Book a demo

CMOS Image Sensor Patent Landscape 2026

CMOS Image Sensor Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape

CMOS Image Sensor Patent Landscape in 2026

The CMOS image sensor patent space is heavily concentrated, with Samsung Electronics holding the leading position among a field of large-scale semiconductor and imaging incumbents. Annual filing volume peaked in 2018 and has eased since, indicating a maturing but still commercially active technology domain.

8,324
Patent families in scope
48%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-45%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Samsung leads a highly concentrated field of imaging and semiconductor incumbents

Samsung Electronics ranks first with 5,199 patent records, followed by Sony Group at 3,968 and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC) at 3,798. Sony Semiconductor Solutions holds fourth place with 3,427 records, and SK Hynix rounds out the top five at 1,615 records.

The top five filers together account for 48% of the combined total across the hundred largest filers, indicating strong concentration at the top tier. A pronounced gap separates the top four from the rest of

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.5,199
2Sony Group Corporation3,968
3Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)3,798
4Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation3,427
5SK Hynix Inc.1,615
6Dongbu HiTek Co., Ltd.1,247
7OmniVision Technologies, Inc.1,201
8Semicon Energy Lab Co., Ltd.1,137
9Canon Inc.1,000
10Dongbu Electronics Co., Ltd.959
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Fujifilm Corporation856
12Toshiba Corporation531
13Applied Materials, Inc.529
14Intellectual Ventures II LLC472
15Aptina Imaging Corporation439
16Micron Technology, Inc.405
17Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC) Shanghai355
18United Microelectronics Corporation (UMC)350
19VisEra Technologies Co., Ltd.322
20Shanghai Huali Microelectronics Corporation295
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The leading positions reflect deep, long-standing investment in pixel-level semiconductor design and image signal processing. Samsung and Sony’s dual presence — Sony Group alongside Sony Semiconductor Solutions — shows that integrated device manufacturer structures amplify apparent share in this field.

Data for 2024 and 2025 should be treated as provisional given standard patent publication delays of 18–24 months; the apparent recent drop in volume reflects this lag rather than a verified market contraction. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

Filing volume peaked in 2018 and semiconductor device patents dominate the technology mix

Two views of the corpus reveal where activity has been concentrated over time and which technology branches define the field. The trend line shows how annual output has evolved, while the IPC composition chart maps the technical territory.

Annual filing trend

Filing volume rose to a peak of 1,318 records in 2018, then declined to 924 by 2022 and 702 in 2023. Figures for 2024 (394) and 2025 (35) are substantially under-counted due to publication lag and should not be read as the current run rate.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 1,318 in 2018.1,31120171,31820181,24420191,29320201,103202192420227022023394202435202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

H01L (semiconductor devices) is the dominant branch by a wide margin, followed by H04N (pictorial communication / video). Secondary branches including G02B (optical elements), H10B (memory device manufacture), and H10D (semiconductor devices, general) account for smaller but meaningful shares, reflecting the cross-disciplinary nature of image sensor development spanning optics, memory integration, and signal processing.

Technology compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices leads with 19,907; H04N · Pictorial communication (video/TV) 8,653.H01L · Semiconductor dev…19,907H04N · Pictorial communi…8,653G02B · Optical elements …1,188H10B · Memory device man…660H10D · Semiconductor dev…621H10K · Organic semicondu…542G01J · Radiation & light…328G01N · Material analysis…275↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20180204867A1Published 2018-07-19

CMOS image sensor (CIS) including MRAM (magnetic r…

Samsung Electronics CO., LTD

A complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) image sensor (CIS) with a simplified stacked structure and improved operation characteristics includes an upper chip, in which a plurality of pixels are arranged in a two-dimensional array structure, and a lower chip below the upper chip including a logic region having logic circuits and a memory region… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

CMOS image sensor (CIS) including MRAM (magnetic r… — patent drawingCMOS image sensor (CIS) including MRAM (magnetic r… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Image sensor based optical reader887
2Focus module and components with actuator800
3Compositions and methods for helper-free productio…791
4Solid-state image-sensing device that compensates …789
5Thin film device transfer method, thin film device…509
6Non-planar semiconductor device having doped sub-F…487
7Fabrication of thin-film, flexible photovoltaic mo…461
8Manufacturing apparatus and method for large-scale…454

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the patent structure means for R&D strategy

The combination of high concentration, a post-peak filing trend, and an incumbents-dominated collaboration network shapes the investment calculus for any new or existing player in this space.

Decline

Post-peak field with easing annual volume

The lifecycle stage is classified as Decline, with annual filings easing back from the 2018 peak of 1,318 records. The multi-year corpus of 8,324 patent families reflects sustained prior investment rather than fresh momentum. New entrants face a dense prior-art thicket, making freedom-to-operate analysis essential before committing R&D capital.

Lifecycle: Post-Peak
Concentration

Top five hold nearly half of the top-100 filer share

The top five filers — Samsung, Sony Group, TSMC, Sony Semiconductor Solutions, and SK Hynix — account for 48% of the combined patent records across the hundred largest filers. This level of concentration means that the core pixel architecture and fabrication process space is largely staked out. Differentiation opportunities lie in adjacent branches rather than the dominant H01L core.

High Concentration
Collaboration

Sony–Sony Semiconductor Solutions is the most active co-filing pair

The most frequent co-filing relationship is Sony Group with Sony Semiconductor Solutions, with 64 joint filings, reflecting an intra-group division of labor between system-level and device-level innovation. Samsung Electronics co-files with SNU R&DB Foundation (12 filings) and Korea Aerospace University (4 filings), indicating university partnerships for exploratory research. SK Hynix collaborates with POSTECH (6 filings) and Dong-A University (4 filings). OmniVision co-files with VisEra Technologies (4 filings), linking fabless design to back-end optics processing.

