Book a demo

Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026

Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ceramic-matrix-composite-manufacturing-process-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Advanced Materials & Metallurgy
Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process Patents
  • Filings peaked in 2017 at 88 and have declined since, with the 2022 midpoint at 54 — a mature claim landscape rather than a growing one.
  • F01D turbine components appear in 239 records, confirming aero-engine hot-section parts as the dominant commercial application pulling this manufacturing IP.
  • Recent-year momentum is negative across every tracked assignee, including a -100% year-on-year drop for Safran Ceramics, suggesting consolidation of prior filings rather than new entry.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
885
Published Records
77%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-23%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review tracks patent families describing ceramic matrix composite manufacturing processes — melt infiltration, polymer infiltration pyrolysis (PIP) and chemical vapour infiltration (CVI) densification — filed under core ceramics classifications (C04B35/80, C04B35/64, C04B35/628). The corpus spans 885 published records from 2015 through the current data cut-off, giving a view of how the underlying process claims have been built up over roughly a decade of filing activity.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the last one to two years in any trend line will understate true filing activity. The pattern here — a clear 2017 peak followed by a declining trend into the 2020s — should be read with that lag in mind, but the direction is consistent enough across several years to be a real signal rather than an artefact of the cut-off.

Filing activity by year, 2017–2026
  1. 1GENERAL ELECTRIC CO231
  2. 2RTX CORP200
  3. 3ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC113
  4. 4ROLLS ROYCE CORP91
  5. 5SAFRAN CERAMICS SA44
  6. 6IHI CORP34
  7. 7ROLLS ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES INC19
  8. 8GOODRICH CORP18
  9. 9UNITED TECH CORP18
  10. 10CORNING INC18
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 885-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which adjacent IPC subclasses the same applicants are also claiming into.

A 2017 peak, then a steady decline

Filings ran at 88 in 2017 and had fallen to 9 by 2026 (a partial year), with 2022 sitting at the 54-filing midpoint. Read alongside the publication lag, this is a landscape where the bulk of foundational process claims were staked out in the mid-2010s and have not been substantially refreshed since.

A 2017 peak, then a steady decline02550751008820172018201920202021202220232024202592026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in ceramics, spilling into turbines and laminates

C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) appears in essentially the entire corpus at 884 records, as the search terms require. The next-heaviest classes are F01D (turbines, 239 records) and B32B (layered products, 191 records), which together point to aero-engine hot-section components and multilayer composite architectures as where most of this process IP is actually deployed, well ahead of smaller pockets in coatings (C23C, 80), shaping (B28B/B29C) and combustion/propulsion hardware (F23R, F02K).

Concentrated in ceramics, spilling into turbines and laminatesC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories88499.9%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines23927.0%B32B · Layered products & laminates19121.6%C23C · Coating & surface deposition809.0%B28B · Shaping clay & cement products647.2%B29C · Shaping of plastics424.7%F23R · Combustion chambers404.5%F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion354.0%Other27931.5%

Shares are the percentage of the 885 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ceramic matrix composite manufacturing process and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Representative filing and most-cited prior art

Representative filing
US20160251269A12016-09-01

Ceramic matrix composite articles and methods for forming same

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

A ceramic matrix composite article includes a melt infiltration ceramic matrix composite substrate comprising a ceramic fiber reinforcement material in a ceramic matrix material having a free silicon proportion, and a chemical vapor infiltration ceramic matrix composite outer layer comprising a ceramic fiber reinforcement material in a ceramic matrix material having essentially no free silicon proportion disposed on an outer surface of at least a portion of the substrate.Filed by General Electric, published 2016-09-01. It illustrates the layered melt-infiltration-plus-CVI construction that recurs across this dataset's highest-cited prior art.

US20160251269A1 — patent drawing 1US20160251269A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US5127783ACarbon/carbon composite fasteners202
2US20030196305A1Method for repairing articles of ceramic composites126
3US20050181192A1Fiber-reinforced ceramic composite material comprising a matrix with a nanolayered microstructure100
4US5488017AFibert reinforced ceramic matrix composite member98
5US6627019B2Process for making ceramic matrix composite parts with cooling channels94
6US20050276961A1Materials and methods for making ceramic matrix composites83
7US20020076541A1Process for making ceramic matrix composite parts with cooling channels82
8US20120076927A1Method of improving the thermo-mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced silicon carbide matrix composites78
9US6820334B2Method for repairing articles of ceramic composites78
10US6696144B2Hybrid monolithic ceramic and ceramic matrix composite airfoil and method for making the same74

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations within the searched corpus — treat them as markers of influence on subsequent filers, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say about this field

Three patterns stand out once the raw filing counts are broken down by year, classification and citation weight.

