Book a demo

CGM Sensor Materials Patent Landscape 2026

CGM Sensor Materials Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
CGM Sensor Materials Patent Landscape in 2026

CGM sensor materials IP is heavily concentrated, with Medtronic MiniMed alone accounting for the plurality of filings and the top five filers commanding nearly two-thirds of the leading filers’ combined output. The field reached its peak annual volume in 2021 and has eased since, signalling a maturing competitive structure where positional defense by incumbents is now the dominant activity.

193
Patent families in scope
64%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-46%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Medtronic MiniMed leads a highly concentrated field

Medtronic MiniMed holds the top position by a substantial margin, followed by Ascensia Diabetes Care, Allez Health, I-Sens, and Sogang University Research & Business Development Foundation rounding out the top five. The top five filers collectively account for 64% of the hundred largest filers’ combined patent records, signalling a field where a small number of actors define the IP frontier.

The tier gap between Medtronic MiniMed and the rest of the ranking is pronounced. No single challenger currently approaches the leader’s scale, though Allez Health and I-Sens are active enough to form a meaningful second tier. Below rank five, individual positions drop sharply, suggesting limited mid-tier depth.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Medtronic MiniMed Inc.96
2Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AG23
3Allez Health Inc.22
4I-Sens Inc.15
5SOGANG UNIV RES & BUSINESS DEV FOUND14
6Willow Lab Inc.12
7Tingo Medical Ltd.10
8UXN Co., Ltd.10
9Cercacor Laboratories Inc.4
10Vivachek Biotech (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd.4
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Zhejiang University City College4
12Children’s Medical Center Corporation3
13Massachusetts Institute of Technology3
14Zhejiang University3
15King Saud University3
16National University of Singapore3
17Sanvita Medical Corporation3
18Pacific Diabetes Technologies Inc.3
19Roche Diabetes Care Inc.2
20Chongqing Wenchuang Medical Laboratory Co., Ltd.2
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leader’s entrenched position across diagnostic and electrochemical sensing branches implies that challengers must either differentiate on adjacent material science routes or compete on manufacturing precision claims to carve out defensible space.

Filings from approximately 2024 onward are likely under-counted due to standard patent publication lag and should not be read as indicative of the true current activity level. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2021; diagnosis and sensing branches dominate the technology mix

Annual filing volume and IPC class distribution together describe a field that expanded rapidly through 2021 but has since eased, while remaining concentrated in a narrow set of diagnostic and electrochemical technology classes.

Annual filing trend

Filings grew from 15 in 2017 to a peak of 47 in 2021, then declined to 21 in 2022 and continued easing through 2023 and 2024. The 2024 and 2025 figures should be treated as preliminary given publication lag; they do not necessarily represent the true filing rate for those years.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 47 in 2021.15201725201818201927202047202121202219202310202410202512026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

A61B (diagnosis and surgery) is overwhelmingly dominant, reflecting the sensor-body interface focus of most filings. G01N (material analysis and testing) forms a meaningful secondary cluster, with A61M (devices for body fluids) and G16H (healthcare informatics) as smaller but notable branches. Polymer chemistry classes such as C08F and C08G, as well as surface deposition branches C25D and C23C, each represent a small but distinct slice of the technology composition.

Technology compositionA61B · Diagnosis & surgery leads with 222; G01N · Material analysis & testing 77.A61B · Diagnosis & surgery222G01N · Material analysis…77A61M · Devices for body …36G16H · Healthcare inform…32G06N · Computing based o…17C12Q · Measuring & testi…16C25D · Electroplating & …9C08F · Addition polymers…8↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20150122646A1Published 2015-05-07

Mediator-less Electrochemical Glucose Sensing Proc…

National University Of Singapore

The present disclosure generally relates to devices and procedures for the development of glucose oxidase-bound electrodes by a covalent binding of glucose oxidase on amine-functionalized electrodes. More particularly, the present disclosure is related to covalently-bound enzyme-coated electrodes that are leach-proof and highly stable for continuous glucose… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Mediator-less Electrochemical Glucose Sensing Proc… — patent drawingMediator-less Electrochemical Glucose Sensing Proc… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Glucose sensors and methods of manufacturing293
2Electrochemical glucose sensing by equilibrium glu…151
3柔性电化学电极、连续葡萄糖监测传感器及其制备方法66
4Methods, systems, and devices for calibration and …61
5Use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS…44
6Methods for continuous glucose monitoring40
7Systems and methods for continuous health monitori…39
8Sensing Fluid Concentration for Continuous Glucose…39

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of post-peak filing volume, high top-five concentration, and a narrow technology class mix points to a field entering consolidation, where incremental positioning matters more than broad exploration.

Decline

Field is past its 2021 peak and entering consolidation

Annual filing volume reached its highest point in 2021 at 47 filings and has eased consistently since. The lifecycle stage is characterised as Decline, driven by easing annual volume from that peak. For R&D planners, this indicates that broad platform staking has largely occurred; future investment is more likely to generate returns in targeted differentiation rather than foundational coverage.

Past-peak · Consolidating
Concentration

Top-five filers hold nearly two-thirds of the leading filers’ output

The top five filers account for 64% of the top 100 filers’ combined patent records, with Medtronic MiniMed alone commanding the largest single share. This level of concentration means new entrants face a well-fortified incumbent landscape in core diagnostic and electrochemical sensing branches. Differentiation in adjacent material science or coating classes offers a more viable entry path than direct competition in the dominant A61B cluster.

