https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/centrifugal-pump-noise-and-vibration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Mechanical Engineering & Machinery
Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration Patents
  • Filing already peaked. Activity rose to 12 families in 2020 and has since flattened toward the 2022 midpoint of 6, with no clear recovery through the most recent full year.
  • China dominates the filing venue. 57 of 65 records were filed at the Chinese receiving office, against 6 in Japan, 1 in South Korea and 1 in the United States — this is a domestically contested field first.
  • Claims cluster tightly around F04D. 56 of 65 records sit in the core pump IPC subclass; adjacent structural fixes in F16H gearing, H02K motors and F16M supports are each claimed by single digits of families.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
65
Published Records
25%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+50%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
CN
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Centrifugal pump noise and vibration is a mechanical-engineering sub-field concerned with suppressing blade-passing-frequency noise, pressure pulsation and structural vibration in centrifugal pumps and pump impellers. The dataset behind this page pulls 65 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine core pump terminology with vibration- and noise-reduction language, restricted to the impeller balancing, spring/damper and pump-body IPC classes (F04D29/66, F04D29/22, F16F). Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year in the trend understates real filing activity.

Most of what is claimed sits inside the pump housing and impeller itself — balance weights, damping bases, heat-dissipating volutes — rather than in the drivetrain or motor that sits next to it. That concentration is the first thing worth noticing before looking at who holds the claims.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK5
  2. 2JIANGSU ZHENHUA HAIKE EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY CO LTD4
  3. 3GUANGDONG JUNCHI TECH HLDG3
  4. 4CHINA AGRI UNIV2
  5. 5JIANGSU UNIV OF TECH2
  6. 6VALEO KAPEC TORQUE CONVERTERS NANJING CO LTD2
  7. 7Huaneng (Dalian) Thermal Power Co., Ltd.2
  8. 8Dalian Zhongke Mingrui Pump Industry Co., Ltd.1
  9. 9Namgang Pump Co., Ltd.1
  10. 10JIANGSU YINGTE PUMP & VALVE MFG1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 65-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and where those filings sit across the IPC classification system.

A 2020 peak, then a plateau

Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2020, then settled near the 2022 midpoint of 6. That pattern reads as a field that had a concentrated burst of activity around 2019-2020 rather than one still accelerating — treat the tail end of the chart as incomplete rather than declining, given the 18-month publication lag.

A 2020 peak, then a plateau03691242017201820191220202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in the pump subclass, thin elsewhere

F04D covers 56 of 65 records, confirming that most inventive effort stays inside the pump body and impeller. F16F springs and dampers (10), F16H gearing (8) and H02K motors (5) each get secondary, single-digit attention, and B01D, F16D, F16M and A47B appear only once or twice — evidence of claim space that has barely been touched from the noise-and-vibration angle.

Concentrated in the pump subclass, thin elsewhereF04D · Non-positive-displacement pumps5686.2%F16F · Springs & vibration dampers1015.4%F16H · Gearing & transmissions812.3%H02K · Electric motors & generators57.7%B01D · Separation processes (filtrati…23.1%F16D · Clutches & brakes23.1%F16M · Supports, stands & frames23.1%A47B · Tables & furniture11.5%Other46.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 65 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about centrifugal pump noise and vibration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

A representative recent filing

Representative record · 2025-10-23
US20250325797A12025-10-23

Magnetic Levitation Centrifugal Pump

ROCKETHEART TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD

A magnetic levitation centrifugal pump built around a volute with a levitation cavity, a static magnetic ring fixed to the volute, and a rotor carrying a dynamic magnetic ring, magnet steel assembly and magnetic member. A driving coil assembly embedded in the volute cooperates with the rotor's magnet steel to suspend and drive the rotor without mechanical bearings, removing the contact points that ordinarily generate vibration and noise.Filed by Rocketheart Technology Co. Ltd, this record replaces the mechanical bearing — the usual source of blade-passing-frequency noise and pulsation — with magnetic levitation, a structurally different route from the balance-weight and damping-base filings that dominate the rest of the dataset.