Filing trend
88 → 9
2017 peak to 2026 (partial)

A landscape past its filing peak

Filing volume ran at 88 in 2017, held near the 54-filing midpoint by 2022, and has fallen to 9 in the current partial year. Combined with the typical 18-month publication lag, this points to a technology area where the core process claims are largely staked out rather than still being actively contested.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Application pull
239 records
F01D turbine classification overlap

Aero-engine hot sections drive the IP

F01D (turbines and non-positive-displacement engines) appears in 239 of the 885 records, second only to the core ceramics classification itself. That overlap confirms turbine blades, shrouds and combustor liners as the commercial pull behind most CMC manufacturing process claims, ahead of general industrial ceramics use.

IPC composition
Citation concentration
202 citations
Top-cited record, US5127783A

Influence sits with early filings

The most-cited record in this corpus, a carbon/carbon composite fastener patent, carries 202 citations — well ahead of the next tier. High citation counts here mark foundational prior art that later filers had to design around, not current state of the art.

Citation analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ceramic matrix composite manufacturing process, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-assignee activity
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INCRolls-Royce plc36
Rolls-Royce plcRolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc.11
Safran CeramicsCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)10
ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INCRolls-Royce North American Technologies, Inc.9
Safran CeramicsUniversity of Bordeaux5
ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INCRolls-Royce plc3
General Electric CompanyVERRILLI MICHAEL J2
General Electric CompanySUBRAMANIAN SURESH2

Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear in this corpus, the strongest linking Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites with Rolls-Royce's own corporate entity at 36 shared filings — evidence of internal group filing structure more than external joint development.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where momentum has stalled

Every tracked assignee shows negative or zero year-on-year filing momentum in the latest period, consistent with the overall decline in the trend line.

Momentum
-71% YoY
Raytheon, latest year

Raytheon still filing, but slowing

Raytheon Technologies recorded 8 filings in the latest tracked year, down 71% year on year — still the most active filer among those with recent-year activity, but clearly decelerating from prior volume.

Recent-year momentum
Momentum
-83% YoY
General Electric, latest year

General Electric's filing pace has thinned sharply

General Electric filed just 1 record in the latest year, an 83% drop year on year, despite being the assignee behind this dataset's representative filing on layered melt-infiltration/CVI construction.

Recent-year momentum
Momentum
0 filings
Rolls-Royce entities and United Technologies, latest year

Rolls-Royce and United Technologies have gone quiet

Rolls-Royce High Temperature Composites, its parent Rolls-Royce entity, and United Technologies all show zero filings in the latest tracked year, alongside Safran Ceramics' -100% drop — a pattern of established holders sitting on existing portfolios rather than extending them.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively thin relative to the core melt infiltration and CVI routes.
Repair of in-service CMC componentsCooling-channel integration in CMC partsNanolayered matrix microstructure controlPolymer infiltration pyrolysis cycle optimisationFree-silicon-content gradient layering
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Raytheon Technologies8-71%
General Electric Company1-83%
ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC0
Rolls-Royce plc0
United Technologies Corporation0
Safran Ceramics0-100%
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (IHI)0
Corning Incorporated0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The filing trend and classification spread point to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing or new filing strategy.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top-cited prior art

The five most-cited records, including the carbon/carbon fastener patent at 202 citations and the repair-method filing at 126, define much of the design space that later applicants had to navigate around.

Explore prior art in Eureka

Watch for portfolio consolidation, not new entry

With every major assignee showing flat or negative recent-year momentum, acquisition or licensing of existing CMC process portfolios is a more likely near-term move than fresh greenfield filing.

Track assignee activity in Eureka

Test claim language in the under-claimed branches

Repair processes, cooling-channel integration and nanolayered matrix control show thinner filing density than the core melt infiltration and CVI routes, and may offer more workable claim scope.

Draft claims in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on CMC manufacturing patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ceramic Matrix Composite Manufacturing Process in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ceramic matrix composite manufacturing process corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.