https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/cmos-image-sensor-packaging-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Sensors & MEMS · Patent Landscape
CMOS Image Sensor Packaging Patents: Who Holds the Stack
  • Filing has flattened, not grown. the count peaked at 57 families in 2019 and had fallen to roughly a third of that by the 2022 midpoint — this is a settled claim space, not an emerging one.
  • One receiving office dominates. 270 of the tracked filings entered through the United States, more than five times the next-largest office (Europe at 45), which concentrates enforcement risk in one jurisdiction.
  • Packaging claims spill into optics and imaging. beyond the core H01L semiconductor-device class, 156 records also carry H04N pictorial-communication codes, showing packaging and downstream signal-processing claims are frequently bundled in the same family.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
453
Published Records
49%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-44%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This dataset tracks 453 patent families filed between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine CMOS image sensor terminology with chip-scale packaging, wafer-level packaging, through-silicon via or hybrid bonding claim language, restricted to the semiconductor-device IPC classes most relevant to sensor packaging. It captures the physical construction side of image sensors — how the die is thinned, stacked, bonded and interconnected — rather than pixel architecture or downstream image processing on its own.

Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart are undercounts and should not be read as a real drop-off on their own; the more reliable signal is the decline already visible by the 2022 midpoint relative to the 2019 peak.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD55
  2. 2OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES INC53
  3. 3SEMICON COMPONENTS IND LLC44
  4. 4NIKON CORP35
  5. 5ILLUMINA INC33
  6. 6SONY SEMICON SOLUTIONS CORP27
  7. 7APTINA IMAGING CORP21
  8. 8TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD20
  9. 9CANDELA MICROSYSTEMS(S) PTE LTD13
  10. 10MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC12
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on CMOS Image Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 453-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how packaging claims distribute across adjacent IPC subclasses.

A peak that has already passed

Filings rose to 57 in 2019, then eased toward 17 by 2022 — a flat-to-declining trajectory rather than a technology still accelerating. Treat the final one or two years as provisional given publication lag.

A peak that has already passed015304560472017201857201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Packaging claims rarely stand alone

Every record sits in H01L, but a third also carries H04N pictorial-communication codes and smaller shares touch G02B optics and G01S positioning — evidence that packaging claims are commonly filed alongside sensor-output or optical-path claims in the same family.

Packaging claims rarely stand aloneH01L · Semiconductor devices453100.0%H04N · Pictorial communication (video…15634.4%H10W5512.1%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)286.2%H10P265.7%G02B · Optical elements & systems163.5%G01S · Radar, sonar & positioning132.9%G01N · Material analysis & testing112.4%Other6213.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 453 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on CMOS Image Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on CMOS Image Sensor Packaging with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about cmos image sensor packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The filings other applicants had to design around

Representative filing
US20210036048A12021-02-04

Image sensor and method for manufacturing deep trench and through-silicon via of the image sensor

SHANGHAI IC R&D CENTER CO., LTD.

Filed by Shanghai IC R&D Center, this filing describes thinning a pixel silicon wafer, forming a deep trench on the thinned side, filling it with organic material, then etching a through-silicon via and depositing a dielectric protective layer across both structures before further metallisation.The claim scope centres on a specific process order — trench formation and fill before via etch and dielectric deposition — rather than the TSV concept itself.

US20210036048A1 — patent drawing 1US20210036048A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20040038442A1Optically interactive device packages and methods of assembly271
2US20050253213A1Covers for microelectronic imagers and methods for wafer-level packaging of microelectronics imagers184
3US9899442B2Image sensor device168
4US20130068929A1Stacked-chip imaging systems146
5US7153720B2CMOS image sensor142
6US20050275750A1Wafer-level packaged microelectronic imagers and processes for wafer-level packaging141
7US11069734B2Image sensor device112
8US6995462B2Image sensor packages105
9US20160064439A1SEMICONDUCTOR AND OPTOELECTRONIC METHODS and DEVICES103
10US8092734B2Covers for microelectronic imagers and methods for wafer-level packaging of microelectronics imagers98

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate references; read them as a measure of influence on the field, not of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on CMOS Image Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Signals

What the filing pattern tells a decision-maker

Three readings of the dataset that matter more than the raw counts on their own.