Ecosystem Collaboration
Geography

US jurisdiction dominates; regional patent offices hold secondary coverage

The United States is the primary filing jurisdiction with 16,899 patent records, far ahead of Europe (EPO) at 1,957 and WIPO/PCT at 723. Singapore, the United Kingdom, and Australia account for smaller volumes. China, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan show modest record counts in this dataset, which likely reflects where applicants chose to file English-language prosecution rather than the full global footprint of these firms.

US-Centric Filing
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Sony Group CorporationSony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation64
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.SNU R&DB Foundation12
Sony Semiconductor Solutions CorporationRiken Corporation7
Toshiba CorporationSanDisk Corporation7
SK Hynix Inc.POSTECH (Pohang University of Science and Technology)6
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Korea Aerospace University4
SK Hynix Inc.Dong-A University4
OmniVision Technologies, Inc.VisEra Technologies Co., Ltd.4
Sony Group CorporationPixus Technologies (Paxs Inc.)3
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)3

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Collaboration counts reflect co-applicant filings within the analyzed corpus.Explore insights →
Leaders

Samsung and Sony lead on volume; TSMC distinguishes itself on process-side focus

The top four applicants are each above 3,400 patent records, forming a distinct leading cluster. Their technical emphases and recent momentum diverge meaningfully, shaping competitive positioning.

Leader · Samsung Electronics

Samsung Electronics

Samsung leads with 5,199 patent records, concentrated in H01L 27 (semiconductor devices, 1,801 records), H01L 21 (fabrication processes, 447 records), and H04N 25 (image sensor signal processing, 366 records). This breadth spans device architecture through system-level imaging. Recent momentum shows a modest decline of 17% versus the prior three-year window, the smallest retreat among the top filers, suggesting Samsung is sustaining activity more than peers.

5,199 patent records
Challenger · Sony Group / Sony Semiconductor Solutions

Sony Group & Sony Semiconductor Solutions

Sony Group holds 3,968 patent records with primary focus on H01L 27 (3,035 records) and H04N 25 and H04N 5 (combined 3,264 records), reflecting deep integration of pixel architecture with video and imaging system claims. Sony Semiconductor Solutions adds 3,427 records with a similar H01L 27 and H04N focus. Recent momentum for Sony Group is down 71% and Sony Semiconductor Solutions down 44% versus prior periods, indicating a significant pull-back in new filings relative to earlier years. Together, the Sony entities represent the strongest combined imaging-system portfolio in the field.

3,968 + 3,427 patent records
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, momentum trends, and technology emphasis for all top-100 filers in this landscape.
TSMCSK Hynix+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Sony Group Corporation114▼ -71%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.462▼ -17%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)409▼ -13%
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation388▼ -44%
Canon Inc.35▼ -73%
SK Hynix Inc.28▼ -77%
OmniVision Technologies, Inc.25▼ -66%
Dongbu HiTek Co., Ltd.17▲ +6%
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Patent record counts reflect filings attributed to each applicant within the analyzed corpus.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches adjacent to the dominant semiconductor core

Several IPC branches appear at lower share within the CMOS image sensor corpus, sitting adjacent to the dominant H01L core. These observations indicate relative sparsity; they represent areas where the patent density is lower and where technical adjacency to image sensing exists.

G02B · Optical elements and systems

With 1,188 patent records and a 3% share of the technology composition, G02B covers microlens arrays, optical filters, and light-gathering structures that are integral to pixel-level sensitivity in image sensors. The branch is sparse relative to the semiconductor device core, and the primary players — Sony, Samsung, and TSMC — have not saturated it. Teams working on microlens design, on-chip color filter optimization, or computational optics stacks could find more navigable prior art here than in H01L 27.

Search this in Eureka →

G01J · Radiation and light measurement

G01J accounts for 328 patent records at roughly 1% share. This branch covers spectral and radiometric characterization relevant to multispectral and hyperspectral image sensors, near-infrared imaging, and quantum efficiency calibration. As demand for sensors beyond visible-light imaging grows in automotive, medical, and industrial inspection contexts, this branch represents an adjacent area where the filing density remains low relative to the commercial application space. Entry would require combining CMOS process expertise with metrology and spectral engineering.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all under-served branches ranked by filing density and technical proximity to your R&D focus.
H10B · Memory device manufactureH10K · Organic semiconductors+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch share figures are derived from patent-record-level IPC classifications within the analyzed corpus.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by technology route emphasis

Strength of each leader across the main technology routes.

PlayerH01L 27 · Semiconductor devicesH04N 25 · Pictorial communication (video/TV)H04N 5 · Pictorial communication (video/TV)H01L 21 · Semiconductor devicesH01L 31 · Semiconductor devices
Sony Group CorporationStrong · 3,035Strong · 1,680Strong · 1,584Emerging · 403Moderate · 649
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Strong · 1,801Moderate · 366Emerging · 305Moderate · 447Emerging · 280
Sony Semiconductor Solutions CorporationStrong · 1,626Moderate · 407Moderate · 638Emerging · 157Emerging · 141
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)Strong · 1,556Emerging · 104Emerging · 83Moderate · 564Emerging · 275
Canon Inc.Strong · 548Moderate · 220Strong · 289AbsentEmerging · 78
Micron Technology, Inc.Strong · 402Moderate · 94AbsentModerate · 183Strong · 217
SK Hynix Inc.Strong · 469Emerging · 83Emerging · 81Moderate · 220Absent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Map your own CMOS image sensor patent landscape

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.