Book a demo

Cut patent&paper research from weeks to hours with PatSnap Eureka AI!

Try now

Concentrated Solar Thermal Storage 2026 — PatSnap Eureka

Concentrated Solar Thermal Storage 2026 — PatSnap Eureka
Tools Explore in Eureka
Reading14 min
PublishedJan 28, 2026
Coverage2010–2026
Technology Landscape 2026

Concentrated Solar Thermal Storage: Patent & Innovation Landscape 2026

CST-TES enables dispatchable renewable electricity by storing solar heat for use when the sun isn’t shining. This report maps the technology regimes, assignee landscape, geographic signals, and frontier IP directions across 80+ patent and literature records spanning 2010–2026.

Fig. 01 — Patent Filings by Jurisdiction (2011–2026)
CST-TES Patent Filings by Jurisdiction: US 5, WO 4, IN 3, ES 1 Bar chart showing patent filing counts for concentrated solar thermal storage across four jurisdictions (2011–2026), based on 80+ retrieved records via PatSnap Eureka. 5 4 3 1 5 filings 4 filings 3 filings 1 filing US WO IN ES
Published by PatSnap Insights Team · · 14 min read Verified by PatSnap Eureka Data
Technology Overview

Three Storage Regimes Across Four Collector Architectures

Concentrated solar thermal storage (CST-TES) divides into three core storage physics regimes: sensible heat storage (SHS), latent heat storage via phase change materials (PCM-LHS), and thermochemical energy storage (TCES). These regimes are implemented across four major CSP collector architectures — parabolic trough (PTC), solar power tower (SPT), linear Fresnel reflector (LFR), and parabolic dish — each imposing different temperature requirements on the storage subsystem.

Among retrieved records, sensible heat storage using molten salt two-tank configurations is described as “the most widespread TES medium” across commercially operational facilities. The canonical binary Solar Salt (60% NaNO₃ + 40% KNO₃) appears across multiple records, including designs for a 100 kW CSPonD prototype at Masdar Institute/MIT and a 100 MW Linear Fresnel plant in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Packed-bed thermocline systems using solid media such as silica rock and concrete are presented as lower-cost alternatives to the two-tank architecture. At the frontier, thermochemical storage offers volumetric energy densities 5–10× those of sensible systems.

A critical enabling function of TES in CSP is dispatchability: the ability to schedule electricity delivery independently of real-time solar flux. This property distinguishes CSP-TES from photovoltaic-battery combinations, particularly for storage durations exceeding 4–10 hours. PatSnap’s analytics platform enables R&D teams to track this evolving IP landscape in real time.

PatSnap Eureka — Analysis based on 80+ patent and literature records retrieved across targeted searches spanning 2010–2026. Explore molten salt TES data ↗
3
Core storage physics regimes (SHS, PCM-LHS, TCES)
4
Major CSP collector architectures
5–10×
Higher volumetric energy density of TCES vs sensible systems
80+
Patent and literature records analyzed (2010–2026)
4–10h
Storage duration where CSP-TES holds economic advantage over PV-battery
100 kW
CSPonD prototype capacity at Masdar Institute/MIT
Key Technology Approaches

Four Patent Clusters Defining the CST-TES Landscape

Retrieved records group into four distinct technology clusters, each representing a different storage physics approach and commercial maturity level.

Cluster 01 — Commercial

Two-Tank Molten Salt Sensible Heat Storage

The dominant commercial architecture stores thermal energy in two tanks of molten salt — one hot, one cold — with Solar Salt (60% NaNO₃ + 40% KNO₃) operating at 290–565°C. Key assignees include Bechtel Power Corporation and Bindingnavale Ranga Krishna Kumar. Constrains power cycle efficiency to Rankine cycle parameters. Documented in plants from 10 MW to 111.7 MW across Spain, USA, Saudi Arabia, and China.

