Book a demo

Cobot Learning-Based Control Patent Landscape 2026

Cobot Learning-Based Control Patent Landscape 2026
Competitive Landscape
Cobot Learning-Based Control Patent Landscape in 2026

Intel Corporation holds a commanding lead in cobot learning-based control patenting, with the field anchored in manipulator and robot control (B25J) and increasingly intersecting AI computing frameworks. Activity has expanded substantially since 2019 and remains elevated, though annual volume has eased from its 2023 peak.

103
Patent families in scope
34%
Top-5 share of top-100 filers
-3%
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
United States
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

Intel leads a moderately concentrated field with a diverse challenger tier

Intel Corporation occupies the top position with 17 patent records, giving it more than twice the output of the next-ranked filer, BAE Systems with 8 patent records, followed by Chengdu Qinchuan IoT Technology with 7.

The top five filers account for 34% of the combined output of the hundred largest filers, indicating moderate concentration: Intel’s lead is clear, but a broad challenger tier including defense, semiconductor, and agricultural robotics players prevents any single route from being locked up.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1Intel Corporation17
2BAE Systems PLC8
3Chengdu Qinchuan IoT Technology Co Ltd7
4Aigen Inc5
5Lam Research Corporation5
6Fanuc Corporation3
7SAVEETHA INST OF MEDICAL & TECH SCI2
8Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC2
9Centro Ricerche Fiat S.C.p.A.2
10Kidde Fire Protection LLC2
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11Arya College of Engineering2
12Accenture Global Solutions Ltd2
13Teknologisk Institut2
14Aditya University2
15JIS College of Engineering2
16Southeast University2
17The Research Foundation for the State University of New York2
18KOREA UNIV OF TECH & EDUCATION IND UNIV COOPERATIO…2
19Hoseo University Academic Cooperation Foundation2
20Dr. Neetesh Kumar Gupta1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Intel’s dominant position, focused heavily on manipulator and robot control alongside business-process data processing, signals that hyperscaler-class compute firms are staking foundational claims in learning-based cobot control, potentially setting licensing reference points for hardware and systems integrators.

Patent records from approximately 20242026 are subject to publication lag and are likely under-counted; the apparent recent-year totals should not be interpreted as a ceiling on activity. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Activity surged after 2019 and technology mix is dominated by robotics with growing AI overlap

The filing trend and technology composition together reveal a field that matured rapidly from a near-zero base and now spans a wide but unequal set of IPC branches.

Annual filing trend

Filings were negligible through 2018, then rose sharply from 2019 onward, reaching a peak in 2023 before easing. The 2024–2026 bars are affected by publication lag and understate true current activity; the multi-year trajectory remains expansive relative to the pre-2019 baseline.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 21 in 2025.12017220181020191020201820215202219202313202421202542026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

B25J (Manipulators and robots) accounts for the largest share by a wide margin, reflecting the core cobot hardware focus. G06N (AI models and computing) and G05B (Control and regulating systems) form a secondary tier, while G06F, G06Q, and image-processing branches (G06T, G06V) appear at lower shares — pointing to adjacent technical territory that remains comparatively sparse.

Technology compositionB25J · Manipulators & robots leads with 98; G06N · Computing based on AI models 27.B25J · Manipulators & ro…98G06N · Computing based o…27G05B · Control & regulat…19G06F · Electric digital …17G06Q · Business, commerc…14G06T · Image data proces…6G06V · Image/video recog…6A01M · Pest & vermin con…5↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
US20260021589A1Published 2026-01-22

Method for precisely determining an output torque,…

Schaeffler Technologies AG & CO. KG

The invention relates to a method for precisely determining an output-side torque, in particular an output-side torque of an actuator gearing mechanism of a joint of a collaborative robot, by means of an artificial intelligence which is designed to output one or more output variables on the basis of input variables, wherein the input variables of the… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Method for precisely determining an output torque,… — patent drawingMethod for precisely determining an output torque,… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Negotiation-based Human-Robot Collaboration via Au…42
2Methods and apparatus to train interdependent auto…41
3医疗影像分类方法、装置、介质及电子设备21
4Collaborative robot network with hybrid electro-me…18
5Collaborative robot system13
6一种协作机器人多步骤自主装配作业决策方法12
7Collaborative robot system on a mobile cart with a…11
8Repetitive task and contextual risk analytics for …10

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Insights

What the competitive structure means for R&D investment decisions

Four structural dimensions — maturity, concentration, collaboration, and geography — shape where incremental R&D investment is likely to find differentiated returns.

Maturity

Field approaching maturity with annual volume eased from its 2023 peak

The lifecycle evidence places this field at a Maturity stage: annual filings have plateaued near their peak following a rapid build-up from 2019. On a multi-year basis the field is substantially larger than it was five years ago, but the era of easy first-mover filing has passed. New entrants should expect to navigate a denser prior-art environment and focus claims on differentiated sub-approaches.

Lifecycle: Maturity
Concentration

Moderate concentration leaves meaningful room for challengers

With 34% of the top-hundred filers’ combined output held by the top five, the field is concentrated enough that Intel’s foundational claims warrant freedom-to-operate review, but not so dominated that entry is structurally blocked. The second tier — BAE Systems, Chengdu Qinchuan, Aigen, and Lam Research — spans defense, IoT, agriculture, and semiconductor process control, indicating that application-specific routes remain open.

