https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/ceramic-matrix-composites-in-hot-sections-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Hot-Section CMCs
Ceramic matrix composite patents for turbine hot sections
  • Five filers hold 68.3% of the field. 3,072 of 4,500 records in scope sit with the top five assignees — this is a concentrated landscape, not a fragmented one.
  • Filing kept climbing through 2024. 2021-to-2024 filings rose 39% (198 to 275); 2025 and later years look lower only because publication lags filing by about 18 months.
  • Ceramics claims dominate, turbine claims are close behind. C04B ceramics/refractories appear on 55.2% of records and F01D turbine classifications on 38.1%, showing most filings couple a material claim to a turbine-specific application.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
4,500
Published Records
68%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+39%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (198 records) with 2024 (275) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,500 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks patent activity at the intersection of silicon carbide fibre composites, melt infiltration and chemical vapour infiltration processing, alongside environmental barrier coatings and compliant attachment designs used to keep ceramic matrix composite parts in gas turbine hot sections. The search string pairs fibre/matrix processing terms with degradation and coating terms, so a record typically has to describe both a composite construction and a durability or attachment mechanism to be in scope.

Coverage runs from 2015 through the third quarter of 2026, with 4,500 published records making up the assignee ranking and the technology composition figures below. Because publication trails filing by roughly a year and a half, the most recent one to two years in any trend line will understate true filing activity.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1GENERAL ELECTRIC CO1,602
  2. 2RTX CORP686
  3. 3ROLLS ROYCE CORP377
  4. 4ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC224
  5. 5SAFRAN CERAMICS SA183
  6. 6ROLLS ROYCE NORTH AMERICAN TECHNOLOGIES INC145
  7. 7GOODRICH CORP104
  8. 8UNITED TECH CORP103
  9. 9ROLLS ROYCE PLC80
  10. 10HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC44
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 4,500-record dataset: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry.

A decade of steady, then accelerating, filing

Filings ran in the low 300s from 2017 through the 2018 peak of 357, then continued at a high level; the confirmed three-year growth from 2021 (198) to 2024 (275) is +39%. The apparent drop after 2024 is a publication-lag artefact, not a slowdown in actual filing.

A decade of steady, then accelerating, filing0100200300400320201735720182019202020212022202320242025282026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Ceramics processing leads, but turbine integration is close behind

C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) appears on 55.2% of the 4,500 records, ahead of F01D (turbines) at 38.1%. Layered-product claims under B32B (13.3%) and coating/deposition claims under C23C (12.0%) point to environmental barrier coating and laminate architecture as the next-largest claim clusters, each still filed on a minority of records.

Ceramics processing leads, but turbine integration is close behindC04B · Ceramics, cement & refractories2,48655.2%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines1,71438.1%B32B · Layered products & laminates60013.3%C23C · Coating & surface deposition53812.0%B29C · Shaping of plastics3507.8%F23R · Combustion chambers2926.5%F02C · Gas-turbine plants2776.2%B28B · Shaping clay & cement products2074.6%Other2,21149.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 4,500 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ceramic matrix composites in hot sections and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited prior art in this space

Representative Record
US20220055954A12022-02-24

Automated preparation method of a SiCf/SiC composite flame tube (US20220055954A1)

CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY

Filed by Central South University, this record describes an automated route to a SiC fibre-reinforced SiC matrix flame tube: a chemical vapour infiltration interface layer is grown on SiC fibre, a unidirectional tape is wound into a net-shape preform sized by simulated fibre volume and orientation, and reactive melt infiltration is combined with chemical vapour infiltration for densification.Notable for combining automated winding with a dual CVI/melt-infiltration densification sequence in one claimed process.

