Coherent Optical Transmission Patents: Leaders & White Space 2026
- Filing has cooled since 2018. The peak year for new families was 2018 (14 filings); by the 2022 midpoint annual output had fallen to a single family, and the trend has not recovered since.
- H04B carries almost the whole corpus. 77 of 87 records sit in H04B (transmission), with H04J multiplexing a distant second at 26 — most contested claim territory is symbol timing, carrier recovery and channel monitoring, not the optical front end.
- Co-filing is rare and concentrated. Only three co-assignee pairs exist across the whole dataset, and the strongest links NTT and NTT Electronics — most applicants here file solo.
What this landscape covers
Coherent optical transmission combines polarization-division multiplexing, digital signal processing and advanced modulation formats to push more data through the same fibre. This landscape pulls 87 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 whose title or abstract claims coherent detection, digital coherent optics or coherent optical transmission, narrowed further by claim-level language on chromatic dispersion compensation, nonlinear impairment, baud rate and modulation format within the H04B10, H04L27 and H04J14 subclasses.
Filing activity concentrates in a handful of long-haul and metro networking specialists, with symbol timing recovery and carrier-multiplexed transmission architecture standing out as the most heavily cited technical threads. Because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent falloff in the most recent year understates real filing activity; the more reliable signal is the multi-year decline visible from the 2018 peak through the 2022 midpoint.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 87-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses actually carry the claim language.
A 2018 peak followed by a sustained decline
Annual filings ran at 6 in 2017, rose to a peak of 14 in 2018, then fell back to just 1 by the 2022 midpoint. The partial 2026 figure reflects publication lag rather than a real stop in filing, but the multi-year direction through 2022 is a genuine decline, not a data artefact.
H04B dominates; multiplexing and optics support it
H04B (general transmission) appears in 77 of 87 records, making it the backbone subclass for this dataset. H04J (multiplex communication, 26) and G02B (optical elements, 14) are the next-largest supporting classes, with H04L (digital transmission, 11) and H01S (lasers, 10) trailing behind. Modulation-specific H03C and pulse-technique H03K appear in only 2 records each, suggesting those angles are addressed mostly as dependent claims rather than as standalone filing strategy.
Shares are the percentage of the 87 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Coherent Optical Transmission Systems with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about coherent optical transmission systems and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe patents other filings cite most
Method for monitoring and correction of adjacent channel penalty in coherent optical transmission
The claim covers an apparatus that receives digital samples from a coherent optical receiver across a set of optical channels, calculates the spacing between each channel and its adjacent channels via digital signal processing of those samples, and uses that calculation to monitor and correct adjacent-channel penalty.Filed by Juniper Networks; granted 2018-10-23 as US10110320B2.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20100329677A1 | Symbol Timing Recovery in Polarization Division Multiplexed Coherent Optical Transmission System | 109 |
| 2 | US8655191B2 | Symbol timing recovery in polarization division multiplexed coherent optical transmission system | 38 |
| 3 | US20190229811A1 | Self-homodyne carrier multiplexed transmission system and method for coherent optical links | 37 |
| 4 | US20110142457A1 | Integrated transmit and receive modules for a coherent optical transmission system | 26 |
| 5 | CN105790849A | 一种面向相干光通信系统的调制格式识别方法 | 24 |
| 6 | US4663596A | Optical transmission system | 22 |
| 7 | US20150155952A1 | Method and related apparatus for coherent optical transmission | 19 |
| 8 | EP2169867A1 | A decision directed algorithm for adjusting a polarization demultiplexer in a coherent detection optical rece… | 19 |
| 9 | US20180269984A1 | Method for monitoring and correction of adjacent channel penalty in coherent optical transmission | 17 |
| 10 | CN102904643A | 适用于QDB频谱压缩偏振复用信号的多模盲均衡算法 | 17 |
Citation counts favour older filings simply because they have had more time to be cited within this searched corpus; treat them as a signal of technical influence, not of current commercial relevance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the data tells a filing team
Three read-throughs from the trend, the IPC split and the citation table, framed for a team deciding where to file next.
The wave has already crested
Annual filings dropped from a peak of 14 in 2018 to just 1 by 2022. A new entrant is not walking into a growing field; the core architecture claims were largely staked out in the 2017-2019 window.
Transmission-layer claims dominate
Almost every record in this dataset touches H04B, the general transmission subclass. Filers looking for open space should look past the transmission layer itself toward the smaller supporting subclasses.
Symbol timing recovery set the baseline
The most-cited record in the corpus concerns symbol timing recovery in polarization-division multiplexed systems, and its continuation carries the second-highest count. Any new filing on synchronization or carrier recovery is filing against dense, well-established prior art.
