Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) remains one of the few thin-film absorber chemistries that has reached commercial module production, and the patent record tracked here isolates the absorber layer itself — deposition sequencing, gallium grading, co-evaporation staging and related process control — rather than the broader thin-film module stack. The dataset spans 50 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filtered to IPC classes covering semiconductor device structure (H01L31/032, H01L31/0749, H01L31/18).
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real activity; treat the most recent one or two years as provisional rather than as evidence of a slowdown on their own.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Two views of the same 50-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the absorber-layer claims actually sit in.
Filings rose to a peak of 4 in 2017, dropped to 1 by the 2022 midpoint, and have not recovered since. That pattern is more consistent with a subfield where the core absorber-deposition claim space was staked out in the mid-2010s than with an area still attracting fresh entrants.
All 50 records classify under H01L (semiconductor devices), with secondary clustering in C23C (coating and surface deposition, 8 records) and H10P (7 records). Smaller counts in B22F, C01B, E06B, G02F and H02S mark adjacent applications — powder-metallurgy precursor routes, window integration, optical control — that sit outside the main claim cluster and are worth checking individually for freedom to operate.
Shares are the percentage of the 50 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cigs solar cell absorber layer and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA method of forming a CIGS absorber layer using a three-stage co-evaporation process, which can improve the efficiency of a solar cell in the case where Na concentration of a substrate is low and thus the depletion layer of the CIGS absorber layer is thick. The method includes a first stage of co-evaporating In, Ga and Se to deposit them; a second stage of co-evaporating Cu and Se to deposit them; and a third stage of co-evaporating In, Ga and Se to deposit them, wherein Ga supply through evaporation in the first stage is greater than Ga supply through evaporation in the third stage.Filed by Korea Institute of Energy Research, published 2015-10-22.

| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2009137637A2 | Nanoparticles and methods of making and using | 52 |
| 2 | US20130224901A1 | Production Line to Fabricate CIGS Thin Film Solar Cells via Roll-to-Roll Processes | 26 |
| 3 | US20120318357A1 | Deposition processes for photovoltaics | 23 |
| 4 | US20160336475A1 | Hexagonal phase epitaxial cadmium sulfide on copper indium gallium selenide for a photovoltaic junction | 21 |
| 5 | KR101097718B1 | Rapid heat treatment apparatus of CIGS absorber layer | 16 |
| 6 | US20120003786A1 | Electroplating methods and chemistries for CIGS precursor stacks with conductive selenide bottom layer | 10 |
| 7 | US10871027B2 | Electric potentially-driven shade with CIGS solar cell, and/or method of making the same | 9 |
| 8 | US20180158973A1 | Silver copper indium gallium selenide reactive sputtering method and apparatus, and photovoltaic cell contain… | 9 |
| 9 | US20150295106A1 | Method for fabrication of copper-indium gallium oxide and chalcogenide thin films | 9 |
| 10 | US20140109967A1 | Thin film solar cells for windows based on low cost solution process and fabrication method thereof | 9 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three signals stand out once the raw counts are read together: where the claim space is dense, where citation influence actually sits, and how filing jurisdiction shapes competitive exposure.
A midpoint of 1 family in 2022 followed by continued decline suggests the core three-stage co-evaporation and gallium-grading claims were substantially staked out by the late 2010s. New entrants filing broad absorber-deposition claims now face a denser prior art wall than the raw yearly count implies.
The most-cited records cover nanoparticle precursor formation, roll-to-roll production lines and CdS/CIGS junction epitaxy rather than absorber composition itself. A design-around strategy focused only on Ga/In ratio claims will miss the process patents that actually carry the citation weight.
Close to 60% of records route through the US receiving office, with South Korea the next largest single jurisdiction. China and India each show only 2 filings, which is a low bar for freedom-to-operate checks there relative to the size of both manufacturing bases.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cigs solar cell absorber layer, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee activity here is a mix of Korean national research institutes, US universities, and a small number of specialist manufacturers — with almost no assignee showing filings in the most recent year, consistent with the overall slowdown.
