https://www.patsnap.com/resources/blog/rd-blog/conductor-temperature-sensing-for-line-rating-patent-landscape/ · Patsnap · data cut-off 2026-07-31 · downloaded from the live page
Patent Landscape · Dynamic Line Rating
Conductor Temperature Sensing Patents: Mapping Line Rating Innovation
  • Concentrated at the top. the five most active assignees hold 71 of 77 records in scope (92.2%), leaving a thin tail below tenth place.
  • Filing is accelerating, not cooling. filings rose from 1 in 2021 to 3 in 2024, a +200% span, with a peak of 7 records in 2022.
  • Sensing overlaps grid protection. H02J power-supply and grid-systems claims appear in 68.8% of records, well ahead of the 54.5% carrying temperature-measurement (G01K) classes.
Get a prior-art report on your approach
77
Published Records
92%
Top-5 Share of All Records
+200%
Filing Growth 2021→2024
EP
Leading Jurisdiction

Filing growth compares 2021 (1 records) with 2024 (3) — a three-year span. 2024 is the most recent year we treat as complete: publication lags filing by roughly 18 months, so 2025 onwards are still filling in and any growth rate that ends there would understate the field. Top-5 share is the combined record count of the five largest assignees divided by all 77 records in scope (CR5), not by the ranked leaders only.

Published byPatsnap Research··6 min readSourced from Patsnap Eureka
Overview

What this landscape covers

This review covers 77 published records filed or published between 2015 and mid-2026 that combine conductor temperature sensing, dynamic line rating and forecast or redundancy elements — the search pairs core sensing terms with operational qualifiers such as weather station input, capacity gain and measurement redundancy so that generic grid-monitoring filings without a line-rating angle fall outside scope.

Because publication trails filing by roughly eighteen months, the 2025 and 2026 counts in the trend chart are still filling in and should not be read as a slowdown. The clearest signal in the data is where claim density sits: sensing hardware and grid-systems integration dominate, while measurement transmission and protective-circuit classes each cover under a third of records.

Filing activity and technology composition
  1. 1NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP28
  2. 2AMPACIMON14
  3. 3UNDERGROUND SYSTEMS INC12
  4. 4INFRAVISION HLDG PTY LTD10
  5. 5SOUTHWIRE CO LLC7
  6. 6GENERAL ELECTRIC CO1
  7. 7FERNANDES ROOSEVELT1
  8. 8DIGITAL PATH1
  9. 9DAVIS MURRAY W1
  10. 10LAKI POWER EHF1
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee ranking and totals. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Let an AI agent run this analysis on your own technology

Pick a task. Every answer cites the patents behind it.

10,000 free credits to start
The data

Filing trends and technology composition

Two views of the same 77 records: how filing activity has moved year over year, and how those records classify across IPC subclasses.

Filing trend, 2017–2026

Annual filings rose unevenly from 2 records in 2017 to a peak of 7 in 2022, then eased before the 2021→2024 span shows growth of +200% (1 to 3 records). The final two years in the window are still incomplete due to publication lag.

Filing trend, 2017–2026024682201720182019202020217202220232024202502026Most recent year is partial — publication lag means later filings are not yet visible.

IPC subclass composition

H02J (power supply and grid systems) and G01R (electric and magnetic measurement) lead at 68.8% and 59.7% of the 77 records respectively, with G01K temperature measurement close behind at 54.5%. Because records carry multiple IPC codes, these shares sum past 100% and should each be read against the full 77-record base, not against each other.

IPC subclass compositionH02J · Power supply & grid systems5368.8%G01R · Electric & magnetic measurement4659.7%G01K · Temperature measurement4254.5%G01D · Measuring (general) & recording3140.3%H01J · Electron & discharge tubes2937.7%G08C · Transmission of measured values2329.9%H02H · Protective circuit arrangements2329.9%H04B · Transmission (general)2329.9%Other80103.9%

Shares are the percentage of the 77 records in scope. A patent can carry several IPC classes, so the shares add up to more than 100%.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Filing trend and technology composition. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.