290–565°C operating range
Cluster 02 — Cost Reduction

Packed-Bed Thermocline & Solid-Medium Sensible Storage

A cost-reduction strategy using a single stratified tank filled with solid packing (silica rock, concrete, steel) through which HTF circulates. Air and gaseous HTFs are frequently paired with this architecture, enabling atmospheric operation without freeze-risk fluids. The dataset also documents direct-irradiation solid storage, where reflected sunlight strikes the solid medium directly through a gated aperture. Skibo Systems LLC and HyperLight Energy are key assignees.

Single-tank thermocline
Cluster 03 — Growth Area

Latent Heat Storage via Phase Change Materials (PCM)

PCM-based storage exploits the latent heat of fusion at a near-isothermal phase transition temperature, delivering higher energy density than sensible systems and isothermal heat release beneficial for power cycle integration. A 2023 review identifies PCM as a significant growth area for CSP over the past decade, with nano-enhanced PCMs emerging as a performance frontier. Key challenges include low thermal conductivity and encapsulation integrity under thermal cycling. P S R Engineering College’s 2026 IN filing targets non-corrosive ceramic PCM buffers at 300–600°C.

300–600°C ceramic PCM (2026 frontier)
Cluster 04 — Pre-Commercial

Thermochemical Energy Storage (TCES)

TCES systems store energy as chemical bond enthalpy via reversible endothermic/exothermic reactions, achieving volumetric energy densities approximately 5–10× those of sensible heat systems with near-zero thermal standby losses — enabling theoretically seasonal storage. Key reaction systems include calcium looping (CaO/CaCO₃), metal oxide redox cycles (CaAl₀.₂Mn₀.₈O₂.₉₋δ), and destabilized lithium hydrides (LiSi, LiAl, LiSn). Described as “the less studied and the most attractive” TES option. Abengoa Solar’s WO/US/ES filings (2013–2015) represent the foundational IP cluster.

5–10× energy density vs sensible
PatSnap Eureka — Technology cluster analysis derived from 80+ retrieved patent and literature records. PatSnap’s chemicals and materials solution supports deep-dive material analysis for TES R&D teams. Explore full cluster data ↗
Data Visualisation

Innovation Timeline & Energy Density Comparison

Key quantitative signals from the retrieved patent and literature corpus, illustrating the multi-phase evolution of CST-TES and the relative performance of storage regimes.

CST-TES Innovation Phase Timeline (2011–2026)

Four distinct development phases identified from publication dates across 80+ retrieved records, from foundational hybrid concepts to 2024–2026 frontier filings.

CST-TES Innovation Timeline: Pre-2013 Foundational, 2014–2018 Diversification, 2019–2022 Maturation, 2023–2026 Frontier Surge Horizontal phase timeline showing four innovation periods in concentrated solar thermal storage based on publication and filing dates across the retrieved dataset, via PatSnap Eureka. PRE-2013 Foundational 2014–2018 Diversification 2019–2022 Maturation 2023–2026 Frontier Surge Skibo WO 2011 Abengoa WO 2013 Bechtel US 2015 China CSP review 2018 sCO₂ integration studies EU-SOLARIS 2022 PhotonStor US 2024 Sol Energia WO 2025 P S R Eng. IN 2026 Source: PatSnap Eureka — 80+ retrieved records, 2010–2026

TES Volumetric Energy Density by Storage Regime

Thermochemical storage achieves 5–10× the volumetric energy density of sensible heat systems, with PCM-LHS occupying an intermediate position, based on retrieved literature records.

TES Volumetric Energy Density: TCES 5–10× baseline, PCM-LHS intermediate, Sensible Heat (SHS) 1× baseline Comparative bar chart of relative volumetric energy density across three thermal energy storage regimes for concentrated solar power, as documented in retrieved literature records via PatSnap Eureka. TCES PCM-LHS SHS 5–10× baseline ~2–4× baseline 1× baseline TCES (pre-commercial) PCM-LHS (growth area) SHS (commercial) Source: PatSnap Eureka — retrieved literature records, 2010–2026
PatSnap Eureka — Energy density multiples for TCES vs sensible systems documented across multiple retrieved studies. Explore the underlying data using PatSnap Analytics. Explore the data ↗
Application Domains

From Utility-Scale Power to Desalination and Grid Services

CST-TES applications span five distinct domains, each with different scale, temperature, and economic requirements documented across the retrieved corpus.

