Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (816 records) with 2024 (450) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 17,404 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
This landscape tracks patent activity where pulse amplitude modulation, coherent detection and decision feedback equalization intersect with the physical-layer problems that make short-reach optical links work in practice: chromatic dispersion, forward error correction, baud rate, receiver sensitivity, transmitter linearity and timing recovery. The scope spans 2015 through the 2026 data cut-off and captures 17,404 published records, treated here as the unit of analysis.
The mix skews heavily toward digital transmission and general transmission claims, with multiplexing, coding and wireless-adjacent classes forming a secondary layer. That composition reflects a field where the modulation and equalization techniques originally built for wireline and wireless receivers are being re-claimed for optical short-reach links, rather than a purely optics-native body of art.
Two views of the same 17,404-record dataset: how filing volume moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claims.
Filings rose from 737 in 2017 to a peak of 921 in 2020, then declined to 450 by 2024 — a -45% move over the 2021-to-2024 span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still filling in under the roughly 18-month publication lag and should not be read as a continued decline.
H04L (digital information transmission) and H04B (transmission, general) each appear on more than half of all records, confirming that most claims sit at the signal-processing and transmission layer rather than in optics-specific subclasses. H04J, H03M and H04W form a mid-tier of multiplexing, coding and wireless-adjacent claims, while H03H (impedance networks and filters) covers just 3.1% of records — because a record can carry multiple classes, these shares sum to more than 100% of the record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 17,404 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about coherent and pam modulation for short reach and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaA timing recovery method enables interpolation of PAM signals sampled at baud rate. The method exploits the structure of the PAM signal and the smoothness of the channel pulse response. The resulting interpolator is an adaptive linear filter whose taps are adapted with the LMS algorithm, letting a Gigabit Ethernet receiver reduce the number of clock phases needed for A/D clock control from 64 to 16.Filed by Texas Instruments, published 2005-10-20 — predates most of the dataset's filing window and anchors baud-rate timing recovery as prior art for later PAM-based short-reach designs.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20070087756A1 | Multifactorial optimization system and method | 1,866 |
| 2 | US5852630A | Method and apparatus for a RADSL transceiver warm start activation procedure with precoding | 1,576 |
| 3 | US20050192727A1 | Sensor Assemblies | 1,179 |
| 4 | US7103460B1 | System and method for vehicle diagnostics | 1,175 |
| 5 | US20040095907A1 | Method and apparatus for optimization of wireless multipoint electromagnetic communication networks | 1,101 |
| 6 | US20030125040A1 | Multiple-access multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication system | 1,075 |
| 7 | US20060167784A1 | Game theoretic prioritization scheme for mobile ad hoc networks permitting hierarchal deference | 1,042 |
| 8 | US20200284883A1 | Component for a lidar sensor system, lidar sensor system, lidar sensor device, method for a lidar sensor syst… | 1,013 |
| 9 | US20100317420A1 | System and method | 991 |
| 10 | US20030093187A1 | PFN/TRAC systemTM FAA upgrades for accountable remote and robotics control to stop the unauthorized use of ai… | 977 |
Citation counts favour older records inside a searched corpus and should be read as a signal of influence, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three read-throughs from the filing trend, the citation table and the co-assignee network.
The peak year was 2020 at 921 records; by 2024, the last complete year in scope, filings had fallen to 450 — a -45% move from the 816 filed in 2021. That is a real pullback in new filing volume, not a sign the underlying claim space is emptying, since occupied claim territory does not need continual re-filing to stay defensible.
The single leading assignee holds 1,140 records, well ahead of tenth place at 282, yet the top 10 combined account for only 30.0% of all records in scope. That gap between one dominant filer and a wide ranked field means most of the claim space is still held by companies with modest, specific filing footprints.
Leading assignees active in the most recent year show sharp year-over-year drops — one at -81%, others at -88% to -100% — consistent with the broader 2021–2024 decline rather than any single company exiting the space.
The most-cited records in this dataset include general optimization and wireless-network patents rather than optics-specific filings, a reminder that citation counts inside a searched corpus reward age and breadth over current relevance to short-reach interconnect design.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to coherent and pam modulation for short reach, with the prior art for and against each one.
The ranking covers 100 companies counted by record, not a curated top list — it is the full set the underlying data endpoint returns for this search.