Go deeper on Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating with Eureka

This page is one run against one query. Ask Eureka your own question about conductor temperature sensing for line rating and every answer comes back with the patent numbers behind it.

Try Eureka
Key patents

Most-cited prior art in this space

Representative filing
WO2022097178A12022-05-12

WO2022097178A1 — Surveillance and weather stations on overhead power lines

LAKI POWER EHF.

The application describes a clamp-mounted apparatus for phase wires that harvests power by magnetic induction from the line current and uses it to run onboard sensors plus active cooling or heating to keep electronics within operating range in extreme outdoor temperatures. It positions itself as a combined meteorological and monitoring station rather than a single-purpose temperature sensor.Filed by Laki Power ehf., published 2022-05-12.

WO2022097178A1 — patent drawing 1WO2022097178A1 — patent drawing 2
View full record
Highest-citation records
#Publication no.Patent titleCitations
1US20080077336A1Power line universal monitor764
2US4886980ATransmission line sensor apparatus operable with near zero current line conditions339
3US4746241AHinge clamp for securing a sensor module on a power transmission line301
4US8386198B2Real-time power line rating242
5US4689752ASystem and apparatus for monitoring and control of a bulk electric power delivery system219
6US4268818AReal-time parameter sensor-transmitter143
7US4420752AReal-time parameter sensor-transmitter120
8US4635055AApparatus for measuring the temperature and other parameters of an electic power conductor116
9US4796027AApparatus for data transmission from multiple sources on a single channel90
10US4794328ATool for mounting a sensor module on a live power transmission line81

Citation counts accumulate over time and favour older filings; treat them as a signal of influence on later filers rather than of current commercial relevance.

Each row carries its publication number; clicking a row searches Eureka by that number.

Source: Patsnap Eureka. Citation counts and representative records. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Run it yourself

Put your own technology through the same analysis


  
Where to run it
Fastest

Eureka on the web

When you want the answer in the next five minutes.

The agent works the prompt against patents and technical literature, citing every source.

Run your analysis now →
For builders

MCP server & REST API

When it has to run inside your own pipeline.

Patent search, landscape analysis and assignee resolution as MCP tools. Drop them into any agent framework, or call REST directly.

Browse MCP servers →
Insights

What the numbers say

Three findings that shape how a freedom-to-operate or whitespace review should be scoped in this field.

Concentration
92.2%
of 77 records held by top 5 assignees

A small group holds nearly all the ground

The top five assignees combined account for 71 of the 77 records in scope, a 92.2% share, while the ranking runs to only 13 companies before it thins out entirely. This is not a fragmented emerging field — it is one where a handful of filers set the terms of the claim space.

Ranked assignee data, 13 companies
Growth
+200%
filings, 2021 to 2024

Momentum is building, not fading

Filings moved from 1 record in 2021 to 3 in 2024, a +200% rise over that span, with the field's overall peak of 7 records reached in 2022. Read the tail end of the trend cautiously: 2025 and 2026 will fill in further as publication catches up with filing.

Filing trend, 2017-2026
Technology mix
68.8%
of records carry H02J grid-systems classes

Sensing is claimed as a grid-systems problem

H02J power-supply and grid-systems classes appear in 68.8% of the 77 records, ahead of G01R measurement at 59.7% and G01K temperature measurement at 54.5%. Filers are more often protecting how sensing data feeds grid operation than protecting the sensor element itself.

IPC composition, 8 subclasses tracked
Eureka AI Agent
Looking for what nobody has claimed yet?

Eureka can read the same corpus for gaps instead of for coverage: under-claimed branches adjacent to conductor temperature sensing for line rating, with the prior art for and against each one.

Find the white space →
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Co-assignee relationships and derived observations. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
Players

Who is filing, and where the gaps sit

The ranked leaders span utilities, sensor specialists and equipment makers; below the top tier, filing activity drops off sharply.

