https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/complementary-fet-miniaturization-and-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductors & Microelectronics · Patent Landscape
Complementary FET patents: who is claiming vertical stacking and cell-height reduction
  • Filing is still accelerating, not maturing. Output rose from zero in 2017 to a peak of 9 records in 2023, with the 2022 midpoint at just 1 filing — the growth curve is recent and still climbing.
  • The field is small and concentrated. Only 29 patent families exist across the full search window, with just two co-assignee pairs on record, meaning most applicants are filing alone rather than through joint development.
  • US filings dominate the venue mix. 17 of the tracked records were filed at the USPTO against 7 PCT applications, 3 at the EPO and 2 in India — protection strategy outside the US is still thin.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
29
Published Records
-40%
3-Yr Growth (lag-adjusted)
US
Leading Jurisdiction
8
Active Filers Ranked
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Technology Overview

What Complementary FET miniaturization covers, and why it is being claimed now

Complementary FET (CFET) architecture stacks an n-type and p-type transistor vertically within a single device footprint, rather than placing them side by side as in planar CMOS. The approach is a direct response to cell-height scaling limits: once lateral gate pitch stops shrinking economically, vertical integration becomes the remaining lever for logic density. This dataset tracks filings specifically tied to area scaling, vertical stacking integration, cell height reduction and ultra-scaled integration claim language, layered onto core CFET device classifications.

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the 2025-2026 figures in any trend line understate real filing activity — the true peak may already have moved past 2023. Family-level counting is used throughout rather than raw document counts, since CFET applicants file heavily across US and PCT routes and a single family can otherwise be counted multiple times.

Filing activity, 2017-2026 (partial)
  1. 1Tokyo Electron Limited15
  2. 2Qualcomm Incorporated6
  3. 3Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc.4
  4. 4Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC)3
  5. 5Applied Materials, Inc.2
  6. 6International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)2
  7. 7IBM (China) Co., Ltd.1
  8. 8Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Data Snapshot

Filing trend and technology composition

The two views below separate momentum from subject matter: one shows when applicants filed, the other shows which classification codes their claims actually sit under.

A late, steep ramp

Zero filings in 2017 through a single filing at the 2022 midpoint, then a jump to a peak of 9 in 2023. The curve has not flattened — it is still on the upward leg, which means the competitive set recorded here is incomplete rather than settled.

A late, steep ramp0358100201720182019202020212022920232024202522026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Concentrated in core semiconductor device classes

All 29 records sit under H01L, with the H10D general semiconductor-device subclass appearing in 9 and smaller clusters in H10P, H10W, H03K and H10B. The narrow spread confirms this is a tightly defined device-architecture niche rather than a broad cross-disciplinary field.

Concentrated in core semiconductor device classesH01L · Semiconductor devices29100.0%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)931.0%H10P517.2%H10W310.3%H03K · Pulse technique & logic circui…26.9%H10B · Memory device manufacture13.4%

Shares are the percentage of the 29 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about complementary fet miniaturization and integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The documents setting the citation baseline

Representative Filing
EP4576188A12025-06-25

EP4576188A1 — CFET structure and method of fabrication (IMEC VZW)

IMEC VZW

The disclosure relates to a CFET structure comprising at least one CFET element with a first transistor structure and a second transistor structure arranged above it, the upper structure including a source and/or drain structure. The structure further specifies a power rail arranged below the first (lower) transistor and a power routing line arranged above the second (upper) transistor, electrically connected to that source/drain structure.Filed by IMEC VZW, published 2025-06-25 — one of the more recent entries in the dataset, reflecting the field's continued acceleration.

EP4576188A1 — patent drawing 1EP4576188A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Most-cited records in this landscape
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20190172755A1Method for incorporating multiple channel materials in a complimentary field effective transistor (CFET) devi…91
2US20210104523A1Method of making multiple NANO layer transistors to enhance a multiple stack CFET performance41
3US20200381430A1Compact 3D stacked-CFET architecture for complex logic cells27
4US10685887B2Method for incorporating multiple channel materials in a complimentary field effective transistor (CFET) devi…27
5US20220122892A1Method of 3D logic fabrication to sequentially decrease processing temperature and maintain material thermal …26
6US20230377998A1Method of forming confined growth s/d contact with selective deposition of inner spacer for cfet19
7US20240203990A1Stacked CMOS devices with two dielectric materials in a gate cut12
8WO2019112952A1Method for incorporating multiple channel materials in a complementary field effective transistor (CFET) devi…10
9US20240222429A1Semiconductor device structure and methods of forming the same9
10US11133310B2Method of making multiple nano layer transistors to enhance a multiple stack CFET performance8

