https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ceramic-matrix-composite-reliability-and-durability-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Advanced Materials
Ceramic matrix composite patents: durability and reliability filings mapped
  • Filing peaked in 2017 at 67 records and has trended down toward the midpoint of 29 in 2022, a pattern that reads as claim consolidation rather than a growing field.
  • Turbine and airfoil applications dominate the IPC mix with F01D turbines appearing in 176 records and F23R combustion chambers and F02K jet propulsion adding another 64 between them.
  • Momentum has cooled across every major assignee the most active filer in the latest year logged just 1 record, a 90% year-on-year drop, and several long-standing names show zero recent activity.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
569
Published Records
66%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+17%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This landscape tracks patent families claiming oxidation durability, thermal shock resistance, creep resistance and general durability improvements for ceramic matrix composites, with a search scope anchored on SiC-SiC and CMC material claims under the C04B ceramics classification. The corpus spans 569 published records filed between 2015 and mid-2026, concentrated heavily in aerospace and power-generation end uses.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real filing activity; treat the last one to two years as a floor, not a ceiling. The dataset is read at the patent-family level throughout, which is the fairer unit for cross-jurisdiction comparison since it removes the distortion of duplicate continuation filings.

Filing activity by year, 2017-2026
  1. 1GENERAL ELECTRIC CO189
  2. 2RTX CORP92
  3. 3ROLLS ROYCE CORP53
  4. 4ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC28
  5. 5CORNING INC15
  6. 6NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP14
  7. 7IHI CORP14
  8. 8UNITED TECH CORP13
  9. 9HRL LAB11
  10. 10THE BOEING CO9
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the underlying technology splits across IPC subclasses.

A field past its filing peak

Filings ran from 67 in 2017 to 29 at the 2022 midpoint and down to 2 in the most recent, still-partial year. Read alongside the publication lag, this looks like a mature filing base rather than an emerging one — activity is concentrated in defending existing claim territory rather than staking new ground.

A field past its filing peak0204060806720172018201920202021202220232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Ceramics classification dominates, turbines close behind

C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) appears in 567 of 569 records, confirming the corpus is correctly scoped. F01D (turbines) at 176 and B32B (layered products) at 122 show where the commercial pull sits: aerospace and power-turbine hot-section components, with F23R combustion chambers and F02K jet propulsion as secondary but material clusters.

Ceramics classification dominates, turbines close behindC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories56799.6%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines17630.9%B32B · Layered products & laminates12221.4%C23C · Coating & surface deposition7613.4%B28B · Shaping clay & cement products366.3%F23R · Combustion chambers335.8%F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion315.4%B29C · Shaping of plastics244.2%Other23240.8%

Shares are the percentage of the 569 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ceramic matrix composite reliability and durability and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The documents anchoring this field

Representative filing
US20160251269A12016-09-01

Ceramic matrix composite articles and methods for forming same (US20160251269A1)

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

A ceramic matrix composite article includes a melt infiltration ceramic matrix composite substrate comprising a ceramic fiber reinforcement material in a ceramic matrix material having a free silicon proportion, and a chemical vapor infiltration ceramic matrix composite outer layer comprising a ceramic fiber reinforcement material in a ceramic matrix material having essentially no free silicon proportion disposed on an outer surface of at least a portion of the substrate.Filed by General Electric, published 2016-09-01. Notable for combining two distinct infiltration routes — melt infiltration and chemical vapor infiltration — in a single layered article, rather than claiming either process alone.

US20160251269A1 — patent drawing 1US20160251269A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6451416B1Hybrid monolithic ceramic and ceramic matrix composite airfoil and method for making the same113
2US20050181192A1Fiber-reinforced ceramic composite material comprising a matrix with a nanolayered microstructure100
3US4936939AFabric-reinforced ceramic matrix composite material75
4US6696144B2Hybrid monolithic ceramic and ceramic matrix composite airfoil and method for making the same74
5US4822660ALightweight ceramic structures and method67
6US5250243AMethod for making ceramic matrix composites64
7CN101224990A耐超高温陶瓷基复合材料及其制备方法61
8US5939216AFiber reinforced ceramic matrix composite and method of manufacturing the same56
9US20180148379A1Formulations and methods for 3D printing of ceramic matrix composites49
10US20040110041A1Ceramic material having ceramic matrix composite backing and method of manufacturing49

Citation counts are drawn from a searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on the field's vocabulary, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, classification and citation data above.

