Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This landscape tracks patent families claiming oxidation durability, thermal shock resistance, creep resistance and general durability improvements for ceramic matrix composites, with a search scope anchored on SiC-SiC and CMC material claims under the C04B ceramics classification. The corpus spans 569 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, concentrated heavily in aerospace and power-generation end uses.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real filing activity; treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling. The dataset is read at the patent-family level throughout, which is the fairer unit for cross-jurisdiction comparison since it removes the distortion of duplicate continuation filings.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the underlying technology splits across IPC subclasses.
Filings ran from 67 in 2017 to 29 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 2 in the most recent, still-partial year. Read alongside the publication lag, this looks like a mature filing base rather than an emerging one — activity is concentrated in defending existing claim territory rather than staking new ground.
C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) appears in 567 of 569 records, confirming the corpus is correctly scoped. F01D (turbines) at 176 and B32B (layered products) at 122 show where the commercial pull sits: aerospace and power-turbine hot-section components, with F23R combustion chambers and F02K jet propulsion as secondary but material clusters.
Shares are the percentage of the 569 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ceramic matrix composite reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA ceramic matrix composite article includes a melt infiltration ceramic matrix composite substrate comprising a ceramic fiber reinforcement material in a ceramic matrix material having a free silicon proportion, and a chemical vapor infiltration ceramic matrix composite outer layer comprising a ceramic fiber reinforcement material in a ceramic matrix material having essentially no free silicon proportion disposed on an outer surface of at least a portion of the substrate.Filed by General Electric, published 2016-09-01. Notable for combining two distinct infiltration routes — melt infiltration and chemical vapor infiltration — in a single layered article, rather than claiming either process alone.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6451416B1 | Hybrid monolithic ceramic and ceramic matrix composite airfoil and method for making the same | 113 |
| 2 | US20050181192A1 | Fiber-reinforced ceramic composite material comprising a matrix with a nanolayered microstructure | 100 |
| 3 | US4936939A | Fabric-reinforced ceramic matrix composite material | 75 |
| 4 | US6696144B2 | Hybrid monolithic ceramic and ceramic matrix composite airfoil and method for making the same | 74 |
| 5 | US4822660A | Lightweight ceramic structures and method | 67 |
| 6 | US5250243A | Method for making ceramic matrix composites | 64 |
| 7 | CN101224990A | 耐超高温陶瓷基复合材料及其制备方法 | 61 |
| 8 | US5939216A | Fiber reinforced ceramic matrix composite and method of manufacturing the same | 56 |
| 9 | US20180148379A1 | Formulations and methods for 3D printing of ceramic matrix composites | 49 |
| 10 | US20040110041A1 | Ceramic material having ceramic matrix composite backing and method of manufacturing | 49 |
Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on the field's vocabulary, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the trend, classification and citation data above.
A drop from 67 filings in the 2017 peak year to single digits by 2026, even accounting for publication lag, points to a field where the foundational infiltration and reinforcement architecture claims are already held. New entrants are more likely to find freedom to operate in application-specific refinements than in core material composition.
Nearly a third of the corpus intersects with turbine classification, and combustion chamber and jet propulsion codes add further weight. This is where durability claims earn commercial value, and where prior art density is highest.
The most-cited records date to the 1980s-2000s and describe hybrid monolithic-CMC airfoil structures and fiber-reinforced nanolayered matrices. Their continued citation frequency signals that later filings are still building on, or designing around, this early architecture rather than replacing it.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ceramic matrix composite reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.
Aerospace and turbine manufacturers dominate the assignee list, and recent-year filing activity has slowed across nearly all of them.
The strongest co-assignee links in the dataset connect Rolls-Royce's parent entity with its high-temperature composites and North American technology subsidiaries, suggesting centrally coordinated CMC filing across the group rather than independent business-unit activity.
General Electric logged 1 filing in the latest year against a 90% year-on-year decline; Raytheon shows a 100% drop to zero, and Rolls-Royce, United Technologies and Northrop Grumman all show zero latest-year activity. This is consistent with a corpus past its filing peak rather than one accelerating.
The United States leads with 239 records and Europe follows with 163; Canada, WIPO/PCT and China trail well behind. Filers building freedom-to-operate positions should treat US and EPO prosecution history as the primary reference set.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| General Electric Company | 1 | -90% |
| Raytheon Technologies Corporation | 0 | -100% |
| Rolls-Royce plc | 0 | — |
| United Technologies Corporation | 0 | — |
| ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC | 0 | — |
| Northrop Grumman Corporation | 0 | — |
| Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (IHI) | 0 | — |
| Corning Incorporated | 0 | — |
The trend and assignee data point to a field defending established positions; the next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing or designing around.
With 176 records overlapping F01D turbine classification, any new hot-section durability claim should be checked against that cluster specifically, not the corpus as a whole.
Explore turbine CMC claims in EurekaThinner filing density in areas like environmental barrier coating adhesion or additive-manufactured preform testing suggests room to file, but only a full-text search confirms whether that is genuine white space.
Run a white-space search in EurekaAggregate filing decline masks that some assignees stopped filing years before others; a per-assignee timeline shows who is still active versus who has exited the space.
Build an assignee timeline in EurekaCeramic matrix composites, particularly SiC-SiC systems, are used mainly in turbine hot-section components such as airfoils, combustion liners and shrouds, where their combination of high-temperature strength and lower density than superalloys reduces cooling air requirements and engine weight. This dataset shows 176 of 569 records intersecting turbine classification codes, confirming that aerospace and power-generation turbines are the dominant commercial application rather than a secondary one. Fiber-reinforced architectures and environmental barrier coatings are the two technical elements that recur most often across these turbine-focused filings.
The most-cited records in this corpus, several with over 100 citations, describe hybrid monolithic-and-CMC airfoil structures and fiber-reinforced ceramic composites with nanolayered microstructures, dating from the late 1980s through the mid-2000s. These older filings still set the technical vocabulary that later patents build on or design around. Recent-year filing activity has slowed across the major aerospace and turbine assignees in this dataset, so citation leadership and current filing activity are not the same thing — check both before assuming a company is still active in the space.
Filing in this corpus peaked at 67 records in 2017 and has fallen toward single digits by 2026, with the 2022 midpoint at 29. This pattern is consistent with a field where the core infiltration and reinforcement architecture claims have already been staked, leaving less room for foundational filings and shifting activity toward incremental, application-specific improvements. It is worth remembering that publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so the most recent one to two years in any such trend will always look thinner than they eventually turn out to be.
US20160251269A1, assigned to General Electric, claims a ceramic matrix composite article that layers a melt-infiltration substrate with a chemical-vapor-infiltration outer layer distinguished by its free-silicon content. Anyone developing a component that combines these two specific infiltration methods in a layered structure with that silicon-content distinction should review this filing closely as part of freedom-to-operate work. It does not block single-process CMC parts or layered structures defined by different distinguishing properties, so the practical workaround space depends on how the layers are differentiated.
Based on the IPC composition in this dataset, filing density outside the core turbine-airfoil cluster is noticeably thinner in areas such as environmental barrier coating adhesion under thermal cycling, creep resistance testing for non-turbine structural CMC uses, and durability testing methods for additive-manufactured CMC preforms. These are not confirmed gaps — they are areas where the classification counts suggest less claim density relative to the turbine cluster's 176 records, and a full-text novelty search is still required before committing R&D spend. Co-assignee filing patterns also show that CMC activity is concentrated among a small number of aerospace groups, which itself suggests room for other applicants outside aerospace.
Go past this page: query the whole ceramic matrix composite reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.