Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (10 records) with 2024 (10) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 515 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape covers 515 published records matched on clock-and-data-recovery loop design terms combined with claim or description language on jitter tolerance, loop bandwidth, phase interpolator resolution, lock time, reference clock jitter and spread spectrum tracking. Coverage runs from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 data cut-off, spanning receiving offices led by the United States (352), with meaningful activity at the EPO, WIPO, Taiwan, China and the UK.
The dataset is dominated by digital-transmission and frequency/phase-control classifications, reflecting that most CDR patenting activity sits inside SerDes, PLL and receiver-equalization architectures rather than as a standalone circuit category. Filing family counts, not raw document counts, are used for the assignee ranking so continuation and multi-jurisdiction filing do not inflate any single company's position.
Two views of the same 515-record set: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how records distribute across IPC subclasses when a single record can carry more than one classification.
Filings ran from 16 in 2017 to a peak of 24 in 2018, then settled into a lower steady band; 2021 and 2024 both recorded 10 filings, a 0% change across that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 read low because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months — treat the tail as incomplete rather than as a real drop-off.
H04L (digital information transmission) touches 69.5% of the 515 records and H03L (automatic frequency/phase control) touches 47.6% — together they confirm that CDR patenting is anchored in transmission-link and PLL/loop-control claims. Smaller but persistent activity sits in H04B general transmission (15.7%), H03D demodulation (9.7%), H04J multiplexing (7.4%), H03K pulse/logic technique (6.0%), and measurement (G01R) and storage (G11B) at 4.9% each.
Shares are the percentage of the 515 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about clock and data recovery circuits and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA clock and data recovery device and a jitter tolerance enhancement method thereof are provided. The clock and data recovery device includes a clock and data recovery circuit and a jitter tolerance enhancement circuit. A data input terminal of the clock and data recovery circuit is suitable for receiving a data signal. The clock and data recovery circuit recovers the data signal to a clock. The jitter tolerance enhancement circuit is coupled to the data input terminal of the clock and data recovery circuit to receive the data signal. The jitter tolerance enhancement circuit detects a correlation between the data signal and the clock and correspondingly adjusts a loop gain of the clock and data recovery circuit.Filed by Novatek Microelectronics, granted 2021-09-21 — an example of a jitter-tolerance enhancement circuit layered onto a conventional CDR loop rather than a new recovery topology.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20070110199A1 | Receive equalizer with adaptive loops | 188 |
| 2 | US5103466A | CMOS digital clock and data recovery circuit | 145 |
| 3 | US20100329677A1 | Symbol Timing Recovery in Polarization Division Multiplexed Coherent Optical Transmission System | 109 |
| 4 | US20070001723A1 | Clock and data recovery circuit and method thereof | 109 |
| 5 | US6753738B1 | Impedance tuning circuit | 108 |
| 6 | US20120257652A1 | Adjusting sampling phase in a baud-rate CDR using timing skew | 98 |
| 7 | US6834367B2 | Built-in self test system and method for high speed clock and data recovery circuit | 97 |
| 8 | US20010016929A1 | Built-in self test system and method for high speed clock and data recovery circuit | 96 |
| 9 | US20150078495A1 | Clock and Data Recovery Having Shared Clock Generator | 92 |
| 10 | US6545507B1 | Fast locking CDR (clock and data recovery circuit) with high jitter tolerance and elimination of effects caus… | 92 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three findings that shape where a new filing is likely to clear and where it will run into dense prior art.
Five assignees hold 143 of the 515 records in scope, led by a single company at 49 filings against 19 at fifth place. Beyond the top 10 (44.1% combined), the ranking spreads across many single- and low-digit filers, typical of a component technology embedded inside larger SerDes and interface product lines.
Filing volume for the period 2021-2024 shows 0% net change, and recent-year momentum data for several major holders shows zero new filings in the latest tracked year. That does not mean the technology is exhausted — it means new claim activity is concentrated in fewer hands or has shifted to adjacent, less-searched claim language.
Nearly half of all records touch H03L automatic frequency/phase control, confirming that PLL and loop-bandwidth mechanics carry the bulk of substantive claim language, even though the broader H04L transmission class touches more records overall (69.5%) because CDR functions are usually claimed as part of a larger receiver or link.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to clock and data recovery circuits, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Corp. | JOHANSEN HENRIK INGVAR | 2 |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | CHO JAMES B | 2 |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | BHAVESH BHAKTA | 2 |
| Silicon Laboratories Inc. | HUANG YUNTENG | 1 |
| Silicon Laboratories Inc. | ELDREDGE ADAM B | 1 |
| Intel Corp. | LIU CHIEN CHANG | 1 |
| Intel Corp. | HSUEH YU LI | 1 |
| Intel Corp. | GAO MIAOBIN | 1 |
Only 10 co-assignee pairs appear across the dataset, each linking a single named inventor to a corporate assignee — consistent with CDR circuit work being filed as in-house engineering output rather than joint ventures or cross-licensed development.
