings that have had more time to accumulate references; read them as a signal of influence within this corpus, not as a ranking of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Cell Free Glycosylation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the ranking and the citations actually tell you

The assignee ranking and the citation table point at the same handful of institutions, but for different reasons — one reflects filing volume, the other reflects influence within this specific corpus.

Filing Leader
24 records
leading assignee

One assignee accounts for close to half the ranked filings

The leading entity in the 13-company ranking holds 24 records, far ahead of the fifth-placed filer at 2 and the tenth at 1. That gap indicates a small core group did the bulk of the inventive work, with a long tail of single- or double-filing entrants around it.

Ranking covers 13 companies, counted in records.
Collaboration
16 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

The Northwestern–Cornell pairing is the dataset's structural backbone

Of 10 identified co-assignee pairs, the Northwestern–Cornell link at 16 shared records dwarfs the next strongest pairings, each at 3. Any competitive-intelligence read of this space starts with that pairing's family tree.

10 co-assignee pairs identified across the dataset.
Citation Concentration
196 citations
top-cited record

Anti-CD47 antibody filings lead citation counts, not the glycosylation core

The most-cited record in the set, an anti-CD47 antibody filing cited 196 times, sits adjacent to rather than at the centre of cell-free glycosylation chemistry — a reminder that citation volume in a keyword-scoped corpus often tracks a well-cited platform patent's breadth, not the topic's technical core.

Second-ranked citation count: 88, for an in vitro biomolecule synthesis filing.
Filing Trajectory
-100%
2021 → 2024 change

The complete filing record ends flat, not rising

2020's peak of 16 filings gave way to a documented -100% change between 2021 (2 filings) and 2024 (0 filings), the last year with a complete cohort. Later years in the chart are still filling in under the publication lag and should not be read as confirming or reversing that trajectory yet.

Peak year: 2020 at 16 records.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cell-free biomanufacturing: cell free glycosylation patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Cell Free Glycosylation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing and citation patterns here raise questions that a static table cannot answer on its own — particularly around freedom to operate and where claim space remains open.

Map freedom to operate against the leading assignee's family

With one assignee holding 24 of the ranked records, any new filing in prokaryotic cell-lysate glycosylation should be checked claim-by-claim against that portfolio before committing R&D spend.

Explore claim charts in Eureka

Track the co-assignee network for licensing signals

The Northwestern–Cornell pairing and the smaller Kudlicki-linked clusters suggest where exclusive or non-exclusive licences are most likely to originate.

Trace assignee networks in Eureka

Watch for the next filing cohort as the lag clears

2025 and 2026 figures will keep revising upward; re-running this landscape in two to three quarters will show whether the 2021–2024 decline held or reversed.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Cell Free Glycosylation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about cell-free glycosylation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Cell Free Glycosylation Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Cell Free Glycosylation Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole cell-free biomanufacturing: cell free glycosylation patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.