Eureka on the web
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →A data-led view of conductive textile patents: who holds the largest families, how filing has moved since 2017, and where the technology map still has open claim space.
Filing growth = 2021 (29 records) → 2024 (22); 2024 is the last year we treat as complete. Top-5 share = the 5 largest assignees ÷ all 892 records in scope (CR5), not the ranked leaders only.
Conductive textile filings sit at the junction of three drafting traditions: textile machinery claims written against weaving and knitting classes, garment and outerwear claims covering how the fabric is worn, and electronics claims covering the sensing or power function the fabric performs. 892 records published between 2015 and the 2026 data cut-off carry at least one of these framings, and most carry two or three at once. That overlap is the first thing a freedom-to-operate review has to account for: a single conductive yarn structure can be blocked by a weaving-process claim, a garment-construction claim, and a sensor-integration claim filed by three different parties.
The assignee ranking is concentrated at the top but not dominated by a single filer: the leader holds 47 records, fifth place holds 25, and the field flattens out quickly after that. Below the ranked group sits a long tail of entrants with one or two filings each, which is typical of a technology still being claimed from multiple adjacent industries rather than owned by an incumbent supply chain.
Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.
These figures come directly from the 892 records in scope. Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 and 2026 counts are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown.
Annual filings climbed from 55 in 2017 to a peak of 58 in 2019, then declined toward a more complete-looking 2021 to 2024 span, where the count moved from 29 to 22 records — a 24% drop over three years. The 2025-2026 figures are undercounts by construction and should not be compared against that trend.
Publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in. Growth rates on this page therefore end at 2024; running them to the last bar would understate the field.
D03D (woven fabrics and weaving) appears in 52.1% of the 892 records and D04B (knitting) in 35.1%, confirming that most conductive textile claims are still anchored in fabric-construction language rather than pure electronics. A41D (outerwear) at 23.4% and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) at 17.2% show the two largest application pulls — apparel and health monitoring — while H05K (printed circuits) at 11.3% marks where textile and rigid-electronics drafting genuinely overlap.
Shares are the percentage of the 892 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.
This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about conductive textile patent landscape and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.
Try EurekaThe claim covers an electrode built from a conductive textile structure whose outer surface carries a continuous carbon nanotube fibre fabric, formed by knitting, weaving, sewing or embroidery, with the fabric's looped or interlaced face made from a single continuous CNT fibre, ribbon or thread.Filed by the US Air Force and granted in 2024, it applies conventional textile manufacturing steps — knitting, weaving, sewing, embroidery — to a carbon nanotube fibre rather than a conventional conductive yarn.


| # | Publication no. | Patent title | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US6381482B1 | Fabric or garment with integrated flexible information infrastructure | 685 |
| 2 | US6210771B1 | Electrically active textiles and articles made therefrom | 577 |
| 3 | US6080690A | Textile fabric with integrated sensing device and clothing fabricated thereof | 438 |
| 4 | US5906004A | Textile fabric with integrated electrically conductive fibers and clothing fabricated thereof | 420 |
| 5 | US6727197B1 | Wearable transmission device | 318 |
| 6 | US5484983A | Electric heating element in knitted fabric | 166 |
| 7 | WO2001002052A2 | Garment comprising electrode | 158 |
| 8 | US20060281382A1 | Surface functional electro-textile with functionality modulation capability, methods for making the same, and… | 157 |
| 9 | GB2443208A | Textile pressure sensor | 150 |
| 10 | US20040259391A1 | Construction and connection technique in textile structures | 130 |
Citation counts reflect influence within the searched corpus and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of prior-art weight, not of which claims are current or commercially active.
Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.
When you want the answer in the next five minutes.
The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.
Run your analysis now →When it has to run inside your own pipeline.
Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.
Browse MCP servers →Three patterns stand out once family counts, IPC classes and receiving offices are put side by side.
The top 5 assignees combined hold 177 of the 892 records in scope, 19.8% of the field, with the leader alone at 47. That leaves roughly four-fifths of the field spread across a long tail of the remaining ranked companies plus unranked single filers — a structure where a new entrant is competing against fragmented prior art rather than one dominant blocking portfolio.
