Book a demo

Cobot Digital Twin / Virtual Commissioning Patent Snapshot

Cobot Digital Twin / Virtual Commissioning Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Cobot Digital Twin / Virtual Commissioning Patent Snapshot in 2026

The cobot digital twin and virtual commissioning space remains a very early-stage, highly concentrated niche, with Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC holding the dominant position among a small set of largely independent filers. Activity is modest and has eased from a 2020 peak, signalling that the field is still forming rather than maturing under sustained competitive pressure.

7
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Baker Hughes leads a fragmented but concentrated early-stage field

Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC is the clear leader, accounting for 3 of the ranked patent records and anchoring the top of a ten-applicant list that otherwise consists of single-record holders — mostly Indian engineering institutions and individual inventors.

The top five filers collectively hold 58% of the combined total among the ranked applicants visible in this query, a high concentration figure for such a small corpus, indicating that no broad competitive pack has yet formed.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC3
2NOIDA INST OF ENG & TECH1
3JIS College of Engineering1
4Mr. Jigar D. Pandya1
5Prof. (Dr.) Rajnee Shukla1
6Dr. Sambhavi Shukla1
7Ms. Poonam D. Chakravarty1
8Dr. Bhavesh K. Lukka1
9St. Martin’s Engineering College1
10Dr. Ritu Pahwa1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Baker Hughes’s position, grounded in manipulator/robot and business-process data classes, suggests the company is staking an early industrial claim; the remaining filers appear to be exploratory academic or individual efforts rather than coordinated commercial programs.

Filings from 2024 onward are subject to publication lag and should be treated as incomplete; the true recent activity level may be higher than current counts suggest. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Sporadic filing activity and a broad but thin technology mix

The annual trend and technology composition charts together reveal a field that has produced only isolated filing bursts, with no visible technology branch commanding sustained depth.

Annual filing trend

Filings first appeared in 2020, peaked in that year, fell to near-zero through 2022–2023, and show a modest uptick in 2025. The 2025 figure and especially 2026 should be read cautiously given publication lag; the lifecycle evidence characterises the field as easing from its 2020 peak rather than in sustained growth.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 3 in 2025.02017020180201922020120210202202023120243202502026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators & robots) and G06Q (Business, commerce & admin data processing) are jointly the most represented IPC classes, each appearing in 5 patent records, followed by G05B (Control & regulating systems) and G06N (AI-based computing) at 3 records each. H04L and H04W (communications) appear at 2 records each, while B64C and H01J are sparse outliers at 1 record each.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 5; G06Q · Business, commerce & admin data processing 5.B25J · Manipulators & ro…5G06Q · Business, commerc…5G05B · Control & regulat…3G06N · Computing based o…3H04L · Digital informati…2H04W · Wireless communic…2B64C · Aeroplanes & heli…1H01J · Electron & discha…1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20220134556A1Published 2022-05-05

Autonomous fluid management using fluid digital tw…

Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC

Examples described herein provide a computer-implemented method that includes determining, using a digital twin, a task to be performed based at least in part on real-time data. The method further includes initiating at least one of a drone, a collaborative robot, or a warehouse system to perform the task. (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Autonomous fluid management using fluid digital tw… — patent drawingAutonomous fluid management using fluid digital tw… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Autonomous fluid management using fluid digital tw…5

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC

Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC

Baker Hughes holds 3 patent records — the largest position in the corpus — focused on manipulator/robot systems (B25J 9), aeroplanes & helicopters (B64C 39), and business-process data processing (G06Q 10). The applicant momentum data does not show a recent-period trend figure for Baker Hughes separately, but its US and PCT filings give it the broadest jurisdictional reach of any filer in scope.

patent records: 3
Challenger · Prof (Dr) Rajnee Shukla

Prof (Dr) Rajnee Shukla

Prof (Dr) Rajnee Shukla holds 1 patent record with a technology focus spanning G05B 23 (control & regulating systems), G06N 20 (AI-based computing), and G06Q 10 (business-process data processing). Applicant momentum classifies this filer as a new entrant (trend: new entrant), indicating the record was filed in the recent window with no prior-period baseline.

patent records: 1
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Noida Institute of Engineering & TechnologyST Martins Engineering College+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.