Complementary FET Gate Dielectric Patents: Leaders & Trends 2026
- Filing has already peaked. 2023 was the high-water mark at 26 families; the following year fell back toward the 2022 level, suggesting the initial claim rush on CFET gate dielectric structures is past its steepest phase.
- The US carries almost the entire docket. 68 of the tracked filings entered through the USPTO against single-digit counts at the EPO, WIPO, UKIPO, KIPO and IPO — this is overwhelmingly a US-prosecuted technology right now.
- Cross-assignee collaboration is essentially absent. Only two co-assignee pairs appear across 85 families, both internal corporate-affiliate filings rather than cross-company joint development.
Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (17) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 85 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
What this landscape covers
Complementary FET (CFET) stacks a PMOS device directly over an NMOS device in the same footprint, and the gate dielectric — the high-k layer, its interfacial layer, and any dipole-engineering treatment used to set threshold voltage separately for the top and bottom channels — is one of the structure’s hardest unsolved integration problems. This landscape tracks 85 patent families published between 2015 and mid-2026 whose claims sit at the intersection of CFET architecture and gate dielectric or interfacial-layer engineering, filtered to H01L21/28, H01L29/51 and H01L29/66, the IPC groups covering gate-stack formation and insulated-gate FET structure.
Because publication typically lags filing by around eighteen months, the most recent one to two years in any trend line will understate actual filing activity — treat the tail of the chart as a floor, not a ceiling.
Filing trend and technical classification
Two views of the same 85-family dataset: how filing volume has moved year over year, and how the classification codes attached to those families split across semiconductor sub-domains.
A single peak, not a ramp
Filings were flat near zero through the mid-2010s, rose to a peak of 26 families in 2023, and had fallen back to roughly the 2022 level (14) by the midpoint of the following filing year — a pattern consistent with an initial claiming wave rather than sustained compounding growth.
Concentrated in core semiconductor-device classes
Every family carries H01L (semiconductor devices), and 39 also carry the newer H10D general semiconductor-device code. Smaller counts spill into memory manufacture (H10B), variable control (G05F), logic circuits (H03K) and nanotechnology (B82Y) — evidence that CFET dielectric claims are being drafted primarily as device-structure patents, with memory and circuit-level framing as a secondary layer rather than the main claim strategy.
Shares are the percentage of the 85 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Complementary FET Gate Dielectric with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about complementary fet gate dielectric and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe documents shaping this space
US12218225B1 — Radical treatment in supercritical fluid for gate dielectric quality improvement to CFET structure
The disclosure covers a method that forms a gate dielectric layer over and wrapping around top-region channels in a stacked CFET structure, then performs a radical treatment on that dielectric layer in a supercritical fluid before forming the metal gate electrode.Filed by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd., granted February 2025.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20190172755A1 | Method for incorporating multiple channel materials in a complimentary field effective transistor (CFET) devi… | 91 |
| 2 | US20210265345A1 | Stacked Nanosheet CFET with Gate All Around Structure | 77 |
| 3 | US20200235098A1 | Vertically-integrated two-dimensional (2D) semiconductor slabs in complementary field effect transistor (CFET… | 69 |
| 4 | US20210265348A1 | Stacked field effect transistor with wrap-around contacts | 51 |
| 5 | US20210202500A1 | CFET SRAM bit cell with three stacked device decks | 49 |
| 6 | US20230307456A1 | Complementary field effect transistor with hybrid nanostructure | 28 |
| 7 | US10685887B2 | Method for incorporating multiple channel materials in a complimentary field effective transistor (CFET) devi… | 27 |
| 8 | US20200286900A1 | Structures and SRAM bit cells integrating complementary field-effect transistors | 26 |
| 9 | US20230178435A1 | Complementary FET (CFET) devices and methods | 21 |
| 10 | US11177258B2 | Stacked nanosheet CFET with gate all around structure | 21 |
Citation counts are drawn from within this searched corpus and skew toward older filings; treat them as a measure of influence on later filers, not of current commercial relevance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers say about the field's maturity
Three signals stand out once the filing trend, jurisdiction mix and citation pattern are read together.
The claiming wave has crested
2023's peak of 26 families was not sustained; 2022's midpoint count of 14 is closer to the trajectory the field is settling into. Combined with the publication lag, this looks like a technology that had its initial land-grab and is now in a more selective filing phase.
Prosecution is overwhelmingly US-centred
With only single-digit counts at the EPO, WIPO, UKIPO and KIPO, competitors evaluating freedom-to-operate outside the US should not assume dense prior art exists there yet — the claim map elsewhere is thin by comparison.