Solo filing is the norm, not joint development
Co-assigned filings are rare in this dataset, and the one recurring pair links NTT to its own electronics subsidiary rather than to an external partner. Cross-company joint filings are essentially absent.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to coherent optical transmission systems, with the prior art for and against each one.
Assignee landscape and where filing has stalled
The named leaders in this dataset show zero filings in the latest year across the board, consistent with the corpus-wide slowdown rather than any one company exiting the field.
Huawei's filing pace has gone flat
Huawei shows a -100% year-over-year change alongside the other tracked assignees, all recording zero filings in the most recent tracked year. This mirrors the corpus-wide decline rather than a company-specific retreat, but it does mean recent activity from any single named leader is not a reliable guide to who is actually still investing.
NTT's internal pairing is the strongest link in the dataset
The strongest co-assignee relationship in this corpus pairs NTT with its own NTT Electronics subsidiary across 5 filings, well ahead of the next pair. This looks like internal group filing practice rather than external technology partnership.
The US remains the primary filing venue
The United States receives 31 of the 87 records, with Europe (19), China (11) and Japan (10) forming a secondary tier. A defensive filing strategy focused only on the US would still miss roughly two-thirds of this corpus.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) | 0 | — |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
| Standard Telephones and Cables plc (STC) | 0 | — |
| Corning Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Juniper Networks, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Alcatel Lucent | 0 | — |
| NTT Electronics Corporation | 0 | — |
| Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The trend and assignee data point to a mature, slowing field with a few specific gaps still open. These are the natural next steps for a team acting on it.
Map the white space claims directly
Take the under-claimed sub-areas identified here and check them against live claim language, not just IPC tags, to confirm they are genuinely open rather than covered by broader dependent claims elsewhere in the portfolio.
Explore in EurekaWatch for continuation filings from the top-cited families
The most-cited records in this corpus, particularly the symbol-timing-recovery lineage, are the kind of foundational filings that generate continuations years after the original priority date.
Track in EurekaReassess jurisdiction strategy against the receiving-office split
With the US, Europe and China together carrying the bulk of filings, a team weighing where to seek protection should size that decision against where competitors have actually filed, not assumed market importance.
Compare in EurekaCommon questions about this landscape
No, not based on this dataset. Filing peaked in 2018 at 14 families and had fallen to just 1 by the 2022 midpoint, indicating a clear multi-year decline rather than continued growth. The most recent years appear lower still, but that is partly an artefact of publication lag, since patent applications typically take around 18 months to publish after filing. The honest read is a field where the core architecture was staked out between roughly 2017 and 2019, with filing activity cooling substantially since.
The dataset's named leaders include NTT, Huawei, Nokia (via its Alcatel-Lucent lineage), Corning, Juniper Networks and Ericsson, but all of them show zero filings in the latest tracked year. Co-assignee data shows NTT paired with its own NTT Electronics subsidiary as the strongest filing link in the corpus, suggesting internal group filing practice more than external partnership. No single company shows a dominant current filing rate; the field looks like several long-established filers holding existing portfolios rather than one clear active leader.
H04B, the general transmission subclass, appears in 77 of the 87 records in this dataset and carries the bulk of the claim language around symbol timing, carrier recovery and channel monitoring. H04J (multiplex communication) and G02B (optical elements and systems) are meaningful secondary classes, while H01S (lasers) and G02F (optical modulation) support the optical hardware side. Narrower classes like H03C and H03K appear in only 2 records each, which points to those being addressed as dependent claims rather than pursued as standalone filing strategy.
US10110320B2, assigned to Juniper Networks and granted in 2018, claims an apparatus that calculates spacing between adjacent optical channels from digital samples taken at a coherent optical receiver, using that calculation to monitor and correct adjacent-channel penalty. It is specific to a monitoring-and-correction function built on digital signal processing of channel spacing, not to coherent detection generally. A new design that avoids per-channel spacing calculation for adjacent-channel penalty correction, or that solves channel monitoring through a materially different signal path, would sit outside its claim scope, but any implementation using this exact spacing-based correction approach should be checked against it carefully.
The clearest gaps sit outside the dense H04B and H04J core: modulation-format auto-identification, pulse-technique synchronization circuits (H03K, only 2 records), and self-homodyne carrier-multiplexed transmission architectures all show comparatively light claim coverage in this dataset. Nonlinear impairment compensation via digital signal processing is referenced in the search criteria but is not saturated with claims the way symbol timing recovery is. Given the overall filing slowdown since 2018, any of these sub-areas would need a genuinely narrow, technically specific first claim rather than a broad architectural one, since the broad architecture space was largely claimed years ago.
Research Coherent Optical Transmission Systems in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole coherent optical transmission systems corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.