Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (198 records) with 2024 (275) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 4,500 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This dataset tracks patent activity at the intersection of silicon carbide fibre composites, melt infiltration and chemical vapour infiltration processing, alongside environmental barrier coatings and compliant attachment designs used to keep ceramic matrix composite parts in gas turbine hot sections. The search string pairs fibre/matrix processing terms with degradation and coating terms, so a record typically has to describe both a composite construction and a durability or attachment mechanism to be in scope.
Coverage runs from 2015 through the third quarter of 2026, with 4,500 published records making up the assignee ranking and the technology composition figures below. Because publication trails filing by roughly a year and a half, the most recent one to two years in any trend line will understate true filing activity.
Two views of the same 4,500-record dataset: filings by year, and the IPC subclasses those filings carry.
Filings ran in the low 300s from 2017 through the 2018 peak of 357, then continued at a high level; the confirmed three-year growth from 2021 (198) to 2024 (275) is +39%. The apparent drop after 2024 is a publication-lag artefact, not a slowdown in actual filing.
C04B (ceramics, cement and refractories) appears on 55.2% of the 4,500 records, ahead of F01D (turbines) at 38.1%. Layered-product claims under B32B (13.3%) and coating/deposition claims under C23C (12.0%) point to environmental barrier coating and laminate architecture as the next-largest claim clusters, each still filed on a minority of records.
Shares are the percentage of the 4,500 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about ceramic matrix composites in hot sections and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by Central South University, this record describes an automated route to a SiC fibre-reinforced SiC matrix flame tube: a chemical vapour infiltration interface layer is grown on SiC fibre, a unidirectional tape is wound into a net-shape preform sized by simulated fibre volume and orientation, and reactive melt infiltration is combined with chemical vapour infiltration for densification.Notable for combining automated winding with a dual CVI/melt-infiltration densification sequence in one claimed process.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20160060752A1 | Method for producing a composite material with a carbide matrix | 347 |
| 2 | US20170165624A1 | Ceramic Orifice Chamber for Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit | 337 |
| 3 | US6648597B1 | Ceramic matrix composite turbine vane | 290 |
| 4 | US6024898A | Article and method for making complex shaped preform and silicon carbide composite by melt infiltration | 271 |
| 5 | US20050230029A1 | Continuous fiber reinforced composites and methods, apparatuses, and compositions for making the same | 222 |
| 6 | US5628938A | Method of making a ceramic composite by infiltration of a ceramic preform | 222 |
| 7 | US6733907B2 | Hybrid ceramic material composed of insulating and structural ceramic layers | 213 |
| 8 | US6258737B1 | Article and method for making complex shaped preform and silicon carbide composite by melt infiltration | 206 |
| 9 | US20110124483A1 | Ceramic composite materials containing carbon nanotube-infused fiber materials and methods for production the… | 200 |
| 10 | US20030044593A1 | Continuous fiber reinforced composites and methods, apparatuses, and compositions for making the same | 177 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply by virtue of time in the corpus; treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings that shape where new filings are likely to land and where they are likely to collide with existing claims.
Aerospace engine makers and their composites subsidiaries hold more than two-thirds of all records in scope. A new entrant is not filing into open ground; it is filing adjacent to a small number of dense portfolios covering fibre architecture, matrix densification and attachment.
The confirmed 2021-to-2024 increase of 198 to 275 filings shows sustained investment, not a plateau. Years after 2024 read lower purely because publication has not caught up with filing.
More than half of records carry a ceramics-processing classification and over a third also carry a turbine-hardware classification. The overlap suggests process claims are commonly drafted together with a specific turbine component, narrowing room for standalone material claims.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to ceramic matrix composites in hot sections, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranked leaders are dominated by a handful of engine OEMs and their composites units, with co-filing patterns that show internal group structure rather than cross-company alliances.
The leading assignee's record count is more than five times the tenth-place total of 44, an unusually steep drop-off that signals one company treats this as core patent territory rather than a peripheral filing area.
The strongest co-assignee pairs link a parent engine maker to its own regional or technology-specific subsidiaries, rather than to outside partners, consistent with internal group filing practice rather than joint ventures.
Every tracked leading assignee shows a year-on-year decline in the latest year, several to zero. Read this alongside the publication lag: a same-year drop to zero is expected reporting behaviour this close to the data cut-off, not evidence that these firms have stopped filing.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Raytheon Technologies (RTX Corp) | 16 | -71% |
| General Electric Co | 10 | -92% |
| Rolls-Royce Corp | 0 | — |
| United Technologies Corp | 0 | — |
| ROLLS ROYCE HIGH TEMPERATURE COMPOSITES INC | 0 | — |
| Safran Ceramics SA | 0 | -100% |
| Rolls Royce North American Technologies Inc | 0 | — |
| Goodrich Corp | 0 | -100% |
Use the dataset to test a specific filing direction before committing drafting time.
With 68.3% of records held by five assignees, any new filing near fibre architecture, densification or attachment should be checked against their claim scope first, not against the field average.
Run an FTO screen in EurekaEnvironmental barrier coating durability and compliant attachment carry lower record density than the core ceramics and turbine classes, which is where a first claim has more room to stand.
Explore white space in EurekaLatest-year counts are depressed by publication lag across every leading assignee; re-check momentum once the 2025-2026 window has caught up.
Set a monitoring alert in EurekaThe dataset's leading assignee holds 1,602 of the 4,500 records in scope, well ahead of the rest of the ranked leaders — fifth place holds 183 and tenth place holds 44. Together the top five assignees account for 68.3% of all records, so the field is concentrated among a small number of aerospace engine manufacturers and their composites divisions rather than spread evenly. Anyone assessing freedom to operate should treat this small group as the primary reference set rather than sampling the wider ranking.
Yes, based on the last full years of data: filings rose from 198 in 2021 to 275 in 2024, a 39% increase over that span. The peak year on record so far is 2018, at 357 filings, but growth resumed and continued through 2024. Figures for 2025 and 2026 appear lower only because patent publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, not because activity has slowed.
Coating and surface deposition claims for CMC hot-section parts fall mainly under C23C, which appears on 12.0% of the 4,500 records in this dataset, often alongside C04B ceramics claims (55.2% of records) and B32B layered-product claims (13.3%). This lower share relative to the core ceramics and turbine classes suggests environmental barrier coating durability, including resistance to water vapour recession, is a comparatively less crowded claim area than fibre or matrix processing itself.
US20220055954A1, filed by Central South University, claims an automated process that combines chemical vapour infiltration for the fibre interface layer with reactive melt infiltration for final densification, applied to a specific winding and net-shape preforming sequence for a flame tube. It does not claim CMC materials or flame tube parts generally; it claims a particular automated process sequence. Processes that use a different densification order, a different preform-forming method, or that omit the automated winding step are outside the specific process claims described here, though a full claim-by-claim comparison against the granted claims is needed before relying on that distinction.
Relative to the dominant C04B and F01D classes, combustion-chamber-specific applications (F23R, 6.5% of records), gas-turbine plant integration (F02C, 6.2%) and clay/cement-based shaping routes (B28B, 4.6%) carry noticeably lower record density. Compliant attachment mechanisms and water-vapour-recession-resistant coating top coats also show up as narrower, less-crowded claim areas within the broader coating and attachment space. These lower-density branches are worth checking first for a first-claim opportunity, since the core fibre, matrix and turbine-integration claims are already occupied by a handful of large portfolios.
Go past this page: query the whole ceramic matrix composites in hot sections corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.