Book a demo

CFRP Laminate Topology Optimization Patent Snapshot

CFRP Laminate Topology Optimization Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
CFRP Laminate / Topology Optimization Patent Snapshot in 2026

The patent evidence snapshot for CFRP laminate topology optimization is extremely sparse, with only 5 patent families in scope and no single dominant applicant holding more than one record. Activity peaked in 2019 and again showed a small uptick in 2025, but overall annual volume has eased, placing the field in a decline lifecycle stage with significant room for structured R&D entry.

5
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

A fragmented, early-stage field with no clear leader

No single applicant commands the evidence snapshot: eight applicants each hold one patent record, and the top five filers collectively account for 63% of the top ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total — a high apparent concentration driven purely by the tiny corpus size rather than any sustained investment program.

The field shows no tier gap in the conventional sense. All ranked applicants are tied at one patent record each, spanning individual inventors in India, a Saudi Arabian university, and Chinese industrial and research entities. This flat distribution signals that no organization has yet made a sustained commitment to this intersection of CFRP laminate design and topology optimization.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1MR SOLAIYAPPAN K1
2King Abdulaziz University1
3MR PRAVEEN R1
4MR P ARUNKUMAR1
5MS THANISKA R1
6Chengdu Kaize Technology Co., Ltd.1
7Nuclear Industry Eighth Research Institute1
8Jiangsu Hengrui Carbon Fiber Technology Co., Ltd.1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The absence of a visible incumbent means there is no entrenched IP moat to navigate, but it also means the field lacks the validation that comes from sustained corporate investment. Entries by King Abdulaziz University and the Nuclear Industry Eighth Research Institute suggest academic and state-backed interest rather than commercial scale-up.

The most recent filing period may be under-represented due to standard publication lag of 18–24 months; the 2025 data point should be treated as a floor rather than a ceiling. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Intermittent filing activity and a computational-methods-heavy technology mix

Annual filings have been episodic rather than sustained, with the field registering activity in only four of the ten years observed. The technology composition skews toward computational methods, reflecting the simulation-driven nature of topology optimization applied to composite laminates.

Annual filing trend

Filings first appeared in 2019, with isolated activity in 2020 and 2023, and a small two-record uptick in 2025. The lifecycle evidence places the field in decline, meaning annual volume has eased from the 2019 peak. The 2025 data should be treated cautiously given publication lag.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 2 in 2025.02017020181201912020020210202212023020242202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

G06F (electric digital data processing) is the visible IPC class, reflecting the computational core of topology optimization workflows. B32B (layered products and laminates) appears as the second branch, directly covering laminate structures. Smaller presences in B29C (shaping of plastics), B64C (aeroplanes and helicopters), and G16C (computational chemistry) indicate nascent application-domain extensions. The A01C (planting and sowing) classification is an apparent anomaly likely tied to a mis-classified or dual-use filing.

Technology compositionG06F · Electric digital data processing leads with 3; B32B · Layered products & laminates 2.G06F · Electric digital …3B32B · Layered products …2A01C · Planting & sowing1B29C · Shaping of plastics1B64C · Aeroplanes & heli…1C08G · Condensation poly…1G16C · Computational che…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US11207867B1Published 2021-12-28

Bio-inspired composite laminate design with high o…

King Abdulaziz University

Bio-inspired carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite laminates are provided. The CFRP laminates display high out-of-plane strength and ductility due to the incorporation of defects (e.g. areas of delamination) which are purposefully introduced into the laminate layers. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Bio-inspired composite laminate design with high o… — patent drawingBio-inspired composite laminate design with high o… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1一种复合材料汽车B柱的设计方法5
2Bio-inspired composite laminate design with high o…3
3一种碳纤维复合材料的设计优化方法、系统和介质1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Nuclear Industry Eighth Research Institute

Nuclear Industry Eighth Research Institute

The Nuclear Industry Eighth Research Institute holds one patent record and is the only applicant flagged as a new entrant with upward momentum in the most recent period. Its technology focus is entirely within G06F (electric digital data processing), specifically sub-classes G06F 111, G06F 113, and G06F 119, indicating a computational simulation approach to topology optimization rather than a materials or manufacturing angle. As a state-affiliated Chinese research institute, its entry may signal growing institutional interest in applying optimization methods to high-performance composites in defense-adjacent sectors.

patent records: 1
Challenger · King Abdulaziz University

King Abdulaziz University

King Abdulaziz University holds one patent record with a technology focus concentrated in B32B (layered products and laminates), specifically sub-classes B32B 5, B32B 19, and B32B 37. This positions the university at the materials and laminate-structure end of the technology spectrum, complementary to the computational focus of the Chinese institutional filers. No momentum trend is recorded for this applicant beyond its single filing.

patent records: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Jiangsu Hengrui Carbon Fiber Technology Co., Ltd.Chengdu Kaize Technology Co., Ltd.+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.