Cell-Free Lysate Energy Regeneration Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
A data-backed look at cell-free biomanufacturing lysate energy regeneration patents: who is filing, how the field has moved since 2017, and where the technology claims concentrate across 53 records in scope.
Filing growth = 2021 (1 records) → 2024 (0); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete.
What this landscape covers
Cell-free biomanufacturing replaces living cells with extracted lysates to run transcription, translation and metabolic reactions outside a cell membrane. The bottleneck that keeps recurring in this corpus is energy regeneration: without a way to resupply ATP or equivalent cofactors, a lysate reaction stalls within hours. This dataset isolates patent records that specifically claim lysate-based energy regeneration methods inside cell-free systems, rather than cell-free technology broadly.
The 53 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, filed across research institutions and a small number of specialist companies. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 53-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings opened this window at 9 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 19 in 2018, and by the last complete year tracked for growth (2021 to 2024) had fallen -100%. 2025 and 2026 figures are partial because of publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
IPC subclass composition
C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) appears in 69.8% of the 53 records and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) in 64.2%, confirming that most claims sit at the molecular-biology and biochemical-reaction level rather than in hardware. C12M bioreactor apparatus claims (15.1%) and C12Q measuring/testing claims (17.0%) are comparatively thin, and C12R microorganism-index claims sit at 7.5%. Records can carry more than one subclass, so these figures sum to more than 100%.
Shares are the percentage of the 53 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cell-free biomanufacturing: lysate energy regeneration patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in the corpus
Cell-Free Translation System (US20150376673A1)
The present invention relates to a new cell-free translation system: a reaction system for translating RNA into protein using a ribosome-depleted red blood cell lysate combined with ribosomes isolated separately from eukaryotic cells, with specific provisos governing which source lysates and ribosome sources may be paired.Filed by INSERM, published 2015-12-31 — cited 14 times within this corpus.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2010074760A1 | Compositions and methods for the production of a compound | 30 |
| 2 | WO2017176963A1 | Cell-free production of ribonucleic acid | 27 |
| 3 | US20110008867A1 | Compositions and methods for the production of a compound | 26 |
| 4 | US20150376673A1 | Cell-Free Translation System | 14 |
| 5 | WO2018126287A1 | Cell-free expression system having novel inorganic polyphosphate-based energy regeneration | 12 |
| 6 | WO2014122231A1 | Cell-free translation system | 4 |
| 7 | US20220064688A1 | Cell-free production of ribonucleic acid | 3 |
Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references; read them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not of current commercial importance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (7 of 7 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Reading the concentration and the gaps
The ranking and the citation table point to a field with one dominant filer, a cluster of academic co-filers, and thin coverage on the hardware side.
One filer, then a steep drop-off
The leading assignee accounts for 26 records against a fifth-place holder at 3 and a tenth-place holder at just 1. That gap signals a field where one organisation has built sustained claim depth while the remaining ranked entities each hold a narrow slice.
Academic-industry pairing stands out
The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs a specialist cell-free company with a leading university, filing 7 records together. Two French academic institutions also co-file repeatedly with each other, at 3 records apiece.
Molecular biology claims dominate over hardware
Nearly seven in ten records touch C12N genetic-engineering claims and almost two-thirds touch C12P fermentation/enzymatic-synthesis claims, while bioreactor apparatus (C12M) appears in only 15.1%. Claim density sits overwhelmingly on the biochemistry side of the process, not on the equipment that runs it.
Activity peaked in 2018, then thinned out
Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 19 the following year. The tracked 2021-to-2024 window shows a -100% change, though the very newest years in any dataset are always undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cell-free biomanufacturing: lysate energy regeneration patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to a concentrated core of filers and a claim space weighted toward biochemistry over hardware. The next step is usually to test a specific claim or a specific gap against the full record set.
Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's filings
With one assignee holding 26 of the 53 records, any new energy-regeneration method should be checked against that portfolio specifically before broader prior-art searching.
Explore assignee filings in EurekaProbe the under-claimed hardware branch
C12M bioreactor-apparatus claims sit at just 15.1% of records, well behind the biochemistry classes. That gap is worth a dedicated search before assuming it is crowded.
Run a white-space search in EurekaTrack the citation leaders for design-around options
The most-cited records in this corpus define the reference points examiners and competitors will cite against a new filing. Reviewing their claim scope early avoids late-stage surprises.
Open the citation network in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
It refers to methods that resupply ATP or an equivalent high-energy cofactor inside a cell-free reaction, typically by adding substrates or enzyme cascades to the lysate rather than relying on a living cell's metabolism. Without it, translation or biosynthesis reactions in a lysate stall within hours because the cofactor pool is not replenished. This dataset specifically isolates patent records claiming that regeneration step, rather than cell-free technology in general, which is why the record count (53) is smaller than a general cell-free search would return.
The assignee ranking supplied with this dataset covers 10 companies and research institutions, with the leader holding 26 of the records and the tenth-ranked entity holding just 1. That is a steep drop-off rather than a gradual one, meaning a small number of organisations account for most of the sustained filing activity while the rest appear as single or occasional filers. Because the ranking counts records rather than a fixed top-50 or top-100 cut, it should be read as the complete set the data endpoint returns, not a sample.
Filing peaked at 19 records in 2018 after starting at 9 in 2017, and the tracked 2021-to-2024 window shows a -100% change. However, publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so the 2025 and 2026 figures in this dataset are still filling in and should not be read as evidence of a continuing decline. A fair reading is that the field cooled after its 2018 peak, with the most recent trend still uncertain until later publications catch up.
C12N, covering microorganisms and genetic engineering, appears in 69.8% of the 53 records in scope, and C12P, covering fermentation and enzymatic synthesis, appears in 64.2%. Bioreactor and enzyme apparatus claims under C12M appear in only 15.1%, and measuring or testing claims under C12Q in 17.0%. Because a single record can carry multiple IPC classes, these shares add up to more than 100%, and the pattern shows claim density sitting mostly on the biochemistry side rather than on equipment design.
This INSERM-filed record, published 2015-12-31, claims a cell-free translation system built on a ribosome-depleted red blood cell lysate combined with ribosomes isolated separately from eukaryotic cells, subject to specific provisos on which lysate and ribosome sources may be paired. It is cited 14 times within this corpus, making it one of the more referenced records in the field. Anyone building a red-blood-cell-lysate translation system should check whether their ribosome source and lysate-treatment combination falls inside those provisos before assuming a clear path.
Research Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole cell-free biomanufacturing: lysate energy regeneration patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.