Citation counts inside a searched corpus favour older filings that have had more time to accumulate references — read them as a signal of influence on later claim drafting, not as a ranking of current commercial importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the filing pattern tells a competitive-intelligence read

Three figures matter more than the raw count of 29 families: how recently the growth started, how few joint filings exist, and where the citation weight sits.

Momentum
0 → 9
filings, 2017 to 2023 peak

Growth is recent and unfinished

The midpoint year (2022) recorded only 1 filing before the count jumped to 9 the following year. A field that moves from near-zero to its peak in a single year has not yet shown its ceiling — expect the true 2024-2026 numbers to revise upward as publications catch up.

Read against the 18-month publication lag.
Collaboration
2
co-assignee pairs across 29 families

Most applicants are filing solo

With only two joint-assignee relationships on record, and the strongest pair linked at 4 shared filings, CFET integration work is being claimed largely by single entities rather than through joint ventures or foundry-equipment co-development deals.

A thin collaboration graph in a fast-growing niche.
Citation weight
91 citations
on the top-cited record

Early channel-material claims anchor the field

The most-cited record concerns incorporating multiple channel materials into a CFET device — a foundational fabrication choice that later filings on stacking and thermal-budget sequencing appear to build on.

Older filings, more time to accumulate citations.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to complementary fet miniaturization and integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the claim space is still open

The named assignee set is short, and momentum in the latest tracked year has already shifted away from the historically active filers toward a new entrant.

Momentum leader
2 filings
in the latest tracked year

Qualcomm is the only assignee still filing

Every other tracked assignee — including the equipment and foundry names that built the early citation base — shows zero filings in the latest year. Qualcomm's continued activity, even at low volume, stands out against an otherwise quiet recent period.

Watch for whether this is a leading indicator or a data-lag artifact.
Equipment-side pairing
4 shared filings
strongest co-assignee pair

Tokyo Electron entities file jointly

The strongest co-assignee relationship in the dataset links Tokyo Electron's home entity with its US holding company, at 4 shared filings — a process-equipment angle on CFET integration rather than a device-architecture one.

Second pair: IBM's US and China entities, at 1 shared filing.
Research consortium
IPC spread: 6 subclasses
H01L, H10D, H10P, H10W, H03K, H10B

IMEC and academic-adjacent filers sit alongside IDMs

A research consortium presence alongside device makers, foundry-equipment suppliers and a fabless designer suggests this niche is still pre-standardisation — no single business model has taken over the claim space.

Representative filing (EP4576188A1) comes from this consortium tier.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth checking before filing
These sub-areas show thin coverage relative to the core stacking and channel-material claims already crowded by the most-cited records.
power-rail routing below stacked transistorssequential low-thermal-budget top-tier processingsource/drain epitaxy for stacked N-P pairsmulti-nanosheet stack performance tuning
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Incorporated2
Tokyo Electron Limited0
Tokyo Electron U.S. Holdings, Inc.0
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC)0
Applied Materials, Inc.0
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)0
IBM (China) Co., Ltd.0
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Turning this landscape into a filing or freedom-to-operate decision

A 29-family dataset is small enough to review claim-by-claim, but that also means a single new filing can materially change the competitive picture within a year.

Track the acceleration, not the total

With the count still rising from a 2023 peak and 2024-2026 data understated by publication lag, re-run this landscape at intervals rather than treating the current totals as final.

Monitor filing trends in Eureka

Map claims against the white-space chips

Power-rail routing, sequential thermal-budget processing and stacked source/drain epitaxy show thinner coverage than core stacking claims — worth a focused prior-art check before drafting.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Watch the momentum shift

Qualcomm is the only assignee filing in the latest tracked year; whether the equipment and IDM names return or cede ground is the signal worth tracking next.

Set an assignee alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on CFET miniaturization patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Complementary FET Miniaturization and Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole complementary fet miniaturization and integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.