Concentration: Moderate
Collaboration

No co-applicant relationships detected in current evidence

The collaboration data contains no recorded co-filing relationships within this corpus. This absence may reflect the nascent state of formal R&D partnerships in learning-based cobot control, the tendency of leading commercial filers to prosecute independently, or data coverage limits. Evidence pending on specific bilateral or consortium-level filing activity.

Collaboration: Evidence pending
Geography

United States leads filings; India and China are active secondary jurisdictions

The United States accounts for the largest share of patent records at 40, followed by India at 21 and China at 17. WIPO PCT filings at 9 and EPO at 7 indicate some applicants are pursuing multi-jurisdictional protection, but the majority of activity is concentrated in three national offices. South Korea, the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, and Turkey are present but at low volumes, suggesting limited systematic protection in manufacturing-heavy European and Asian markets beyond China and Korea.

Geography: US-led
Patsnap Eureka · TRIZ Solution Agent
Facing a specific technical bottleneck in this field?

Go beyond the landscape: Eureka’s TRIZ Solution agent breaks down an R&D problem and returns patented concept solutions, each with a technical approach and cited patent & literature evidence.

Solve it in Eureka →

Co-filing pairs, ranked by the number of jointly-filed patent families.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Insights derived from applicant ranking, lifecycle, collaboration, and jurisdiction evidence.Explore insights →
Leaders

Intel dominates core robotics claims; BAE Systems emphasizes sensing and control

The two leading filers differ in emphasis: Intel concentrates on core manipulator programming and business-process integration, while BAE Systems stacks depth in sensing and feedback control for likely defense-adjacent cobot applications.

Leader · Intel Corporation

Intel Corporation

Intel Corporation leads with 17 patent records, focused primarily on B25J 9 (manipulator programming and path control), with secondary claims in business-process data processing (G06Q 10) and neural-network AI models (G06N 3). Momentum data classifies Intel as a new entrant in the recent filing window — suggesting its 17-record position was built quickly and recently, making it a fast-moving accumulator rather than a long-established incumbent.

patent records: 17
Challenger · BAE Systems PLC

BAE Systems PLC

BAE Systems holds 8 patent records with a portfolio spread across B25J 9 (manipulator programming), B25J 13 (operator-controlled manipulators and sensing), and G05B 19 (computer-integrated manufacturing control). This combination points to human-robot interaction and precision control applications consistent with defense and advanced manufacturing use cases. BAE Systems does not appear in the recent-window momentum list, indicating a more established prior filing base.

patent records: 8
🔍
See the full applicant breakdown
Unlock rankings for all filers including Chengdu Qinchuan IoT Technology, Aigen, Lam Research, Fanuc, and academic institutions.
Chengdu Qinchuan IoT Technology Co LtdAigen Inc+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Leading-applicant momentum (recent 3 yrs, lag-adjusted)
ApplicantRecent (3 yrs)Trend
Intel Corporation7▲ new entrant
Chengdu Qinchuan IoT Technology Co Ltd6▲ new entrant
Lam Research Corporation1▲ new entrant
Aigen Inc3▲ new entrant
韩国技术教育大学产学协力团2▲ new entrant
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Player emphasis derived from IPC sub-class focus and applicant momentum data.Explore players →
Adjacent Branches

Under-served branches in control systems, AI computing, and image recognition

Several IPC branches appear at materially lower patent-record counts than B25J, pointing to areas where technical overlap with cobot learning exists but dedicated filing is sparse relative to the core robotics class.

G05B · Control & Regulating Systems

G05B appears in 19 patent records — substantial in absolute terms but far below B25J’s 98, leaving a gap in learning-integrated process control and adaptive feedback loops for cobots. As cobots move into tighter closed-loop manufacturing and quality-assurance roles, claims bridging machine-learning inference and real-time regulatory control (G05B 19, G05B 13) represent a plausible adjacent area. Entry could leverage existing G05B competencies from automation incumbents rather than requiring a ground-up robotics stack.

Search this in Eureka →

G06V · Image/Video Recognition

G06V (image and video recognition) appears in only 6 patent records, despite visual perception being a foundational capability for learning-based cobot manipulation and human-robot collaboration. The sparsity is notable given the volume of vision-based cobot demonstrations in research literature. Applicants with existing computer-vision portfolios — particularly in industrial inspection or autonomous systems — may find this an accessible entry path for differentiated cobot-perception claims.

Search this in Eureka →
🔒
Unlock the full white-space map
See coverage gaps across all 23 IPC branches identified in the corpus, including G06T, G06Q, and IoT data processing.
G06T · Image data processingG06Q · Business process data processing+ more
Unlock full analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Adjacent branches identified by relative patent-record count against the dominant B25J class.Explore emerging →
Route Matrix

How leading applicants differ by IPC technology route

Route coverage across the main technology branches in the current evidence set.

PlayerB25J 9 · Manipulators & robotsG06N 3 · Computing based on AI modelsG05B 19 · Control & regulating systemsG06N 20 · Computing based on AI modelsB25J 13 · Manipulators & robots
BAE Systems PLCStrong · 8AbsentModerate · 4Moderate · 2Strong · 6
Intel CorporationStrong · 15Emerging · 2AbsentAbsentAbsent
Chengdu Qinchuan IoT Technology Co LtdStrong · 7AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Aditya UniversityStrong · 2Moderate · 1Strong · 2AbsentModerate · 1
Arya College of EngineeringStrong · 2Strong · 2AbsentStrong · 2Absent
Aigen IncStrong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Lam Research CorporationStrong · 5AbsentAbsentAbsentAbsent
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Matrix values are measured in patent records and should not be compared directly with family-level applicant totals.Compare in Eureka →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.