Book a demo

Cell-Free Lysate Energy Regeneration Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Cell-Free Lysate Energy Regeneration Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/cell-free-biomanufacturing-lysate-energy-regeneration-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Synthetic Biology & Biomanufacturing
Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patents

A data-backed look at cell-free biomanufacturing lysate energy regeneration patents: who is filing, how the field has moved since 2017, and where the technology claims concentrate across 53 records in scope.

53
Published Records
-100%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
IL
Leading Jurisdiction
10
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth = 2021 (1 records) → 2024 (0); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Field Overview

What this landscape covers

Cell-free biomanufacturing replaces living cells with extracted lysates to run transcription, translation and metabolic reactions outside a cell membrane. The bottleneck that keeps recurring in this corpus is energy regeneration: without a way to resupply ATP or equivalent cofactors, a lysate reaction stalls within hours. This dataset isolates patent records that specifically claim lysate-based energy regeneration methods inside cell-free systems, rather than cell-free technology broadly.

The 53 records in scope span 2015 through the 2026 cut-off, filed across research institutions and a small number of specialist companies. Because publication trails filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent one to two years understate real filing activity and should be read as provisional.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1Greenlight Biosciences, Inc.26
  2. 2NTXBIO LLC14
  3. 3Lernio Bio Co., Ltd.8
  4. 4The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University7
  5. 5Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon3
  6. 6Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)3
  7. 7Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 13
  8. 8Nature's Toolbox, Inc.2
  9. 9ZARUR ANDREY J1
  10. 10SWARTZ JAMES1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 53-record dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim weight.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings opened this window at 9 in 2017, climbed to a peak of 19 in 2018, and by the last complete year tracked for growth (2021 to 2024) had fallen -100%. 2025 and 2026 figures are partial because of publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline.

Filing trend, 2017-20260510152092017192018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

IPC subclass composition

C12N (microorganisms and genetic engineering) appears in 69.8% of the 53 records and C12P (fermentation and enzymatic synthesis) in 64.2%, confirming that most claims sit at the molecular-biology and biochemical-reaction level rather than in hardware. C12M bioreactor apparatus claims (15.1%) and C12Q measuring/testing claims (17.0%) are comparatively thin, and C12R microorganism-index claims sit at 7.5%. Records can carry more than one subclass, so these figures sum to more than 100%.

IPC subclass compositionC12N · Microorganisms & genetic engin…3769.8%C12P · Fermentation & enzymatic synth…3464.2%C12Q · Measuring & testing involving …917.0%C12M · Bioreactors & enzyme apparatus815.1%C12R · Microorganisms (index)47.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 53 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cell-free biomanufacturing: lysate energy regeneration patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records in the corpus

Representative Record
US20150376673A12015-12-31

Cell-Free Translation System (US20150376673A1)

INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA SANTE ET DE LA RECHERCHE MEDICALE (INSERM)

The present invention relates to a new cell-free translation system: a reaction system for translating RNA into protein using a ribosome-depleted red blood cell lysate combined with ribosomes isolated separately from eukaryotic cells, with specific provisos governing which source lysates and ribosome sources may be paired.Filed by INSERM, published 2015-12-31 — cited 14 times within this corpus.

US20150376673A1 — patent drawing 1US20150376673A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2010074760A1Compositions and methods for the production of a compound30
2WO2017176963A1Cell-free production of ribonucleic acid27
3US20110008867A1Compositions and methods for the production of a compound26
4US20150376673A1Cell-Free Translation System14
5WO2018126287A1Cell-free expression system having novel inorganic polyphosphate-based energy regeneration12
6WO2014122231A1Cell-free translation system4
7US20220064688A1Cell-free production of ribonucleic acid3

Citation counts favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references; read them as a signal of influence within this searched corpus, not of current commercial importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (7 of 7 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

Reading the concentration and the gaps

The ranking and the citation table point to a field with one dominant filer, a cluster of academic co-filers, and thin coverage on the hardware side.

Concentration
26 vs 1
leader vs tenth place, in records

One filer, then a steep drop-off

The leading assignee accounts for 26 records against a fifth-place holder at 3 and a tenth-place holder at just 1. That gap signals a field where one organisation has built sustained claim depth while the remaining ranked entities each hold a narrow slice.

Based on the 10-company assignee ranking supplied with this dataset.
Collaboration
7 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Academic-industry pairing stands out

The strongest co-assignee link in the dataset pairs a specialist cell-free company with a leading university, filing 7 records together. Two French academic institutions also co-file repeatedly with each other, at 3 records apiece.

Drawn from 9 identified co-assignee pairs in the corpus.
Technology mix
69.8%
of 53 records carry C12N

Molecular biology claims dominate over hardware

Nearly seven in ten records touch C12N genetic-engineering claims and almost two-thirds touch C12P fermentation/enzymatic-synthesis claims, while bioreactor apparatus (C12M) appears in only 15.1%. Claim density sits overwhelmingly on the biochemistry side of the process, not on the equipment that runs it.

IPC subclass shares are of the 53-record total; a record may carry multiple classes.
Filing momentum
19 in 2018
peak-year filings

Activity peaked in 2018, then thinned out

Filings rose from 9 in 2017 to a peak of 19 the following year. The tracked 2021-to-2024 window shows a -100% change, though the very newest years in any dataset are always undercounted because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months.

Peak and trend figures from the filing-trend series, 2017-2026.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cell-free biomanufacturing: lysate energy regeneration patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a concentrated core of filers and a claim space weighted toward biochemistry over hardware. The next step is usually to test a specific claim or a specific gap against the full record set.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's filings

With one assignee holding 26 of the 53 records, any new energy-regeneration method should be checked against that portfolio specifically before broader prior-art searching.

Explore assignee filings in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed hardware branch

C12M bioreactor-apparatus claims sit at just 15.1% of records, well behind the biochemistry classes. That gap is worth a dedicated search before assuming it is crowded.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the citation leaders for design-around options

The most-cited records in this corpus define the reference points examiners and competitors will cite against a new filing. Reviewing their claim scope early avoids late-stage surprises.

Open the citation network in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Cell-Free Biomanufacturing: Lysate Energy Regeneration Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole cell-free biomanufacturing: lysate energy regeneration patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.