Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →This dataset tracks 453 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine CMOS image sensor terminology with chip-scale packaging, wafer-level packaging, through-silicon via or hybrid bonding claim language, restricted to the semiconductor-device IPC classes most relevant to sensor packaging. It captures the physical construction side of image sensors — how the die is thinned, stacked, bonded and interconnected — rather than pixel architecture or downstream image processing on its own.
Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart are undercounts and should not be read as a real drop-off on their own; the more reliable signal is the decline already visible by the 2022 midpoint relative to the 2019 peak.
Two views of the same 453-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how packaging claims distribute across adjacent IPC subclasses.
Filings rose to 57 in 2019, then eased toward 17 by 2022 — a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than a technology still accelerating. Treat the final one or two years as provisional given publication lag.
Every record sits in H01L, but a third also carries H04N pictorial-communication codes and smaller shares touch G02B optics and G01S positioning — evidence that packaging claims are commonly filed alongside sensor-output or optical-path claims in the same family.
Shares are the percentage of the 453 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cmos image sensor packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaFiled by Shanghai IC R&D Center, this filing describes thinning a pixel silicon wafer, forming a deep trench on the thinned side, filling it with organic material, then etching a through-silicon via and depositing a dielectric protective layer across both structures before further metallisation.The claim scope centres on a specific process order — trench formation and fill before via etch and dielectric deposition — rather than the TSV concept itself.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20040038442A1 | Optically interactive device packages and methods of assembly | 271 |
| 2 | US20050253213A1 | Covers for microelectronic imagers and methods for wafer-level packaging of microelectronics imagers | 184 |
| 3 | US9899442B2 | Image sensor device | 168 |
| 4 | US20130068929A1 | Stacked-chip imaging systems | 146 |
| 5 | US7153720B2 | CMOS image sensor | 142 |
| 6 | US20050275750A1 | Wafer-level packaged microelectronic imagers and processes for wafer-level packaging | 141 |
| 7 | US11069734B2 | Image sensor device | 112 |
| 8 | US6995462B2 | Image sensor packages | 105 |
| 9 | US20160064439A1 | SEMICONDUCTOR AND OPTOELECTRONIC METHODS and DEVICES | 103 |
| 10 | US8092734B2 | Covers for microelectronic imagers and methods for wafer-level packaging of microelectronics imagers | 98 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references; read them as a measure of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three readings of the dataset that matter more than the raw counts on their own.
Nearly 60% of tracked filings entered through the United States receiving office, well ahead of Europe (45), China (38) and WIPO/PCT (18) combined against that lead. A freedom-to-operate review that skips US prosecution history is reviewing a small fraction of the real exposure.
Peak filing in 2019 has not been matched since, and the 2022 midpoint sits at less than a third of that peak. High density of existing claims in stacking, TSV and hybrid bonding means new filers are working in already-crowded ground rather than open territory.
A third of the corpus pairs H01L packaging codes with H04N pictorial-communication codes, and smaller cohorts touch G02B optics (16) and G01S positioning (13). Packaging-only claim drafting misses how often these families also stake out signal-path or optical-path scope.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cmos image sensor packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.
Recent-year filing counts across the tracked assignees show zero activity in the latest year across every one reviewed, consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a single firm pulling back.
Every major assignee reviewed for recent-year momentum, including OmniVision, Samsung, Semiconductor Components Industries, Nikon, Illumina and Sony Semiconductor Solutions, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. This is consistent with the publication-lag effect but also with a genuinely mature claim landscape.
Only ten co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, and the strongest single pairing links Crossbar-style microsystems and a named inventor across 11 shared families, well ahead of the next pairings involving Micron-linked entities. Most filers here prosecute alone.
Semiconductor Components Industries shows a full year-over-year drop to zero, a pattern echoed across the other tracked names. Read this alongside the 18-month publication lag before assuming any single company has exited the space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| OmniVision Technologies | 0 | — |
| Samsung Electronics | 0 | — |
| Semiconductor Components Industries | 0 | -100% |
| Nikon Corporation | 0 | — |
| Illumina, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation | 0 | — |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 0 | — |
| Micron Technology, Inc. | 0 | — |
The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion.
With 270 of 453 families entering through the US receiving office, a clearance review that under-weights US prosecution history is reviewing a minority of the real exposure.
Run a freedom-to-operate check in EurekaThe apparent decline after 2022 is partly a reporting artefact; re-pull the trend once later filing years have had time to publish before treating the slope as final.
Set up a filing alert in EurekaDeep-trench fill materials and hybrid bonding surface treatment sit alongside dense core claims but carry thinner filing density themselves — worth a targeted search before assuming they are occupied.
Explore white space in EurekaThe dataset tracks 453 families across assignees including OmniVision, Samsung, Sony Semiconductor Solutions, Micron, Nikon and TSMC, among others, with filing concentrated among a smaller set of repeat filers and a long tail of single-filing entrants. Rather than one dominant holder, the field shows the packaging-specific claims spread across several large sensor and semiconductor manufacturers who each hold meaningful but not overwhelming share. Checking the assignee ranking directly is more reliable than assuming a single company controls the space, since recent-year momentum has flattened across all of them simultaneously.
Filing peaked at 57 families in 2019 and had fallen to 17 by the 2022 midpoint, which is consistent with a claim space that became crowded rather than one that lost commercial relevance. Core techniques such as through-silicon via formation, wafer-level packaging and stacked-chip imaging had already accumulated dense prior art by the late 2010s, narrowing the room for genuinely novel claims. Part of the apparent 2025-2026 drop is also a publication-lag artefact, since patent applications typically take around 18 months to publish, so the most recent years understate real filing activity.
Through-silicon via (TSV) technology creates vertical electrical connections by etching and filling channels through the silicon wafer, connecting stacked dies without wire bonding at the edges. Hybrid bonding instead joins two wafers or dies directly at the bond interface, combining metal-to-metal and dielectric-to-dielectric bonding in the same step to shrink interconnect pitch further than TSV alone typically allows. Both terms appear in this dataset's search criteria, and many families combine references to both techniques within the same packaging claim set.
This Shanghai IC R&D Center filing claims a specific process sequence for forming a deep trench and a through-silicon via on the same wafer: thinning the wafer, forming the trench, filling it with organic material, then etching the via and depositing a dielectric protective layer across both structures. It does not claim the general concept of combining deep trenches with TSVs, so a different processing order or a different fill/protection sequence would likely fall outside its claim scope. Anyone implementing a similar dual-structure approach should compare their exact process flow against the claim language rather than assuming the whole trench-plus-TSV concept is blocked.
The IPC composition shows core semiconductor-device claims (H01L) present in every record, but comparatively thinner filing in adjacent areas such as deep-trench isolation fill materials, hybrid bonding pad surface treatment and wafer-level chip-scale cover integration. These sub-areas sit next to dense core claim territory rather than in isolation, which is why they are worth a targeted novelty search rather than a broad filing. Confirming white space requires checking current pending applications as well as granted claims, since the 18-month publication lag means the newest filings in these branches may not yet be visible.
Go past this page: query the whole cmos image sensor packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.