Complementary FET High-k Gate Dielectric Patent Landscape 2026 | Patsnap
- Filing peaked in 2023 at 26 families then stalled — signalling that the foundational claim space is largely occupied, not that the technology has matured.
- US filings dominate at 68 of 85 families while EPO and PCT coverage is thin, leaving meaningful geographic white space outside the American corridor.
- Radical and supercritical-fluid gate treatments are now patented routes as seen in the TSMC representative record, marking a shift from classical ALD deposition toward post-formation quality improvement.
Filing growth compares 2021 (12 records) with 2024 (17) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 85 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.
High-k dielectrics in a stacked-transistor world
Complementary FET (CFET) architecture stacks an NMOS and a PMOS transistor vertically in the same footprint, shrinking cell area in ways that conventional lateral FinFET scaling can no longer achieve. Every CFET design depends critically on the gate dielectric stack — the thin high-k film, its interfacial oxide, and any dipole-engineering layers inserted between them — because the same deposition and treatment steps must simultaneously serve both the upper and lower channel without cross-contamination or threshold-voltage mismatch. That constraint makes the dielectric process the most tightly coupled, and most heavily patented, module in the CFET flow. The 85 patent families indexed here span the full stack: bulk high-k composition, interfacial-layer passivation, dipole insertion by metal oxide diffusion, and post-formation treatments — including emerging supercritical-fluid radical processing — aimed at reducing interface-state density without disturbing the already-formed metal gate.
The IPC composition confirms the engineering focus: virtually every family carries an H01L classification, with a meaningful secondary cluster in H10D (general semiconductor device design) and a smaller memory-adjacent group in H10B. The cross-filing into H03K (logic circuits) and G05F (variable power control) shows that a subset of applicants are claiming the device-level performance benefits — threshold voltage stability, leakage control — rather than the process alone. That distinction matters when assessing freedom to operate: a process claim and a device claim covering the same structure impose separate hurdles.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
A field that built quickly and is now consolidating
The annual filing curve for CFET high-k gate dielectric families rose steadily from 2017 onward, reached a single-year peak in 2023, then fell back sharply. The most recent year's tally is always understated — patent applications are not published until roughly 18 months after filing — so the apparent drop in 2025–2026 reflects publication lag rather than a confirmed decline in inventive activity. Even discounting that effect, however, the trajectory from the 2022 midpoint onward is flat at best, suggesting that the core claim space is becoming saturated.
Annual family filings — peak and plateau
Filings reached a single-year high of 26 families in 2023, against a midpoint of 14 in 2022. That modest growth ratio, and the absence of an accelerating second half, is consistent with a field entering a consolidation phase rather than an open-ended expansion. New entrants in this environment face dense prior art on the most obvious claim structures, pushing innovation toward narrower process variants, novel treatment chemistries, and device-architecture combinations not yet in the corpus.
Semiconductor device classifications lead; adjacent codes reveal strategic intent
All 85 families carry H01L (semiconductor devices), the broadest home for transistor-process patents. The 39 families also tagged H10D indicate that nearly half of filers protected the device structure as well as the process — a dual-layer strategy that raises design-around costs considerably. The 7 families in H10B (memory device manufacture) are a practical signal: CFET dielectric processes developed for logic are being extended to memory applications, a cross-domain opportunity that is still lightly explored. The four families each in G05F and H03K confirm that threshold-voltage engineering — the downstream benefit of dipole and interfacial-layer control — is being claimed at the circuit level as well.
Shares are the percentage of the 85 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Complementary FET – High-k Gate Dielectric with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about complementary fet – high-k gate dielectric and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaSupercritical-fluid radical treatment as a quality-improvement pathway
Radical treatment in supercritical fluid for gate dielectric quality improvement to CFET structure
The invention describes a method in which a semiconductor structure with both a bottom channel region and a top channel region is provided; a gate dielectric layer is formed over and wrapping around the top channels; a radical treatment is then performed on that dielectric layer while it is immersed in a supercritical fluid; and finally a metal gate electrode is deposited on the treated dielectric layer. The supercritical-fluid environment enables radical species to penetrate and repair the high-k film without the thermal budget penalties of conventional anneal steps.Abstract language is that of the patent document. Claim scope is determined by the issued claims, not the abstract. Seek qualified IP counsel before drawing freedom-to-operate conclusions.


Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the filing patterns reveal for strategy
Three structural features of this corpus carry direct implications for R&D prioritisation, filing strategy, and competitive monitoring.
The US is the primary battleground — elsewhere is open
With 68 of 85 families filed at the USPTO and only 5 each at the EPO and via PCT, the competitive claim space outside the United States is notably thin. A well-resourced applicant with genuinely novel process chemistry could establish a meaningful European or PCT-anchored portfolio with relatively modest prosecution effort.