Utility Power
10–111.7 MW Plants
Molten salt tower and parabolic trough plants with 6–15 hours TES. Projects in Spain, USA, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, India, Honduras, Morocco, China. LCOE target: 6 cents/kWh.
Economic Benchmark
Crescent Dunes (110 MW) recorded $2.38/kWh effective cost — highlighting gap to 6 cents/kWh target as of 2020.
Industrial Heat & Desalination
Process Heat ~600°C
CSPth Hybrid Central Tower concept targets ~600°C for industrial applications. Concrete-TES for pasteurization and small-scale parabolic trough for processes below 180°C also documented.
Solar Desalination
Choi (US 2021) uses single-phase fluid storage at 190–400°C / 20–300 bar for multi-effect distillation. CSP tower desalination targets $1.48/m³ levelized water cost.
🔒
Unlock Grid Services & Distributed Applications
See how CSP-TES repositions as a grid-scale long-duration storage platform for 100% variable renewable systems, plus small-scale ORC applications.
Grid-hybrid chargingORC integrationCSPonD prototype
Unlock full analysis →
PatSnap Eureka — Application domain analysis from retrieved patent and literature records. PatSnap Life Sciences and energy sector solutions support cross-domain technology intelligence. Explore application domains ↗
Geographic & Assignee Landscape

Fragmented IP with India Emerging as Dual-Role Jurisdiction

Assignee Jurisdiction(s) Filing Years Status Technology Focus
Abengoa Solar Inc./LLC WO, US, ES 2013–2015 Inactive (3 filings) Grid-tied high-temp TES with electric heating element hybridization
PhotonStor Corp. US, IN 2024, 2026 Active / Pending Near-blackbody receiver-integrated TES, direct irradiation storage
Bechtel Power Corporation US 2015 Inactive Hybrid collector field CSP plant
Skibo Systems LLC WO 2011 Single filing Multistage cascade TES with geothermal integration
🔒
Unlock Full Assignee Table
See all assignees including Sol Energia, P S R Engineering College, Choi Peter B., and Andric Milos — with status, jurisdiction, and technology focus.
Sol Energia WO 2025Choi US 2021Andric WO 2021+ more
Unlock full table →
PatSnap Eureka — 87% of commercial CSP projects through the early 2020s were located in Spain and the USA, per retrieved literature. India is emerging as both demand market and active IP filing jurisdiction. See how IP teams use PatSnap for jurisdiction strategy. Explore assignee landscape ↗
Emerging Directions

Five Frontier Signals from the 2023–2026 Filing Cluster

The most recent filings and literature records in this dataset identify five convergent innovation directions that define the current frontier of CST-TES IP development.

High-Temperature Storage for sCO₂ Power Cycles

The most consistent frontier signal: coupling next-generation supercritical CO₂ Brayton cycles (700–1000°C turbine inlet temperatures) with compatible TES media. Records document redox-active metal oxide particles (CAM28, achieving 1,200°C air delivery) and destabilized lithium hydrides (LiSi, LiSn at 700–750°C for sCO₂). A 2023 dual receiver-storage design using cast steel at 850–1000 K targets sCO₂ integration via beam-down optics.

Near-Blackbody Receiver-Integrated Storage

PhotonStor Corp. (US 2024, IN 2026) and Andric Milos (WO 2021) describe architectures where concentrated sunlight strikes the storage medium directly — eliminating HTF thermal resistance losses and pumping infrastructure. Consistent with the CSPonD concept at Masdar/MIT (2015), this represents a conceptual convergence toward receiver-storage unification that challenges conventional plant topology.

