Book a demo

Chemical Recycling of Plastics Patent Landscape 2026

Chemical Recycling of Plastics Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

Chemical Recycling of Plastics Patent Landscape in 2026

Chemical recycling of plastics has reached a growth-stage field with multi-year filing volumes more than doubling relative to the prior window, driven by a concentrated group of petrochemical and specialty-chemical leaders anchored by Eastman Chemical. Activity is spread across pyrolysis-oriented hydrocarbon-refining routes and polymer-dissolution pathways, with Europe and the United States the primary filing jurisdictions.

5,571
Patent families in scope
31%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+103%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
Europe (EPO)
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Eastman Chemical leads a moderately concentrated field with a clear tier gap at the top

Eastman Chemical Company holds the top position with 317 patent families, ahead of SK Innovation and Chevron USA at 264 and 261 patent families respectively. SK Geo Centric and SABIC Global Technologies follow closely, indicating that the leading positions are held primarily by large integrated petrochemical and specialty-chemical companies.

The top five filers account for 31% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate concentration: a dominant cluster exists, but no single actor commands an overwhelming share. The gap between first place and the mid-tier is meaningful, with the top four applicants each exceeding 240 patent families while the tenth-ranked Lummus Technology sits at 92.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
1Eastman Chemical Company317
2SK Innovation Co., Ltd.264
3Chevron USA Inc.261
4SK Geo Centric Co., Ltd.249
5SABIC Global Technologies BV226
6PROCTER & GAMBLE CO210
7IFP Energies Nouvelles176
8Revalyu Resources GmbH128
9LG Chem Ltd.117
10Lummus Technology Inc.92
#ApplicantPatent familiesShare
11UOP LLC (Honeywell UOP)91
12ExxonMobil Product Solutions Co.88
13Plastic Energy Ltd.73
14Repsol SA73
15Carbios72
16Mura Technology Ltd.70
17Basell Poliolefine Italia SRL66
18SK Chemicals Co., Ltd.58
19Borealis AG56
20Evonik Operations GmbH55
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leaders’ positions suggest that incumbents with refining infrastructure and polymer-chemistry expertise have moved earliest and most aggressively. New, dedicated recycling specialists such as Revalyu Resources, Carbios, Mura Technology, and Plastic Energy appear in the ranking, signalling that technology-focused entrants are establishing defensible positions alongside diversified chemical majors.

Filing counts for 2024 and 2025 are understated relative to final totals due to patent publication lag; recent-period figures should be treated as minimums rather than complete counts. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent families. Applicant counts can overlap where a patent family lists several applicants, so they need not sum to the total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Multi-year growth is robust, with pyrolysis and polymer-processing routes dominating the technology mix

The annual filing trend illustrates the field’s rapid expansion since 2019, while the technology-composition chart shows how activity is distributed across distinct chemical-process branches.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings climbed sharply from 2019 onward, reaching a peak in 2023. The apparent decline in 2024 and 2025 reflects publication lag rather than a real contraction; the three-year recent window sits 103% above the prior equivalent window, confirming the field remains in net expansion on a multi-year basis. The 2026 figure represents only a partial year and should not be read as a trend.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,383 in 2023.17820179820182762019435202087320211,07920221,383202375720244392025532026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

C08J (Polymer processing and solutions) and C10G (Hydrocarbon oils and refining) together account for the two largest technology branches, reflecting the two dominant process families: solvent-based or dissolution recycling of polymers, and pyrolysis-to-fuel or pyrolysis-to-feedstock upgrading. B29B (Plastics preparation), C07C (Acyclic and carbocyclic compounds), and C10B (Coke and destructive distillation) form a secondary cluster, while enzymatic and biological routes in C12N and C12P are present but comparatively sparse.