Dense prior art at the peak means narrow room for broad claims
A burst of 26 families in a single year compresses the prior-art timeline dramatically. Examiners and competitors alike will have a rich body of art to cite against broad method claims filed now. The practical response is to draft claims that specify process conditions — temperature windows, radical-species identity, supercritical-fluid pressure ranges — rather than functional outcomes.
Process plus device claiming is the dominant strategic model
Nearly half of all families pair a semiconductor-process classification with a device-structure classification, meaning the same assignee has locked up both the method of making and the resulting structure. For a competitor seeking design-around options, this dual strategy significantly narrows the available paths: an alternative process that produces the same device structure may still infringe the device claim.
Logic-derived dielectric processes are migrating into memory
Seven families carry H10B classifications, indicating that applicants are extending CFET high-k dielectric techniques into memory device contexts. This is a relatively small cluster, and it represents an under-claimed cross-domain space where a logic-focused CFET process innovator could establish early priority in memory applications with incremental claim drafting effort.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to complementary fet – high-k gate dielectric, with the prior art for and against each one.
| Assignee | Co-assignee | Shared families |
|---|---|---|
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | International Business Machines (China) Co., Ltd. | 1 |
| Tokyo Electron Limited (TEL) | Tokyo Electron America Holdings, Inc. | 1 |
Only 2 co-assignee pairs appear in the corpus — one linking IBM's US and China entities, the other linking Tokyo Electron's Japanese and US holding structures. These are intra-corporate rather than inter-company pairings, meaning true cross-organisation research collaboration on CFET high-k dielectrics has not yet crystallised into co-filed patents at scale. That absence may reflect the competitive sensitivity of the technology rather than a lack of joint development activity.
A concentrated field with a long tail of single-family entrants
The assignee ranking in this corpus follows a pattern common to leading-edge process technology: a small group of integrated device manufacturers and equipment companies accounts for the majority of families, while a longer tail of universities, fabless designers, and contract research organisations hold one or two families each. The top of the ranking is dominated by names that also lead in advanced-node manufacturing — the same organisations whose process teams are closest to CFET pilot lines. Equipment and materials companies appear alongside device makers, consistent with a technology where the deposition and treatment steps are as IP-sensitive as the device architecture itself.
TSMC anchors the corpus with process-focused families
TSMC holds the largest family count in this landscape, and its representative patent — a supercritical-fluid radical treatment for gate dielectric quality improvement — illustrates the direction of its claims: post-formation process optimisation rather than bulk dielectric composition. This approach suggests that TSMC views the quality of the as-deposited high-k film as a solved problem and is now patenting the remediation steps that push device performance to production targets.
IBM's dual-entity filings reflect a global prosecution strategy
IBM appears both as a standalone assignee and as part of the only two co-assignee pairs in the corpus — pairing its US and China entities. The intra-corporate structure reflects a coordinated global prosecution approach rather than genuine joint invention. IBM's CFET dielectric claims historically span both novel high-k compositions and device-level threshold-voltage control, giving the portfolio breadth across process and device classifications.
Tokyo Electron bridges tool design and process-recipe IP
Tokyo Electron files both under its Japanese parent and its US holding entity — a structure mirrored in the co-assignee data. As a leading ALD and CVD tool supplier, its CFET dielectric families are likely to cover the intersection of tool configuration and process chemistry, making them particularly relevant to any manufacturer sourcing deposition equipment. Claims at the tool-recipe boundary are often the hardest to design around without changing both the equipment and the process.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (TSMC) | 0 | — |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | 0 | — |
| Qualcomm Incorporated | 0 | — |
| Tokyo Electron Limited (TEL) | 0 | — |
| Intel Corporation | 0 | — |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 0 | — |
| GlobalFoundries Inc. | 0 | — |
| imec (Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre) | 0 | — |
Where this technology is heading
The filing plateau after 2023 does not mean innovation has stopped — it means the easiest claim structures are occupied. The next wave of patent activity in CFET high-k gate dielectrics is likely to concentrate in three directions.
Post-formation dielectric quality engineering
The TSMC supercritical-fluid radical treatment patent is likely a leading indicator. As CFET pilot lines move toward volume production, the gap between as-deposited dielectric quality and the spec required for production-level threshold-voltage uniformity will drive a new generation of process patents covering annealing alternatives, plasma treatments, and chemically mediated repair — all operating within a minimal thermal budget.