Leader
28 records
top-ranked assignee

One filer sets the pace

The leading assignee holds 28 of the 77 records in scope, well clear of fifth place at 7. That gap suggests an early and sustained filing programme rather than a recent push.

Assignee ranking, 13 companies
Mid-tier
7 records
fifth-place assignee

A workable second tier, then a steep drop

Fifth place holds 7 records, but tenth place falls to just 1 — the ranking's long tail is thin. Co-assignment activity is also limited, with only 3 co-assignee pairs identified across the dataset.

Co-assignee pairs: 3
Momentum
0 latest year
across tracked leading assignees

Recent-year activity has gone quiet among named leaders

None of the leading assignees tracked for recent-year momentum show filings in the latest year, consistent with publication lag rather than an actual pullback. Newer or smaller filers may be filling that gap ahead of the data catching up.

Recent-year momentum, 6 assignees tracked
🔍
Under-claimed branches worth a closer look
Sub-areas where filing density is comparatively low relative to the core sensing and grid-integration claims.
forecast-horizon calibration modelsmeasurement-redundancy fault arbitrationinduction-harvested sensor power budgetsprotective-circuit interaction with dynamic ratingsoperator-acceptance interface design
Rank all filers by momentum →
Recent-year filing momentum
AssigneeRecent yearYoY
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp0
Ampacimon0
Infravision Holdings Pty Ltd0
Southwire Co LLC0
Underground Systems Inc0
LANCASTER MARK0
University of Liège0
DAVIS MURRAY W0
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Assignee-level momentum. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
What's next

Where to take this analysis

The landscape points to where claim space is dense and where it is still open — the next step is testing a specific claim or design against it.

Check freedom-to-operate against the leader's portfolio

With one assignee holding 28 of 77 records, any new filing in core sensing or clamp-mounted hardware should be checked against that portfolio first.

Run a freedom-to-operate check in Eureka

Draft around the under-claimed branches

Forecast-horizon calibration and measurement-redundancy arbitration show lighter filing density than core sensing hardware — a first claim there has more room to move.

Draft claims with Eureka

Track the incomplete recent years

2025 and 2026 filings are still publishing; revisit the trend once the lag closes to see whether the 2021-2024 growth rate continued.

Set a monitoring alert in Eureka
Source: Patsnap Eureka. Forward-looking reading of the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP
FAQ

Common questions about this landscape

Answers are grounded in the same dataset. Derived from a Patsnap search on Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating covering 2015–2026, data cut-off 2026-07-31. Counts reflect published records only and shift as new filings publish.Run this in Eureka MCP

Research Conductor Temperature Sensing for Line Rating in depth with Eureka

Go past this page: query the whole conductor temperature sensing for line rating corpus yourself, in your own scope.
Every answer comes back with patent numbers you can open.

Try Eureka

Disclaimer. This page is generated from Patsnap Eureka data drawn from a limited snapshot of global patent and scientific-literature records, and is provided for general information and reference only.

Patent data carries inherent limitations: recent filings (typically the most recent 18–24 months) are under-counted due to standard publication lag; counts may be reported at either a patent-family or a patent-record basis and are not always directly comparable; classification, applicant-name, and citation data may contain errors, duplicates, or omissions; and the underlying search query defines and constrains the scope shown. As a result, the analysis may be incomplete or inaccurate and may not reflect the full technology landscape.

Nothing on this page constitutes an exhaustive prior-art, novelty, freedom-to-operate, or validity search, nor does it constitute legal, financial, investment, or professional advice, and it should not be relied upon as such. Any patent, commercial, or strategic decision should be verified independently and reviewed with qualified patent, legal, and domain professionals. Patsnap makes no warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, completeness, or fitness for any particular purpose of the information presented.

Machine translation. Assignee and organisation names originally recorded in Chinese, Japanese or Korean have been rendered into English by an AI translation step so that the tables stay readable. These renderings are best-effort and may not match a company's registered English name; the original name is what the underlying patent record carries, and it is what any Eureka query launched from this page uses.