Combination Product Design Control Patents: Who Leads 2026
Combination product design control patents: mapping who holds design verification and usability engineering claims
One leader, a steep drop-off. the top-ranked assignee holds 11 records while fifth place holds just 1, and the top 5 together account for 88.9% of all 27 records in scope. Filings peaked at 8 in 2017 and have declined since, reaching 0 in the most recent partial year. With publication lagging filing by roughly 18 months, the last one to two years of any such trend will always look thinner than the underlying filing activity actually was, so the tail should be read cautiously rather than as a sign the field has stopped.
- 1詹森生物科技公司40.7%
- 2利瓦诺维德国有限责任公司29.6%
- 3ROJAS GARCIA KATIA MARIEL7.4%
- 4ACCELIDEA INC7.4%
- 5株式会社东芝3.7%
See the full combination product design control analysis in Eureka
- The complete ranking, not just the top five
- Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
- The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Common questions about this landscape
What counts as a combination product for design control purposes in this patent landscape?
In this dataset, a combination product record is one that ties design-verification or essential-performance-requirement language to a specific engineering or human-factors test method, such as usability engineering, shipping simulation, or component dimensional tolerance. This is narrower than the full drug-delivery-device category; it isolates filings that address the design-control evidence chain rather than the drug or device mechanism alone. Readers looking for a broader delivery-device landscape should expect a larger record count than the 27 tracked here.
Who are the leading patent holders in combination product design control?
The ranking covers 8 assignees across all 27 records in scope, with one clear leader holding 11 records and a steep drop to the fifth-ranked assignee, which holds only 1. The top 5 assignees combined account for 88.9% of all records, meaning a small group holds nearly the entire field. This is not a top-50 or top-100 ranking; it is the complete set the data endpoint returns for this scope.
Why did filing activity peak in 2017 and decline afterward?
The trend shows 8 filings in 2017, the peak year, followed by a decline toward zero in the most recent partial year. The underlying reasons are not captured in the dataset itself, but the shape is consistent with a single wave of early filings rather than sustained growth, and a formal growth rate cannot be computed given the short run of complete years. Publication typically lags filing by roughly 18 months, so recent years understate true filing activity and should not be read as the field having stopped.
Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.
Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Combination Product Design Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.