Book a demo

CO2 Geological Storage & Injection Wells Patent Landscape

CO2 Geological Storage & Injection Wells Patent Landscape
Competitive Landscape
CO2 Geological Storage & Injection Wells Patent Landscape in 2026

The CO2 geological storage and injection wells space is in a Growth stage, with the recent three-year filing window sitting 390% above the prior three-year window, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak. Activity is moderately concentrated, with oilfield-services and national oil companies sharing the lead, and E21B (earth and rock drilling) dominating the technology mix.

477
Patent families in scope
19%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
+390%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
China
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in PatSnap Eureka
Published byPatSnap Insights Team··7 min readVerified by PatSnap Eureka data
Overview

Saudi Arabian Oil Co and Halliburton lead a moderately concentrated field

Saudi Arabian Oil Co ranks first with 27 patent records, followed closely by Halliburton Energy Services at 26 and a tightly grouped trio — IFP Energies Nouvelles, PetroChina, and. China Petroleum & Chemical Corp — each at 21.

The top five filers account for 19% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate concentration. No single player holds a dominant grip; the top two are separated by only one patent record, and the gap between ranks two and three is five records, suggesting a competitive first tier rather than a clear monopoly.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Saudi Arabian Oil Company27
2Halliburton Energy Services Inc.26
3IFP Energies Nouvelles21
4PetroChina Co. Ltd.21
5CHINA PETROLEUM & CHEMICAL CORP21
6ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company20
7CHINA UNIV OF MINING & TECH17
8China University of Petroleum (East China)16
9Southwest Petroleum University14
10Schlumberger Technology Corporation14
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Services Petroliers Schlumberger SA13
12Koloma Inc.13
13AIR PROD & CHEM INC12
14Blue Planet Systems Corporation11
15Equinor Energy AS11
16ABB (Schweiz) AG11
17Mirade Consultants Ltd.10
18Board of Regents, The University of Texas System10
19Huaneng Qingyang Coal & Power Co. Ltd.9
20American Shale Oil LLC9
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

The co-presence of oilfield-services majors (Halliburton, Schlumberger), national oil companies (Saudi Aramco, PetroChina, Sinopec), and a French public research institute (IFP Energies Nouvelles) signals that both commercial operators and publicly funded bodies are racing to establish foundational positions, creating a multi-polar competitive front.

The most recent 18–24 months of filing data are under-counted due to publication lag; apparent softening in 20242026 figures should not be read as a real decline in activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Trends & Structure

A 390% multi-year surge concentrated in E21B well-drilling technology

The filing trend and technology-composition charts together show a field that shifted from low-single-digit annual volumes before 2021 to a peak of 122 patent records in 2023, with E21B earth-and-rock drilling accounting for the largest share of filings by a wide margin.

Annual filing trend

Annual filings rose from 26 in 2017, dipped in 2018–2020, then accelerated sharply from 2021 onward, peaking at 122 records in 2023 before easing to 101 in 2024 and 67 in 2025. The 2025 and 2026 bars are further understated by publication lag and should not be interpreted as a plateau or decline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 122 in 2023.26201714201819201913202029202176202212220231012024672025102026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

E21B (earth and rock drilling / wells) dominates with 597 patent records — more than six times the next-largest branch, B65G (conveying and material handling) at 88. Secondary branches including C09K (materials for miscellaneous applications), G01V (geophysics and gravity surveying), and C01B (non-metallic elements and inorganic compounds) each hold single-digit percentage shares, reflecting the field’s strong centering on wellbore engineering.