Technology compositionC08J · Polymer processing & solutions leads with 3,689; C10G · Hydrocarbon oils & refining 2,779.C08J · Polymer processin…3,689C10G · Hydrocarbon oils …2,779B29B · Plastics preparat…1,292C07C · Acyclic & carbocy…1,025C10B · Coke & destructiv…970C08G · Condensation poly…785B01J · Chemical/physical…650C08L · Polymer compositi…557↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240392195A1Published 2024-11-28

Recovery of recycle content co2 from pyrolysis flu…

Exxonmobil Product Solutions Company

A process and system for recovering a recycle content carbon dioxide is provided that can lower the carbon footprint and global warming potential of a chemical recycling facility. More particularly, a pyrolysis flue gas and/or a pyrolysis gas from waste plastic pyrolysis may be treated in an absorber system to thereby form a recovered CO<sub>2 </sub>stream… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Recovery of recycle content co2 from pyrolysis flu… — patent drawingRecovery of recycle content co2 from pyrolysis flu… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Robust Integrated Process for Conversion of Waste …258
2An integrated process configuration involving the …241
3Integrated Process for Conversion of Waste Plastic…225
4Process for converting waste plastic into lubricat…203
5Process for converting mixed waste plastic (MWP) i…172
6Method for separating and recovering dimethyl tere…171
7Recycled polyester-containing polyester structure …170
8An integrated process configuration involving the …167

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

The combination of strong recent growth, moderate concentration, active cross-company collaboration, and broad geographic filing creates both well-defended core routes and identifiable adjacent spaces for new entrants.

Growth

Growth stage, expanding on a multi-year basis with 2023 as the peak annual year

The field is classified as Growth stage: the most recent three-year filing window is 103% above the prior equivalent window, confirming sustained expansion. Annual volume has eased from the 2023 peak, and the most recent years carry additional undercount from publication lag. For R&D planners, this means foundational process patents are being filed now and freedom-to-operate windows are narrowing rapidly.

Growth stage
Concentration

Moderate concentration with a clear top-four cluster and an active second tier

The top five filers hold 31% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers. Below the top four, the ranking features both large diversified players (IFP Energies Nouvelles, LG Chem, Lummus Technology, ExxonMobil) and dedicated recycling specialists (Revalyu Resources, Carbios, Mura Technology). This two-tier structure suggests that niche or application-specific strategies remain viable alongside the integrated-industry incumbents.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

SK Innovation and SK Geo Centric form the field’s most active co-filing pair, with IFP-led consortia also prominent

The most active co-filing relationship is between SK Innovation and SK Geo Centric, with 262 jointly filed patent families, reflecting a coordinated group strategy on pyrolysis upgrading. IFP Energies Nouvelles collaborates with national oil company partners (63 joint families) and with JEPLAN (9 families). BASF appears in multiple collaborations with Northwestern University, BASF (China), and trinamiX, pointing to cross-sector academic-industrial partnerships. Procter and Gamble co-files with the University of Michigan Board of Trustees.

Active co-filing
Geography

Europe and the United States are the primary filing destinations; India is the leading emerging market

Europe via the EPO and the United States are the top two jurisdictions by patent-record count, with WIPO PCT filings in third place reflecting broad international prosecution strategies. India ranks fourth, notably ahead of China, South Korea, and Japan, suggesting that filers view India as a commercially relevant market for chemical recycling deployment. China’s relatively lower rank is notable given its polymer production volumes and may represent a gap worth monitoring.

Europe & US lead
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
SK Innovation Co., Ltd.SK Geo Centric Co., Ltd.262
IFP Energies NouvellesADNOC (National Oil Company)63
SABIC Global Technologies BVSaudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC)11
SABIC Global Technologies BVSaudi Arabian Oil Company (Saudi Aramco)10
IFP Energies NouvellesJEPLAN Inc.9
BASF SENorthwestern University6
BASF SEBASF (China) Co., Ltd.6
Procter & Gamble Co.Regents of the University of Michigan4
BASF SEtrinamiX GmbH3
BASF SEBASF Corporation3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Insights are derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle assessment, collaboration pairs, and jurisdiction distribution in the evidence set.Explore insights →
Leaders

Eastman and SK Innovation lead on divergent technology routes

The top applicants divide broadly between polymer-dissolution and solvent-based routes (Eastman, Procter and Gamble, Revalyu) and pyrolysis-to-hydrocarbon upgrading routes (SK Innovation, SK Geo Centric, Chevron, SABIC, IFP). Understanding this route differentiation is essential for positioning new filings.

