CFET Stacked Device Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
- Filing only recently took off. activity was flat through 2017-2021 and peaked in 2023 at 15 records, so the field's claim map is still being drawn.
- One leader, then a steep drop. the top-ranked assignee holds 12 records against 2 at fifth place, with most of the ranked group filing only a handful each.
- Filing has slowed at the top since the 2023 peak. the leading assignee shows 0 filings in the latest year (-100% YoY), while a newer entrant logged the only filing recorded so far this year.
What this landscape covers
Complementary FET (CFET) stacking places an NFET and a PFET on top of one another within a single footprint, using either monolithic or sequential integration to get there. The patent evidence in scope spans dielectric isolation in the gate cut, source/drain contact schemes, self-heating mitigation, and epitaxy alignment between the two stacked device tiers — the process details that decide whether a CFET architecture is actually manufacturable rather than just drawn.
The 33 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year's count understates real filing activity and should not be read as a slowdown on its own.
Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
Filing trend and technology composition
Two views of the same 33-record set: when the filings landed, and which IPC subclasses they were classed under.
Filing trend, 2017-2026
Filings were absent in 2017, rose through the early 2020s and peaked in 2023 at 15 records — the single busiest year in the dataset. The partial 2026 count (1 record so far) reflects the publication lag rather than a real drop-off.
IPC subclass composition
H01L (general semiconductor devices) covers 63.6% of the 33 records and H10D (semiconductor devices, general) covers 45.5%, confirming that most filings are core device-structure claims rather than application-specific ones. Smaller shares in H10B, G06F, H01J, A61F, A61M and B82Y mark where CFET structures are being claimed alongside memory, computing, electron-tube and even biomedical or nanotech contexts — each at 3.0%-9.1% of records. Because a record can carry more than one class, these shares add up to over 100% of the 33-record total.
Shares are the percentage of the 33 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
Go deeper on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration with Eureka
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about complementary fet stacked device integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaMost-cited records in this landscape
Stacked CMOS devices with two dielectric materials in a gate cut (US20240203990A1)
A complementary field effect transistor (CFET) device is formed on a semiconductor substrate, with a first transistor under a second transistor. A filled gate cut sits directly adjacent to the gate sidewall, using two different dielectric materials: one adjacent to the first transistor, one adjacent to the second. The materials are chosen so that each dielectric applies a distinct stress to its neighbouring channel, tuning the electrical performance of the NFET and PFET independently within the same stack.Filed by International Business Machines Corporation, published 2024-06-20.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US11177258B2 | Stacked nanosheet CFET with gate all around structure | 21 |
| 2 | US20240203990A1 | Stacked CMOS devices with two dielectric materials in a gate cut | 12 |
| 3 | US20240222429A1 | Semiconductor device structure and methods of forming the same | 9 |
| 4 | US20250006739A1 | Complementary field-effect transistor devices and methods of forming the same | 2 |
| 5 | US20250194242A1 | Lateral passive diodes co-integrated with nanosheet technology | 1 |
| 6 | US20250107176A1 | Middle Dielectric Isolation in Complementary Field-Effect Transistor Devices | 1 |
Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence, not of current importance.
Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (6 of 6 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
Put your own technology through the same analysis
Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →MCP server & REST API
When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →What the numbers mean for a filing decision
Three read-throughs from the trend, the class mix and the citation table.
The claim map is barely five years old
With 0 records as far back as 2017 and a peak of 15 in 2023, most of the substantive claim language in this field was filed within a narrow window. That leaves less accumulated prior art to work around than in a mature device category, but it also means the core structural claims (gate cut dielectrics, stacked source/drain schemes) are recent and still enforceable for years to come.
A steep drop after the leader, not a flat field
The ranked assignee list has only 8 companies, headed by a filer with 12 records against 2 at fifth place. That gap suggests one organisation built out a broad claim position early while most others are testing narrower, single-digit filing footprints rather than committing to a full architecture.
Core device structure dominates, application classes are thin
The two largest IPC subclasses, H01L and H10D, both cover general semiconductor device structure, meaning the bulk of the field is still contesting the basic stacking, isolation and contact architecture rather than end applications. Classes tied to memory, computing or biomedical use each sit at single-digit percentages of the 33 records, marking those as add-on rather than core claim territory today.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to complementary fet stacked device integration, with the prior art for and against each one.
Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled
The ranked assignee list covers 8 companies total, counted in records — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, this is the entire ranking the dataset returns.
One filer built the broadest position, then paused
The top-ranked assignee holds 12 of the 33 records in scope but shows 0 filings in the latest year, a -100% year-on-year change. That combination — a strong historical position with no recent activity — is consistent with a company that staked out foundational claims early and has since shifted its filing elsewhere, or is simply between filing cycles given publication lag.
A newer name is the only one filing right now
Among the six assignees with recent-year momentum data, only one shows a filing in the latest year on record, while the rest — including the leader — show zero. That single data point is thin, but it is the only sign of live filing activity in the most current period covered.
Co-filing is rare and confined to affiliates
The dataset's single identifiable co-assignee pairing links two entities under the same corporate parent, rather than an arm's-length collaboration between unrelated companies. Cross-company joint filing does not show up as a pattern here, suggesting most CFET integration work is being developed and claimed in-house.
| Assignee | Recent year | YoY |
|---|---|---|
| Qualcomm Incorporated | 1 | — |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) | 0 | -100% |
| Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC) | 0 | — |
| International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) | 0 | — |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 0 | — |
| Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
| VELLORE INSITUTE OF TECH | 0 | -100% |
| International Business Machines (China) Co., Ltd. | 0 | — |
Where to take this analysis
The published record only shows filings up to the 18-month publication lag; recent strategic moves are still working their way into the data.
Track the gate-cut dielectric claim cluster
The most-cited record in this set centres on dual-dielectric gate cuts, a specific and still-narrow claim area. Watching continuations and new filings against this exact mechanism will show whether it hardens into a blocking position or gets designed around.
Explore this cluster in EurekaModel the white-space chips against your own roadmap
Self-heating mitigation, epitaxy alignment and lateral passive co-integration all show thin IPC coverage relative to the core device classes. Running your own claim drafts against these branches in Eureka can surface exactly how much room remains before filing.
Run a white-space check in EurekaFrequently asked questions
A CFET stacks an NFET and a PFET transistor vertically within a single device footprint, rather than placing them side by side as in conventional CMOS. This is done through either monolithic integration, where both tiers are built in one continuous process flow, or sequential integration, where the bottom tier is completed before the top tier is added. The patent evidence in this landscape centres on the process details that make this stacking manufacturable: dielectric isolation in the gate cut, source/drain contact schemes, self-heating mitigation and epitaxy alignment between the two tiers.
The ranking covers 8 companies in total, counted in patent records, with the leading assignee holding 12 records and the fifth-placed company holding 2. This is a full ranking rather than a top-50 or top-100 cut, and most of the eight companies file only a handful of records each, so the field has one clear leader followed by a long tail of lighter filers. Recent-year data shows the historical leader with zero filings in the latest year, while a different company logged the field's only filing so far in that period.
Filing activity was essentially flat through 2017-2021 before rising, and the busiest year recorded so far is 2023, with 15 records. Counts for the most recent year are necessarily partial because patent publication typically lags the actual filing date by around 18 months, so the true 2025-2026 filing volume is understated in any dataset pulled today. Readers should treat any apparent recent decline with that lag in mind rather than as evidence of cooling interest.
US20240203990A1 describes a CFET device with a first transistor stacked under a second transistor, where the gate cut adjacent to the stack uses two different dielectric materials chosen to apply distinct stress to each transistor's channel. This lets the NFET and PFET in the same stack have their electrical performance tuned independently through material choice alone, rather than through separate process steps for each device. Anyone designing a gate-cut isolation scheme for a stacked NFET/PFET pair should check this claim structure closely, since it covers a specific and commercially relevant mechanism for tuning stacked-device performance.
The IPC composition shows heavy concentration in general semiconductor device classes (H01L at 63.6% and H10D at 45.5% of the 33 records in scope), while adjacent classes such as memory device manufacture, digital data processing, electron tubes, and implant or body-fluid devices each sit at only 3.0%-9.1% of records. That gap suggests core stacking, isolation and contact architecture is well claimed, while integration of CFET structures into memory arrays, biomedical devices or passive-diode co-integration remains comparatively open. A first claim in one of these thinner branches would likely need to tie the CFET stack's specific geometry to the adjacent application rather than restate the base architecture.
Research Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration in depth with Eureka
Go past this page: query the whole complementary fet stacked device integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.