Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →Complementary FET (CFET) architecture stacks an n-type and p-type transistor vertically within a single device footprint, rather than placing them side by side as in planar CMOS. The approach is a direct response to cell-height scaling limits: once lateral gate pitch stops shrinking economically, vertical integration becomes the remaining lever for logic density. This dataset tracks filings specifically tied to area scaling, vertical stacking integration, cell height reduction and ultra-scaled integration claim language, layered onto core CFET device classifications.
Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures in any trend line understate real filing activity — the true peak may already have moved past 2023. Family-level counting is used throughout rather than raw document counts, since CFET applicants file heavily across US and PCT routes and a single family can otherwise be counted multiple times.
The two views below separate momentum from subject matter: one shows when applicants filed, the other shows which classification codes their claims actually sit under.
Zero filings in 2017 through a single filing at the 2022 midpoint, then a jump to a peak of 9 in 2023. The curve has not flattened — it is still on the upward leg, which means the competitive set recorded here is incomplete rather than settled.
All 29 records sit under H01L, with the H10D general semiconductor-device subclass appearing in 9 and smaller clusters in H10P, H10W, H03K and H10B. The narrow spread confirms this is a tightly defined device-architecture niche rather than a broad cross-disciplinary field.
Shares are the percentage of the 29 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about complementary fet miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe disclosure relates to a CFET structure comprising at least one CFET element with a first transistor structure and a second transistor structure arranged above it, the upper structure including a source and/or drain structure. The structure further specifies a power rail arranged below the first (lower) transistor and a power routing line arranged above the second (upper) transistor, electrically connected to that source/drain structure.Filed by IMEC VZW, published 2025-06-25 — one of the more recent entries in the dataset, reflecting the field's continued acceleration.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US20190172755A1 | Method for incorporating multiple channel materials in a complimentary field effective transistor (CFET) devi… | 91 |
| 2 | US20210104523A1 | Method of making multiple NANO layer transistors to enhance a multiple stack CFET performance | 41 |
| 3 | US20200381430A1 | Compact 3D stacked-CFET architecture for complex logic cells | 27 |
| 4 | US10685887B2 | Method for incorporating multiple channel materials in a complimentary field effective transistor (CFET) devi… | 27 |
| 5 | US20220122892A1 | Method of 3D logic fabrication to sequentially decrease processing temperature and maintain material thermal … | 26 |
| 6 | US20230377998A1 | Method of forming confined growth s/d contact with selective deposition of inner spacer for cfet | 19 |
| 7 | US20240203990A1 | Stacked CMOS devices with two dielectric materials in a gate cut | 12 |
| 8 | WO2019112952A1 | Method for incorporating multiple channel materials in a complementary field effective transistor (CFET) devi… | 10 |
| 9 | US20240222429A1 | Semiconductor device structure and methods of forming the same | 9 |
| 10 | US11133310B2 | Method of making multiple nano layer transistors to enhance a multiple stack CFET performance | 8 |
Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence on later claim drafting, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three figures matter more than the raw count of 29 families: how recently the growth started, how few joint filings exist, and where the citation weight sits.
The midpoint year (2022) recorded only 1 filing before the count jumped to 9 the following year. A field that moves from near-zero to its peak in a single year has not yet shown its ceiling — expect the true 2024-2026 numbers to revise upward as publications catch up.
With only two joint-assignee relationships on record, and the strongest pair linked at 4 shared filings, CFET integration work is being claimed largely by single entities rather than through joint ventures or foundry-equipment co-development deals.
The most-cited record concerns incorporating multiple channel materials into a CFET device — a foundational fabrication choice that later filings on stacking and thermal-budget sequencing appear to build on.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to complementary fet miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
The named assignee set is short, and momentum in the latest tracked year has already shifted away from the historically active filers toward a new entrant.
Every other tracked assignee — including the equipment and foundry names that built the early citation base — shows zero filings in the latest year. Qualcomm's continued activity, even at low volume, stands out against an otherwise quiet recent period.
The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset links Tokyo Electron's home entity with its US holding company, at 4 shared filings — a process-equipment angle on CFET integration rather than a device-architecture one.
A research consortium presence alongside device makers, foundry-equipment suppliers and a fabless designer suggests this niche is still pre-standardisation — no single business model has taken over the claim space.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Qualcomm Incorporated | 2 | — |
| Tokyo Electron Limited | 0 | — |
| Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC) | 0 | — |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 0 | — |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | 0 | — |
| IBM (China) Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 0 | — |
A 29-family dataset is small enough to review claim-by-claim, but that also means a single new filing can materially change the competitive picture within a year.
With the count still rising from a 2023 peak and 2024-2026 data understated by publication lag, re-run this landscape at intervals rather than treating the current totals as final.
Monitor filing trends in EurekaPower-rail routing, sequential thermal-budget processing and stacked source/drain epitaxy show thinner coverage than core stacking claims — worth a focused prior-art check before drafting.
Run a white-space search in EurekaQualcomm is the only assignee filing in the latest tracked year; whether the equipment and IDM names return or cede ground is the signal worth tracking next.
Set an assignee alert in EurekaA CFET stacks an n-type and p-type transistor vertically within the same footprint, instead of placing them side by side as conventional planar CMOS does. This vertical arrangement is aimed at reducing cell height and standard-cell area once lateral gate-pitch scaling becomes uneconomical. The patents in this landscape focus specifically on the fabrication and integration methods that make that stacking work in practice, including channel-material choice, thermal-budget sequencing during upper-tier processing, and power-delivery routing around the stacked pair.
The tracked dataset covers 29 patent families total, filed by a short list of assignees spanning IDMs, a fabless designer, process-equipment suppliers and a research consortium. Only two co-assignee relationships appear across the whole set, meaning most of these families were filed by a single entity rather than jointly. That is a small, still-forming field rather than a mature one with dozens of established players.
It is accelerating. Filings moved from zero in 2017 to just one at the 2022 midpoint, then jumped to a peak of 9 in 2023. Because patent publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, the apparent dip in the most recent years is very likely a reporting artifact rather than a real slowdown — the underlying filing rate has probably kept climbing.
EP4576188A1, filed by IMEC VZW, claims a CFET structure with a lower transistor, an upper transistor carrying a source/drain structure, a power rail positioned below the lower transistor, and a power routing line above the upper transistor that connects to that source/drain structure. It is specific to that particular power-delivery arrangement around a stacked pair, not to CFET stacking in general, so it constrains that one routing topology rather than the whole architecture. Anyone designing power delivery for a stacked CFET cell should check this claim set before committing to a similar rail-above/rail-below layout.
The most-cited existing records cluster around multiple-channel-material integration and basic 3D stacking architecture, which means those specific claim territories are comparatively crowded. Thinner coverage appears around sequential low-thermal-budget processing for upper-tier transistors, source/drain epitaxy tuned for stacked n-type/p-type pairs, and power-rail routing variants beyond the one IMEC has claimed. These are reasonable areas to search closely before drafting a new application, given how few total families exist to block them.
Go past this page: query the whole complementary fet miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.