Book a demo

CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation Patents: Trends & Gaps 2026

CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation Patents: Trends & Gaps 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/cigs-solar-cell-process-automation-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Photovoltaics & Solar · Patent Landscape
CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation Patents: Where Filing Stopped and What's Still Open
  • One sharp wave, not a steady climb. Nine of twelve families were filed around 2018, with zero activity at the 2022 midpoint and none reported in the latest year.
  • Control automation is barely claimed. Only one family sits in G05B (control and regulating systems) against eleven in H01L and nine in H02S — the process-control layer is the thin slice.
  • Almost entirely a US story. Eleven of twelve records were filed through the US patent office, with a single PCT filing showing any international reach.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
12
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
2018
Peak Filing Year
H01L
Lead IPC Subclass
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A small, front-loaded corner of solar manufacturing IP

CIGS solar cell process automation covers patent claims combining copper indium gallium selenide thin-film photovoltaic technology with deposition process automation, automated production lines, or roll-to-roll automation. The tracked corpus holds 12 patent families, spanning filings from 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off, concentrated almost entirely in semiconductor device and photovoltaic generation classifications.

Filing activity is not evenly spread across that window. Nine of the twelve families were filed around 2018, and the record shows zero filings at the 2022 midpoint, with none reported in the most recent year. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the most recent period is always undercounted — but the flat middle years in this dataset are a real pattern, not just a reporting artefact.

Filing volume and IPC composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1NAT MECHANICAL GRP CORP9
  2. 2CAMPANELLA NICK B8
  3. 3SOLARPAINT2
  4. 4BEIJING APOLLO DING RONG SOLAR TECH1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Data

Filing trends and technology composition

Twelve patent families define this dataset, filed almost entirely through the US patent office with a single PCT entry. The trend line and IPC spread below show where activity clustered and where it stopped.

A single filing wave, then silence

Filings sat at zero through 2017, spiked to nine records in 2018, and returned to zero by the 2022 midpoint. There is no filing activity to report in the most recent year, though publication lag means late 2025-2026 filings may not yet be visible.

A single filing wave, then silence0358100201792018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Semiconductor and PV codes dominate, control systems barely appear

H01L (semiconductor devices) covers 11 of 12 records and H02S (photovoltaic generation) covers 9, meaning most families are tagged under both codes. G05B (control and regulating systems) appears in only one family, marking automated process control as the thinnest-claimed slice of this space.

Semiconductor and PV codes dominate, control systems barely appearH01L · Semiconductor devices1191.7%H02S · Photovoltaic / solar power gen…975.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems18.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 12 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cigs solar cell process automation and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Representative filing and most-cited records

Representative Record
US20240332440A12024-10-03

Rollable Photovoltaic Awning, Rollable Photovoltaic Canopy, and Rollable Photovoltaic Articles that Generate Electricity from Light

SOLARPAINT LTD.

A system includes a rollable photovoltaic awning having an array of flexible and rollable photovoltaic cells that convert incoming light to electricity. The rollable photovoltaic awning is configured to transit between a rolled-out state and a rolled-in state. In the rolled-in state, the rollable photovoltaic awning has a cylindrical form-factor with a diameter smaller than 30 centimeters. In the rolled-out state, it has a surface area of at least 2 square meters, and it is structured to withstand at least 1,000 cycles of rolling and unrolling with not more than 15 percent degradation of operational photovoltaic efficiency.Filed by SOLARPAINT LTD., published 2024-10-03 — the newest record referenced in this landscape.

US20240332440A1 — patent drawing 1US20240332440A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record in Eureka
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1WO2020061730A1Automation process monitoring and controlling method and device3
2US20230261126A1Flexible Solar Panels and Photovoltaic Devices, and Methods and Systems of Producing Them2
3US20190288139A1Frame-less encapsulated photo-voltaic (PV) solar power panel supporting solar cell modules encapsulated withi…2
4US20190288141A1Solar power panel factory and process for manufacturing frame-less encapsulated photo-voltaic (PV) solar powe…1

Citation counts are drawn from a 12-family corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence within this dataset, not as a measure of current commercial importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (4 of 4 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Analysis

What the filing pattern signals

With only twelve families in scope, this is a niche corner of solar manufacturing patenting rather than a crowded field. The shape of the data — a sharp 2018 spike, a thin control-systems layer, and near-total US concentration — points to specific, checkable conclusions.