Explore related families in Patsnap Eureka →Memory-device extensions of logic CFET dielectric processes
The 7 families already tagged H10B are an early signal that logic-derived CFET dielectric processes are being adapted for memory. As 3D memory architectures converge with CFET cell designs, the dielectric requirements — leakage, reliability, scalability — become structurally similar, and applicants with logic-process IP will seek to extend that portfolio into memory with targeted continuation claims.
Find memory-adjacent CFET families →Geographic portfolio expansion beyond the US
With only 5 EPO and 5 PCT families against 68 US filings, the non-US claim landscape is thin. As CFET manufacturing moves toward commercialisation in Europe and East Asia, the value of European and Korean patents in this sub-domain will increase. Applicants who file PCT applications now — before the US-centric corpus grows further — will have the strongest priority positions outside the American corridor.
Analyse jurisdiction gaps in Patsnap Eureka →CFET High-k Gate Dielectric Patents — Practitioner Questions
A complementary FET (CFET) stacks an NMOS transistor directly above a PMOS transistor in the same device footprint, enabling logic cell areas well below what lateral FinFET or nanosheet architectures can reach. The gate dielectric — typically a hafnium-based high-k film grown over a thin silicon-oxide interfacial layer — must wrap around both the upper and lower channel nanosheets simultaneously, which means a single deposition sequence has to satisfy the threshold-voltage, leakage, and reliability requirements of two complementary devices at once. That constraint makes the dielectric process the most tightly controlled module in the CFET integration flow, and it explains why gate-dielectric patent filings have grown proportionally faster than any other CFET process sub-domain.
The corpus of 85 families is concentrated at the top: a small group of integrated device manufacturers and advanced-process equipment companies accounts for the majority of families. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company leads by family count, with a portfolio skewed toward post-formation dielectric quality improvement. IBM files through both its US and China entities and covers the process-to-device spectrum. Tokyo Electron, as a leading ALD and CVD tool supplier, contributes families at the intersection of tool design and process chemistry. A long tail of single-family entrants — including fabless designers and research institutions — rounds out the corpus, but none holds enough families individually to constitute a blocking position on its own.
The densest prior art sits on broadly stated ALD-deposited hafnium-based high-k films and their classical thermal anneal treatments. Sub-areas with notably thin coverage include supercritical-fluid or radical-based repair of the bottom-channel dielectric specifically (as distinct from the top channel), selective interfacial-layer regrowth after gate etch, dipole-engineering approaches targeting dual-threshold CFET cells in a single process step, and memory-device extensions of logic CFET dielectric flows. Geographically, the EPO and PCT filing space is thin — only 5 families each — making non-US jurisdictions an underexplored avenue for building portfolio leverage.
Within the CFET technology space overall, the high-k gate dielectric sub-domain is one of the more active process clusters, reflecting the centrality of the dielectric stack to device performance. The 85 families indexed here peaked in 2023 at 26 annual filings, a level consistent with the broader CFET filing surge that accompanied the industry's move from research demonstrations to pilot-line integration. The subsequent plateau suggests that the most obvious claim structures — composition, deposition method, basic interfacial-layer control — are now occupied, and that new entrants must differentiate on process variants, specific material combinations, or novel treatment steps to obtain broad independent claims.
US12218225B1 describes and claims a method in which a gate dielectric layer — formed over and wrapping around the top-channel nanosheets of a CFET structure — is subjected to a radical treatment while the structure is immersed in a supercritical fluid, followed by metal gate electrode formation. The supercritical-fluid medium allows radical species to penetrate and repair the dielectric without the high thermal budgets that would disturb previously formed metal-gate or epitaxial layers. For competitors, this patent narrows the freedom to use supercritical-fluid environments for post-deposition dielectric treatment in CFET flows; design-around options would likely require either a different treatment medium, a fundamentally different radical-generation mechanism, or a process sequence in which the dielectric is treated before the top-channel structure is fully formed. IP counsel should review the issued claims carefully before drawing conclusions about scope.
Dipole engineering refers to the deliberate insertion of a thin metal-oxide layer — typically lanthanum oxide for NMOS or aluminium oxide for PMOS — between the high-k dielectric and the interfacial silicon oxide. The inserted layer creates an electrostatic dipole at the interface that shifts the effective work function and therefore the threshold voltage of the transistor, enabling threshold-voltage tuning without changing the metal gate material. In a CFET, where the top and bottom transistors require different threshold voltages, selective dipole insertion is an attractive approach because it can in principle be achieved through selective deposition or etch-back steps on a stacked structure. The current corpus contains families touching dipole engineering, but this sub-area is less densely claimed than bulk high-k composition or interfacial-layer thickness control — making it one of the more accessible areas for new filings with genuinely novel process sequences.
Research Complementary FET – High-k Gate Dielectric in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole complementary fet – high-k gate dielectric corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.