Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filings peaked in 2017 at 88 and have declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 54 — a mature claim landscape rather than a growing one.
- F01D turbine components appear in 239 records, confirming aero-engine hot-section parts as the dominant commercial application pulling this manufacturing IP.
- Recent-year momentum is negative across every tracked assignee, including a -100% year-on-year drop for Safran Ceramics, suggesting consolidation of prior filings rather than new entry.
What this landscape covers
This review tracks patent families describing ceramic matrix composite manufacturing processes — melt infiltration, polymer infiltration pyrolysis (PIP) and chemical vapour infiltration (CVI) densification — filed under core ceramics classifications (C04B35/80, C04B35/64, C04B35/628). The corpus spans 885 published records from 2015 through the current data cut-off, giving a view of how the underlying process claims have been built up over roughly a decade of filing activity.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend line will understate true filing activity. The pattern here — a clear 2017 peak followed by a declining trend into the 2020s — should be read with that lag in mind, but the direction is consistent enough across several years to be a real signal rather than an artefact of the cut-off.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 885-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which adjacent IPC subclasses the same applicants are also claiming into.
A 2017 peak, then a steady decline
Filings ran at 88 in 2017 and had fallen to 9 by 2026 (a partial year), with 2022 sitting at the 54-filing midpoint. Read alongside the publication lag, this is a landscape where the bulk of foundational process claims were staked out in the mid-2010s and have not been substantially refreshed since.
Concentrated in ceramics, spilling into turbines and laminates
C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) appears in essentially the entire corpus at 884 records, as the search terms require. The next-heaviest classes are F01D (turbines, 239 records) and B32B (layered products, 191 records), which together point to aero-engine hot-section components and multilayer composite architectures as where most of this process IP is actually deployed, well ahead of smaller pockets in coatings (C23C, 80), shaping (B28B/B29C) and combustion/propulsion hardware (F23R, F02K).
Shares are the percentage of the 885 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ceramic matrix composite manufacturing process and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited prior art
Ceramic matrix composite articles and methods for forming same
A ceramic matrix composite article includes a melt infiltration ceramic matrix composite substrate comprising a ceramic fiber reinforcement material in a ceramic matrix material having a free silicon proportion, and a chemical vapor infiltration ceramic matrix composite outer layer comprising a ceramic fiber reinforcement material in a ceramic matrix material having essentially no free silicon proportion disposed on an outer surface of at least a portion of the substrate.Filed by General Electric, published 2016-09-01. It illustrates the layered melt-infiltration-plus-CVI construction that recurs across this dataset's highest-cited prior art.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US5127783A | Carbon/carbon composite fasteners | 202 |
| 2 | US20030196305A1 | Method for repairing articles of ceramic composites | 126 |
| 3 | US20050181192A1 | Fiber-reinforced ceramic composite material comprising a matrix with a nanolayered microstructure | 100 |
| 4 | US5488017A | Fibert reinforced ceramic matrix composite member | 98 |
| 5 | US6627019B2 | Process for making ceramic matrix composite parts with cooling channels | 94 |
| 6 | US20050276961A1 | Materials and methods for making ceramic matrix composites | 83 |
| 7 | US20020076541A1 | Process for making ceramic matrix composite parts with cooling channels | 82 |
| 8 | US20120076927A1 | Method of improving the thermo-mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced silicon carbide matrix composites | 78 |
| 9 | US6820334B2 | Method for repairing articles of ceramic composites | 78 |
| 10 | US6696144B2 | Hybrid monolithic ceramic and ceramic matrix composite airfoil and method for making the same | 74 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat them as markers of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current technical importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about this field
Three patterns stand out once the raw filing counts are broken down by year, classification and citation weight.
A landscape past its filing peak
Filing volume ran at 88 in 2017, held near the 54-filing midpoint by 2022, and has fallen to 9 in the current partial year. Combined with the typical 18-month publication lag, this points to a technology area where the core process claims are largely staked out rather than still being actively contested.
Aero-engine hot sections drive the IP
F01D (turbines and non-positive-displacement engines) appears in 239 of the 885 records, second only to the core ceramics classification itself. That overlap confirms turbine blades, shrouds and combustor liners as the commercial pull behind most CMC manufacturing process claims, ahead of general industrial ceramics use.
