https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/complementary-fet-advanced-packaging-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Semiconductors & Microelectronics
Complementary FET Advanced Packaging Patent Landscape 2026
  • 13 families total — a small, still-forming corpus rather than a mature, crowded field.
  • Filings peaked in 2020 at six records, then went flat; the 2022 midpoint sits at zero, so momentum has stalled rather than accelerated.
  • One dominant co-filing pair — Tokyo Electron's parent and its US holding entity — account for five of the thirteen families, more than any other assignee combination.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
13
Published Records
0%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction
5
Active Filers Ranked

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

A narrow, early-stage filing pattern

Complementary FET (CFET) advanced packaging — stacking n-type and p-type devices vertically and connecting them through backside power delivery, 3D integration or hybrid bonding — is a claim space with very few published families so far. The search returns only 13 families, concentrated almost entirely under the core semiconductor-device classifications H01L and H10D, with a smaller H03K logic-circuit overlap. That composition says the filings are about device and interconnect structure, not about the logic-cell architectures those structures are meant to enable.

Filing activity rose to a single peak in 2020 and has not repeated it since; the 2022 midpoint is empty. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in this window will read lower than they eventually settle — but even allowing for that lag, this is a field where the claim space is thin enough that a well-drafted filing today still has room to move.

Filing activity, 2017–2026
  1. 1Tokyo Electron Limited9
  2. 2Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc.5
  3. 3Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC)2
  4. 4Applied Materials, Inc.1
  5. 5Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Advanced Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 13 families: when they were filed, and where they sit in the classification system.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Zero filings recorded in 2017, a peak of six in 2020, and a return to zero at the 2022 midpoint — a spike-and-fade pattern rather than sustained growth. The final years are necessarily undercounted given publication lag.

Filing trend, 2017–2026023560201720182019620202021202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H01L covers all 13 records, H10D nine, and H03K three — device and interconnect structure claims dominate over logic-circuit-level claims, which is where the white space concentrates.

IPC subclass compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices13100.0%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)969.2%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…323.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 13 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Advanced Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Complementary FET Advanced Packaging with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about complementary fet advanced packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

The most-cited records

Representative record
EP4791148A12026-08-12

Complementary field-effect transistor and method for its manufacture

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.

In some examples, a complementary field-effect transistor (CFET) comprises a first transistor formed on a first level, and a second transistor formed on a second level, wherein the second level is stacked on the first level, wherein a channel of the first transistor is offset from a channel of the second transistor while maintaining partial overlap between the channels.Filed by Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.; publication and assignee detail rendered above.

EP4791148A1 — patent drawing 1EP4791148A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited families in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20230377998A1Method of forming confined growth s/d contact with selective deposition of inner spacer for cfet19
2US20230377983A1Method to reduce parasitic resistance for CFET devices through single damascene processing of vias9
3WO2020242909A1Compact 3D stacked CFET architecture for complex logic cells3
4JP2022534858A複合ロジックセルのための小型3D積層CFETアーキテクチャ3
5WO2025165387A1Contact integration in complementary field effect transistor (CFET) devices1

Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus — read them as a marker of influence on later filings, not as a signal of current commercial importance.

Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Advanced Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers imply for filing strategy

Three readings of the trend, composition and citation data that matter more than the raw counts.

Filing momentum
Peak 2020 · 6 filings
then flat to zero by 2022

A single spike, not a growth curve

The corpus shows one concentrated filing year rather than a rising trend. Recent-year momentum figures for every leading assignee read zero or negative, which is consistent with either a pause in patenting or a lag not yet reflected in the published record.

Treat the 2024–2026 years as provisional.
Classification mix
H01L 13 · H10D 9 · H03K 3
records by IPC subclass

Structure claims outweigh circuit claims

Nearly every family touches core device structure (H01L/H10D); only three reach into pulse-technique and logic-circuit classification (H03K). Claims tying CFET stacking to specific logic-cell topologies are comparatively rare.

Logic-cell-level claims remain the smaller share.
Citation concentration
Top record cited 19
vs. single-digit counts elsewhere

Influence sits with two early filings

Two US-origin records on contact formation and via processing for CFET devices carry citation counts well above the rest of the corpus, suggesting these structural approaches became reference points for subsequent filers.

Citation counts favour earlier filings by construction.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to complementary fet advanced packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Co-filing pattern
AssigneeCo-assigneeShared families
Tokyo Electron LimitedTokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc.5

The strongest co-assignee pair in the corpus — Tokyo Electron's parent entity and its US holding company — appear together on five of the thirteen families, the only pairing with more than incidental overlap.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Advanced Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

Assignee activity is led by equipment and foundry names rather than a broad field of entrants, and recent-year momentum has cooled across the board.

Equipment leader
5 co-filed families
with its US holding entity

Tokyo Electron group

The two Tokyo Electron entities in this corpus co-file more than any other pairing, pointing to process-tool claims around CFET fabrication steps rather than device architecture alone.

0 filings in the latest year for both entities.
Foundry
-100% YoY
latest-year change

TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC))

TSMC appears among the leading assignees but its latest-year filing count has dropped to zero, a full reversal from prior activity and consistent with the corpus-wide 2022 dip.

Watch for a rebound once 2024–2025 filings publish.
Equipment
0 in latest year
no recent-year filings recorded

Applied Materials (Applied Materials, Inc.)

Applied Materials sits among the ranked assignees on structural and process claims but shows no filings in the most recent year captured, matching the broader pause across the corpus.

Process-integration claims are its likely angle.
Device maker
-100% YoY
latest-year change

Huawei Technologies (Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.)

Huawei's representative record in this set claims offset, partially overlapping channels across stacked CFET levels — a device-architecture angle distinct from the process claims held by equipment makers.

Latest-year filings also read zero, mirroring the field-wide lull.
🔍
Under-claimed sub-areas
Branches adjacent to the core structural claims that carry few or no dedicated filings in this corpus.
logic-cell-level CFET topology claimsbackside power rail contact schemeshybrid-bonding alignment tolerance methodschiplet-to-CFET interconnect routinginner-spacer selective deposition variants
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Tokyo Electron Limited0
Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc.0
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC)0-100%
Applied Materials, Inc.0
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0-100%
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Advanced Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this

The corpus is small enough that a targeted freedom-to-operate check and a claim-drafting pass are both tractable in the near term.

Map the logic-cell overlap

Only three of thirteen families reach H03K logic-circuit classification. Anyone claiming a specific CFET-based standard-cell layout is filing into largely open space.

Explore CFET logic-cell claims in Eureka →

Watch the equipment pairing

The Tokyo Electron co-filing pattern suggests process-tool claims are being built out ahead of device-architecture claims from other players. Track their next filings closely.

Track assignee filings in Eureka →

Re-check after the next publication cycle

Given the 18-month publication lag, 2024–2026 filing counts will revise upward. A follow-up pull in the next two quarters will clarify whether the 2022 dip was real or an artifact of timing.

Set a landscape alert in Eureka →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Advanced Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on CFET packaging patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Advanced Packaging covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Complementary FET Advanced Packaging in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole complementary fet advanced packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.