More than half of all records touch D03D and over a third touch D04B, meaning the dominant claim language in this field is still about how the fabric is built, not just what circuit sits on it. H05K, the pure printed-circuit class, reaches only 11.3% — genuine textile-electronics fusion claims remain a minority of the corpus.
The United States receiving office accounts for the largest single block at 272 records, ahead of Europe at 149 and WIPO/PCT filings at 98. Germany, South Korea and Australia follow at smaller but still active volumes, indicating the field is being prosecuted across several jurisdictions rather than filed defensively in one home market.
Annual filings peaked at 58 in 2019 and the most recent complete span shows a 24% decline from 29 records in 2021 to 22 in 2024. That is a real signal over a comparable window, distinct from the necessarily incomplete 2025-2026 counts still arriving in the data.
Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to conductive textile patent landscape, with the prior art for and against each one.
The dataset points to specific next steps depending on whether you are scoping freedom-to-operate, sizing a licensing opportunity, or deciding where to file.
Run your specific fibre, weave or knit construction against the most-cited records to see which claim elements you would need to design around before committing to a manufacturing process.
Explore in EurekaH05K crossover sits at just 11.3% of records — use claim charting in Eureka to test whether a specific sensing or power-delivery integration is still open in your target jurisdiction.
Explore in EurekaMost of the field sits outside the top five assignees; screening the single- and double-filing entrants can surface acquisition or licensing targets before they consolidate.
Explore in EurekaThe assignee ranking covers 100 companies, with the leader holding 47 of the 892 records in scope and the fifth-placed company holding 25. Combined, the top five assignees hold 19.8% of all records, which means the field has a visible leader but no single dominant blocking portfolio. Beyond the ranked group there is a long tail of companies with only one or two filings each, spanning textile machinery makers, wearable-electronics firms and medical-device companies. Anyone assessing competitive position should look at both the ranked leaders and the fragmented tail, since the tail is where niche technical approaches often sit.
Filing peaked at 58 records in 2019 and the most recent complete comparison shows a 24% decline, from 29 records in 2021 to 22 in 2024. Figures for 2025 and 2026 appear lower still, but that is expected: publication typically lags filing by around 18 months, so the newest years are undercounted and should not be read as evidence of further decline. The honest read is that filing cooled after a 2019 peak and has not yet clearly recovered based on the complete years available.
The bulk of records sit in fabric-construction classes: D03D, woven fabrics and weaving, covers 52.1% of the 892 records, and D04B, knitting, covers 35.1%. Application-side classes follow, with A41D (outerwear and garments) at 23.4% and A61B (diagnosis and surgery) at 17.2%, showing apparel and health monitoring as the two largest end uses. Pure electronics integration, H05K, appears in only 11.3% of records, meaning most patents still frame the invention primarily as a textile with an added function rather than a circuit with a fabric substrate.
US11913146B1, granted in 2024 to the US Air Force, claims an electrode built from a conductive textile structure whose outer surface carries a continuous carbon nanotube fibre fabric formed by knitting, weaving, sewing or embroidery. It does not claim conductive textiles generally; it is specific to a carbon nanotube fibre used as the conductive element and to the electrode-cathode application. Work using conventional metal-coated or intrinsically conductive polymer yarns, or work outside the electrode/cathode use case, sits outside this claim's scope, though anyone building CNT-fibre-based textile electrodes should chart their construction against it directly.
The technology composition data shows H05K (printed circuits) at only 11.3% of records against D03D and D04B each above a third, which suggests the deeper fusion of textile-construction claims with circuit-level claims is still a minority activity. Combined with a long tail of single-filing entrants below the top five assignees, this points to under-claimed space in fully integrated woven or knit circuitry rather than fabric-plus-attached-sensor designs. A first claim in this space would typically need to tie a specific weave or knit topology directly to a defined electrical function, rather than claiming the fabric and the circuit as separately joined elements.
Go past this page: query the whole conductive textile patent landscape corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.
Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.
Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.
Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.
Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.