https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/conductive-textile-patent-landscape-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-08-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Conductive Textiles
Conductive textile patents: who holds the claims and where filing is headed

A data-led view of conductive textile patents: who holds the largest families, how filing has moved since 2017, and where the technology map still has open claim space.

892
Published Records
20%
Top-5 Share of All Records
-24%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
US
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth = 2021 (29 records) → 2024 (22); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 892 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.

Check your own idea
Published byPatsnap Research··7 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What the conductive textile patent record shows

Conductive textile filings sit at the junction of three drafting traditions: textile machinery claims written against weaving and knitting classes, garment and outerwear claims covering how the fabric is worn, and electronics claims covering the sensing or power function the fabric performs. 892 records published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off carry at least one of these framings, and most carry two or three at once. That overlap is the first thing a freedom-to-operate review has to account for: a single conductive yarn structure can be blocked by a weaving-process claim, a garment-construction claim, and a sensor-integration claim filed by three different parties.

The assignee ranking is concentrated at the top but not dominated by a single filer: the leader holds 47 records, fifth place holds 25, and the field flattens out quickly after that. Below the ranked group sits a long tail of entrants with one or two filings each, which is typical of a technology still being claimed from multiple adjacent industries rather than owned by an incumbent supply chain.

Filing activity and technology composition, 2017-2026
  1. 1MILLIKEN & CO47
  2. 2SANKO TEKSTIL ISLETMELERI SANAYI VE TICARET AS43
  3. 3GOOGLE LLC32
  4. 4HEALTHWATCH LTD30
  5. 5KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV25
  6. 6FOOTFALLS & HEARTBEATS (UK) LTD24
  7. 7INTELLIGENT TEXTILES19
  8. 8MYANT INC18
  9. 9IMAGINE INTELLIGENT MATERIALS LTD16
  10. 10SYSTEMS PROTECTION GROUP US LLC13
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductive Textile Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The Numbers

Filing trend, technology split and concentration

These figures come directly from the 892 records in scope. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 counts are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown.

Filing rose through 2019, then eased back

Annual filings climbed from 55 in 2017 to a peak of 58 in 2019, then declined toward a more complete-looking 2021 to 2024 span, where the count moved from 29 to 22 records — a 24% drop over three years. The 2025-2026 figures are undercounts by construction and should not be compared against that trend.

Filing rose through 2019, then eased back015304560552017201858201920202021202220232024202532026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.

Woven and knit fabric classes carry the bulk of the filing

D03D (woven fabrics and weaving) appears in 52.1% of the 892 records and D04B (knitting) in 35.1%, confirming that most conductive textile claims are still anchored in fabric-construction language rather than pure electronics. A41D (outerwear) at 23.4% and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) at 17.2% show the two largest application pulls — apparel and health monitoring — while H05K (printed circuits) at 11.3% marks where textile and rigid-electronics drafting genuinely overlap.

Woven and knit fabric classes carry the bulk of the filingD03D · Woven fabrics & weaving46552.1%D04B · Knitting31335.1%A41D · Outerwear & garments20923.4%A61B · Diagnosis & surgery15317.2%D02G · Yarn texturing & crimping15217.0%B32B · Layered products & laminates10611.9%H05K · Printed circuits & assemblies10111.3%D06M · Textile chemical treatment9610.8%Other1,041116.7%

Shares are the percentage of the 892 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductive Textile Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Conductive Textile Patent Landscape with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about conductive textile patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key Patents

The most-cited records and a representative recent filing

Representative Recent Filing
US11913146B12024-02-27

Carbon nanotube yarn cathode using textile manufacturing methods (US11913146B1)

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

The claim covers an electrode built from a conductive textile structure whose outer surface carries a continuous carbon nanotube fibre fabric, formed by knitting, weaving, sewing or embroidery, with the fabric's looped or interlaced face made from a single continuous CNT fibre, ribbon or thread.Filed by the US Air Force and granted in 2024, it applies conventional textile manufacturing steps — knitting, weaving, sewing, embroidery — to a carbon nanotube fibre rather than a conventional conductive yarn.

US11913146B1 — patent drawing 1US11913146B1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Most-cited conductive textile patents
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US6381482B1Fabric or garment with integrated flexible information infrastructure685
2US6210771B1Electrically active textiles and articles made therefrom577
3US6080690ATextile fabric with integrated sensing device and clothing fabricated thereof438
4US5906004ATextile fabric with integrated electrically conductive fibers and clothing fabricated thereof420
5US6727197B1Wearable transmission device318
6US5484983AElectric heating element in knitted fabric166
7WO2001002052A2Garment comprising electrode158
8US20060281382A1Surface functional electro-textile with functionality modulation capability, methods for making the same, and…157
9GB2443208ATextile pressure sensor150
10US20040259391A1Construction and connection technique in textile structures130

Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of prior-art weight, not of which claims are current or commercially active.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductive Textile Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the concentration and technology data mean for filing strategy

Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC classes and receiving offices are put side by side.

Concentration
19.8%
of 892 records held by the top 5

A leader, not a monopoly

The top 5 assignees combined hold 177 of the 892 records in scope, 19.8% of the field, with the leader alone at 47. That leaves roughly four-fifths of the field spread across a long tail of the remaining ranked companies plus unranked single filers — a structure where a new entrant is competing against fragmented prior art rather than one dominant blocking portfolio.

Based on the assignee ranking of 100 companies.
Technology mix
52.1%
of records in D03D (woven fabrics)

Fabric construction still leads electronics integration

More than half of all records touch D03D and over a third touch D04B, meaning the dominant claim language in this field is still about how the fabric is built, not just what circuit sits on it. H05K, the pure printed-circuit class, reaches only 11.3% — genuine textile-electronics fusion claims remain a minority of the corpus.

IPC shares sum to more than 100% because records carry multiple classes.
Filing geography
272
US receiving-office records

US and EPO carry the bulk of filing activity

The United States receiving office accounts for the largest single block at 272 records, ahead of Europe at 149 and WIPO/PCT filings at 98. Germany, South Korea and Australia follow at smaller but still active volumes, indicating the field is being prosecuted across several jurisdictions rather than filed defensively in one home market.

Counts are by receiving office, not by inventor or assignee country.
Trend
-24%
filing change, 2021 to 2024

Growth cooled after the 2019 peak

Annual filings peaked at 58 in 2019 and the most recent complete span shows a 24% decline from 29 records in 2021 to 22 in 2024. That is a real signal over a comparable window, distinct from the necessarily incomplete 2025-2026 counts still arriving in the data.

2025 and 2026 figures are partial due to publication lag.
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to conductive textile patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductive Textile Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's Next

Where to take this analysis

The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, sizing a licensing opportunity, or deciding where to file.

Map claims against your own conductive yarn or fabric structure

Run your specific fibre, weave or knit construction against the most-cited records to see which claim elements you would need to design around before committing to a manufacturing process.

Explore in Eureka

Track the under-claimed textile-electronics overlap

H05K crossover sits at just 11.3% of records — use claim charting in Eureka to test whether a specific sensing or power-delivery integration is still open in your target jurisdiction.

Explore in Eureka

Watch the long tail for acquisition or licensing targets

Most of the field sits outside the top five assignees; screening the single- and double-filing entrants can surface acquisition or licensing targets before they consolidate.

Explore in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductive Textile Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about conductive textile patents

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductive Textile Patent Landscape covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-08-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Conductive Textile Patent Landscape in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole conductive textile patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.