https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/cigs-solar-cell-absorber-layer-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Photovoltaics & Solar
CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer Patents: Who Files, What They Claim, Where the Gaps Are
  • Filing peaked in 2017 at 4 families and has since flattened rather than accelerated, unusual for a subfield still cited as a route to higher-efficiency thin-film cells.
  • Nearly two-thirds of all filings route through the US receiving office (29 of 50), with South Korea, WIPO and Taiwan making up most of the remainder — filing strategy here is concentrated, not globally dispersed.
  • Co-assignment is rare and mostly academic-industry pairs only 8 co-assignee pairs exist across 50 families, and the strongest link involves a Chinese photovoltaic firm and a US university research council.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
50
Published Records
50%
Top-5 Share of All Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
41
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··8 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Copper indium gallium selenide (CIGS) remains one of the few thin-film absorber chemistries that has reached commercial module production, and the patent record tracked here isolates the absorber layer itself — deposition sequencing, gallium grading, co-evaporation staging and related process control — rather than the broader thin-film module stack. The dataset spans 50 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026, filtered to IPC classes covering semiconductor device structure (H01L31/032, H01L31/0749, H01L31/18).

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 figures in any trend line understate real activity; treat the most recent one or two years as provisional rather than as evidence of a slowdown on their own.

Filing activity, 2015–2026
  1. 1TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD10
  2. 2BEIJING APOLLO DING RONG SOLAR TECH5
  3. 3THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY4
  4. 4KOREA INST OF SCI & TECH3
  5. 5THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIV OF ILLINOIS3
  6. 6LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NAT SECURITY LLC3
  7. 7SOLACTRON2
  8. 8GOODFELLOW BRIAN W2
  9. 9KOREA INST OF ENERGY RES2
  10. 10GUARDIAN GLASS LLC2
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 50-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses the absorber-layer claims actually sit in.

A flat-to-declining filing curve

Filings rose to a peak of 4 in 2017, dropped to 1 by the 2022 midpoint, and have not recovered since. That pattern is more consistent with a subfield where the core absorber-deposition claim space was staked out in the mid-2010s than with an area still attracting fresh entrants.

A flat-to-declining filing curve012344201742018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in core semiconductor device classes

All 50 records classify under H01L (semiconductor devices), with secondary clustering in C23C (coating and surface deposition, 8 records) and H10P (7 records). Smaller counts in B22F, C01B, E06B, G02F and H02S mark adjacent applications — powder-metallurgy precursor routes, window integration, optical control — that sit outside the main claim cluster and are worth checking individually for freedom to operate.

Concentrated in core semiconductor device classesH01L · Semiconductor devices50100.0%C23C · Coating & surface deposition816.0%H10P714.0%B22F · Powder metallurgy24.0%C01B · Non-metallic elements & inorga…24.0%E06B · Doors, windows & shutters24.0%G02F · Optical control & modulation24.0%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…24.0%Other510.0%

Shares are the percentage of the 50 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cigs solar cell absorber layer and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records in this corpus

Representative Filing
US20150303328A12015-10-22

US20150303328A1 — Method of forming CIGS absorber layer for solar cell and CIGS solar cell

KOREA INSTITUTE OF ENERGY RESEARCH

A method of forming a CIGS absorber layer using a three-stage co-evaporation process, which can improve the efficiency of a solar cell in the case where Na concentration of a substrate is low and thus the depletion layer of the CIGS absorber layer is thick. The method includes a first stage of co-evaporating In, Ga and Se to deposit them; a second stage of co-evaporating Cu and Se to deposit them; and a third stage of co-evaporating In, Ga and Se to deposit them, wherein Ga supply through evaporation in the first stage is greater than Ga supply through evaporation in the third stage.Filed by Korea Institute of Energy Research, published 2015-10-22.

US20150303328A1 — patent drawing 1US20150303328A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation patents, CIGS absorber layer
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2009137637A2Nanoparticles and methods of making and using52
2US20130224901A1Production Line to Fabricate CIGS Thin Film Solar Cells via Roll-to-Roll Processes26
3US20120318357A1Deposition processes for photovoltaics23
4US20160336475A1Hexagonal phase epitaxial cadmium sulfide on copper indium gallium selenide for a photovoltaic junction21
5KR101097718B1Rapid heat treatment apparatus of CIGS absorber layer16
6US20120003786A1Electroplating methods and chemistries for CIGS precursor stacks with conductive selenide bottom layer10
7US10871027B2Electric potentially-driven shade with CIGS solar cell, and/or method of making the same9
8US20180158973A1Silver copper indium gallium selenide reactive sputtering method and apparatus, and photovoltaic cell contain…9
9US20150295106A1Method for fabrication of copper-indium gallium oxide and chalcogenide thin films9
10US20140109967A1Thin film solar cells for windows based on low cost solution process and fabrication method thereof9

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and skew toward older filings; they are not a measure of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three signals stand out once the raw counts are read together: where the claim space is dense, where citation influence actually sits, and how filing jurisdiction shapes competitive exposure.

