Book a demo

CFET Stacked Device Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026

CFET Stacked Device Patents: Who Leads, Where the Gaps Are 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/complementary-fet-stacked-device-integration-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Semiconductors · Patent Landscape
Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration Patents
  • Filing only recently took off. activity was flat through 2017-2021 and peaked in 2023 at 15 records, so the field's claim map is still being drawn.
  • One leader, then a steep drop. the top-ranked assignee holds 12 records against 2 at fifth place, with most of the ranked group filing only a handful each.
  • Filing has slowed at the top since the 2023 peak. the leading assignee shows 0 filings in the latest year (-100% YoY), while a newer entrant logged the only filing recorded so far this year.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
33
Published Records
US
Leading Jurisdiction
8
Active Filers Ranked
2023
Peak Filing Year

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Complementary FET (CFET) stacking places an NFET and a PFET on top of one another within a single footprint, using either monolithic or sequential integration to get there. The patent evidence in scope spans dielectric isolation in the gate cut, source/drain contact schemes, self-heating mitigation, and epitaxy alignment between the two stacked device tiers — the process details that decide whether a CFET architecture is actually manufacturable rather than just drawn.

The 33 records in scope run from 2015 through the 2026-07-31 cut-off. Publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the most recent year's count understates real filing activity and should not be read as a slowdown on its own.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2015-2026
  1. 1Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)12
  2. 2Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC)6
  3. 3International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)6
  4. 4Qualcomm Incorporated3
  5. 5Applied Materials, Inc.2
  6. 6Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.2
  7. 7VELLORE INSITUTE OF TECH2
  8. 8International Business Machines (China) Co., Ltd.1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 33-record set: when the filings landed, and which IPC subclasses they were classed under.

Filing trend, 2017-2026

Filings were absent in 2017, rose through the early 2020s and peaked in 2023 at 15 records — the single busiest year in the dataset. The partial 2026 count (1 record so far) reflects the publication lag rather than a real drop-off.

Filing trend, 2017-2026048111502017201820192020202120221520232024202512026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H01L (general semiconductor devices) covers 63.6% of the 33 records and H10D (semiconductor devices, general) covers 45.5%, confirming that most filings are core device-structure claims rather than application-specific ones. Smaller shares in H10B, G06F, H01J, A61F, A61M and B82Y mark where CFET structures are being claimed alongside memory, computing, electron-tube and even biomedical or nanotech contexts — each at 3.0%-9.1% of records. Because a record can carry more than one class, these shares add up to over 100% of the 33-record total.

IPC subclass compositionH01L · Semiconductor devices2163.6%H10D · Semiconductor devices (general)1545.5%H10B · Memory device manufacture39.1%G06F · Electric digital data processi…26.1%H01J · Electron & discharge tubes26.1%A61F · Implants & prostheses13.0%A61M · Devices for body fluids13.0%B82Y · Nanotechnology applications13.0%Other412.1%

Shares are the percentage of the 33 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about complementary fet stacked device integration and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited records in this landscape

Representative filing
US20240203990A12024-06-20

Stacked CMOS devices with two dielectric materials in a gate cut (US20240203990A1)

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION

A complementary field effect transistor (CFET) device is formed on a semiconductor substrate, with a first transistor under a second transistor. A filled gate cut sits directly adjacent to the gate sidewall, using two different dielectric materials: one adjacent to the first transistor, one adjacent to the second. The materials are chosen so that each dielectric applies a distinct stress to its neighbouring channel, tuning the electrical performance of the NFET and PFET independently within the same stack.Filed by International Business Machines Corporation, published 2024-06-20.

US20240203990A1 — patent drawing 1US20240203990A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-cited records in scope
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US11177258B2Stacked nanosheet CFET with gate all around structure21
2US20240203990A1Stacked CMOS devices with two dielectric materials in a gate cut12
3US20240222429A1Semiconductor device structure and methods of forming the same9
4US20250006739A1Complementary field-effect transistor devices and methods of forming the same2
5US20250194242A1Lateral passive diodes co-integrated with nanosheet technology1
6US20250107176A1Middle Dielectric Isolation in Complementary Field-Effect Transistor Devices1

Citation counts favour older records simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations inside the searched corpus; treat them as a signal of influence, not of current importance.