Every one of the leading assignees tracked in this dataset — spanning Korean research institutes, a Taiwanese solar manufacturer, a Chinese photovoltaic firm and a US university — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a single company pulling back.
Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, the strongest linking a Beijing-based photovoltaic company with a US university research council, and two others linking the University of Texas System with individual named inventors. Most families are filed by a single assignee acting alone.
Korea Institute of Energy Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology and University of Illinois council appear among the more active assignees, alongside university-affiliated inventors at the University of Texas System. Commercial manufacturers appear but are a smaller share of total families than the research-institute base.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| TSMC Solar Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Beijing Dingrong Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Korea Institute of Science and Technology | 0 | — |
| The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois | 0 | — |
| ABUSHAMA JEHAD A | 0 | — |
| Korea Institute of Energy Research | 0 | — |
| Korea National University of Transportation Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation | 0 | — |
| Board of Regents, The University of Texas System | 0 | — |
The dataset points to a mature, narrowly-claimed field rather than a fast-growing one — the practical next steps are about precision, not volume.
The highest-cited records are deposition-line and precursor patents rather than absorber-composition claims. A citation-network view centred on those documents will surface which downstream filings actually depend on them.
Explore citation mapping in EurekaChina and India show only 2 filings each despite significant CIGS manufacturing activity in the broader thin-film sector. A targeted FTO search in those jurisdictions may reveal exposure that a global count would hide.
Check jurisdictional coverage in EurekaAlkali post-treatment, wide-bandgap back-contact grading and Cd-free buffer pairing show thin coverage relative to the core absorber-deposition cluster. Each is a candidate for a first-mover claim rather than a design-around exercise.
Set up white-space alerts in EurekaThe dataset shows activity concentrated among Korean national research institutes, notably Korea Institute of Energy Research and Korea Institute of Science and Technology, alongside US university-affiliated filers such as the University of Illinois research council and the University of Texas System. No single assignee dominates the full 50-family set; the pattern is a moderate cluster of institutional filers followed by a long tail of single-filing entrants. None of the leading assignees show filings in the most recent tracked year, which is consistent with the overall flat-to-declining trend rather than one company's specific withdrawal.
No — filings peaked at 4 families in 2017, fell to 1 by the 2022 midpoint, and have continued to decline through the most recent tracked years. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the very latest year always looks lower than it will eventually turn out to be, so a single down year is not conclusive. But the multi-year trend from 2017 onward is a genuine decline, not a data artefact, and it points to a field where the core claim space was largely staked out in the mid-2010s.
This Korea Institute of Energy Research filing claims a three-stage co-evaporation method for forming the CIGS absorber layer: a first stage co-evaporating indium, gallium and selenium, a second stage co-evaporating copper and selenium, and a third stage repeating indium, gallium and selenium deposition, with gallium supply in the first stage exceeding that in the third. It is specifically framed as a fix for substrates with low sodium concentration, where the depletion layer would otherwise be too thick. Anyone using an asymmetric three-stage Ga-grading sequence with that particular first-stage-heavy gallium profile should check this filing's claim scope directly rather than assume a generic three-stage process is clear.
The United States receives the largest share of filings by a wide margin — 29 of 50 tracked families — with South Korea a distant second at 6, followed by WIPO PCT filings at 5 and Taiwan at 4. China and India each show only 2 filings in this dataset. For a company manufacturing or selling in China or India, that low count is worth treating as an opportunity to check for gaps rather than as evidence the field is unclaimed there, since global applicants may simply not have prioritised filing in those offices yet.
Relative to the dense core cluster in H01L absorber-deposition claims, several adjacent branches show thin coverage: alkali post-deposition treatment control, wide-bandgap grading near the back contact, roll-to-roll flexible substrate integration, cadmium-free buffer layer pairing, and nanoparticle precursor ink formulation. These sit at the edges of the IPC composition data, in classes like C23C, B22F and H02S, rather than in the main H01L cluster. A first claim in one of these areas is more likely to clear prior art cleanly than another absorber-composition filing in the core space.
Go past this page: query the whole cigs solar cell absorber layer corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.