Filing Trend
Peak 4 (2017) → 0 (2026, partial)
families per year

Activity has not recovered since its 2017 peak

A midpoint of 1 family in 2022 followed by continued decline suggests the core three-stage co-evaporation and gallium-grading claims were substantially staked out by the late 2010s. New entrants filing broad absorber-deposition claims now face a denser prior art wall than the raw yearly count implies.

Read alongside the 18-month publication lag before treating 2025–2026 as a real drop.
Citation Concentration
Top cite: 52 (WO2009137637A2)
citations, nanoparticle precursor route

Influence sits with precursor and deposition-line patents, not absorber chemistry alone

The most-cited records cover nanoparticle precursor formation, roll-to-roll production lines and CdS/CIGS junction epitaxy rather than absorber composition itself. A design-around strategy focused only on Ga/In ratio claims will miss the process patents that actually carry the citation weight.

Citation counts favour older filings within this corpus and should be read as influence, not current market relevance.
Jurisdiction Mix
US 29, KR 6, WIPO 5, TW 4
of 50 receiving-office filings

Filing strategy is US-centred with a secondary Korean cluster

Close to 60% of records route through the US receiving office, with South Korea the next largest single jurisdiction. China and India each show only 2 filings, which is a low bar for freedom-to-operate checks there relative to the size of both manufacturing bases.

Receiving-office counts describe where families were filed, not where the underlying research originated.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cigs solar cell absorber layer, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who holds the claim space

Assignee activity here is a mix of Korean national research institutes, US universities, and a small number of specialist manufacturers — with almost no assignee showing filings in the most recent year, consistent with the overall slowdown.

Momentum
0 filings, latest year
across every tracked top assignee

No assignee is currently accelerating

Every one of the leading assignees tracked in this dataset — spanning Korean research institutes, a Taiwanese solar manufacturer, a Chinese photovoltaic firm and a US university — shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. That is consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a single company pulling back.

Confirm against each assignee's most recent public roadmap before reading this as exit from the field.
Collaboration
8 co-assignee pairs total
out of 50 families

Co-filing is the exception, not the norm

Only 8 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, the strongest linking a Beijing-based photovoltaic company with a US university research council, and two others linking the University of Texas System with individual named inventors. Most families are filed by a single assignee acting alone.

Sparse co-filing suggests limited cross-licensing pressure so far in this niche.
Institutional Base
Korean & US research institutes lead
by family count

National labs and universities anchor the field

Korea Institute of Energy Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology and University of Illinois council appear among the more active assignees, alongside university-affiliated inventors at the University of Texas System. Commercial manufacturers appear but are a smaller share of total families than the research-institute base.

Institute-held families often license out rather than manufacture directly — check licensing status before assuming direct competitive exposure.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
Sub-areas with thin coverage relative to the core H01L cluster:
Alkali post-deposition treatment controlWide-bandgap grading near back contactRoll-to-roll flexible substrate integrationCd-free buffer layer pairingNanoparticle precursor ink formulation
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
TSMC Solar Ltd.0
Beijing Dingrong Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd.0
Korea Institute of Science and Technology0
The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois0
ABUSHAMA JEHAD A0
Korea Institute of Energy Research0
Korea National University of Transportation Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation0
Board of Regents, The University of Texas System0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to a mature, narrowly-claimed field rather than a fast-growing one — the practical next steps are about precision, not volume.

Map the process-patent citation network

The highest-cited records are deposition-line and precursor patents rather than absorber-composition claims. A citation-network view centred on those documents will surface which downstream filings actually depend on them.

Explore citation mapping in Eureka

Run freedom-to-operate on the low-filing jurisdictions

China and India show only 2 filings each despite significant CIGS manufacturing activity in the broader thin-film sector. A targeted FTO search in those jurisdictions may reveal exposure that a global count would hide.

Check jurisdictional coverage in Eureka

Track the under-claimed branches directly

Alkali post-treatment, wide-bandgap back-contact grading and Cd-free buffer pairing show thin coverage relative to the core absorber-deposition cluster. Each is a candidate for a first-mover claim rather than a design-around exercise.

Set up white-space alerts in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on CIGS absorber layer patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research CIGS Solar Cell Absorber Layer in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole cigs solar cell absorber layer corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.