The leading assignee's 1,140 records put it far ahead of fifth place at 483 and tenth place at 282, but that lead does not translate into control of the field: even combined, the top 5 cover only 20.5% of all 17,404 records.
With the top 10 combined at 30.0% of all records, the remainder of the ranked 100 companies — plus unranked filers — account for the majority of filing activity, a pattern typical of a field built on adaptable signal-processing techniques rather than a single patented architecture.
The most active assignee in the latest year logged just 10 records, down 81% year over year; others on the recent-momentum list logged single digits or zero, reinforcing the broader post-2021 pullback in filing volume.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 10 | -81% |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 2 | -89% |
| Infinera Corp. | 1 | -88% |
| Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) | 1 | — |
| Broadcom Inc. | 0 | — |
| Intel Corp. | 0 | -100% |
| Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | 0 | -100% |
| Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. | 0 | -100% |
The dataset points to specific follow-up questions rather than a single conclusion — use these as starting prompts.
With 30.0% of all records held by the top 10 ranked assignees, any new filing in the H04L/H04B core should be checked against those portfolios specifically before broader prior-art work begins.
Run a freedom-to-operate checkH03H, G06F and H04N overlaps carry far fewer records than the H04L/H04B core, which can mean either open claim space or simply less commercial interest — both are worth confirming before committing R&D budget.
Explore white space by IPC classThe -45% filing decline from 2021 to 2024 spans multiple leading assignees, not one exit — watching who keeps filing through the slowdown is a better signal of where the field is heading than raw volume alone.
Monitor assignee filing trendsThis landscape covers 17,404 published records where pulse amplitude modulation, coherent detection, or decision feedback equalization claims intersect with physical-layer concerns like chromatic dispersion, forward error correction, baud rate, receiver sensitivity, transmitter linearity, or timing recovery. Most of these records classify under H04L (digital information transmission) and H04B (transmission, general), which together cover more than half of all records, meaning the bulk of the art sits at the signal-processing layer rather than in optics-specific classifications. A smaller but meaningful share touches multiplexing (H04J), coding (H03M) and wireless-adjacent (H04W) claims, reflecting how techniques originally built for wireline and wireless systems get re-claimed for optical short-reach interconnect.
The ranking covers 100 companies counted by record, and it is a genuine long tail: the leading assignee holds 1,140 records, well ahead of tenth place at 282, yet the top 10 combined still account for only 30.0% of all 17,404 records in scope. That means no single company or small group controls the claim space, and freedom-to-operate work needs to look well beyond the leading few names. Filing activity among even the most active recent filers has also slowed sharply, with year-over-year drops in the -80% to -100% range for several leading assignees in the latest tracked year.
Filing peaked in 2020 at 921 records and declined to 450 by 2024, a -45% move from the 816 filed in 2021 — this is the clearest complete-year trend the dataset supports. Records from 2025 and 2026 are still incomplete because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so those most recent years understate actual filing activity and should not be read as a further decline. The honest read is that filing volume pulled back meaningfully after 2021, not that the technology area is being abandoned, since dense existing claim coverage reduces the need for continued high-volume filing.
US20050232383A1, assigned to Texas Instruments and published in 2005, claims a timing recovery method that interpolates PAM signals sampled at baud rate using an adaptive linear filter whose taps adapt via the LMS algorithm. Its core contribution is reducing the number of clock phases needed for A/D clock control, demonstrated as a drop from 64 to 16 phases in a Gigabit Ethernet receiver. Because it predates most of the 17,404-record dataset, it functions as foundational prior art: any baud-rate timing recovery approach that relies on LMS-adapted interpolation without a materially different filter structure risks reading on this claim family.
The thinnest coverage relative to the H04L/H04B core sits in H03H (impedance networks and filters) at 3.1% of records, alongside overlaps into G06F (digital data processing), H04N (pictorial/video communication) and H04W (wireless networks) that each stay under 8% of records. These lower-density branches can mean either genuinely open claim space or simply less commercial interest in patenting there, so the two possibilities need separate confirmation before committing R&D or filing resources. Given that a leader-plus-long-tail assignee pattern already exists in the core classes, thinner adjacent branches are a reasonable place to look for a differentiated filing strategy rather than competing directly against the top-10 concentration.
Go past this page: query the whole coherent and pam modulation for short reach corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.
Help us improve
Something wrong, out of date, or missing on this page? Tell us and it goes straight to the team that maintains it.
This page