US20250325797A1 — patent drawing 1US20250325797A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited records in this dataset
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1CN110486282A一种散热减震离心泵11
2KR101855707B1Motor pump with built-in balance weight impeller and vibration reduction method using pump11
3CN108758184A一种可调节离心泵底座8
4CN111188775A一种具有高效散热和减振结构的电动水泵7
5JP2016003748ATorsional vibration reduction device6
6CN211623744U一种具有高效散热和减振结构的电动水泵5
7CN211059318U液力变矩器和包括该液力变矩器的车辆5
8CN113107862A减振离心泵4
9JP2016161070ATorsional vibration reduction device4
10CN117780653A一种船用低振动的离心泵3

Citation counts reward older records simply for having been in the corpus longer; read them as a signal of influence on subsequent filings, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for filing strategy

Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the geographic concentration of this dataset.

Filing venue
57 of 65
records filed in China

This is a China-centred contest

With only 6 Japanese, 1 Korean and 1 US-filed record in the set, most competitive pressure and most prior art a new filer needs to clear sits in Chinese-language documents rather than in JP or US corpora.

Receiving office split
Technology focus
56 / 65
records in F04D

Claims stay inside the pump body

The overwhelming majority of activity is classified under non-positive-displacement pumps rather than the springs/dampers, gearing or motor classes that sit adjacent to it, so structural damping approaches outside the pump housing remain comparatively open.

IPC composition
Filing momentum
12 in 2020 → 6 by 2022
peak-to-midpoint filings

Activity has plateaued, not accelerated

The filing count peaked in 2020 and has since flattened toward roughly half that level, a pattern more consistent with a saturated core claim space than with a technology still building momentum.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to centrifugal pump noise and vibration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gate sits

The assignee list is long-tailed: most named organisations in the recent-momentum data show zero filings in the latest year, consistent with a field of many single- or few-filing entrants rather than a small number of firms filing continuously.

Filing pattern
0 in latest year
for most tracked assignees

A long tail, not a sustained core

Organisations spanning equipment makers, universities and power-generation operators each show no filings in the most recent year tracked, suggesting episodic rather than continuous investment in this specific claim space.

Recent-year momentum
Co-filing
3 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Collaboration is rare and localised

Only three co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, including a nuclear-power operator filing alongside its parent group — evidence that most work here is filed by a single entity rather than through joint development.

Co-assignee pairs
Geography
57 / 65
Chinese-origin filings

Entrants range from equipment makers to universities

The assignee base includes pump manufacturers, a furniture company, a pipeline operator and multiple universities, pointing to a technology area that gets touched opportunistically by adjacent industries rather than owned by a specialist pump-noise sector.

Assignee composition
🔍
Under-claimed structural routes
Sub-areas that show up only once or twice in the IPC composition, worth checking before assuming freedom to operate.
Motor-integrated damping (H02K)Gearbox-side vibration isolation (F16H)Filtration-coupled noise paths (B01D)Clutch/brake-linked pulsation control (F16D)Base-frame and support damping (F16M)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Toyota Motor Corporation0
Jiangsu Zhenhua Haike Equipment Technology Co., Ltd.0
Guangdong Junchi Technology Co., Ltd.0
Valeo Kapec Torque Converter (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.0
Jiangsu University of Technology0
Huaneng (Dalian) Thermal Power Co., Ltd.0
China Agricultural University0
Kim Ki Cheol0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The dataset points to a few concrete next steps for anyone deciding where to file or build.

Check the Chinese prior art first

With 57 of 65 records filed in China, any freedom-to-operate check that starts with US or JP databases alone will miss most of the relevant claim space.

Explore filings in Eureka

Look outside F04D before filing

The gearing, motor and support classes are each claimed by single digits of families — a structural fix located there is less likely to run into dense prior art than another impeller-side damping mechanism.

Map white space in Eureka

Track bearing-free approaches

Magnetic levitation designs remove the mechanical contact points that generate blade-passing-frequency noise; monitor whether more filers move away from balance-weight and damping-base fixes toward this route.

Watch this technology in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Centrifugal Pump Noise and Vibration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole centrifugal pump noise and vibration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.