Book a demo

Combinatorial Indexing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

Combinatorial Indexing Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
Data to 2026-07-31

Combinatorial indexing patents: mapping split-pool barcoding and index-hopping claims

One assignee dominates the ranking. the leader holds 236 of the 359 records in scope, with the fifth-ranked entity at 24 and the tenth at 7 — a steep drop-off after the top position. Filings rose to a peak of 96 in 2019, then declined; the -79% drop from 67 filings in 2021 to 14 in 2024 marks the last complete year of data. Readings for 2025 and 2026 will fill in as publications catch up.

Filing trend: a sharp rise, then a sharp pullback
Complete Incomplete
Filing trend: a sharp rise, then a sharp pullback0255075100222017201896201920202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.
359
Published Records
-79%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
69
Active Filers Ranked
Top filers · published records
  1. 1ILLUMINA INC236
  2. 2UNIV OF WASHINGTON102
  3. 3OREGON HEALTH & SCI UNIV89
  4. 4THE BROAD INST INC24
  5. 5MASSACHUSETTS INST OF TECH24
Published by Patsnap Research·

See the full combinatorial indexing methods analysis in Eureka

  • The complete ranking, not just the top five
  • Every IPC branch with its share of the corpus
  • The most-cited records, and where claim space is still thin
Read more about this analysis in Eureka
FAQ

Common questions about combinatorial indexing patents

What is combinatorial indexing in single-cell sequencing?+

Combinatorial indexing, often called split-pool barcoding, is a method for tagging DNA or RNA from many individual cells or nuclei with unique combinations of short index sequences across multiple rounds of pooling and splitting, so that reads can later be traced back to their cell of origin without isolating each cell physically. It allows a single sequencing run to process far more cells than droplet-based methods at a lower cost per cell. The patent literature in this space, 359 records as of mid-2026, covers the core barcoding method along with practical problems like index hopping, nuclei integrity, and protocol complexity.

Who are the leading patent holders in combinatorial indexing?+

The assignee ranking for this dataset covers 69 companies and research institutions, but it is heavily front-loaded: the leading assignee holds 236 of the 359 records in scope, while the fifth-ranked entity holds 24 and the tenth holds 7. Several university and research-institute names also appear near the top of the ranking, often as co-assignees alongside the leading commercial filer. This pattern indicates the foundational method was developed and patented through a small number of academic-commercial partnerships rather than broadly across the industry.

Is combinatorial indexing patent activity still growing?+

Filing activity peaked at 96 records in 2019 and had fallen to 14 by 2024, a -79% decline over that three-year span, which is the most recent period that can be read reliably given an approximately 18-month gap between filing and publication. Figures for 2025 and 2026 in the raw data appear near zero, but that reflects publications still working through the pipeline rather than an actual stop in R&D. The safer read is that the core method is now well-established and heavily claimed, which naturally slows the pace of new foundational filings even as application-specific work continues.

Disclaimer. This analysis is based on Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent records and is provided for general information and reference only. Patent data carries inherent limitations — recent filings are under-counted because of publication lag, counts may be on a record or family basis, classification and applicant-name data may contain errors or duplicates, and the underlying search query defines the scope shown — so the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing here is an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Verify independently and review with qualified patent and legal professionals before acting on it.

Method: Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Combinatorial Indexing Methods covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish. Every share divides by all records in scope. Data: Patsnap Eureka. See the full landscape report.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.