Technology compositionE21B · Earth & rock drilling (wells) leads with 597; B65G · Conveying & material handling 88.E21B · Earth & rock dril…597B65G · Conveying & mater…88C09K · Materials for mis…54G01V · Geophysics & grav…39C01B · Non-metallic elem…35B01D · Separation proces…33G06F · Electric digital …32E21F · Mine safety & ven…28↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260193964A1Published 2026-07-09

CO2 Injection Well Placement

Saudi Arabian Oil Company

This disclosure describes methods and systems for CO2 injection well placement in a target area. The method involves identifying input data associated with the target area, the input data including at least one of core samples or well logs from the target area; generating, based on the input data, a structural depth grid of the target area; generating… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

CO2 Injection Well Placement — patent drawingCO2 Injection Well Placement — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Carbon capture and storage143
2Utilizing salts for carbon capture and storage99
3Subterranean permeability modification by using mi…84
4页岩气井液态CO2压裂工艺55
5Storing carbon dioxide and producing methane and g…55
6Method of conjugated hydrocarbon gas extraction an…51
7Storing Carbon Dioxide and Producing Methane and G…46
8Carbon sequestration methods and systems45

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural signals — maturity stage, concentration, collaboration patterns, and geographic spread — together define where defensible positions can still be established and where fast-follower strategies remain viable.

Growth

Growth stage with peak behind it

The field is classified as Growth: the recent three-year filing window sits 390% above the prior three-year window, confirming a still-expanding multi-year trajectory. Annual volume, however, has eased from its 2023 peak of 122 records. New entrants can still establish positions, but the window before the field matures is narrowing and foundational well-engineering claims are increasingly occupied.

Growth · past 2023 peak
Concentration

Multi-polar first tier, no dominant holder

The top five filers hold 19% of the hundred largest filers’ combined output, and the gap between the top two applicants is a single patent record. This multi-polar structure means no incumbent can block the space unilaterally, but it also means any new entrant must differentiate on sub-technology focus rather than filing volume alone. The university cohort — China University of Mining & Technology, China University of Petroleum (East China), Southwest Petroleum University — adds an academic tier that may license rather than litigate.

Moderate concentration
Collaboration

Schlumberger entities and Sinopec drive co-filing activity

The most active co-filing pairs are Schlumberger Technology Corp with Schlumberger Canada Ltd (7 joint records) and Schlumberger Technology Corp with Schlumberger NV (7 joint records), reflecting intra-group portfolio coordination. Saudi Arabian Oil Co co-files with Aramco Services Co (5 records), and China Petroleum & Chemical Corp co-files with its Exploration & Development Research Institute (5 records). Cross-company, arms-length collaborations are sparse, suggesting IP is treated as a competitive asset rather than a shared pre-competitive resource.

Intra-group dominant
Geography

China leads filing volume; US and PCT pathways signal global intent

China accounts for 236 patent records — the largest single jurisdiction — reflecting both domestic regulatory push and the strong presence of Chinese universities and NOCs. The United States follows at 145 records, and WIPO PCT filings (73 records) indicate that several applicants are seeking broad international protection. Europe (EPO, 51 records) and Canada (39 records) round out the major jurisdictions, consistent with the geography of major storage-project deployment.

China-led, global reach
PatSnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →
Top collaboration links
ApplicantCollaboratorCo-filings
Schlumberger Technology CorporationSchlumberger Canada Ltd.7
Schlumberger Technology CorporationSchlumberger NV7
Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyAramco Services Company5
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)Sinopec Exploration & Development Research Institute5
Schlumberger Technology CorporationSchlumberger Technology BV4
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)Sinopec Zhongyuan Oilfield Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute3
PetroChina Co. Ltd.Daqing Oilfield Co. Ltd.3
Schlumberger Technology CorporationGeoQuest Systems BV3
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)Sinopec Safety Engineering Research Institute Co. Ltd.2
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)Sinopec East China Oil & Gas Branch2

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: PatSnap Eureka. Jurisdiction and collaboration counts are at the patent-record level.Explore insights →
Leaders

Saudi Arabian Oil Co and Halliburton anchor the field with overlapping E21B focus

Both leading applicants concentrate heavily on E21B subclasses covering well completion, production, and environmental protection, but differ in secondary emphases — Saudi Aramco extends into reservoir characterization while Halliburton stays tightly focused on wellbore engineering.