Leader · Eastman Chemical Company

Eastman Chemical Company

Eastman holds 317 patent families and leads across C10G hydrocarbon-refining, C08J polymer-processing, and B29B plastics-preparation branches, indicating a broad process portfolio spanning both pyrolysis upgrading and molecular recycling. Its recent three-year filing momentum is essentially flat at minus 1%, suggesting the company has reached a steady-state filing rate rather than accelerating further.

families: 317
Challenger · SK Innovation

SK Innovation Co., Ltd.

SK Innovation holds 264 patent families with a trajectory of 11 times its prior three-year filing volume, indicating a dramatic recent scale-up of its recycling IP program. Its technology emphasis is concentrated almost entirely in C10G hydrocarbon-refining subclasses, reflecting a pyrolysis-to-fuel or pyrolysis-to-feedstock strategy. Its affiliate SK Geo Centric (249 patent families, 13 times its prior three-year volume) files on overlapping technology and the two entities are the most active co-filing pair in the field.

families: 264
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access ranked profiles for all top-100 filers, including momentum trajectories and technology-route maps.
Chevron USA Inc.SABIC Global Technologies BV+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Eastman Chemical Company197▬ -1%
SK Innovation Co., Ltd.244▲ 11× vs prior 3-yr
SK Geo Centric Co., Ltd.243▲ 13× vs prior 3-yr
Chevron USA Inc.124▲ +44%
SABIC Global Technologies BV118▲ 5.1× vs prior 3-yr
Procter & Gamble Co.20▼ -77%
IFP Energies Nouvelles75▼ -12%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Player profiles are based on applicant patent-family rankings, recent filing momentum, and IPC technology focus from the evidence set.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring for white-space positioning

Several IPC branches adjacent to the dominant C08J and C10G clusters show lower relative filing share despite plausible technical relevance to chemical recycling workflows. These are observations of relative sparsity; each should be evaluated against specific technical and commercial entry conditions before treating them as investment priorities.

B01J · Chemical and physical processes and catalysis

With 650 patent records, B01J represents a lower-share branch relative to the dominant processing classes, despite catalyst design being central to both pyrolysis upgrading and solvent-based depolymerisation. Catalyst selectivity, tolerance to mixed or contaminated plastic feedstocks, and regenerability are active technical challenges with limited dedicated IP coverage here. An entrant focused on novel heterogeneous or homogeneous catalyst systems specifically optimised for real-world mixed plastic streams could find defensible space within this branch.

Search this in Eureka →

C12N and C12P · Microorganisms, genetic engineering, and enzymatic synthesis

Enzymatic and biological depolymerisation routes — exemplified by PETase and cutinase-class enzymes for PET — appear in C12N and C12P with 129 and 102 patent records respectively, making them among the sparsest branches relative to the overall corpus size. Carbios is the visible specialist, but the broader enzymatic route for non-PET polymers (polyurethanes, polyamides) remains comparatively open. Entry paths include enzyme engineering, process integration with upstream sorting, and combination bio-chemical hybrid routes.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent branches ranked by filing density, claim scope, and applicant overlap for systematic gap identification.
C08G · Condensation polymers (depolymerisation routes)B01D · Separation processes (feedstock purification)+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch sparsity is assessed relative to the dominant classes in the technology-composition distribution; low share does not automatically imply commercial opportunity.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route across IPC branches

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerC08J 11 · Polymer processing & solutionsC10G 1 · Hydrocarbon oils & refiningB29B 17 · Plastics preparationC10B 53 · Coke & destructive distillationC10G 9 · Hydrocarbon oils & refining
Eastman Chemical CompanyStrong · 176Strong · 234Moderate · 111Moderate · 60Emerging · 46
Chevron USA Inc.Moderate · 81Strong · 201AbsentStrong · 154Emerging · 29
SK Innovation Co., Ltd.AbsentStrong · 252Emerging · 27Emerging · 22Absent
Procter & Gamble Co.Strong · 194AbsentModerate · 82AbsentAbsent
SK Geo Centric Co., Ltd.AbsentStrong · 248Emerging · 27AbsentAbsent
SABIC Global Technologies BVAbsentStrong · 167AbsentModerate · 34Moderate · 61
IFP Energies NouvellesModerate · 56Strong · 114AbsentModerate · 24Moderate · 48
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own chemical recycling landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.