Filing pattern
9 of 12 in 2018
peak year concentration

A single wave, not sustained investment

Nine of the twelve tracked families were filed around 2018, and the trend returns to zero by the 2022 midpoint. That is the signature of a short burst of experimentation rather than an ongoing R&D program, and it means recent competitive activity in this exact claim space is not visible in the granted-and-published record.

Zero filings at 2022 midpoint
Technology gap
1 of 12 in G05B
control-systems families

Process control is the thin layer

Semiconductor device structure (H01L) and photovoltaic generation (H02S) claims dominate the corpus, but automated control and regulating systems appear in a single family. Deposition-rate feedback, line-speed control, and closed-loop quality monitoring for CIGS automation are correspondingly under-documented in patent form.

H01L 11 · H02S 9 · G05B 1
Jurisdiction
11 of 12 in US
receiving office

Filing is concentrated in one office

Eleven records were filed with the United States patent office and one through the PCT system. There is no visible parallel buildout of this exact claim territory in other major patent offices within this dataset, which affects where freedom-to-operate risk actually sits.

1 PCT filing only
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cigs solar cell process automation, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

With only 12 families across the whole corpus, no single assignee shows sustained multi-year filing here, and none of the tracked assignees recorded activity in the most recent year. That combination — a small pool of filers and no current momentum — is itself the finding.

Momentum
0 in latest year
across tracked assignees

No assignee shows recent activity

Every assignee tracked for recent-year momentum in this corpus, including NAT MECHANICAL GRP CORP and other named filers, shows zero filings in the latest year. That is consistent with the broader trend line: a 2018 concentration with no renewed wave since.

Consistent with 2022 midpoint of zero
Filing base
12 families
total corpus size

A narrow field, easy to fully map

Because the entire corpus sits at 12 families, it is feasible to review every assignee and every claim individually rather than relying on aggregate statistics. That makes this a good candidate for a manual freedom-to-operate pass rather than a purely quantitative screen.

Full manual review is practical at this scale
Jurisdiction
11 US / 1 PCT
receiving office split

Filing strategy has been almost entirely domestic

With eleven of twelve records filed through the US patent office and only one PCT filing, assignees in this space have not built out broad international coverage for these specific automation claims, leaving other jurisdictions comparatively open on this exact claim territory.

No filings recorded outside US/PCT in this set
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
These branches show thin or no coverage in the current 12-family corpus, based on IPC composition and citation gaps.
In-line deposition-rate feedback controlAutomated selenization/anneal parameter adjustmentRoll-to-roll line-speed closed-loop controlAutomated quality inspection during CIGS coatingPCT-filed automation claims outside the US
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
NAT MECHANICAL GRP CORP0
SOLARPAINT LTD.0
Beijing Dingrong Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The filing pattern here raises specific follow-up questions rather than a general call to explore more data. These are the next checks worth running.

Verify whether 2018-era filings lapsed or converted to grants

A spike followed by silence can mean applications were abandoned, granted, or simply not renewed. Checking prosecution status on the 2018 cohort clarifies whether the claim space is actually open or quietly held.

Check prosecution status in Eureka

Track the G05B control-systems gap for new entrants

With only one family in automated control and regulating systems, new filings in that specific IPC code would be an early signal of renewed investment in this space worth monitoring.

Set an alert on G05B filings

Run a claim-scope comparison against US20240332440A1

Any team developing a rollable or flexible CIGS module should compare their form factor against the specific numeric limits in this filing before committing to a design.

Compare claim scope in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on CIGS solar cell process automation patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research CIGS Solar Cell Process Automation in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole cigs solar cell process automation corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.