High concentration
Collaboration

Industry-academia pairing drives the most active co-filing relationship

The most active co-filing relationship in the corpus links I-Sens (listed in the evidence as the Korean sensor maker) with Sogang University Research & Business Development Foundation, who co-filed 14 patent records together. A secondary collaboration connects MIT with Children’s Medical Center Corporation across 3 co-filed records. Both pairings follow an industry-academia model, suggesting that novel material formulations in this space are still being seeded through academic research partnerships.

Industry-academia model
Geography

US-centric filing with selective PCT and EPO coverage

The United States is the lead jurisdiction with 109 patent records, followed by Europe via the EPO at 33, WIPO PCT at 27, and Australia at 21. China holds 18 records despite hosting several active filers, and South Korea has only 2 records despite I-Sens and Sogang University being ranked applicants. This geographic unevenness suggests that some applicants are not fully extending their Korean or Chinese innovations into international prosecution, which may leave coverage gaps that competitors can exploit.

US-centric · Selective extension
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
I-Sens Inc.SOGANG UNIV RES & BUSINESS DEV FOUND14
Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyChildren’s Medical Center Corporation3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Medtronic MiniMed versus an emerging challenger tier led by Allez Health

Medtronic MiniMed’s lead is built on deep coverage across diagnostic sensing and electrochemical measurement branches, while Allez Health has entered as a new participant with a fully A61B-focused portfolio and immediate scale.

Leader · Medtronic MiniMed

Medtronic MiniMed

Medtronic MiniMed holds 96 patent records, the largest position in the corpus by a wide margin. Its technical focus spans A61B (diagnosis and surgery), G01N electrochemical measurement, and A61M fluid delivery, reflecting a comprehensive sensor-system stack rather than a single materials bet. Recent momentum shows a modest decline of 11% versus the prior period, consistent with the field’s overall post-peak trajectory rather than a structural retreat.

96 patent records
Challenger · Allez Health

Allez Health

Allez Health holds 22 patent records and entered the ranking as a new entrant with recent filings of 13 records, making it the fastest-growing named applicant in the corpus by momentum. Its technical focus is concentrated almost entirely in A61B (diagnosis and surgery), with secondary positions in A61B10 and C12N, suggesting an emphasis on sensor-body interface design and enzyme-related materials rather than the broader electrochemical stack that defines the leader’s portfolio.

22 patent records
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all 20 named applicants including Ascensia, I-Sens, Sogang University, Willow Lab, and Tingo Medical.
Ascensia Diabetes Care HoldingsI-Sens+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Medtronic MiniMed Inc.24▼ -11%
Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AG1▼ -95%
Allez Health Inc.13▲ new entrant
Tingo Medical Ltd.1▲ new entrant
Cercacor Laboratories Inc.3▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player counts are patent records from the applicant ranking; momentum figures are recent-versus-prior-period comparisons from applicant momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in electroplating, enzyme chemistry, and AI-assisted sensing

Several IPC classes appear at low share relative to the dominant A61B cluster, and at least two carry plausible technical relevance to next-generation CGM sensor materials that warrants monitoring.

C25D · Electroplating and electroforming

With only 9 patent records and a 2% share among the branches observed, electroplating and electroforming is the sparsest class with direct relevance to sensor electrode fabrication. Precision electrodeposition of enzyme-retaining or biocompatible metal layers is a documented route to improving CGM sensor sensitivity and longevity. The low filing count suggests few applicants are staking claims in this manufacturing process dimension, which may represent an entry path for materials or process specialists not currently active in the A61B core.

Search this in Eureka →

G06N · Computing based on AI models

AI-model-related filings account for 17 patent records and a 4% share, making this branch sparse relative to the clinical sensing core but growing in relevance as sensor signal processing and calibration correction move toward learned models. The most-cited work in the corpus already references EIS-based sensing and calibration methods, and AI integration with raw sensor material output is a logical extension. Entrants with strength in embedded inference or edge ML could find less crowded ground here than in the physical sensor layer.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
Access the complete branch-level analysis covering all 26 IPC classes identified in the corpus, including polymer chemistry and coating process branches.
C12Q · Measuring and testing involving enzymes and DNAC23C · Coating and surface deposition+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share is calculated at the patent-record level across the full IPC class distribution.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across diagnostic, electrochemical, and materials routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerA61B 5 · Diagnosis & surgeryG01N 27 · Material analysis & testingA61M 5 · Devices for body fluidsG16H 40 · Healthcare informaticsG16H 50 · Healthcare informatics
Medtronic MiniMed Inc.Strong · 96Moderate · 34Moderate · 30Emerging · 17Emerging · 16
Ascensia Diabetes Care Holdings AGStrong · 23AbsentEmerging · 2Moderate · 8Moderate · 5
Allez Health Inc.Strong · 22AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Sogang University Research & Business Development FoundationStrong · 8Strong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
I-Sens Inc.Strong · 8Strong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
UXN Co., Ltd.Strong · 7Strong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsent
Tingo Medical Ltd.Strong · 10AbsentAbsentEmerging · 1Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own CGM sensor materials landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.