Concentration
270 of 453
filings via US receiving office

Enforcement risk concentrates in one jurisdiction

Nearly 60% of tracked filings entered through the United States receiving office, well ahead of Europe (45), China (38) and WIPO/PCT (18) combined against that lead. A freedom-to-operate review that skips US prosecution history is reviewing a small fraction of the real exposure.

Receiving office data
Trajectory
57 → 17
peak (2019) to midpoint (2022)

The claim space is settling, not expanding

Peak filing in 2019 has not been matched since, and the 2022 midpoint sits at less than a third of that peak. High density of existing claims in stacking, TSV and hybrid bonding means new filers are working in already-crowded ground rather than open territory.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Cross-class filing
156 of 453
also carry H04N codes

Packaging and pixel-output claims are bundled

A third of the corpus pairs H01L packaging codes with H04N pictorial-communication codes, and smaller cohorts touch G02B optics (16) and G01S positioning (13). Packaging-only claim drafting misses how often these families also stake out signal-path or optical-path scope.

IPC composition
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to cmos image sensor packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on CMOS Image Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who holds the ground

Assignee activity and where momentum has stalled

Recent-year filing counts across the tracked assignees show zero activity in the latest year across every one reviewed, consistent with the broader flat-to-declining trend rather than a single firm pulling back.

Momentum
0
latest-year filings across tracked leaders

No leader is currently accelerating

Every major assignee reviewed for recent-year momentum, including OmniVision, Samsung, Semiconductor Components Industries, Nikon, Illumina and Sony Semiconductor Solutions, shows zero filings in the latest tracked year. This is consistent with the publication-lag effect but also with a genuinely mature claim landscape.

Recent-year momentum
Co-filing
10 pairs
co-assignee relationships identified

Collaboration is limited and concentrated

Only ten co-assignee pairings appear in the dataset, and the strongest single pairing links Crossbar-style microsystems and a named inventor across 11 shared families, well ahead of the next pairings involving Micron-linked entities. Most filers here prosecute alone.

Co-assignee pairs
Decline
-100% YoY
Semiconductor Components Industries

Even active filers have gone quiet

Semiconductor Components Industries shows a full year-over-year drop to zero, a pattern echoed across the other tracked names. Read this alongside the 18-month publication lag before assuming any single company has exited the space.

Recent-year momentum
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth a closer look
Branches adjacent to the core stacking and TSV claims that carry comparatively thin filing density in this corpus.
Deep-trench isolation fill materialsHybrid bonding pad surface treatmentBackside dielectric protective layersWafer-level chip-scale cover integrationThrough-silicon via etch sequencing
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
OmniVision Technologies0
Samsung Electronics0
Semiconductor Components Industries0-100%
Nikon Corporation0
Illumina, Inc.0
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation0
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0
Micron Technology, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on CMOS Image Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Next steps

Where to take this from here

The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion.

Check freedom-to-operate against the US filings specifically

With 270 of 453 families entering through the US receiving office, a clearance review that under-weights US prosecution history is reviewing a minority of the real exposure.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Watch for the publication-lag catch-up in 2025-2026 data

The apparent decline after 2022 is partly a reporting artefact; re-pull the trend once later filing years have had time to publish before treating the slope as final.

Set up a filing alert in Eureka

Look at the under-claimed process branches directly

Deep-trench fill materials and hybrid bonding surface treatment sit alongside dense core claims but carry thinner filing density themselves — worth a targeted search before assuming they are occupied.

Explore white space in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on CMOS Image Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on CMOS Image Sensor Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research CMOS Image Sensor Packaging in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole cmos image sensor packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.