Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (1) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field.
Complementary FET (CFET) advanced packaging — stacking n-type and p-type devices vertically and connecting them through backside power delivery, 3D integration or hybrid bonding — is a claim space with very few published families so far. The search returns only 13 families, concentrated almost entirely under the core semiconductor-device classifications H01L and H10D, with a smaller H03K logic-circuit overlap. That composition says the filings are about device and interconnect structure, not about the logic-cell architectures those structures are meant to enable.
Filing activity rose to a single peak in 2020 and has not repeated it since; the 2022 midpoint is empty. Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the most recent years in this window will read lower than they eventually settle — but even allowing for that lag, this is a field where the claim space is thin enough that a well-drafted filing today still has room to move.
Two views of the same 13 families: when they were filed, and where they sit in the classification system.
Zero filings recorded in 2017, a peak of six in 2020, and a return to zero at the 2022 midpoint — a spike-and-fade pattern rather than sustained growth. The final years are necessarily undercounted given publication lag.
H01L covers all 13 records, H10D nine, and H03K three — device and interconnect structure claims dominate over logic-circuit-level claims, which is where the white space concentrates.
Shares are the percentage of the 13 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about complementary fet advanced packaging and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaIn some examples, a complementary field-effect transistor (CFET) comprises a first transistor formed on a first level, and a second transistor formed on a second level, wherein the second level is stacked on the first level, wherein a channel of the first transistor is offset from a channel of the second transistor while maintaining partial overlap between the channels.Filed by Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.; publication and assignee detail rendered above.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20230377998A1 | Method of forming confined growth s/d contact with selective deposition of inner spacer for cfet | 19 |
| 2 | US20230377983A1 | Method to reduce parasitic resistance for CFET devices through single damascene processing of vias | 9 |
| 3 | WO2020242909A1 | Compact 3D stacked CFET architecture for complex logic cells | 3 |
| 4 | JP2022534858A | 複合ロジックセルのための小型3D積層CFETアーキテクチャ | 3 |
| 5 | WO2025165387A1 | Contact integration in complementary field effect transistor (CFET) devices | 1 |
Citation counts favour older records in any searched corpus — read them as a marker of influence on later filings, not as a signal of current commercial importance.
Patent titles are shown in the language they were filed in, not translated, so that each record stays verifiable against the original filing — a translated title will not match in Eureka or in any national register. Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (5 of 5 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three readings of the trend, composition and citation data that matter more than the raw counts.
The corpus shows one concentrated filing year rather than a rising trend. Recent-year momentum figures for every leading assignee read zero or negative, which is consistent with either a pause in patenting or a lag not yet reflected in the published record.
Nearly every family touches core device structure (H01L/H10D); only three reach into pulse-technique and logic-circuit classification (H03K). Claims tying CFET stacking to specific logic-cell topologies are comparatively rare.
Two US-origin records on contact formation and via processing for CFET devices carry citation counts well above the rest of the corpus, suggesting these structural approaches became reference points for subsequent filers.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to complementary fet advanced packaging, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| Tokyo Electron Limited | Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc. | 5 |
The strongest co-assignee pair in the corpus — Tokyo Electron's parent entity and its US holding company — appear together on five of the thirteen families, the only pairing with more than incidental overlap.
Assignee activity is led by equipment and foundry names rather than a broad field of entrants, and recent-year momentum has cooled across the board.
The two Tokyo Electron entities in this corpus co-file more than any other pairing, pointing to process-tool claims around CFET fabrication steps rather than device architecture alone.
TSMC appears among the leading assignees but its latest-year filing count has dropped to zero, a full reversal from prior activity and consistent with the corpus-wide 2022 dip.
Applied Materials sits among the ranked assignees on structural and process claims but shows no filings in the most recent year captured, matching the broader pause across the corpus.
Huawei's representative record in this set claims offset, partially overlapping channels across stacked CFET levels — a device-architecture angle distinct from the process claims held by equipment makers.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Tokyo Electron Limited | 0 | — |
| Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC) | 0 | -100% |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | -100% |
The corpus is small enough that a targeted freedom-to-operate check and a claim-drafting pass are both tractable in the near term.
Only three of thirteen families reach H03K logic-circuit classification. Anyone claiming a specific CFET-based standard-cell layout is filing into largely open space.
Explore CFET logic-cell claims in Eureka →The Tokyo Electron co-filing pattern suggests process-tool claims are being built out ahead of device-architecture claims from other players. Track their next filings closely.
Track assignee filings in Eureka →Given the 18-month publication lag, 2024–2026 filing counts will revise upward. A follow-up pull in the next two quarters will clarify whether the 2022 dip was real or an artifact of timing.
Set a landscape alert in Eureka →A complementary FET stacks an n-type and a p-type transistor vertically on top of each other rather than placing them side by side, which shrinks the footprint of a logic cell. In advanced packaging contexts, CFET claims often intersect with backside power delivery, 3D integration and hybrid bonding because the stacked devices need vertical interconnects and power rails routed from the back of the wafer. This corpus shows CFET claims classified overwhelmingly under core semiconductor-device codes (H01L, H10D), meaning most filings so far address the device and contact structure rather than full packaging integration.
The strongest single pattern in this dataset is a co-filing relationship between Tokyo Electron's parent entity and its US holding company, which together appear on five of the thirteen tracked families. TSMC, Applied Materials and Huawei also appear among the ranked assignees, covering foundry, equipment and device-maker perspectives respectively. All of the leading assignees show zero or negative filing momentum in the most recent tracked year, though this likely reflects publication lag rather than an actual slowdown.
With only 13 published families across an 11-year search window, this is not a crowded field by any conventional measure. Filing activity peaked once, in 2020, and has not sustained since, with the 2022 midpoint showing no filings at all. That combination — low absolute volume and a stalled trend — suggests meaningful claim space remains open, particularly outside the core device-structure classifications where most existing filings sit.
EP4791148A1, filed by Huawei Technologies, claims a CFET structure where a first transistor sits on one level and a second transistor on a level stacked above it, with the two transistors' channels offset from each other while still maintaining partial overlap. That specific geometric relationship — offset-but-overlapping channels across stacked levels — is the novel element rather than vertical stacking generally, which is already the baseline CFET concept. Anyone designing a stacked-channel CFET architecture should check where their channel alignment falls relative to this claim before finalising a layout.
The classification data points to logic-cell-level topology as the clearest gap: only three of thirteen families touch H03K, the logic-circuit classification, meaning most existing claims stop at the device or contact level rather than extending to specific standard-cell layouts built from CFET stacks. Backside power rail contact schemes and hybrid-bonding alignment tolerance methods also show little dedicated coverage in this corpus. A first claim in these areas would need to tie the structural CFET arrangement to a specific circuit-level or process-tolerance outcome to differentiate from the existing structural filings.
Go past this page: query the whole complementary fet advanced packaging corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.