Book a demo

Coherent Optical Transmission Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026

Coherent Optical Transmission Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/coherent-optical-transmission-systems-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Optical Communications
Coherent Optical Transmission Systems: Patents, Leading Filers and Where the Claim Space Is Still Open
  • Filing has cooled since 2018. The peak year for new families was 2018 (14 filings); by the 2022 midpoint annual output had fallen to a single family, and the trend has not recovered since.
  • H04B carries almost the whole corpus. 77 of 87 records sit in H04B (transmission), with H04J multiplexing a distant second at 26 — most contested claim territory is symbol timing, carrier recovery and channel monitoring, not the optical front end.
  • Co-filing is rare and concentrated. Only three co-assignee pairs exist across the whole dataset, and the strongest links NTT and NTT Electronics — most applicants here file solo.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
87
Published Records
51%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+150%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Coherent optical transmission combines polarization-division multiplexing, digital signal processing and advanced modulation formats to push more data through the same fibre. This landscape pulls 87 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 whose title or abstract claims coherent detection, digital coherent optics or coherent optical transmission, narrowed further by claim-level language on chromatic dispersion compensation, nonlinear impairment, baud rate and modulation format within the H04B10, H04L27 and H04J14 subclasses.

Filing activity concentrates in a handful of long-haul and metro networking specialists, with symbol timing recovery and carrier-multiplexed transmission architecture standing out as the most heavily cited technical threads. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent falloff in the most recent year understates real filing activity; the more reliable signal is the multi-year decline visible from the 2018 peak through the 2022 midpoint.

Filing activity, 2017-2026
  1. 1NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP11
  2. 2HUAWEI TECH CO LTD9
  3. 3CORNING INC8
  4. 4ALCATEL LUCENT SA8
  5. 5STC PLC8
  6. 6JUNIPER NETWORKS INC7
  7. 7NTT ELECTORNICS CORP5
  8. 8GOOGLE LLC4
  9. 9MAXIM INTEGRATED PROD INC4
  10. 10TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)4
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 87-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses actually carry the claim language.

A 2018 peak followed by a sustained decline

Annual filings ran at 6 in 2017, rose to a peak of 14 in 2018, then fell back to just 1 by the 2022 midpoint. The partial 2026 figure reflects publication lag rather than a real stop in filing, but the multi-year direction through 2022 is a genuine decline, not a data artefact.

A 2018 peak followed by a sustained decline048111562017142018201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

H04B dominates; multiplexing and optics support it

H04B (general transmission) appears in 77 of 87 records, making it the backbone subclass for this dataset. H04J (multiplex communication, 26) and G02B (optical elements, 14) are the next-largest supporting classes, with H04L (digital transmission, 11) and H01S (lasers, 10) trailing behind. Modulation-specific H03C and pulse-technique H03K appear in only 2 records each, suggesting those angles are addressed mostly as dependent claims rather than as standalone filing strategy.

H04B dominates; multiplexing and optics support itH04B · Transmission (general)7788.5%H04J · Multiplex communication2629.9%G02B · Optical elements & systems1416.1%H04L · Digital information transmissi…1112.6%H01S · Lasers & stimulated emission1011.5%G02F · Optical control & modulation89.2%H03C · Modulation22.3%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…22.3%Other22.3%

Shares are the percentage of the 87 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about coherent optical transmission systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The patents other filings cite most

Representative Filing
US10110320B22018-10-23

Method for monitoring and correction of adjacent channel penalty in coherent optical transmission

JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC.

The claim covers an apparatus that receives digital samples from a coherent optical receiver across a set of optical channels, calculates the spacing between each channel and its adjacent channels via digital signal processing of those samples, and uses that calculation to monitor and correct adjacent-channel penalty.Filed by Juniper Networks; granted 2018-10-23 as US10110320B2.

