Book a demo

Cobot Joint Health Monitoring Patent Snapshot 2026

Cobot Joint Health Monitoring Patent Snapshot 2026
Evidence Snapshot
Cobot Joint Health Monitoring Patent Snapshot in 2026

The cobot joint health monitoring patent space is small and nascent, with 13 patent families in scope dominated by a single industrial player alongside a cluster of Indian academic institutions. Annual volume peaked in 2021 and has eased since, placing the field in a decline stage with meaningful room for technically differentiated entrants.

13
Patent families in scope
N/A
Concentration not assessed
N/A
Growth trend not assessed
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··5 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Lam Research leads a highly concentrated, early-stage field

Lam Research Corporation holds the top position in this evidence snapshot, accounting for the largest single block of patent records among all filers. The top five filers collectively represent 61% of the ranked applicants visible in this query’ combined total, a level of concentration unusual even for a nascent technology.

A clear two-tier structure exists: Lam Research sits alone at the top with 5 patent records, followed by Aditya University and JIS College of Engineering each holding 2 records, with all remaining applicants holding a single record each. The gap between the leader and the rest is substantial relative to the corpus size.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Lam Research Corporation5
2Aditya University2
3JIS College of Engineering2
4Sanskrithi School of Engineering1
5NOIDA INST OF ENG & TECH1
6Jigar D. Pandya1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
7Rajnee Shukla1
8Sambhavi Shukla1
9Poonam D. Chakravarty1
10Bhavesh K. Lukka1
11St. Martin’s Engineering College1
12Ritu Pahwa1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Lam Research’s position signals that at least one industrial actor sees cobot joint health monitoring as strategically relevant to semiconductor fabrication automation. The academic cluster suggests the field is still being defined at the research level, creating an opening for industrial players to establish stronger IP positions before a consolidation wave.

Filings from roughly 2024 onward may be under-counted due to standard patent publication lag and should not be interpreted as a final measure of recent activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity peaked in 2021; AI and robot-control branches dominate the technology mix

The filing trend and IPC composition together reveal a field that mobilized briefly around 2021 and is now settling, with technology emphasis concentrated in manipulator mechanics and control systems but with notable AI and connectivity branches emerging.

Annual filing trend

Filings were absent from 2017 through 2020, surged to 4 records in 2021, then fell to zero in 2022–2023 before recovering modestly in 2024 and 2025. The 2025 and 2026 bars are likely under-counted due to publication lag and should not be read as a sustained rebound.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 5 in 2025.02017020180201902020420210202202023220245202522026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators and robots) is by far the visible branch, reflecting the core hardware focus. G05B (Control and regulating systems) and G06N (AI-based computing) each appear at material share, indicating that algorithmic health monitoring is already embedded in the field’s IP framing. G06Q (business and administrative data processing) also appears, suggesting some applicants are pursuing maintenance workflow and predictive-service angles.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 12; G05B · Control & regulating systems 6.B25J · Manipulators & ro…12G05B · Control & regulat…6G06N · Computing based o…6G06Q · Business, commerc…5H04L · Digital informati…3H04W · Wireless communic…2G05D · Control of non-el…1G06F · Electric digital …1↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20240009856A1Published 2024-01-11

Collaborative robot system on a mobile cart with a…

Lam Research Corporation

A robot system for servicing a semiconductor tool includes a cart frame. An arm support frame is fixed to the cart frame and is coupled to a robot arm. An arm frame is connected by hinges to the arm support frame at a first end and to a fixture connect interface at a second end. The fixture connect interface connects to a docking fixture of the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Collaborative robot system on a mobile cart with a… — patent drawingCollaborative robot system on a mobile cart with a… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Collaborative robot system on a mobile cart with a…11
2Collaborative robot system on a mobile cart with a…6

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Lam Research Corporation

Lam Research Corporation

Lam Research holds 5 patent records — the largest block in the corpus — concentrated entirely in B25J manipulator and robot classes, spanning sub-groups B25J 11, B25J 5, and B25J 9. This hardware-first emphasis suggests the company is protecting cobot joint monitoring as part of its semiconductor process automation systems rather than as a standalone product. Momentum is flagged as a new entrant in the recent tracking window, consistent with the 20242025 filing uptick visible in the trend.

5 patent records
Challenger · JIS College of Engineering

JIS College of Engineering

JIS College of Engineering holds 2 patent records, split across B25J 9 (robot manipulators), G05B 19 (control systems), and G06N 20 (machine-learning models). This multi-branch positioning — combining hardware, control logic, and AI — represents a broader methodological scope than the leader’s hardware focus. The institution is not flagged as having recent momentum, suggesting its filings predate the 20242025 window.

2 patent records
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Aditya UniversitySanskrithi School of Engineering+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.