Non-Corrosive PCM Alternatives to Molten Salt

The 2026 IN filing from P S R Engineering College explicitly targets replacement of corrosive molten salts with ceramic-based or specialized solid PCM buffers at 300–600°C. This addresses one of the most persistent operational barriers — high-temperature corrosion of metallic containment components — and is consistent with the broader PCM research surge documented in the 2023 review literature.

🔒
Unlock Grid-Hybrid & Thermochemical Seasonal Storage
Access the full analysis of grid-hybrid charging architectures and thermochemical seasonal storage pathways from the 2023–2026 filing cluster.
Sol Energia WO 2025Calcium looping TCESMetal oxide redox
Unlock frontier signals →
PatSnap Eureka — Frontier signals derived from 2023–2026 filings including PhotonStor Corp., Sol Energia Inc., and P S R Engineering College. Explore the PatSnap Analytics platform for white-space identification. Explore frontier filings ↗
Strategic Implications

Five IP and R&D Strategy Signals for CST-TES Decision-Makers

Key strategic takeaways for IP professionals, R&D teams, and technology strategists, derived from the patent and literature corpus.

Cost & Corrosion Risk

Molten Salt Two-Tank Systems Face Headwinds

The dominant commercial TES architecture has well-documented operational challenges including freeze risk, high-temperature corrosion, and elevated capital cost. IP and R&D teams should assess whether portfolio strategies weighted toward next-generation materials — PCMs, redox oxides, destabilized hydrides — offer defensible differentiation, particularly as ceramic and solid-medium alternatives accumulate patent filings in IN and WO jurisdictions. See the PatSnap analytics platform for portfolio gap analysis.

Freeze risk · High-temp corrosion · Capital cost
White-Space Opportunity

The sCO₂-TES Interface is an Underprotected IP Frontier

Multiple literature records identify supercritical CO₂ Brayton cycle integration as the primary pathway to sub-6 cent/kWh LCOE, yet the patent dataset shows minimal issued IP specifically covering TES-sCO₂ integration architectures. This represents a white-space opportunity for R&D organizations pursuing high-temperature solid particle or metal oxide storage systems. Access global patent databases through PatSnap’s open API for freedom-to-operate analysis.

Sub-6¢/kWh LCOE target · White-space IP
Jurisdiction Strategy

India is an Emerging Dual-Role Jurisdiction

India appears as both a growing demand market (techno-economic studies in Rajasthan, Udaipur) and an active IP filing jurisdiction, with three recent IN filings (2016, 2026×2) in this dataset. IP strategists entering Asian markets should prioritize IN prosecution alongside CN, where CSP policy support and installed capacity ambitions are documented at the national level. China’s CSP industry review (2018) and subsequent policy analysis (2021) indicate government-backed ambitions.

IN filings: 2016, 2026×2 · CN policy ambition
Disruptive Architecture Risk

Direct Irradiation TES Challenges Conventional Plant Topology

Patents from Andric Milos (WO 2021) and PhotonStor Corp. (US 2024, IN 2026) converge on eliminating the HTF loop between receiver and storage — a structural disruption to conventional CSP plant architecture. Incumbents with IP covering HTF-based systems should monitor this cluster as a potential design-around threat to established two-tank and thermocline portfolios. Track emerging filers with PatSnap competitive intelligence tools.

HTF loop elimination · Design-around risk
PatSnap Eureka — Strategic implications derived from retrieved patent and literature corpus. Business model and regulatory frameworks for grid-hybrid CSP-TES remain underdeveloped — a first-mover IP positioning opportunity. Explore strategic signals ↗
Frequently asked questions

Concentrated Solar Thermal Storage — key questions answered

Still have questions? PatSnap Eureka can answer them instantly from patent and research data. Ask Eureka ↗
PatSnap Eureka

Generate Your Own CST-TES Technology Landscape Report

Join 18,000+ innovators using PatSnap Eureka to generate reports like this one for any technology area — from molten salt storage to sCO₂ integration and thermochemical seasonal storage.

Ask anything about concentrated solar thermal storage.
PatSnap Eureka searches patents and research literature to answer instantly.
Powered by PatSnap Eureka
Link copied to clipboard