CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation Patents: Trends & Gaps 2026
- One sharp wave, not a steady climb. Nine of twelve families were filed around 2018, with zero activity at the 2022 midpoint and none reported in the latest year.
- Control automation is barely claimed. Only one family sits in G05B (control and regulating systems) against eleven in H01L and nine in H02S — the process-control layer is the thin slice.
- Almost entirely a US story. Eleven of twelve records were filed through the US patent office, with a single PCT filing showing any international reach.
A small, front-loaded corner of solar manufacturing IP
CIGS solar cell process automation covers patent claims combining copper indium gallium selenide thin-film photovoltaic technology with deposition process automation, automated production lines, or roll-to-roll automation. The tracked corpus holds 12 patent families, spanning filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, concentrated almost entirely in semiconductor device and photovoltaic generation classifications.
Filing activity is not evenly spread across that window. Nine of the twelve families were filed around 2018, and the record shows zero filings at the 2022 midpoint, with none reported in the most recent year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent period is always undercounted — but the flat middle years in this dataset are a real pattern, not just a reporting artefact.
Filing trends and technology composition
Twelve patent families define this dataset, filed almost entirely through the US patent office with a single PCT entry. The trend line and IPC spread below show where activity clustered and where it stopped.
A single filing wave, then silence
Filings sat at zero through 2017, spiked to nine records in 2018, and returned to zero by the 2022 midpoint. There is no filing activity to report in the most recent year, though publication lag means late 2025-2026 filings may not yet be visible.
Semiconductor and PV codes dominate, control systems barely appear
H01L (semiconductor devices) covers 11 of 12 records and H02S (photovoltaic generation) covers 9, meaning most families are tagged under both codes. G05B (control and regulating systems) appears in only one family, marking automated process control as the thinnest-claimed slice of this space.
Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cigs solar cell process automation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaRepresentative filing and most-cited records
Rollable Photovoltaic Awning, Rollable Photovoltaic Canopy, and Rollable Photovoltaic Articles that Generate Electricity from Light
A system includes a rollable photovoltaic awning having an array of flexible and rollable photovoltaic cells that convert incoming light to electricity. The rollable photovoltaic awning is configured to transit between a rolled-out state and a rolled-in state. In the rolled-in state, the rollable photovoltaic awning has a cylindrical form-factor with a diameter smaller than 30 centimeters. In the rolled-out state, it has a surface area of at least 2 square meters, and it is structured to withstand at least 1,000 cycles of rolling and unrolling with not more than 15 percent degradation of operational photovoltaic efficiency.Filed by SOLARPAINT LTD., published 2024-10-03 — the newest record referenced in this landscape.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WO2020061730A1 | Automation process monitoring and controlling method and device | 3 |
| 2 | US20230261126A1 | Flexible Solar Panels and Photovoltaic Devices, and Methods and Systems of Producing Them | 2 |
| 3 | US20190288139A1 | Frame-less encapsulated photo-voltaic (PV) solar power panel supporting solar cell modules encapsulated withi… | 2 |
| 4 | US20190288141A1 | Solar power panel factory and process for manufacturing frame-less encapsulated photo-voltaic (PV) solar powe… | 1 |
Citation counts are drawn from a 12-family corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence within this dataset, not as a measure of current commercial importance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (4 of 4 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing pattern signals
With only twelve families in scope, this is a niche corner of solar manufacturing patenting rather than a crowded field. The shape of the data — a sharp 2018 spike, a thin control-systems layer, and near-total US concentration — points to specific, checkable conclusions.
A single wave, not sustained investment
Nine of the twelve tracked families were filed around 2018, and the trend returns to zero by the 2022 midpoint. That is the signature of a short burst of experimentation rather than an ongoing R&D program, and it means recent competitive activity in this exact claim space is not visible in the granted-and-published record.
Process control is the thin layer
Semiconductor device structure (H01L) and photovoltaic generation (H02S) claims dominate the corpus, but automated control and regulating systems appear in a single family. Deposition-rate feedback, line-speed control, and closed-loop quality monitoring for CIGS automation are correspondingly under-documented in patent form.