The ranked leaders are large semiconductor and IP-licensing firms whose CDR portfolios sit inside broader SerDes, interface-IP or optical-transceiver businesses rather than standalone CDR product lines.
The top-ranked assignee's 49 records are more than double the fifth-place holder's 19, indicating a sustained, multi-generation investment in CDR loop IP rather than a single product cycle's worth of filing.
Recent-year momentum data shows most of the largest historical filers recording zero new filings in the latest tracked year, with only one of the tracked assignees showing a single new filing. This is consistent with the broader plateau in filing volume rather than any one company exiting the space.
The United States receives more than two-thirds of tracked filings, with the EPO, WIPO/PCT, Taiwan, China and the UK forming a secondary tier. That pattern favours companies building a US-first enforcement position before extending via PCT.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Xilinx Inc. | 1 | — |
| Silicon Laboratories Inc. | 0 | — |
| Broadcom Inc. | 0 | — |
| Intel Corp. | 0 | — |
| Rambus Inc. | 0 | — |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 0 | — |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | 0 | — |
| Realtek Semiconductor Corp. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up work rather than a single conclusion.
With 44.1% of all records held by 10 assignees, a new CDR filing in loop-bandwidth or lock-time claim territory should be checked against those portfolios first, since that is where claim density is thickest.
Run a freedom-to-operate scanBecause publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent plateau after 2024 should be re-checked once the 2025 and 2026 cohorts finish publishing rather than treated as a confirmed slowdown.
Track filing updatesPhase interpolator resolution and spread-spectrum tracking show thinner density than core loop-control claims — worth a closer look if your roadmap already touches those mechanisms.
Explore white spaceFiling in this space is concentrated at the top: the leading assignee holds 49 of the 515 records in scope, with the next four ranked assignees combining for a total top-5 share of 143 records, or 27.8% of the field. The ranked list runs across 100 assignees, so beyond the top 10 (44.1% combined) the picture is a long tail of companies with only a handful of filings each. Large semiconductor and interface-IP firms make up most of the concentrated top tier, reflecting that CDR circuits are usually filed as part of larger SerDes or transceiver product portfolios rather than standalone patent programs.
Filing volume has effectively plateaued rather than grown or declined: 2021 and 2024 both recorded 10 filings each, a 0% change across that three-year span, after an earlier peak of 24 filings in 2018. The years after 2024 look lower in the raw trend line, but that is expected — publication typically lags actual filing by around 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in and should not be read as a real drop. The honest read is a mature, steady filing rate rather than either momentum or decline.
The two dominant IPC subclasses are H04L (digital information transmission), touching 69.5% of the 515 records, and H03L (automatic frequency/phase control), touching 47.6%. These overlap heavily because CDR circuits are usually claimed as part of a transmission link or receiver, with the loop and PLL mechanics classified under H03L. Secondary classes include H04B general transmission (15.7%), H03D demodulation (9.7%), H04J multiplexing (7.4%), H03K pulse and logic technique (6.0%), and G01R measurement and G11B storage at 4.9% each — since records often carry multiple classes, these shares add up to well over 100%.
US11128304B1, assigned to Novatek Microelectronics and granted in 2021, claims a jitter tolerance enhancement circuit layered onto a conventional CDR loop: it sits on the data input path, detects a correlation between the incoming data signal and the recovered clock, and adjusts the loop gain of the CDR circuit in response. It does not claim a new clock recovery topology outright — it claims the specific mechanism of correlation-based loop-gain adjustment for jitter tolerance improvement. A design that achieves jitter tolerance through a different mechanism, such as fixed multi-stage filtering or a different bandwidth-adaptation scheme, would sit outside this specific claim scope, but any implementation using correlation-driven gain adjustment on the data-to-clock path should be checked against it directly.
Relative to the dense core of loop-bandwidth and phase/frequency-control claims (H03L at 47.6% of records), several adjacent mechanisms show thinner coverage in this dataset: phase interpolator resolution scaling, spread-spectrum clock tracking loops, sub-rate lock-time acceleration, reference-clock jitter injection compensation, and multi-lane CDR skew calibration. These are not unclaimed territory outright, but they carry less filing density than the core loop-control claim space, making them worth a closer freedom-to-operate check before assuming they are blocked.
Go past this page: query the whole clock and data recovery circuits corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.