Filing trajectory
67 → 2
peak to latest year

The claim space is largely staked

A drop from 67 filings in the 2017 peak year to single digits by 2026, even accounting for publication lag, points to a field where the foundational infiltration and reinforcement architecture claims are already held. New entrants are more likely to find freedom to operate in application-specific refinements than in core material composition.

Based on year-by-year filing counts, 2017-2026.
Application concentration
176 records
F01D turbine overlap

Hot-section turbine parts are the commercial center of gravity

Nearly a third of the corpus intersects with turbine classification, and combustion chamber and jet propulsion codes add further weight. This is where durability claims earn commercial value, and where prior art density is highest.

IPC cross-tabulation, F01D + F23R + F02K.
Citation pattern
113 citations
top-cited record

Foundational airfoil patents still set the vocabulary

The most-cited records date to the 1980s-2000s and describe hybrid monolithic-CMC airfoil structures and fiber-reinforced nanolayered matrices. Their continued citation frequency signals that later filings are still building on, or designing around, this early architecture rather than replacing it.

Citation counts, most-cited records in corpus.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ceramic matrix composite reliability and durability, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's filing

Assignee concentration and recent momentum

Aerospace and turbine manufacturers dominate the assignee list, and recent-year filing activity has slowed across nearly all of them.

Filing concentration
7 pairs
co-assignee relationships

Rolls-Royce entities file jointly across corporate structure

The strongest co-assignee links in the dataset connect Rolls-Royce's parent entity with its high-temperature composites and North American technology subsidiaries, suggesting centrally coordinated CMC filing across the group rather than independent business-unit activity.

Co-assignee pair frequency, corpus-wide.
Recent momentum
-90% YoY
General Electric, latest year

Even the most active recent filer has slowed sharply

General Electric logged 1 filing in the latest year against a 90% year-on-year decline; Raytheon shows a 100% drop to zero, and Rolls-Royce, United Technologies and Northrop Grumman all show zero latest-year activity. This is consistent with a corpus past its filing peak rather than one accelerating.

Recent-year momentum by assignee.
Jurisdiction mix
239 US filings
largest receiving office

US and European offices carry most of the volume

The United States leads with 239 records and Europe follows with 163; Canada, WIPO/PCT and China trail well behind. Filers building freedom-to-operate positions should treat US and EPO prosecution history as the primary reference set.

Receiving office counts, corpus-wide.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thinner relative to the core turbine-airfoil cluster.
Environmental barrier coating adhesion under thermal cyclingCreep resistance in non-turbine structural CMCChemical vapor infiltration process control claimsFiber-matrix interface tailoring for oxidation resistanceAdditive-manufactured CMC preform durability testing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
General Electric Company1-90%
Raytheon Technologies Corporation0-100%
Rolls-Royce plc0
United Technologies Corporation0
ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC0
Northrop Grumman Corporation0
Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (IHI)0
Corning Incorporated0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a field defending established positions; the next steps depend on whether you are filing, licensing or designing around.

Map freedom-to-operate against the turbine cluster

With 176 records overlapping F01D turbine classification, any new hot-section durability claim should be checked against that cluster specifically, not the corpus as a whole.

Explore turbine CMC claims in Eureka

Test under-claimed branches before committing R&D

Thinner filing density in areas like environmental barrier coating adhesion or additive-manufactured preform testing suggests room to file, but only a full-text search confirms whether that is genuine white space.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Track the slowdown by assignee, not just by year

Aggregate filing decline masks that some assignees stopped filing years before others; a per-assignee timeline shows who is still active versus who has exited the space.

Build an assignee timeline in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on CMC durability patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ceramic Matrix Composite Reliability and Durability in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ceramic matrix composite reliability and durability corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.