US10110320B2 — patent drawing 1US10110320B2 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20100329677A1Symbol Timing Recovery in Polarization Division Multiplexed Coherent Optical Transmission System109
2US8655191B2Symbol timing recovery in polarization division multiplexed coherent optical transmission system38
3US20190229811A1Self-homodyne carrier multiplexed transmission system and method for coherent optical links37
4US20110142457A1Integrated transmit and receive modules for a coherent optical transmission system26
5CN105790849A一种面向相干光通信系统的调制格式识别方法24
6US4663596AOptical transmission system22
7US20150155952A1Method and related apparatus for coherent optical transmission19
8EP2169867A1A decision directed algorithm for adjusting a polarization demultiplexer in a coherent detection optical rece…19
9US20180269984A1Method for monitoring and correction of adjacent channel penalty in coherent optical transmission17
10CN102904643A适用于QDB频谱压缩偏振复用信号的多模盲均衡算法17

Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited within this searched corpus; treat them as a signal of technical influence, not of current commercial relevance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the data tells a filing team

Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the citation table, framed for a team deciding where to file next.

Filing Momentum
14 → 1
peak year 2018 to 2022 midpoint

The wave has already crested

Annual filings dropped from a peak of 14 in 2018 to just 1 by 2022. A new entrant is not walking into a growing field; the core architecture claims were largely staked out in the 2017-2019 window.

Trend data, 2017-2026
Claim Concentration
77 of 87
records tagged H04B

Transmission-layer claims dominate

Almost every record in this dataset touches H04B, the general transmission subclass. Filers looking for open space should look past the transmission layer itself toward the smaller supporting subclasses.

IPC composition
Influence Signal
109 citations
top-cited record

Symbol timing recovery set the baseline

The most-cited record in the corpus concerns symbol timing recovery in polarization-division multiplexed systems, and its continuation carries the second-highest count. Any new filing on synchronization or carrier recovery is filing against dense, well-established prior art.

Citation ranking
Collaboration Pattern
3 pairs
co-assignee filings across 87 families

Solo filing is the norm, not joint development

Co-assigned filings are rare in this dataset, and the one recurring pair links NTT to its own electronics subsidiary rather than to an external partner. Cross-company joint filings are essentially absent.

Co-assignee analysis
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to coherent optical transmission systems, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Who's Filing

Assignee landscape and where filing has stalled

The named leaders in this dataset show zero filings in the latest year across the board, consistent with the corpus-wide slowdown rather than any one company exiting the field.

Momentum Check
0
latest-year filings, Huawei

Huawei's filing pace has gone flat

Huawei shows a -100% year-over-year change alongside the other tracked assignees, all recording zero filings in the most recent tracked year. This mirrors the corpus-wide decline rather than a company-specific retreat, but it does mean recent activity from any single named leader is not a reliable guide to who is actually still investing.

Recent-year momentum
Filing Partner
5
co-assignee filings, NTT + NTT Electronics

NTT's internal pairing is the strongest link in the dataset

The strongest co-assignee relationship in this corpus pairs NTT with its own NTT Electronics subsidiary across 5 filings, well ahead of the next pair. This looks like internal group filing practice rather than external technology partnership.

Co-assignee pairs
Jurisdiction Mix
31 of 87
US receiving office

The US remains the primary filing venue

The United States receives 31 of the 87 records, with Europe (19), China (11) and Japan (10) forming a secondary tier. A defensive filing strategy focused only on the US would still miss roughly two-thirds of this corpus.

Receiving office split
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas worth checking before filing
These sit outside the dense H04B/H04J core and show comparatively light claim coverage in this dataset.
adjacent-channel penalty monitoringself-homodyne carrier multiplexingnonlinear impairment compensation via DSPmodulation-format auto-identificationpulse-technique synchronization circuits
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT)0
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0-100%
Standard Telephones and Cables plc (STC)0
Corning Incorporated0
Juniper Networks, Inc.0
Alcatel Lucent0
NTT Electronics Corporation0
Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The trend and assignee data point to a mature, slowing field with a few specific gaps still open. These are the natural next steps for a team acting on it.

Map the white space claims directly

Take the under-claimed sub-areas identified here and check them against live claim language, not just IPC tags, to confirm they are genuinely open rather than covered by broader dependent claims elsewhere in the portfolio.

Explore in Eureka

Watch for continuation filings from the top-cited families

The most-cited records in this corpus, particularly the symbol-timing-recovery lineage, are the kind of foundational filings that generate continuations years after the original priority date.

Track in Eureka

Reassess jurisdiction strategy against the receiving-office split

With the US, Europe and China together carrying the bulk of filings, a team weighing where to seek protection should size that decision against where competitors have actually filed, not assumed market importance.

Compare in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Coherent Optical Transmission Systems in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole coherent optical transmission systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.