Influence sits with the earliest structural patents
The most-cited records describe foundational CFET architecture — multi-channel integration, gate-all-around stacking, wrap-around contacts — rather than dielectric chemistry specifically. Later filers appear to be building dielectric and interfacial-layer claims on top of an architecture that was already staked out.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to complementary fet gate dielectric, with the prior art for and against each one.
The assignee landscape
Filing is dominated by large integrated device manufacturers and foundries, with foundry equipment suppliers appearing as a secondary group. Recent-year momentum across the leading assignees has flattened to zero, consistent with the broader post-2023 pullback in filing volume.
Foundries anchor the structural claims
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company appears at the top of the ranking and holds the representative recent grant in this dataset, covering a supercritical-fluid radical treatment for gate-dielectric quality — a process-level claim layered onto existing CFET architecture.
IBM and Intel hold early structural ground
Both assignees sit among the top filers with structural CFET claims dating to the field's earlier years; neither shows filing activity in the most recent tracked year, though the publication lag means this understates true recent activity.
Tool makers file alongside, not with, device makers
Applied Materials and Tokyo Electron appear in the ranking, but the only collaboration links in the dataset are internal affiliate pairings, not joint filings between equipment suppliers and device manufacturers — a sign that gate-dielectric process IP is still being claimed independently along the supply chain.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC) | 0 | — |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | 0 | — |
| Qualcomm Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Tokyo Electron Limited | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 0 | — |
| GlobalFoundries Inc. | 0 | — |
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC) | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, licensing strategy, or R&D prioritisation.
Map claims against the under-claimed sub-areas
Dipole-engineering and interfacial-layer composition for independently tuned top/bottom thresholds show thin filing density relative to core structural claims — a first-claim opportunity for teams with process data.
Explore white space in EurekaTrack the non-US jurisdictions before they fill in
With only single-digit filings outside the US, the freedom-to-operate picture in Europe, the UK, Korea and India is still being written — worth monitoring rather than assuming it stays open.
Set up jurisdiction alerts in EurekaWatch for the next filing wave once the lag clears
Because 2025-2026 filings are still publishing, the apparent post-2023 slowdown may partially resolve once the backlog surfaces — recheck the trend in six to twelve months.
Monitor filing trends in EurekaCommon questions about CFET gate dielectric patents
A complementary FET (CFET) stacks a PMOS transistor directly above an NMOS transistor in the same vertical footprint, and the gate dielectric — the high-k layer plus its interfacial layer — has to be formed and tuned separately for both channels within that stack. This is mechanically and chemically harder than a planar or single-tier gate stack because the top and bottom devices need different threshold-voltage tuning, often via dipole engineering, while sharing a fabrication sequence. Patent claims in this niche typically combine a CFET structural element (stacking, gate-all-around wrap, channel material) with a specific dielectric formation or treatment step, which is why the search here layers CFET terminology against gate-dielectric and interfacial-layer language rather than searching either alone.
The ranking in this dataset is led by major foundries and integrated device manufacturers, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company holding the representative recent grant covering a supercritical-fluid dielectric treatment step. IBM, Intel, Qualcomm and equipment suppliers such as Applied Materials and Tokyo Electron also appear among the top filers. None of the leading assignees show filing activity in the most recent tracked year in this corpus, though that is consistent with the roughly eighteen-month publication lag rather than necessarily reflecting an actual stop in filing.
Not by the numbers in this dataset. Filing peaked at 26 families in 2023 and had fallen back toward the 2022 level of 14 by the following year's midpoint, which reads as a flattening or mild decline rather than continued growth. Some of that apparent drop-off is an artefact of publication lag understating the most recent one to two years, so the true picture will only be clear once later filings finish publishing — but even accounting for lag, the trajectory looks like a completed initial claiming wave rather than an accelerating one.
The thinnest claim density relative to the core structural patents sits in dipole-engineering dielectric tuning for independently setting top and bottom channel thresholds, interfacial-layer composition specific to stacked geometries, and post-formation treatments such as supercritical-fluid processing of the high-k layer. Reliability of the gate dielectric under the thermal budget imposed by sequential deck processing is another area with comparatively few dedicated claims. Because the overall corpus is small — 85 families — any of these branches could still be claimed broadly by a well-drafted first filing.
US12218225B1 claims a specific sequence — forming a gate dielectric layer wrapping around top-region channels, then treating it with radicals in a supercritical fluid, then forming the metal gate — assigned to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. It does not broadly block gate dielectric formation or treatment in CFET structures generally; it blocks that particular supercritical-fluid radical-treatment sequence applied to a top-channel wrap-around dielectric. Alternative treatment chemistries, different treatment ordering, or treatments applied to the bottom-channel dielectric instead would need their own freedom-to-operate review against this and the other most-cited structural patents in the corpus.
Research Complementary FET Gate Dielectric in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole complementary fet gate dielectric corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.