Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Centrifugal pump noise and vibration is a mechanical-engineering sub-field concerned with suppressing blade-passing-frequency noise, pressure pulsation and structural vibration in centrifugal pumps and pump impellers. The dataset behind this page pulls 65 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine core pump terminology with vibration- and noise-reduction language, restricted to the impeller balancing, spring/damper and pump-body IPC classes (F04D29/66, F04D29/22, F16F). Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent year in the trend understates real filing activity.
Most of what is claimed sits inside the pump housing and impeller itself — balance weights, damping bases, heat-dissipating volutes — rather than in the drivetrain or motor that sits next to it. That concentration is the first thing worth noticing before looking at who holds the claims.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 65-family dataset: how filing activity has moved year over year, and where those filings sit across the IPC classification system.
Filings rose from 4 in 2017 to a peak of 12 in 2020, then settled near the 2022 midpoint of 6. That pattern reads as a field that had a concentrated burst of activity around 2019-2020 rather than one still accelerating — treat the tail end of the chart as incomplete rather than declining, given the 18-month publication lag.
F04D covers 56 of 65 records, confirming that most inventive effort stays inside the pump body and impeller. F16F springs and dampers (10), F16H gearing (8) and H02K motors (5) each get secondary, single-digit attention, and B01D, F16D, F16M and A47B appear only once or twice — evidence of claim space that has barely been touched from the noise-and-vibration angle.
Shares are the percentage of the 65 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about centrifugal pump noise and vibration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA magnetic levitation centrifugal pump built around a volute with a levitation cavity, a static magnetic ring fixed to the volute, and a rotor carrying a dynamic magnetic ring, magnet steel assembly and magnetic member. A driving coil assembly embedded in the volute cooperates with the rotor's magnet steel to suspend and drive the rotor without mechanical bearings, removing the contact points that ordinarily generate vibration and noise.Filed by Rocketheart Technology Co. Ltd, this record replaces the mechanical bearing — the usual source of blade-passing-frequency noise and pulsation — with magnetic levitation, a structurally different route from the balance-weight and damping-base filings that dominate the rest of the dataset.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CN110486282A | 一种散热减震离心泵 | 11 |
| 2 | KR101855707B1 | Motor pump with built-in balance weight impeller and vibration reduction method using pump | 11 |
| 3 | CN108758184A | 一种可调节离心泵底座 | 8 |
| 4 | CN111188775A | 一种具有高效散热和减振结构的电动水泵 | 7 |
| 5 | JP2016003748A | Torsional vibration reduction device | 6 |
| 6 | CN211623744U | 一种具有高效散热和减振结构的电动水泵 | 5 |
| 7 | CN211059318U | 液力变矩器和包括该液力变矩器的车辆 | 5 |
| 8 | CN113107862A | 减振离心泵 | 4 |
| 9 | JP2016161070A | Torsional vibration reduction device | 4 |
| 10 | CN117780653A | 一种船用低振动的离心泵 | 3 |
Citation counts reward older records simply for having been in the corpus longer; read them as a signal of influence on subsequent filings, not as a ranking of current technical importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the geographic concentration of this dataset.
With only 6 Japanese, 1 Korean and 1 US-filed record in the set, most competitive pressure and most prior art a new filer needs to clear sits in Chinese-language documents rather than in JP or US corpora.
The overwhelming majority of activity is classified under non-positive-displacement pumps rather than the springs/dampers, gearing or motor classes that sit adjacent to it, so structural damping approaches outside the pump housing remain comparatively open.
The filing count peaked in 2020 and has since flattened toward roughly half that level, a pattern more consistent with a saturated core claim space than with a technology still building momentum.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to centrifugal pump noise and vibration, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee list is long-tailed: most named organisations in the recent-momentum data show zero filings in the latest year, consistent with a field of many single- or few-filing entrants rather than a small number of firms filing continuously.
Organisations spanning equipment makers, universities and power-generation operators each show no filings in the most recent year tracked, suggesting episodic rather than continuous investment in this specific claim space.
Only three co-assignee pairs appear in the dataset, including a nuclear-power operator filing alongside its parent group — evidence that most work here is filed by a single entity rather than through joint development.
The assignee base includes pump manufacturers, a furniture company, a pipeline operator and multiple universities, pointing to a technology area that gets touched opportunistically by adjacent industries rather than owned by a specialist pump-noise sector.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Toyota Motor Corporation | 0 | — |
| Jiangsu Zhenhua Haike Equipment Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Guangdong Junchi Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Valeo Kapec Torque Converter (Nanjing) Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Jiangsu University of Technology | 0 | — |
| Huaneng (Dalian) Thermal Power Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| China Agricultural University | 0 | — |
| Kim Ki Cheol | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a few concrete next steps for anyone deciding where to file or build.
With 57 of 65 records filed in China, any freedom-to-operate check that starts with US or JP databases alone will miss most of the relevant claim space.
Explore filings in EurekaThe gearing, motor and support classes are each claimed by single digits of families — a structural fix located there is less likely to run into dense prior art than another impeller-side damping mechanism.
Map white space in EurekaMagnetic levitation designs remove the mechanical contact points that generate blade-passing-frequency noise; monitor whether more filers move away from balance-weight and damping-base fixes toward this route.
Watch this technology in EurekaMost noise in a centrifugal pump comes from blade-passing-frequency interactions between the impeller and volute, and from pressure pulsation as fluid moves past the cutwater. The patents in this dataset address it structurally, mostly by redesigning the impeller balance, adding damping bases beneath the pump body, or reworking the volute for better heat dissipation alongside vibration control. A smaller share tackle it from the motor or gearing side, or through non-contact approaches such as magnetic levitation that remove mechanical bearing contact entirely.
The assignee base is broad rather than concentrated: it includes specialist pump manufacturers, universities, a nuclear power operator, and even companies from adjacent industries such as furniture and pipeline operation. Recent-year momentum data shows most named organisations recorded zero filings in the latest tracked year, which points to episodic filing activity rather than a small number of firms filing continuously. Anyone benchmarking competitors here should expect a long tail of single- or few-filing entrants rather than a handful of dominant players.
Filing activity peaked at 12 families in 2020 and has since flattened toward roughly half that level by the 2022 midpoint, which reads as a plateau rather than continued growth. Because publication typically lags filing by about 18 months, the most recent years in the dataset are understated and should not be read as a real decline. The safest interpretation is that the core claim space around impeller balancing and damping bases saturated after an initial burst of activity.
The IPC composition shows heavy concentration in the core pump subclass F04D, with only single-digit family counts in adjacent classes like gearing, motors, clutches and support structures. That imbalance suggests under-claimed routes in motor-integrated damping, gearbox-side vibration isolation, and base-frame or support-structure damping, since these areas are touched by only a handful of filings each. A first claim there would likely combine a specific mechanical isolation structure with a defined frequency or amplitude reduction target, rather than repeating the impeller-balance approach that already has dense prior art.
Of the 65 families in this dataset, 57 were filed at the Chinese receiving office, against single-digit counts for Japan, South Korea and the United States. This likely reflects both a concentration of pump manufacturing in China and the fact that many of these filings are utility-model-style structural improvements, a filing type heavily used by Chinese manufacturers for incremental mechanical redesigns. Anyone conducting a freedom-to-operate search in this field needs to prioritise Chinese-language prior art rather than relying on US or JP corpora alone.
Go past this page: query the whole centrifugal pump noise and vibration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.