Book a demo

Compressor Stall and Surge Control Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026

Compressor Stall and Surge Control Patents: Top Companies & Trends 2026
https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/compressor-stall-and-surge-control-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Fan & Compressor Aerodynamics
Compressor Stall and Surge Control Patents: Who Leads and Where Filing Is Headed
  • 40.1% concentration. The five leading assignees account for 1,340 of the 3,341 records in scope — filing is concentrated at the top, with a long tail of single-digit filers behind them.
  • Filing has cooled from its 2017 peak. Annual filings ran from 209 in 2017 down to 73 by 2024, a 42% drop across 2021-2024, though 2025-2026 figures are still filling in as publication catches up with filing.
  • Gas-turbine and pump classifications dominate. F02C and F04D each cover roughly two-fifths of all records, while control-systems classes like G05B and F02D sit under 5% — a gap between mechanical hardware claims and control-software claims.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
3,341
Published Records
40%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-42%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (125 records) with 2024 (73) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 3,341 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

Compressor stall and surge control spans the mechanisms that keep axial and centrifugal compressors operating away from their instability boundary: variable stator vanes, inlet guide vanes, bleed valve scheduling, casing treatments, tip injection and the stall-inception sensing that triggers them. The search set combines these mechanism terms with the aerodynamic phenomena they manage, so the corpus captures both hardware claims — vane geometries, bleed-valve arrangements, casing profiles — and control-logic claims that schedule those mechanisms against a stall margin.

The dataset covers 3,341 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026, drawn primarily from jet-engine and industrial gas-turbine assignees, with receiving offices led by the United States, the European Patent Office and the United Kingdom.

Filing activity and technology mix, 2015-2026
  1. 1ROLLS ROYCE PLC591
  2. 2GENERAL ELECTRIC CO306
  3. 3PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP165
  4. 4FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC152
  5. 5GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH LLC126
  6. 6UNITED TECH CORP123
  7. 7HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC80
  8. 8WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP77
  9. 9SAFRAN SA64
  10. 10ROLLS ROYCE CORP59
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Compressor Stall and Surge Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
The Numbers

Filing trend and technology composition

Two views of the same 3,341-record corpus: how filing activity has moved year over year, and which IPC subclasses carry the claim density.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a multi-year pullback

Annual filings peaked at 209 in 2017. By 2021 the annual count had settled to 125, and by 2024 — the most recent year with a complete publication window — it had fallen to 73, a 42% decline across that three-year span. 2025 and 2026 figures are still incomplete because publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so those years should not yet be read as a continued decline.

Filing trend: a 2017 peak, then a multi-year pullback06312518825020920172018201920202021202220232024202542026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Technology composition: gas-turbine and pump hardware lead

F02C (gas-turbine plants) and F04D (non-positive-displacement pumps) each touch roughly two-fifths of the 3,341 records, and F01D (turbines and non-positive engines) covers close to a third. Control and regulating classifications — G05B and F02D — sit under 5% each, and aircraft-equipment class B64D sits at 5.0%. Because a single record can carry several IPC classes, these shares do not sum to 100% and should be read against the full record count, not against each other.

Technology composition: gas-turbine and pump hardware leadF02C · Gas-turbine plants1,51145.2%F04D · Non-positive-displacement pumps1,33239.9%F01D · Turbines & non-positive engines97629.2%F02B · Internal-combustion engines2216.6%B64D · Aircraft equipment1675.0%G05B · Control & regulating systems1494.5%F02K · Jet & reaction propulsion1324.0%F02D · Engine control1253.7%Other1,34340.2%

Shares are the percentage of the 3,341 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Compressor Stall and Surge Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Compressor Stall and Surge Control with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about compressor stall and surge control and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

Most-cited records and a representative filing

Representative Filing
US20080279676A12008-11-13

US20080279676A1 — Turbine Anti-Rotating Stall Schedule

GE INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNOLOGY LLC

A method of starting up a turbine with a compressor having an inlet guide vane, a number of bleed valves, and a number of blades so as to limit the duration in a rotating stall window. The method includes starting rotation of the blades, increasing rotational speed, closing one or more bleed valves to shift the rotating stall window to a higher rotational speed, partially opening the inlet guide vane to a position outside that window, and opening the bleed valves while partially closing the inlet guide vane so the blades pass through the rotating stall window.Filed by GE Infrastructure Technology, this record ties bleed-valve and inlet-guide-vane scheduling together as a single start-up sequence rather than treating each mechanism independently.