Publication numbers are shown where the record carries one (6 of 6 rows); clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers mean for a filing decision

Three read-throughs from the trend, the class mix and the citation table.

Timing
Peak year: 2023 (15 records)
busiest year in scope

The claim map is barely five years old

With 0 records as far back as 2017 and a peak of 15 in 2023, most of the substantive claim language in this field was filed within a narrow window. That leaves less accumulated prior art to work around than in a mature device category, but it also means the core structural claims (gate cut dielectrics, stacked source/drain schemes) are recent and still enforceable for years to come.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Concentration
Leader: 12 records; 5th place: 2
records, ranked assignees

A steep drop after the leader, not a flat field

The ranked assignee list has only 8 companies, headed by a filer with 12 records against 2 at fifth place. That gap suggests one organisation built out a broad claim position early while most others are testing narrower, single-digit filing footprints rather than committing to a full architecture.

Assignee ranking, 8 companies
Technology mix
H01L 63.6% / H10D 45.5% of 33 records
share of records in scope

Core device structure dominates, application classes are thin

The two largest IPC subclasses, H01L and H10D, both cover general semiconductor device structure, meaning the bulk of the field is still contesting the basic stacking, isolation and contact architecture rather than end applications. Classes tied to memory, computing or biomedical use each sit at single-digit percentages of the 33 records, marking those as add-on rather than core claim territory today.

IPC composition, 33 records
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to complementary fet stacked device integration, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the activity has cooled

The ranked assignee list covers 8 companies total, counted in records — not a top-50 or top-100 cut, this is the entire ranking the dataset returns.

Leader
12 records
leading assignee

One filer built the broadest position, then paused

The top-ranked assignee holds 12 of the 33 records in scope but shows 0 filings in the latest year, a -100% year-on-year change. That combination — a strong historical position with no recent activity — is consistent with a company that staked out foundational claims early and has since shifted its filing elsewhere, or is simply between filing cycles given publication lag.

Recent-year momentum, leading assignee
New entrant
1 filing, latest year
only active filer this year

A newer name is the only one filing right now

Among the six assignees with recent-year momentum data, only one shows a filing in the latest year on record, while the rest — including the leader — show zero. That single data point is thin, but it is the only sign of live filing activity in the most current period covered.

Recent-year momentum by assignee
Collaboration
1 co-assignee pair
strongest pairing in the dataset

Co-filing is rare and confined to affiliates

The dataset's single identifiable co-assignee pairing links two entities under the same corporate parent, rather than an arm's-length collaboration between unrelated companies. Cross-company joint filing does not show up as a pattern here, suggesting most CFET integration work is being developed and claimed in-house.

Co-assignee pairs, strongest link
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas that show up thinly in the IPC mix relative to the core device-structure classes
Lateral passive diode co-integration with nanosheet stacksCFET structures for memory-array integration (H10B overlap)Self-heating mitigation across stacked NFET/PFET tiersEpitaxy alignment schemes between sequential device layersBiomedical and implant-adjacent nanosheet device claims
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum by assignee
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Qualcomm Incorporated1
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC)0-100%
Interuniversity Microelectronics Centre (IMEC)0
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM)0
Applied Materials, Inc.0
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.0
VELLORE INSITUTE OF TECH0-100%
International Business Machines (China) Co., Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The published record only shows filings up to the 18-month publication lag; recent strategic moves are still working their way into the data.

Track the gate-cut dielectric claim cluster

The most-cited record in this set centres on dual-dielectric gate cuts, a specific and still-narrow claim area. Watching continuations and new filings against this exact mechanism will show whether it hardens into a blocking position or gets designed around.

Explore this cluster in Eureka

Model the white-space chips against your own roadmap

Self-heating mitigation, epitaxy alignment and lateral passive co-integration all show thin IPC coverage relative to the core device classes. Running your own claim drafts against these branches in Eureka can surface exactly how much room remains before filing.

Run a white-space check in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Complementary FET Stacked Device Integration in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole complementary fet stacked device integration corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.