Filing is concentrated in one office
Eleven records were filed with the United States patent office and one through the PCT system. There is no visible parallel buildout of this exact claim territory in other major patent offices within this dataset, which affects where freedom-to-operate risk actually sits.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cigs solar cell process automation, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open
With only 12 families across the whole corpus, no single assignee shows sustained multi-year filing here, and none of the tracked assignees recorded activity in the most recent year. That combination — a small pool of filers and no current momentum — is itself the finding.
No assignee shows recent activity
Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum in this corpus, including NAT MECHANICAL GRP CORP and other named filers, shows zero filings in the latest year. That is consistent with the broader trend line: a 2018 concentration with no renewed wave since.
A narrow field, easy to fully map
Because the entire corpus sits at 12 families, it is feasible to review every assignee and every claim individually rather than relying on aggregate statistics. That makes this a good candidate for a manual freedom-to-operate pass rather than a purely quantitative screen.
Filing strategy has been almost entirely domestic
With eleven of twelve records filed through the US patent office and only one PCT filing, assignees in this space have not built out broad international coverage for these specific automation claims, leaving other jurisdictions comparatively open on this exact claim territory.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| NAT MECHANICAL GRP CORP | 0 | — |
| SOLARPAINT LTD. | 0 | — |
| Beijing Dingrong Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The filing pattern here raises specific follow-up questions rather than a general call to explore more data. These are the next checks worth running.
Verify whether 2018-era filings lapsed or converted to grants
A spike followed by silence can mean applications were abandoned, granted, or simply not renewed. Checking prosecution status on the 2018 cohort clarifies whether the claim space is actually open or quietly held.
Check prosecution status in EurekaTrack the G05B control-systems gap for new entrants
With only one family in automated control and regulating systems, new filings in that specific IPC code would be an early signal of renewed investment in this space worth monitoring.
Set an alert on G05B filingsRun a claim-scope comparison against US20240332440A1
Any team developing a rollable or flexible CIGS module should compare their form factor against the specific numeric limits in this filing before committing to a design.
Compare claim scope in EurekaCommon questions on CIGS solar cell process automation patents
The dataset used for this landscape contains 12 published patent families matching deposition process automation, automated production line, or roll-to-roll automation claims tied to CIGS or copper indium gallium selenide thin-film technology. That is a small, concentrated corpus rather than a broad field, so any single filing carries proportionally more weight than it would in a larger technology area. Filing activity peaked in 2018 with nine records and has not repeated that volume since.
Filing in this corpus is spread across a small number of assignees rather than concentrated in one dominant player, and none of the tracked assignees show any filings in the most recent year covered by the data. This is consistent with a field that saw a short burst of interest around 2018 rather than sustained, ongoing investment by a fixed set of leaders. Anyone assessing competitive position here should look at the assignee ranking directly rather than assume a stable leader exists.
Coverage is uneven. Semiconductor device claims (H01L) and photovoltaic generation claims (H02S) account for most of the corpus, but automated control and regulating systems (G05B) appear in only one family out of twelve. That means the physical roll-to-roll handling and module structure are more thoroughly claimed than the automated process-control layer that would govern deposition rate, web speed, or in-line quality feedback.
A concentrated spike followed by a drop to zero by 2022 usually signals that a specific technical approach was tested in the patent record and then not pursued further, rather than a technology maturing into steady-state filing. For a new entrant, that pattern is worth investigating claim-by-claim: it can mean the approach hit a technical or commercial dead end, or that filers shifted their automation claims into adjacent categories not captured by this search string. Either way, absence of recent filings is not the same as absence of active development, given the roughly 18-month lag between filing and publication.
US20240332440A1, assigned to SOLARPAINT LTD., claims a rollable photovoltaic awning or canopy with specific physical limits: a rolled-in diameter under 30 centimeters, a rolled-out area of at least 2 square meters, and durability of 1,000 roll/unroll cycles with no more than 15 percent efficiency degradation. A product that falls inside all three of those bounds in a similar awning or canopy form factor is the configuration most likely to need a freedom-to-operate review. Products built around CIGS deposition equipment or automated manufacturing lines rather than the finished rollable form factor sit outside what this claim covers.
Research CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole cigs solar cell process automation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.