US20220055954A1 — patent drawing 1US20220055954A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20160060752A1Method for producing a composite material with a carbide matrix347
2US20170165624A1Ceramic Orifice Chamber for Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit337
3US6648597B1Ceramic matrix composite turbine vane290
4US6024898AArticle and method for making complex shaped preform and silicon carbide composite by melt infiltration271
5US20050230029A1Continuous fiber reinforced composites and methods, apparatuses, and compositions for making the same222
6US5628938AMethod of making a ceramic composite by infiltration of a ceramic preform222
7US6733907B2Hybrid ceramic material composed of insulating and structural ceramic layers213
8US6258737B1Article and method for making complex shaped preform and silicon carbide composite by melt infiltration206
9US20110124483A1Ceramic composite materials containing carbon nanotube-infused fiber materials and methods for production the…200
10US20030044593A1Continuous fiber reinforced composites and methods, apparatuses, and compositions for making the same177

Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of time in the corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern signals

Three findings that shape where new filings are likely to land and where they are likely to collide with existing claims.

Concentration
68.3%
of 4,500 records held by top 5

A five-firm core, not a crowded field

Aerospace engine makers and their composites subsidiaries hold more than two-thirds of all records in scope. A new entrant is not filing into open ground; it is filing adjacent to a small number of dense portfolios covering fibre architecture, matrix densification and attachment.

Top 10 combined reach 78.8% of the 4,500 records.
Momentum
+39%
filing growth, 2021 to 2024

Growth is real, recent years just look thin

The confirmed 2021-to-2024 increase of 198 to 275 filings shows sustained investment, not a plateau. Years after 2024 read lower purely because publication has not caught up with filing.

Peak filing year so far remains 2018, at 357 records.
Claim overlap
55.2% / 38.1%
C04B vs F01D share of records

Most filings link a material claim to a turbine use

More than half of records carry a ceramics-processing classification and over a third also carry a turbine-hardware classification. The overlap suggests process claims are commonly drafted together with a specific turbine component, narrowing room for standalone material claims.

B32B laminate claims and C23C coating claims each sit near 12-13% of records.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ceramic matrix composites in hot sections, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the ground, and where it is thinning

The ranked leaders are dominated by a handful of engine OEMs and their composites units, with co-filing patterns that show internal group structure rather than cross-company alliances.

Leader
1,602
records

A single filer well ahead of the field

The leading assignee's record count is more than five times the tenth-place total of 44, an unusually steep drop-off that signals one company treats this as core patent territory rather than a peripheral filing area.

Fifth place holds 183 records.
Group filing
92 shared records
strongest co-assignee pair

Co-filing tracks corporate structure

The strongest co-assignee pairs link a parent engine maker to its own regional or technology-specific subsidiaries, rather than to outside partners, consistent with internal group filing practice rather than joint ventures.

Ten co-assignee pairs are recorded in total.
Momentum shift
-71% to -100% YoY
recent-year change among top filers

Latest-year counts have fallen across the leaders

Every tracked leading assignee shows a year-on-year decline in the latest year, several to zero. Read this alongside the publication lag: a same-year drop to zero is expected reporting behaviour this close to the data cut-off, not evidence that these firms have stopped filing.

Latest-year counts are the figures most affected by the 18-month publication lag.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas where record density is lower relative to the core ceramics and turbine classes.
boron nitride interphase tailoringwater vapour recession-resistant EBC top coatscompliant attachment for CMC shroudscombustion-chamber-specific CMC liners (F23R)clay/cement-based shaping routes (B28B)
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Raytheon Technologies (RTX Corp)16-71%
General Electric Co10-92%
Rolls-Royce Corp0
United Technologies Corp0
ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC0
Safran Ceramics SA0-100%
Rolls Royce North American Technologies Inc0
Goodrich Corp0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this

Use the dataset to test a specific filing direction before committing drafting time.

Check freedom-to-operate against the top five

With 68.3% of records held by five assignees, any new filing near fibre architecture, densification or attachment should be checked against their claim scope first, not against the field average.

Run an FTO screen in Eureka

Probe the under-claimed branches

Environmental barrier coating durability and compliant attachment carry lower record density than the core ceramics and turbine classes, which is where a first claim has more room to stand.

Explore white space in Eureka

Track the leaders' next filings, not just their totals

Latest-year counts are depressed by publication lag across every leading assignee; re-check momentum once the 2025-2026 window has caught up.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on CMC hot-section patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Ceramic Matrix Composites in Hot Sections in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole ceramic matrix composites in hot sections corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.