US20080279676A1 — patent drawing 1US20080279676A1 — patent drawing 2
View full filing
Highest-citation records in the corpus
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20150185716A1Methods and systems for enhancing control of power plant generating units492
2US5915917ACompressor stall and surge control using airflow asymmetry measurement442
3US5809772ATurbofan engine with a core driven supercharged bypass duct273
4US20160281607A1Methods and systems for enhancing operation of power plant generating units and systems262
5US20020024332A1Methods and apparatus for controlling electric appliances during reduced power conditions260
6US4031407ASystem and method employing a digital computer with improved programmed operation for automatically synchroni…256
7US4455614AGas turbine and steam turbine combined cycle electric power generating plant having a coordinated and hybridi…239
8US4151725AControl system for regulating large capacity rotating machinery224
9US6891478B2Methods and apparatus for controlling electric appliances during reduced power conditions208
10US20080243352A1Methods and Systems for Model-Based Control of Gas Turbines207

Citation counts inside a searched corpus skew toward older filings simply because they have had longer to accumulate citations — read them as a signal of influence on later filers, not as a ranking of current technical importance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Compressor Stall and Surge Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis

 
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and trend numbers mean for filing strategy

The record counts point to a field where hardware claim space is heavily occupied at the top but the control-logic layer is comparatively open.

Concentration
40.1%
of 3,341 records held by the top 5 assignees

Filing is concentrated, not fragmented

The five leading assignees hold 1,340 of the 3,341 records in scope, and the top ten extend that to 52.2%. That leaves a long tail of the remaining ranked assignees each holding a modest share — new entrants are filing into gaps rather than displacing the leaders.

Based on the full 100-company assignee ranking.
Filing momentum
-42%
filing change, 2021 to 2024

Activity has pulled back from its 2017 peak

Annual filings fell from 125 in 2021 to 73 in 2024. That is a real decline over a complete measurement window, though the 2025-2026 figures are still incomplete due to publication lag and should not be read as confirming a continued drop.

2024 is the most recent year treated as complete.
Technology mix
45.2%
of records classified under F02C

Gas-turbine hardware carries the claim density

F02C and F04D between them touch a large majority of records, reflecting how much of this field's IP sits in mechanical hardware — vanes, bleed valves, casings — rather than in the control software that schedules them.

IPC shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to compressor stall and surge control, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Compressor Stall and Surge Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders are dominated by jet-engine OEMs and industrial gas-turbine makers, with recent-year momentum mostly flat or negative rather than accelerating.

Leader
591
records held by the top-ranked assignee

A single OEM dominates the ranking

The leading assignee's 591 records outstrip the fifth-place holder's 126, a gap wide enough that the leader alone accounts for close to a fifth of all 3,341 records in scope.

Counted by patent family across the ranking.
Second tier
126
records at fifth place

A cluster of major OEMs fills the mid-ranks

From fifth to tenth place, holdings taper from 126 down to 59 records, a group made up largely of established jet-engine and turbine manufacturers rather than new entrants.

Tenth place sits at 59 records.
Momentum
0% YoY
for several top-ranked assignees in the latest year

Recent-year activity has gone flat across the leaders

Several of the most prolific historical filers show zero or negative year-over-year change in the latest year, with the two largest showing -100% YoY. This likely reflects publication lag rather than an actual halt in filing.

Momentum figures cover the most recent recorded year.
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is thin relative to the mechanisms they support.
Stall-inception sensor fusionActive tip-injection actuation timingAdaptive bleed-valve scheduling logicCasing treatment for centrifugal stagesCross-mechanism surge-margin control loops
Rank all filers by momentum →
Year-over-year momentum among leading assignees
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Rolls-Royce plc10%
Honeywell International Inc.10%
General Electric Company0-100%
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.0-100%
United Technologies Corporation0
Ford Global Technologies, LLC0
Westinghouse Electric Corporation0
Hitachi, Ltd.0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Compressor Stall and Surge Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether the goal is freedom-to-operate, competitive tracking or identifying open claim space.

Map claim boundaries around the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 591 of 3,341 records, a freedom-to-operate check for any new bleed-valve or vane-scheduling mechanism should start by mapping that portfolio's claim boundaries directly.

Explore assignee portfolios in Eureka

Track the control-logic gap

G05B and F02D classifications sit well under the hardware classes, suggesting control-software claims around stall-margin scheduling are comparatively open — worth a dedicated search before filing.

Run a white-space search in Eureka

Watch for the 2025-2026 publication catch-up

Because publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, the apparent 2025-2026 slowdown will fill in over the next reporting cycles — re-run the trend query rather than treating the current dip as final.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Compressor Stall and Surge Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions on this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Compressor Stall and Surge Control covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Compressor Stall and Surge Control in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole compressor stall and surge control corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company’s registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.

Help us improve this page

Found incorrect or outdated information? Let us know and we'll get it fixed.