Influence sits with early filings
The most-cited record in this corpus, a carbon/carbon composite fastener patent, carries 202 citations — well ahead of the next tier. High citation counts here mark foundational prior art that later filers had to design around, not current state of the art.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ceramic matrix composite manufacturing process, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC | Rolls-Royce plc | 36 |
| Rolls-Royce plc | Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc. | 11 |
| Safran Ceramics | Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) | 10 |
| ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC | Rolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc. | 9 |
| Safran Ceramics | University of Bordeaux | 5 |
| ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC | Rolls-Royce plc | 3 |
| General Electric Company | VERRILLI MICHAEL J | 2 |
| General Electric Company | SUBRAMANIAN SURESH | 2 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in this corpus, the strongest linking Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites with Rolls-Royce's own corporate entity at 36 shared filings — evidence of internal group filing structure more than external joint development.
Who holds the ground, and where momentum has stalled
Every tracked assignee shows negative or zero year-on-year filing momentum in the latest period, consistent with the overall decline in the trend line.
Raytheon still filing, but slowing
Raytheon Technologies recorded 8 filings in the latest tracked year, down 71% year on year — still the most active filer among those with recent-year activity, but clearly decelerating from prior volume.
General Electric's filing pace has thinned sharply
General Electric filed just 1 record in the latest year, an 83% drop year on year, despite being the assignee behind this dataset's representative filing on layered melt-infiltration/CVI construction.
Rolls-Royce and United Technologies have gone quiet
Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites, its parent Rolls-Royce entity, and United Technologies all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, alongside Safran Ceramics' -100% drop — a pattern of established holders sitting on existing portfolios rather than extending them.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Raytheon Technologies | 8 | -71% |
| General Electric Company | 1 | -83% |
| ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC | 0 | — |
| Rolls-Royce plc | 0 | — |
| United Technologies Corporation | 0 | — |
| Safran Ceramics | 0 | -100% |
| Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (IHI) | 0 | — |
| Corning Incorporated | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing trend and classification spread point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing strategy.
Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited prior art
The five most-cited records, including the carbon/carbon fastener patent at 202 citations and the repair-method filing at 126, define much of the design space that later applicants had to navigate around.
Explore prior art in EurekaWatch for portfolio consolidation, not new entry
With every major assignee showing flat or negative recent-year momentum, acquisition or licensing of existing CMC process portfolios is a more likely near-term move than fresh greenfield filing.
Track assignee activity in EurekaTest claim language in the under-claimed branches
Repair processes, cooling-channel integration and nanolayered matrix control show thinner filing density than the core melt infiltration and CVI routes, and may offer more workable claim scope.
Draft claims in EurekaCommon questions on CMC manufacturing patents
Melt infiltration involves wicking molten silicon into a porous fiber preform to form the ceramic matrix, typically producing a matrix with a residual free-silicon content. Chemical vapor infiltration (CVI) instead deposits the matrix material from a gas phase over many hours, producing a matrix with essentially no free silicon but requiring longer processing times. The representative filing in this dataset, from General Electric, combines both: a melt-infiltration substrate with a CVI outer layer, which is a common strategy for balancing cost against high-temperature performance.
This dataset shows filings peaking at 88 in 2017 and falling to 9 by 2026, with 2022 near the midpoint at 54. That pattern, combined with every tracked assignee showing flat or negative recent-year momentum, suggests the core process routes — melt infiltration, PIP and CVI — were substantially claimed by major aerospace suppliers in the mid-2010s. Publication lag of roughly 18 months means the very latest years are understated, but the multi-year downward trend predates any lag effect.
Rolls-Royce (through its High Temperature Composites subsidiary and parent entity), General Electric, Raytheon Technologies (formerly United Technologies), and Safran Ceramics all appear as significant assignees in this corpus. Recent-year momentum has slowed sharply across all of them, with Raytheon down 71% and General Electric down 83% year on year, and several others at zero recent filings, indicating these are established rather than newly aggressive filers in this space.
Filing density is comparatively thin in areas like repair processes for in-service CMC components, cooling-channel integration within CMC parts, and control of nanolayered matrix microstructures, relative to the dense core coverage of melt infiltration and CVI densification themselves. These branches sit adjacent to well-established high-citation prior art, such as the repair-method and cooling-channel patents in this corpus, but have not been claimed as exhaustively. That makes them a reasonable starting point for teams looking for open claim scope rather than crowded territory.
F01D, the classification covering turbines and non-positive-displacement engines, appears in 239 of the 885 records in this dataset, second only to the core ceramics classification itself. That overlap reflects the primary commercial driver for CMC manufacturing process patents: turbine blades, shrouds, combustor liners and other hot-section components in aero engines, where CMCs replace heavier metal superalloys. Filers active in this space, including Rolls-Royce, General Electric and Raytheon, are aerospace and propulsion companies rather than general ceramics manufacturers.
Research Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole ceramic matrix composite manufacturing process corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.