Book a demo

Compostable Shelf-Life vs Compostability Patent Snapshot

Compostable Shelf-Life vs Compostability Patent Snapshot
Evidence Snapshot
Compostable Shelf-Life vs Compostability Patent Snapshot in 2026

This is a nascent, lightly contested field — just 30 patent families in scope — with Procter & Gamble leading a fragmented group of academic institutions and small innovators concentrated in India. Activity accelerated sharply from 2022 onward, and polymer-composition chemistry dominates the technical mix, leaving adjacent branches in additives, laminates, and food-packaging applications relatively sparse.

30
Patent families in scope
20%
Top visible applicants share
3-yr filing growth (lag-adj.)
India
Leading jurisdiction
↗ Tap any metric to explore the underlying patents and uncover deeper insights in Patsnap Eureka
Published byPatsnap Insights Team··6 min readVerified by Patsnap Eureka data
Overview

A nascent field led by Procter & Gamble, with activity dominated by Indian filers

Procter & Gamble is the single largest filer, holding 5 patent records, followed by a cluster of applicants — KG Ecoplast, Velammal Engineering College, DOST–Philippine Science High School System, and Global Patented Tech — each with 2 patent records.

The top five filers account for 20% of the combined total across the ranked applicants visible in this query, indicating low concentration overall. The field is populated mainly by academic institutions and small commercial entities rather than large incumbent material or packaging companies.

Leading applicants
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
1PROCTER & GAMBLE CO5
2KG Ecoplast Pte Ltd2
3Velammal Engineering College2
4DOST – Philippine Science High School System2
5Global Patented Tech2
6E Baby Shalini1
7Raja Rajeshwaran Thangavel Saraswathy1
8R Swathika1
9Sreyass Kallemuchikkal Sukumaran1
10Dr. Rakesh Rahul Jadhav1
#ApplicantPatent recordsShare
11R Lavanya Bai1
12Antony Berlin Antony Peter1
13Graphic Era Deemed to be University1
14Dr. Sonal Prasad1
15Microtek Holdings Inc.1
16Aarthi Chinnaswamy Ravi1
17Dr. Sumathy Raj1
18Dr. Suganthi Ramasamy1
19Shalini Avinashi Jothi Thirumalaisamy1
20Sankar T1
↗ Hover a row · click a company to ask Eureka

Procter & Gamble’s lead, focused on polymer compositions, suggests the tension between preserving product shelf life and ensuring end-of-life compostability is being addressed primarily through formulation chemistry. The absence of other major consumer-goods or packaging multinationals from the ranking is notable and points to significant open territory.

Filing activity in the most recent 18–24 months is subject to publication lag and likely understates true activity; conclusions about recent momentum should be treated as provisional. Longer-window growth, applicant concentration, and technology-route coverage are therefore more reliable signals than the latest-year bar alone.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Chart shows the top applicants ranked by patent records; the corpus total is measured in patent families. These figures use different units and should not be compared directly. This same dataset is now available on Patsnap Open Platform via MCP.Connect via MCP →
Trends & Structure

Rapid acceleration since 2022, anchored in polymer-composition and packaging classes

The filing trend and technology composition together describe an early-stage field that activated in 2022 and built quickly, with its technical core sitting in polymer formulation and container design.

Annual filing trend

No filings appear before 2022; activity jumped to 2 records in that year, rose to 3 in 2023, and reached 9 in both 2024 and 2025, with 7 recorded so far in 2026. The 2025 and 2026 figures are subject to publication lag and almost certainly undercount actual activity — the apparent plateau should not be read as a real slowdown.

Annual filing trendAnnual values from 2017 to 2026, peaking at 9 in 2024.02017020180201902020020212202232023920249202572026↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka

Technology composition

Polymer compositions (C08L) is the visible IPC class, followed by containers and packaging (B65D) and polymer processing (C08J). Use of additives in polymers (C08K), layered products (B32B), and food and beverage applications (A23L) each register materially lower counts, marking them as the most under-served adjacent branches in the current corpus.

Technology compositionC08L · Polymer compositions leads with 32; B65D · Containers & packaging 25.C08L · Polymer compositi…32B65D · Containers & pack…25C08J · Polymer processin…24C08K · Use of additives …8B32B · Layered products …5A23L · Foods & non-alcoh…4B29C · Shaping of plastics4A61K · Medicinal prepara…3↗ Hover for values · click a bar to ask Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Technology-branch counts are measured in patent records; a single patent family can carry several IPC classes, so class totals can exceed the family total in scope.Explore deeper in Eureka →
Key Patents

Highly cited patent families surfaced by the query

Citation-heavy patent families returned by the query. Use this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents.

Featured patent
WO2026150303A1Published 2026-07-16

Biodegradable and compostable packaging material a…

PRADHAN, Rehan Ali

A biodegradable packaging material and method thereof is provided. The biodegradable packaging materials includes molded items, flexible sheets, and films, derived from agricultural and industrial residues such as used cooking oil, tamarind kernel seed waste, and bamboo dust. The agricultural and industrial residues are formulated using natural binders like… (excerpt from the patent abstract)

Biodegradable and compostable packaging material a… — patent drawingBiodegradable and compostable packaging material a… — patent drawing
Representative drawings from the patent document.
Open this patent in Eureka →
Highly cited patent families surfaced by this query
#PatentCitations
1Plastic products comprising biodegradable polyeste…42
2Plastic products comprising biodegradable polyeste…17
3Biodegradable packaging of starch and fiber made b…4
4Biodegradable container/bag and methods of prepari…1
5KUNSTSTOFFGEGENSTÄNDE AUS BIOABBAUBAREM POLYESTER …1

Ranked by total forward citations. Citation counts favour older and broadly cited patent families, and broad or adjacent patents may appear when they match the search scope. Treat this section as citation context, not as a curated list of the most topic-specific patents. Some patent titles may be shown in their original, non-English language where an accurate translation could not be guaranteed.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation-ranked patent families surfaced by this query.Open in Eureka →
Visible assignees

Assignee snapshot from the current evidence set

The applicants below are visible in this query result. Because the evidence set is relatively small, read this section as a directional snapshot rather than a full competitive ranking.

Leader · Procter & Gamble

Procter & Gamble

Procter & Gamble holds 5 patent records — the largest share among all applicants — concentrated in polymer compositions (C08L 101 and C08L 67). This formulation-level focus reflects an effort to engineer compostability directly into material chemistry rather than through structural packaging design. No momentum data is available in the evidence base, so trajectory cannot be characterized.

5 patent records
Challenger · KG Ecoplast

KG Ecoplast

KG Ecoplast holds 2 patent records and is a new entrant according to filing momentum data. Its technical emphasis spans containers and packaging (B65D 65) and polymer compositions (C08L 101 and C08L 23), positioning it at the intersection of material formulation and packaging format — a combination that could support broader commercial applications than formulation alone.

2 patent records
🔍
More assignee evidence is available in Eureka
Use Eureka to validate whether these visible assignees remain central after refining the query scope and adding related patent classes.
Velammal Engineering CollegeDOST – Philippine Science High School System+ more
Unlock full assignee analysis →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee evidence is drawn from the current PatSnap Eureka query. In small evidence sets, applicant counts should be treated as directional signals, not a complete competitive ranking.Explore players →
Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

Still have questions? Patsnap Eureka answers them from patent and research data.Ask Eureka →

Built on Patsnap Open Platform

This report’s underlying patent dataset — filings, assignees, technology clusters — is open for developers via MCP and REST API. Free to start, 10,000 credits, no credit card required.

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Explore in Eureka ↗
Powered by Patsnap Eureka

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.