Leader · Saudi Arabian Oil Co

Saudi Arabian Oil Co

Ranked first with 27 patent records, Saudi Arabian Oil Co concentrates on E21B 41 (environmental protection in well drilling, 18 records), E21B 43 (production of fluids from wells, 17 records), and E21B 49 (sampling or testing in wells, 6 records). Its momentum is flagged as a new entrant in the recent three-year window (18 recent records), indicating the bulk of its portfolio is a recent strategic build-out aligned with Saudi Arabia’s CCS commitments.

patent records: 27
Challenger · Halliburton Energy Services

Halliburton Energy Services

Ranked second with 26 patent records, Halliburton leads in E21B 41 (18 records) and supplements with E21B 43 (9 records) and E21B 33 (well sealing and casing, 7 records). Its momentum is also flagged as a new entrant in the recent period (25 recent records), suggesting Halliburton has repositioned its oilfield-services IP portfolio toward storage and injection applications as a deliberate growth initiative rather than a legacy position.

patent records: 26
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Access rankings, technology focus, and momentum scores for all 100 tracked applicants in this landscape.
IFP Energies NouvellesExxonMobil Upstream Research Company+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Halliburton Energy Services Inc.25▲ new entrant
Saudi Arabian Oil Company18▲ new entrant
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)13▲ new entrant
PetroChina Co. Ltd.15▲ new entrant
China University of Mining and Technology8▲ new entrant
China University of Petroleum (East China)4▲ new entrant
Southwest Petroleum University7▲ new entrant
Schlumberger Technology Corporation9▲ new entrant
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Applicant rankings and tech emphasis are based on patent records; momentum reflects recent-vs-prior three-year filing comparison.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served adjacent branches worth monitoring

Several IPC classes appear in the corpus at materially lower share than the dominant E21B class. Two branches stand out as having plausible technical relevance and realistic entry paths for teams already active in CO2 storage.

G01V · Geophysics & gravity surveying

G01V appears in 39 patent records — roughly 3% of branch-level activity — despite geophysical monitoring being a regulatory and operational prerequisite for any geological storage site. This relative sparsity suggests that seismic and gravitational monitoring methods tailored specifically to CO2 plume tracking are under-patented. Teams with expertise in 4D seismic or distributed acoustic sensing could target this branch; the technical entry path runs through adaptation of existing reservoir-monitoring IP to the specific density and phase-change characteristics of supercritical CO2.

Search this in Eureka →

C09K · Materials for misc. applications

C09K accounts for 54 patent records (approximately 4% of branch activity), covering specialty materials such as well-treatment fluids, sealants, and formation-conditioning agents relevant to injection-well integrity. Given that wellbore integrity failure is a primary risk in long-term CO2 storage, this branch represents an under-served engineering challenge. Entry paths exist for materials companies or cement/sealant specialists able to demonstrate CO2-resistant formulations under supercritical conditions across the pressure and temperature ranges typical of saline aquifer or depleted-reservoir storage.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See all adjacent IPC branches, their filing density, and ranked entry-path assessments across the complete corpus.
B65G · Conveying & material handlingB01D · Separation processes+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Branch counts are at the patent-record level; lower share relative to E21B indicates relative sparsity, not absence of prior art.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ across E21B subclasses and adjacent routes

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerE21B 43 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)E21B 41 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)E21B 47 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)B65G 5 · Conveying & material handlingE21B 49 · Earth & rock drilling (wells)
Saudi Arabian Oil CompanyStrong · 17Strong · 18AbsentAbsentModerate · 6
IFP Energies NouvellesAbsentStrong · 14Strong · 11Strong · 12Absent
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec)Strong · 21AbsentModerate · 5AbsentEmerging · 4
Halliburton Energy Services Inc.AbsentStrong · 18Moderate · 6AbsentModerate · 5
PetroChina Co. Ltd.Strong · 19AbsentModerate · 5AbsentEmerging · 3
ABB (Schweiz) AGStrong · 9Strong · 11AbsentModerate · 3Absent
ExxonMobil Upstream Research CompanyStrong · 18AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: PatSnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →
PatSnap Eureka

Ready to map your own CO2 storage patent landscape?

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to map any technology landscape: search 2B+ patents and papers, surface key assignees, and generate a report like this in minutes.

18,000+innovators worldwide
2B+patents & papers
< 5 minper landscape report

Disclaimer. This page is generated from PatSnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. PatSnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by PatSnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.